Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

64 PROCARE – phase 2 KCE reports 81Figure 17. Mean corrected rank per centre with at least 10 patients in thedenominator for at least 6 of the 10 measurable QI (administrative cohort).1100,990,880,77Mean corrected rank0,60,50,4654Number of measurable QI0,330,220,110The grey bars represent the mean corrected ranks for non-PROCARE centres, while the bluebars represent the results of the PROCARE centres. The dots represent the number ofmeasurable QI per centre. A lower mean corrected rank is associated with better performance.These results are preliminary, and cannot be used to judge the quality of care.0Figure 18. Mean corrected rank per centre with at least 20 patients in thedenominator for at least 6 of the 10 measurable QI (administrative cohort).1100,990,880,77Mean corrected rank0,60,50,4654Number of measurable QI0,330,220,1100The grey bars represent the mean corrected ranks for non-PROCARE centres, while the bluebars represent the results of the PROCARE centres. The dots represent the number ofmeasurable QI per centre. A lower mean corrected rank is associated with better performance.These results are preliminary, and cannot be used to judge the quality of care.
KCE Reports 81 PROCARE – phase 2 65Figure 19. Mean QI result per centre with at least 10 patients in thedenominator for at least 6 of the 10 measurable QI (administrative cohort).10010909808707Mean QI result (%)605040654Number of measurable QI30320210100The grey bars represent the mean QI results for non-PROCARE centres, while the blue barsrepresent the results of the PROCARE centres. The dots represent the number of measurable QIper centre. A higher mean QI result is associated with better performance. These results arepreliminary, and cannot be used to judge the quality of care.3.2.3.3 Correlation analysisThe correlation analysis concerned 24 PROCARE centres. The results of theSpearman’s rank correlation test did not allow to reject the null hypothesis (rs=-0.45, p-value = 0.98). This indicates that there is no association between the mean correctedranks in the prospective and the administrative database for these 24 centres.Figure 20 shows the plots of the ranks based on the mean corrected ranks using thePROCARE and administrative database respectively. The points are scattered around,rather than lying on a line with a positive slope, reflecting the absence of positivecorrelation between the two measures.Figure 20. Correlation between the ranks based on the mean correctedranks using the PROCARE and administrative database respectively.25ADMINISTRATIVE database201510500 5 10 15 20 25PROSPECTIVE database
Page 1 and 2:
Assurance de qualitépour le cancer
Page 3 and 4:
Assurance de qualité pour lecancer
Page 5 and 6:
KCE Reports 81B Cancer rectal - pha
Page 7:
KCE Reports 81B Cancer rectal - pha
Page 10 and 11:
vi Cancer rectal - phase 2 KCE Repo
Page 12 and 13:
2 PROCARE - phase 2 KCE reports 81A
Page 14 and 15:
4 PROCARE - phase 2 KCE reports 811
Page 16 and 17:
6 PROCARE - phase 2 KCE reports 81F
Page 19 and 20:
KCE Reports 81 PROCARE - phase 2 92
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24: KCE Reports 81 PROCARE - phase 2 13
Page 73: KCE Reports 81 PROCARE - phase 2 63
Page 87 and 88: KCE Reports 81 PROCARE - Phase 2 77
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169:
Page 172 and 173:
Dépôt légal : D/2008/10.273/39
Page 174 and 175:
35. Etude relative aux coûts poten
show all

Assurance de qualité pour le cancer rectal – phase 2 ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?