12.07.2015 Views

On Point: the United States Army in Operation Iraqi ... - Boekje Pienter

On Point: the United States Army in Operation Iraqi ... - Boekje Pienter

On Point: the United States Army in Operation Iraqi ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ight th<strong>in</strong>g to do. More than 6,200 soldiers supported special operations, and ano<strong>the</strong>r 33,220soldiers executed critical missions throughout Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and elsewhere, <strong>in</strong> awide variety of units and organizations. Some of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> 32nd <strong>Army</strong> Air and MissileDefense Command, <strong>the</strong> 244th Theater Aviation Brigade, <strong>the</strong> 204th Air Traffic Service Group,<strong>the</strong> 416th Eng<strong>in</strong>eer Command, <strong>the</strong> 52nd Ordnance Group, <strong>the</strong> 377th TSC, <strong>the</strong> 335th TheaterSignal Command, <strong>the</strong> 352nd Civil Affairs Command, <strong>the</strong> 513th Military Intelligence Brigade,<strong>the</strong> 3rd Medical Command, and <strong>the</strong> 75th Field Artillery’s Sensitive Site Exploitation and WMDDiscovery teams. 59These soldiers distributed bulk fuel, water, and ammunition and managed mortuary affairs,enemy prisoner of war operations, <strong>the</strong>ater communications, transportation, air and sea portoperations, and combat support hospitals. Many soldiers wore “purple” uniforms, work<strong>in</strong>gsolely <strong>in</strong> a jo<strong>in</strong>t environment, while o<strong>the</strong>rs rema<strong>in</strong>ed “<strong>Army</strong> Green” but none<strong>the</strong>less supportedall of <strong>the</strong> services and <strong>the</strong>ater personnel. For example, <strong>in</strong> support of I MEF, <strong>the</strong> 377th TSCtransported more than 4,266 conta<strong>in</strong>ers from 16 January to 19 April, 9,572 short tons of cargoand just under 10 million gallons of bulk fuel from 20 March to 19 April 2003. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>same period, soldiers provided similar support to <strong>the</strong> Air Force, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g handl<strong>in</strong>g more than18 million gallons of fuel. 60Support to I MEFBy design, Mar<strong>in</strong>e Corps forces are not organized or equipped for susta<strong>in</strong>ed land combat,and certa<strong>in</strong>ly not for a campaign ashore last<strong>in</strong>g months <strong>in</strong> an offensive hundreds of miles <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terior of a country with a poor <strong>in</strong>frastructure and virtually no coastl<strong>in</strong>e. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong><strong>Army</strong> provided significant re<strong>in</strong>forcement from both active duty and reserve units to round outor—<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of rocket artillery, Patriots, civil affairs, and psychological operations—provide<strong>the</strong> I MEF capabilities <strong>the</strong>y required for a susta<strong>in</strong>ed campaign.So as <strong>Army</strong> forces flowed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ater, Mar<strong>in</strong>es assigned to and support<strong>in</strong>g I MEFalso arrived and prepared. The I MEF, command<strong>in</strong>g 1st Mar<strong>in</strong>e Division (1 MARDIV), 1Air W<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> 1st Armoured Division (UK), and o<strong>the</strong>r support<strong>in</strong>g units, made <strong>the</strong> support<strong>in</strong>gattack on <strong>the</strong> right flank of CFLCC’s advance to Baghdad. At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>es executed<strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>itial operation to secure <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn oil fields <strong>in</strong> Iraq on 20 March 2003, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Army</strong>had attached more than 2,700 soldiers to I MEF to provide <strong>the</strong> capabilities not resident <strong>in</strong>Mar<strong>in</strong>e forces, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: a Patriot missile brigade and five Patriot batteries; an eng<strong>in</strong>eer groupwith two eng<strong>in</strong>eer battalions and three bridge companies; a military police (MP) battalion; anuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) defense battalion; an air medical evacuation company;a signal battalion; a civil affairs brigade; a psychological operations (PSYOP) battalion; a corpssupport group with seven transportation companies; and numerous smaller units. 61 These unitscontributed to <strong>the</strong> success of <strong>the</strong> I MEF <strong>in</strong> OIF.Theater Missile Defense EmploymentThe <strong>Army</strong> also supported <strong>the</strong>ater air and missile defense (TAMD) as part of a jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>the</strong>aterair and missile defense effort. TAMD had to be provided not only over <strong>Army</strong>, Air Force, Mar<strong>in</strong>eCorps, and coalition forces, but also over <strong>the</strong> nations of Kuwait, Jordan, Turkey, Qatar, Bahra<strong>in</strong>,Saudi Arabia, and Israel. The 32nd Air and Missile Defense Command (AAMDC), based <strong>in</strong>Fort Bliss, Texas, provided <strong>the</strong> <strong>Army</strong> component of jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>the</strong>ater air and missile defense.64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!