10 - University of Leicester

© architects design partnership llp

Contents01 Introduction02 Design OverviewDesign concept_ Understanding the BriefDesign concept_ Understanding the SiteDesign concept_ The DesignDesign concept_ The Bridge LinkPlanningProcurement & Finance03 Architectural AssessmentAcademic Facilities (Medical School. Regent College Site)Post Graduate Student AccommodationSport facilitiesWaste Recycling CompoundStudent EnvironmentBuilding AestheticsAccessibility IssuesLandscape04 Environmental & BREEAM AssessmentEnvironmental PolicySustainability Strategy Including BREEAMSpecific IssuesSustainability Summary06 Mechanical & Electrical AssessmentService DiversionsProposed Infrastructure StrategyRefurbishment of Existing AccommodationEnergy StrategySummary07 Cost ReportIntroductionBasis of CostingsBenchmarkingVATFunding Option08 CDM ElementsIntroductionCDM ElementsBuildabilityAssociated Construction Hazards09 Summary10 AppendicesUtilities Record DrawingsBREEAM Pre Assessment Education 2008BREEAM Pre Assessment Multi-Residential05 Civil & Structural AssessmentDemolitionFlood Risk AssessmentDrainageSite Access & HighwayPedestrian & Cycle FootbridgeStructural SolutionParking Facilities

01 Introduction

01Introduction01.1 IntroductionSite HistoryThe Site is a part of the original Freemen’s Common, a 600 acre area of common grazingland. In the 1630’s there was approximately 2800 acres of common land bordering thetown; North, South, East and Westfields.This area is reputed to have been granted to the Burgesses of Leicester by Simon deMontfort in the 13th Century for their ‘use and occupation’ and also includes the areawhere the Central, North and South Campuses of the University of Leicester are sited,also Victoria Park, (which contained a racecourse from 1806 to 1883) de Montfort Halland New Walk.The Freemen enjoyed grazing rights on the common land. The freemen originated fromthe old Merchant Guilds set up in the 11th Century for merchants, craftsmen and theirapprentices. The men became Freemen by inheritance.As the land use began to change and ws taken up by a number of larger farms, this leadto disputes by the free men about the loss of their rights to graze their cattle. In 1804,the Corporation moved to enclose and parcel up the entire area. The Freemen’s parcelsof land were all moved into three large and properly defined areas: Saffron Lane area,the area now Walker Stadium and the 70 acre Freemen’s Common, situated betweenthe Welford and Aylestone Roads.In 1840 the Midland Railway was built through the city, dividing Freemen’s Common intwo. The Cattle Market was moved from its central site (now Town Hall) to the westernside of Freemen’s Common to be close to the railway. The remaining land on Freemen’sCommon was divided up onto individual allotments and these were rented by tenantsup until the late 19th Century.The last of the Freemen’s land was purchased by the City Council by 1968. The fundsraised were used to purchase an area of land in Aylestone, now Freemen’s Holt and36 bungalows were built as homes for hereditary Freemen of Leicester. The LeicesterFreemen’s estate is a registered charity which serves the hereditary Freemen of Leicesterand their widows.Freemen’s Common to the west of the railway was developed as an industrial estateafter 1968. Most of the remaining eastern portion of Freemen’s Common was sold tothe University in 1969, and is in close proximity to the central campus. On the northernpart of this site, Freemen’s Common houses, which are 3 storey medical student accommodation,were built in two phases, 1973 and 1975. The architect for both phaseswas W,D Sterland of Nottingham.Putney Road was built in the 1980’s accross the Common from the junction of WelfordRoad and Victoria Park Road and over the railway where it meets the Aylestone Road.Image 1 above_Aerial Photograph of the Freemen’s Commen Site© architects design partnership llp Page 5

01IntroductionUrban MorphologyThe Maps below and opposite from 1880 clearly define the plot with roads runningbetween pairs of plots. The main road runs south-west from the cottage and over therailway.Heritage & ConservationIn 1856 the first cottages were built to accommodate needy aged Freemen and theFreemen’s widows, designed by the architect Redfern and Sawday. This was subsequentlyextended in 1885 when the clock tower was placed on top.The second house was built in 1893, which were not separate cottages but individualself contained rooms in one building. Subsequently Leicester City Council have listedthese building of historic value.The cottages were first used by the University, appropriately as a Victorian Study Centre,and subsequently has been the University Health Centre since the late 1980’s. There arenow plans to relocate the Health Centre to an alternative location, giving the Universitythe opportunity to re-invent how the building is utilised.Historical Reference◦◦◦Leicester Chronicler www.leicesterchronicler.comThe Leicester Freemen’s Estate www.leicester-freemen.comThe History of Victoria Park, Leicester, Helen Boyton, 2000Image 2 above_Site Plan 1938-1952Image 1 above_Site Plan 1880-1890Image 3 above_Freemen’s Cottage Listed Building 1893© architects design partnership llp Page 6

01IntroductionSite Photographs© architects design partnership llp Page 7

02 Design Overview

© architects design partnership llp Page 9

02Design Overview02.1 Design concept_ Understanding the BriefThe University Development Framework Plan identifies the potential for mixed developmenton the site to be split between teaching and residential accommodation.The existing accommodation at Freemen’s Common, off Welford Road to the south ofthe main academic campus comprises of 300 student bedrooms in low-rise (3 to 4 storey)blocks about 40 years old and due to their poor state of repair and out moded facilitiesare in need of replacement.There is a small amount of support and academic related accommodation and healthcare, and the rest of the site provides a significant proportion of University car parking.Following the tenants of development for the site established in the Development PlanFramework, the low rise out of date residences should be replaced with modern superioraccommodation. The proximity of the site to the main campus should drive thepotential for the development to seek higher density accommodation02.2 Design concept_ Understanding the Site02.21 Site AnalysisOur initial site analysis highlighted the following features and issues that should beconsidered :-◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Significant falls across the site to the southeast.Connectivity to Main Campus and Nixon Court residencies.Potential noise from the road and railway line.Significance of ecologically sensitive natural corridors bordering the railway line.Risk of Japanese Knotweed from the south west of the site and railway line.Grade II listed Freemen Cottages on the site.Limited opportunities for site access due to the existing junction off Welford Roadand Putney Road.Views to the west over Leicester City from the site.Prominence of the development on the skyline due to the elevated site.Image 2 above_Site SectionsImage 3 above_Site AnalysisImage 1 above_Site Section A_ from Nixon Court to the Main Campus© architects design partnership llp Page 10

02Design OverviewDevelopment Framework Plan© architects design partnership llp Page 12

02Design Concept_The DesignOutline Proposal A◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Outline Proposal_A12,000 sqm of academic space over 7 floors.598 Student Bedrooms. The main blocks at 6 storey’s, with the tower building at 10storey to form a visual link with the University’s existing three towers on the maincampus.The orientation of the blocks follows the historic grain of the site.Large public spaces formed to the rear of the listed building.Teaching accommodation arranged as a linear block allowing street/atriumconfiguration or phased linear development.500 car parking spaces below ground split over two levels with vehicular access offPutney Road.ProsEast-West building orientation good for solar gains which potentially gives a highthermal mass building.Shallow plan provides good day lighting to most of each floor plate.Academic building relates better to the listed buildingSignificant quantities of protected landscaped areas, including larger public spacebetween the academic and the residential zones.Cons◦ East-West building orientation may be good for solar gains but this may also createover shadowing across the site due to the heights of the buildings.◦ South-west prevailing winds might create a vortex effect within the centrallandscape areas. This would be need to be investigated further with the designteam.◦ No recognition of existing trees which have recently had a tree preservation orderassociated to them.◦ Portions of the accommodation are in close proximity to Welford Road and PutneyRoad, which could likely cause issues with noise and air pollution.Image 1 above_Concept Sketch PlanImage 2 above_Proposed Site Plan© architects design partnership llp Page 14

02Design Concept_The DesignOutline Proposal AImage 1 above_3D VisualAcademic BuildingsResidential BuildingsSports FacilitiesMulti-Storey Car ParkImage 2 above_Site Plan_ Links with University Main CampusImage 3 above_3D Visual© architects design partnership llp Page 15

02Design Concept_The DesignOutline Proposal BOutline Proposal_B◦◦◦◦◦◦12,000 sqm of academic space over 6 floorsSite split into two with a prominent bridge linking the main campus to Freemen’sCommon Site.630 Student Bedrooms over 7 Floors.500 carparking spaces below ground split over two levelsParking located at the lower end of the site to utilise the 4m change in levels.Takes away the need for a multi-storey above ground car park, with vehicularaccess off Putney Road.This releases more of the site for development.◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦ProsScheme addresses the site edges to give maximum street frontageThe arrangement of accommodation on the site affords good daylighting and viewsout for much of the accommodation..Single extensive external protected landscaped area.A safe and secure site with good visual surveillance across the site.ConsNo recognition of existing trees which have a tree preservation order associated tothem.South-west prevailing winds might create a vortex effect within the centrallandscape areas. This would be need to be investigated further with the designteam.Building in close proximity to Welford Road and Putney Road, which will causeissues with noise and air pollution. The resolution of these in terms of creating acomfortable internal environment would likely compromise the ability of the projectto have low energy services systems.Some academic accommodation will directly overlook the waste recycling centre.Image 1 above_Concept Sketch PlanImage 2 above_Proposed Site Plan© architects design partnership llp Page 16

02Design Concept_The DesignOutline Proposal BImage 1 above_3D VisualAcademic BuildingsResidential BuildingsSports FacilitiesMulti-Storey Car ParkImage 2 above_Site Plan_Links with Univerity Main CampusImage 3 above_3D Visual© architects design partnership llp Page 17

02Design Concept_The DesignOutline Proposal CImage 1 above_3D VisualAcademic BuildingsResidential BuildingsSports FacilitiesMulti-Storey Car ParkImage 2 above_Site Plan_Links with Univerity Main CampusImage 3 above_3D Visual© architects design partnership llp Page 19

02Design Concept_The DesignOutline Proposal D◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Outline Proposal_D12,000 sqm of academic space accommodated within 4-5 storey buildings on thelower north-east half side of the site. This arrangement can assist in creating anacademic gateway to the University.350 Student Bedrooms between 4-7 storey’sResidential buildings form a new courtyard space behind the existing listedbuilding.New Vista formed connecting the existing Nixon Court student residencies throughto the main campus.Multi storey car parking for 487 spaces over 7 storey’s, which gives an approximatetotal floor area of 13,440 sqm.ProsRetaining existing trees which have a tree preservation order, which act as a barrierto the road, reducing the impact of noise and air pollution.More intimate landscaped spaces are created between the building creating apleasant environment.The residential building can be natural ventilated.Good natural day lighting and most buildings can be naturally ventilated apartfrom the buildings in close proximity to the road which will have to be mechanicallyventilatedConsMassing of car park reduces the area on site that can be used for more residentialbuildings.Multi storey car parking option not favourable with the Local Authority Planners.No flexibility within this proposal to develop further.Significantly smaller numbers of residential units possible compared to otheroptions.Image 1 above_Concept Sketch PlanImage 2 above_Proposed Site Plan© architects design partnership llp Page 20

02Design Concept_The DesignOutline Proposal E◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Outline Proposal E12,000 sqm of academic space accommodated within 5-6 storey buildings withglazed central atrium space.535 Student Bedrooms can be accommodated in 6-7 storey’s, anticipated restrictionfrom the Local Authority Planning Department may limit the development in this areato 4-5 storey’s This would limit the development to be 375 Student Bedrooms.300/400 below ground car parking spaces with vehicular access off Putney Road.Landscaped arranged to create a definitive new vista which forms a connectionfrom the existing Nixon Court student residencies through to the Main Campus.ProsRetained existing trees (which have a tree preservation order), act as a barrier tothe road, reducing the impact of noise and air pollution.The landscaped spaces between the buildings are greater creating a pleasantenvironment without creating excess overshadowing from the buildings.Good natural day lighting and most buildings can be naturally ventilated apartfrom the buildings in close proximity to the road which will have to be mechanicallyventilated.Central glazed atrium to the academic building would assist with and be a centralpart of a natural daylighting and ventilation strategy.Central core arrangement assists in the reduction of circulation and corridors.This will help raise the net to gross ratio.Potential for future flexibility of use of academic spaces. Flexibility offered byarrangement allowing adaptability of department size within large floor platearrangementBetter relationship with existing listed building and the new academic building.Location of Sport Facilities are well located to benefit from adjacent residentialaccommodation both on this site and at Nixon Court.◦◦◦ConsUnderground carpark will consume alot of energy to build.No distinction between the Sports and academic buildingOrientation of academic accommodation means an increased issue with noise andImage 1 above_Concept Sketch PlanImage 2 above_Proposed Site Plan© architects design partnership llp Page 22

02Design Concept_The Bridge LinkThe Bridge Link◦ 250m long fully accessible bridge allowing uninterrupted crossing of Welford Roadbetween the Freemen’s Common and main University campus’ for both pedestriansand cyclists.◦ The bridge provides an opportunity to create an iconic structure that forms agateway into the University. The bridge would become a symbolic structure whichdefines the University’s site both locally and within the wider context of UK highereducation establishments similar to the iconic 3 towers of the University.◦ The bridge will be incorporated into the landscape scheme of the Freemen’sCommon site enabling the landscaping to extend across the bridge into the mainuniversity campus as part of a potential overall university landscape strategy.◦ The bridge design and location allows for use as both a destination and meansof passage. The bridge allows for the main campus to become physically linkedand forms a means of passage between sites. The twisting elevated design of theramp affords views across the city from its location on the crest of Knighton Hillwhile reinforcing its location within the extended University campus by turning bothtowards the main campus and the Freemen’s Common and Nixon Court sites alongits length.Pros◦ The design allows for use by all by offering 3 approaches to its upper level at 3differing gradients to cater for the needs of the physically less able to those usingit for purposes of expediency.◦ Potentially could be used to offset the cost of providing public art should this be arequirement by the local planning authority. This could be designed in conjunctionwith an artist/sculptor.◦ Opportunity for the University and Leicester city council to provide a piece of iconicpublic art which could form part of an international competition similar to the RiverSoar Bridge competition in 2009 which was won by Exploration Architecture withBuro Happold.◦ It may remove the need for the current pedestrian crossing at the junction ofWelford Road and University Road.Cons◦ Potential for under use if not designed with both expedience and accessibility askey design drivers.◦ Potential issues regarding the difficulty of construction over an existing majortraffic route into the City of Leicester.◦ Potential to be prohibitively expensive.Image 2 above_Bridge Concept Sketch looking along University Road towards Freemens CommonImage 1 above_Concept Sketch PerspectiveImage 3 above_Concept Precedent Images© architects design partnership llp Page 26

02Planning02.3 Planning02.31 Leicester City Council - Planning ConsultationThere are no objections in principle to the redevelopment of the site that includes theremoval of the existing student accommodation buildings, the Local Authority feel theseare of low architectural value. The existing Freemen’s cottages to Welford Road are tobe retained within all proposed redevelopment schemes. The modern rear extensionto the Freemen’s Cottages should be removed. The key areas highlighted during ourmeeting are as follows:-◦ Commission studies into the exact location and value of the existing landscapeand nature conservation characteristics of the site together with a comprehensiveurban design analysis of the site within its wider context.◦ Archaeological desk based assessment of the site.◦ A detailed topographical survey will be necessary to better illustrate how allbuildings proposed to the site will relate to the external ground levels.The local authority have visited the site and undertaken a basic analysis of the area andthe initial schemes that were prepared by ADP. The Local Authorities initial recommendationsare as follows:◦ Schemes of this scale and massing (schemes that include all the accommodationrequested in the briefing process) are not appropriate for this location.◦ Whilst the redevelopment of the site should not necessarily reflect the suburbancontext, it would be inappropriate to have a development based on large monolithictower blocks with undercroft parking exposed close to the back of the pavement.◦ It was suggested that medium sized apartment blocks of between 4 and 5 storieswould be appropriate if set back from the surrounding public realm. These blocksshould be located within the central part of the site and set-back behind the existingtrees◦ The LA would expect a SUD system to be incorporated into the development of asite of this size and nature.◦ It was also suggested that the existing vehicle access points are retained to servean underground carpark that will also need to be constrained within the outer limitsof new buildings. To compensate for the reduction in width to the underground carpark proposed, the car park could extend further into the site along a north-eastaxis. Exposure of the underground car park to the external environment on the siteshould be kept to an absolute minimum.◦ The proposed split between teaching and residential use on the site is welcomed,as is the proposal for some sort of urban square between the 2 uses and behindthe listed building.◦ It was the concern of the highways officers that the high level walkway bridgingWelford Road, on the crest of Knighton Hill might be rarely used, cost a great dealof money to build, be a visual intrusion and take up an inordinate amount of spaceon both sides of the road.◦ As an alternative approach to securing safe access across Welford Road thehighways officer recommend that the existing pedestrian crossing be relocatedand upgraded immediately to the south side of the Welford Road/University Roadjunction. In addition, Part of the planning authorities recommendation was that anew bus stop be provided between this new pedestrian crossing and the vehicleaccess point into the site. This would enable 2 existing bus stops to be removed,one outside the New Road Inn and one opposite the entrance to the cemetery, bothof which only ever appear to be used by students accessing this site and the mainsite of University Road.02.32 Leicester City Council - Tree Preservation OrderSince the consultation meeting with the Local Authority Planning Department a treepreservation order for Freemen’s common has been issued. The TPO covers 101 existingtrees and has an effect on the feasibility proposals produced to date. Prior to makingany applications for development a detailed tree survey will have to be instructed by theUniversity and submitted together with the development proposals..02.33 Leicester City Council - Environmental ConsultationThe following comments were received from Steve Brown at LCC by email on the 4thMay 2010.For this major development, all three energy policies will apply - UD04, BE16 & BE17- and a Sustainable Energy Statement will therefore be required as part of any submission- within or separate to the Design and Access Statement.The applicants are referred to “Advice and Guidance to applicants and consultants onmeeting requirements for energy policies UD04, BE16 and BE17 and for submitting aSustainable Energy Statement”.This Guidance is now available on the website at http://www.leicester.gov.uk/yourcouncil-services/ep/planning/planningapplications/planningapplications/adviceforapplicants/sustainable-energy-statement/The site location and extent of the site offer unusually good opportunities for utilisationof renewable energy generation.In view of the nature and function of the building a highly insulated fabric constructionwould assist in reducing the overall operational energy load for the building so that isan essential first step.The applicants may wish to consider the provision of the 14 % renewable on site generationthrough one of the following technologies which may be appropriate to the needsof the building:◦◦◦◦◦◦Roof mounted photovoltaic cellsSolar thermalAir source heat pumps which may form part of a mechanical ventilation and airconditioning system, providing both heating and cooling.Ground source heat pumpsBiomassWindmillsComprehensive consideration of Policy BE17: Combined Heat and Power/CommunityHeating is required, with particular reference to the proposed extended Combined Heatand Power network linking up to the proposed Energy Centre at Leicester Universitywhich is intended to link Phases 2 and 3 of the Distribution Network. The developmentof this site would be an ideal opportunity to link a large scheme with a varied and highdemand into the Combined Heat and Power network.Taking into account policy BE17 a heating system may be considered with the possibilityof using a combined heat and power installation. Whilst this is not necessarily consideredas a renewable technology it a very efficient (gas powered way) of using energy andreducing CO2 emissions in buildings and make use of waste heat to provide electricity.With regard to the Idea block layouts provided for the scheme I would like the designersto consider the implementation of passive solar design principles in the design andform of the accommodation particularly for the proposed student accommodation. Irefer the applicants to the Supplementary Planning Document; Energy Efficiency andRenewable Energy in New Developments for introductory details regarding solar orientationand internal layout.When designing flat or student accommodation, in order to exploit passive solar gain,the theoretical ideal layout for flats would be with the predominant elevation of a linearblock facing within 30 degrees of south having an approximate East/ West linear axis.Service blocks and ancillary accommodation aligned to the rear of the block would maximisethe number of flats facing within 30 degrees of south.Alternatively if flats are to be ranged equally on both sides of a linear corridor in an accommodationblock then a north /south linear axis would be advantageous with all flatsgetting sunshine throughout the day either from the East or West.Many options are open to the designers to exploit passive solar gain with careful considerationthrough the design of overall external form and internal layout.© architects design partnership llp Page 27

02Procurement & Finance02.4 Procurement & FinanceFollowing our meeting with James Hunt - Finance Director the following key pointswhere discussed:-◦ Timing of the development of the academic portion of the site is crucial to theUniversity. The need for the redevelopment of the accommodation for thesedepartments is less urgent than the medical school, and it would follow the medicalschool development.◦ Residential accommodation would be higher quality units for post graduatestudents.◦ It is possible the University will look to develop the residential accommodation inpartnership with a developer/ private provider.◦ This would probably be a preferred procurement route which is faster for theUniversity.◦ Time tabling and phasing the scheme would mean that combined residential andteaching accommodation in one building would not likely work. It may precludevarious development/procurement options, so would not be favoured.◦ Unknown risk of partnering the development of academic accommodation.But a commercial developer may be a procurement option for academicaccommodation.◦ Medical school is also partnered with NHS trust and has funding from the NHS.◦ Car park and residential is an option but one where a likely private partner developerwould end up outsourcing the car park build. It may be better if possible to look atseparating the development of the car park and the residential accommodation.◦ The study should look at the option for a multi storey car park as well.◦ The medical school would need to be built in one go so phasing for the academicaccommodation is not necessary.◦ Medical school provides for the educational needs of both the university and theNHS.◦ Preference from the registrar that sports accommodation proposed for the CharlesWilson building is also included in the feasibility study.◦ If the phasing can retain some residences on site it might help with the developmentby providing a revenue stream.◦ Car park and residences would likely be the first development on the site.© architects design partnership llp Page 28

03 Architectural Assessment

03 Architectural Assessment03.3 Sports FacilitiesDuring the consultation process we were advised that the sport facilities at the CharlesWilson building would need to be relocated to the Freemen’s Common Site. We havehad a meeting with Colin Hide – Director of Sport, who advised us on the followingrequirements:-◦ 2 No Court Sports Halls - To provide 8 badminton courts or two netball, volleyball,basketball an 5-a -Side pitches. Good storage for trampolines. Trampoline harnesspoints.◦ 600 sq m gym -Gym for steppers, treadmills etc + resistance equipment◦ 25m x 13m pool - 6 lane competition pool, variable depth, some seating, startingblocks, timing scoreboard.◦ Activity room - 225 sq m sprung wooden floor for aerobics, step, karate◦ 4 Squash courts - Glass backed, with tiered seating behind.◦ Sports Injury Clinic - A small treatment room to be provide with waiting area – ornear café to use this space as a waiting area.◦ Reception - Large enough to service the above with back office space behind◦ Café/Sports bar -Adjacent to receptionThe following facilities would be desirable however not a necessity for the sportfacilities:-◦ Dojo -Sized to allow for two competition mats◦ Dance studio - To allow ballroom dancing so non wooden floor. Mirrored down oneside◦ Climbing wall - A feature in an atrium/foyer◦ Indoor running track - around the gym perhaps or around facility if design allowsColin Hide anticipates 23,000 students/staff would potentially use these sport facilities.Currently there are 4,500 sports cards issued and with staff and student without cardsapproximately 11,000 use the sports facilities. The revenue brought in by the currentfacilities at Charles Wilson is £200k per year.There will be requirement for Mini Bus parking for external team’s visiting the facilities.The foot print of the minimum facilities required is approximately 2860m2 excludedchanging facilities and parking. The extent of the large footprint of the sport facilitieshas been demonstrated within the feasibility report.03.4 Waste Recycling CompoundA recent planning application has been submitted to Leicester City Council by WhiteYoung Hookins on behalf of the University. This is for the waste recycling compound witha separate delivery access of Putney Road. The extent of the compound enclosure hasbeen a included within our feasibility proposal.03.5 Student EnvironmentFollowing a consultation meeting with Frances Stone (Director of Residential & CommercialServices), it became clear that s key objective is to create a community feel andgood experience for students in any new proposed student accommodation. In shortany new development must have the student experience as a key design driver, whichshould seek to improve the experience given by the accommodation offer . This offershould provide the following advantages:-◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Improved spatial and environmental quality of accommodationRobust building fabric with a perceived air of qualityImproved architectural expression of the new buildingImproved external areasSecure EnvironmentProvision for Retail/café outletsConference facilitiesCommunal facilities including laundryGood mobile network coverageGood Environment for studyingVisitors/Tutor FlatsInclusive provision for disabled studentsImage 1 below_Waste Recycling Compound Layout03.6 Building aestheticsThe existing 3 storey buildings are repetitive in nature, monolithic in appearance anddue to the low quality and aging fabric, oppressive. In order to create architecturalinterest and a positive contrast with the existing accommodation to be replaced andthe surrounding environment alternative modern materials should be proposed for thedevelopment at Freemen’s common.By its nature the schemes which have been investigated contain considerable amountsof repetitive accommodation, and include some large block academic buildings . In orderto avoid monotony, visual interest would be created by carefully considering thearrangement of the facades constituent parts. Architectural features can be createdby responding to orientation, projecting glazed elements on the facades, expression ofvaried use in the façade organisation, varying textures and material chosen, and othersimilar architectural devices. Due to the sub urban situation it should be considered adesign driver that the buildings do not possess too urban and imposing an architecturalexpression. That is not to say that the building expression should not allow for highquality and appropriate place making. The site as whole can still be conceived to providea landmark arrangement without seeking to impose sn iconic expression.The use of modern materials and appropriately orientated or protected areas of glasswould provide a distinct contrast from surrounding buildings and have an unclutteredarchitectural approach to the development. A simple language that can be wovenaround the contextual response of the building form would be an appropriate way toapproach the building fabric design. The above elements will need to be considered aspart of the overall strategy to achieve buildings which can be constructed quickly andefficiently and to a defined budget.This study does not look too closely at the actual building expressions and that wouldneed to be the subject of further study.03.7 Accessibility IssuesThis feasibility report is looking at whole site redevelopment. As such it would beexpected that all accommodation will be developed in accordance with Buildingregulations and ADM as well as BS8300 allowing fully accessible environments. Thelisted cottages may present some issues with providing fully for the disabled in theaccommodation housed. As such the redevelopment of the cottages should seek toallow for equivalent accommodation elsewhere on site such there can be no issues ofdisabled discrimination.The fall across site and the interface levels with the public highway will create somechallenges in respect of arriving at a DDA compliant scheme. This will need to becarefully considered in any further study.Parking strategies so far suggested may not fully meet the requirements of DDA accessand again this will need to be scrutinised on a campus wide basis in terms of access tothe offer accommodation and facilities.It would be expected that all new accommodation will be fully compliant within thebuildings themselves and so the risks to providing a fully accessible environment arelimited to the residual listed accommodation and the limitations of the topography ofthe site.© architects design partnership llp Page 31

03Architectural Assessment03.9 Landscape StrategyThe landscape at Freemen’s Common has been created to form a connection betweenneighbouring Nixon Court student residences and the University Campus as well asproviding high quality landscape spaces for the users of Freemen’s Common. The designwill focus on three areas of activity across the site, using a similar design approachapplied to Nixon Court, to identify Primary, Secondary and Tertiary spaces and routes.This will then help inform the materiality of the spaces and create a unity between NixonCourt and Freemen’s Common.◦ A primary courtyard is determined by a high level of pedestrian movement and hasbuildings which open out on to the space. These spaces can be identified by havingan urban design fabric and create activity hubs where there is an increased level ofspontaneous meeting and interaction between people.◦ A secondary courtyard is more of a transitional space - with a moderate level ofpedestrian traffic and linking areas together. Trees are used to highlight routeswith the potential to have small seating areas along the way.◦ A tertiary courtyard is purely social - these spaces are not situated on mainpedestrian routes and are more of a destination: Courtyards can be found onalternative pathways around the site, which take the pedestrian through areas ofinformal British native planting and copses of trees. Tertiary spaces are intendedto be more relaxed, informal and intimate social areas0.3.9.1 General principles:◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Create safe and secure pedestrian and cycle routes across the site, linking intosurrounding areas, including public transport nodes.Social courtyard spaces between buildings which are usable at all times of the day,reducing the possibility of night time ‘Dead Zones’Boundary tree planting to act as a shelter belt, buffering the noise from the busyWelford RoadEnhancing biodiversity by providing habitats for wildlife, this is particularlyimportant adjacent to the existing railway line where there is a well establishedwildlife corridor.Reinstatement and enhancement of a water feature to provide further habitatareas, with the opportunity to install a reed bed filtration system and swales.Provide routes linking residential buildings and waste management areas.Soft landscape to be utilised to enhance security throughout the site, for example,using thorny plants underneath windows.Review the potential to use permeable hard landscaping materials, reducing theneed for underground drainage.Signage across the site to be sympathetic to the large numbers of foreign studentswhich will be occupying the residences.Opportunity to use public art throughout the site03.9.2 Soft LandscapeThe plants selected for the scheme should consist of a large proportion of British nativespecies to increase the biodiversity of the site and to connect into the existing speciesadjacent to the perimeter.Any trees lost from the existing site will be mitigated with new tree planting. Trees willbe used to define routes and spaces - for example the proposed scheme indicates anavenue planted with a feature tree species, to provide a contrast to the other trees onthe site, reinforcing a primary route.Species will be chosen for their light reflecting and airy qualities, to diminish the effectof the dominant building form. Tree species such as Robina pseudoacaia ‘frisia’ will beused for light and reflective foliage qualities and Fagus sylvatica ‘Dawyck Gold’ for lightleaf and columnular habit. Variegated shrubs such as Cornus alba ‘argenteo-marginata’offer light quality through their white and green leaves and has been indicated in plantbeds throughout the courtyard.Copses of silver birch trees can be used to create block planting which are open andpermeable - giving a sensation of light and movement.A wildflower meadow along the more informal paths around the perimeter will enhancebiodiversity, encouraging insects and therefore birds to site.A small proportion of non-native species may be used in the courtyards to add colourand texture. Where possible these will be nectar rich species to encourage biodiversitywhich have been agreed with a qualified ecologist.© architects design partnership llp Page 32

03Architectural Assessment03.9.3 Hard LandscapeHard landscape materials will be selected from the same palette as Nixon Court, toprovide a sense of unity throughout the two sites. Attention will be paid to the useof kerbs to distinguish parking areas, preventing vehicles from driving over plantingareas and lawns on drop off and collection days. Appropriate materials, such as, grassreinforcement can be used in areas which are susceptible to heavy use to prevent thedegeneration of grass and planting areas.Primary courtyard spaces will have a more vibrant paving fabric which is energetic andactive, to reflect the pedestrian activity within these busy areas.Secondary courtyards are transitional spaces and although they will be animated, thefocus of the paving will be towards guidance and coherence between the primary andtertiary courtyards.Tertiary courtyards provide the opportunity to sit and socialise off the main pedestrianroutes. This will be reflected through the use of paving which has a loose and freeflowing impression - hinting at a more relaxed use of the space.03.9.4 Maintenance.The landscape scheme comprises of two distinct character areas which will require adifferent approach to maintenance.The courtyards will require regular mowing of lawns, pruning of shrubs and weedingof plantbeds (although a bark mulch will be used to suppress weeds). The perimeterplanting will be of a more naturalistic character and may be left to reach maturity,pruning and weeding where necessary.The most important period of maintenance will be in the first few establishing seasonswhere the watering of trees and grass seed will be crucial. In the longer term the areasof lawn may require scarifying and aeration.Pruning of the shrubs will be required on an annual basis according to the RHSrecommendations. Hard surfaces will need to be kept leaf free in autumn to reduce therisk of slipping and swept regularly throughout the year to keep drainage channels freefrom debris.All maintenance must comply with British Standards 7370-3 and 7370-4.A detailed maintenance strategy will be developed with the Universities EstatesDepartment.© architects design partnership llp Page 33

04 Environmental & BREEAM Assessment

04Environmental & BREEAM Assessment04.0 Environmental PolicyThe briefing requirements for the proposed development are largely being drivenfrom Leicester City Council planning policies, Building Regulation requirements andthe University’s own policies; each of which will shape and influence the proposedscheme.04.0.1 Leicester City Council Local PlanLeicester City Council currently has a Local Plan which was adopted in 2006 until 2016,when it will be replaced with the Local Development Framework. The Council placesustainability at the heart of their local plan and have enforced progressive policiesto push forward an ever increasing sustainability agenda, with particular emphasis onenergy efficiency and carbon reduction.Policies which will have an impact on the proposed development at Freemen’sCommon, in terms of sustainability are as set out below; details of how these have beenimplemented are set out within Environment and Sustainability Approach.Urban design policies:◦◦◦◦◦UD01 High quality building design and local context: sustainability forms a keystrand pulling aspects of urban design together, including the existing naturallandscapeUD03 Design and layout of streets and public space: Creating a sense of place,creating safe, social, vibrant spaces with priority to pedestrians and cyclistsUD05 Adaptability and future flexibilityUD06 Landscape Design: Integrating and enhancing landscaping and ongoingmaintenanceUD07 Waste Disposal: Including recycling space within waste storageTransport policies all of which are incorporated and addressed through the UniversityTravel Plan:◦ AM01: The impact of development on pedestrians and people with limited mobility◦ AM02: Cycling and development◦ AM05: Buses and the development◦ AM09: Transport assessments and travel plans.Energy policies:◦ UD04: Energy efficiency - low energy design through passive measures◦ BE16: Renewable Energy - 13% energy reduction from 2009 with 1% year on yearincrease through use of on site renewables◦ BE17: Combined Heat and Power and Community Heating encourage - promotionof combined heat and powerSurface water:◦ BE18 Water flow and quality: Reducing the amount of surface water runoffGreen space linking in with Leicester City Council’s Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP)◦ GE03 Biodiversity enhancement sites◦ GE04 Protected species◦ GE05 Wildlife habitats◦ CL07 University of Leicester – Support for implementing the Development Plan andstatement that the University will develop a transport strategy encouraging publictransport and reducing car use.04.0.2 University Environmental Sustainability PolicyThe University are forward thinking in terms of sustainability, in particular through theirinternal management structure led by the Environment Team to drive their sustainabilityagenda forward.Sustainability is being integrated into University life through various initiatives, policies,targets and action, many of which were set within the Development Framework Plan2008 and have since progressed at a rapid rate. Measures include; rising up the Peopleand Planet Green League table, meeting the Carbon Trust Standard by setting carbonreduction targets significantly beyond government levels and implementing energysaving measures through upgrading existing buildings through Salix funding.Developing progressive strategies will also enable the University to address therequirement from HEFCE to link carbon reduction targets to the Capital InvestmentFramework (CIF) application for capital funding. The previous Secretary of State, setout that Higher Education Institutions are required to contribute to the Government’stargets for reductions in carbon emissions, which the University of Leicester, as notedabove, are aiming beyond.The proposed development will need to play a key part in meeting and incorporatingthe sustainability policies and targets. These policies and targets are continuallychanging as the University addresses a wider range of issues which should be takeninto consideration as the project moves forward.Current sustainability policies which have been taken into consideration are set outunder the headings below.Environmental Sustainability Policy (February 2009)Key aspects of this policy are:◦◦◦◦◦◦◦To reduce the University carbon footprint: This policy has been updated and willbe launched around the end of May 2010, setting out the Universities target of areduction in carbon emissions by 60% compared to 2004/5 Levels by 2020. Thisfigure includes electricity, gas and fossil fuel for the use of buildings. In additionto this the University have stated that in order to significantly reduce its overallcarbon footprint any new development will need to aim to be carbon neutral tooffset carbon use in existing buildings and to accommodate growth.Manage and reduce water consumptionAgree a travel policy and implement measures to encourage walking, cycling anduse of public transportImplementation of a recycling policyProtect natural habitats and encourage local wildlife and biological diversityDevelop the University estate in a manner to avoid negative environmental impactsand enhances the local environmentAvoid and limit the use of environmentally damaging substances material andprocessesThe updated environmental Sustainability Policy will also include the requirement forall new development to meet a BREEAM Excellent rating with an aspiration towardsBREEAM Outstanding.Transport PolicyA Travel Plan has been produced by Colin Buchanan for Leicester University underthe direction of the Sustainable Travel Implementation Group. The plan has been puttogether to address a number of issues;◦◦◦◦◦◦Leicester City Council requirement for any future development on the siteReduce carbon emissions as part of the Environmental Sustainable PolicyTo manage and reduce the ever increasing car volume on the site in conjunctionwith University growthTo improve the quality of the campus environment by removing car parking fromthe centre of the main campus and rationalising deliveriesImprove the provision and facilities for cyclists and pedestrians across the UniversitycampusesCurrent public transport links and provision to be improvedThe development of the Travel plan is integral to the 2008 Development FrameworkPlan, and will be implemented in August 2010 with annual targets set over the following5 years.A number of specific measures are set out within the Travel Plan to address the issuesnoted above:◦ Moving car parking to Freemen’s Common site and thereby removing cars from thecentre of the campus◦ Reducing car use through encouragement of staff sharing schemes and a policy ofno student parking to reduce single occupancy car travel by 15%◦ Increase the proportion of University owned vehicles with lower carbon emissions◦ Delivery and service vehicle access being rationalised to all the University sites◦ Increasing cycle compounds in line with city council guidelines◦ Improving cycling facilities with a planning application currently made for cycleshelter and shower facilities at Entrance 1 of the main campus◦ Forming a business case for providing a shuttle bus linking the main campus sitewith the city centre with Leicester City Council.◦ Lobbying local bus operators to improve their transport provision and quality ofservice while offering discounts◦ Programme of educating and providing information to encourage staff and studentsto more sustainable forms of travel methods.◦ Capturing and collating data on carbon emissions through travel to set a baselineto benchmark further reductionsA number of initiatives are already in place including; car sharing, increased busservices, public transport information and increased cycle storage.Waste PolicyThe University have a waste strategy providing measures for dealing with waste andfor sorting and recycling waste. This does not currently extend to waste produced bycontractors on site, although this will be a future requirement from HEFCE as part ofthe Estates Management Statistics.A central part of the recycling policy is the provision of a waste recycling managementplant, which is sited adjacent to the West of Freemen’s Common along Putney Road.This facility has recently been submitted as a planning application© architects design partnership llp Page 36

04Environmental & BREEAM Assessment04.1 Sustainability Strategy Including BREEAMThe approach to environmental sustainability issues has been set out in terms of analysisof the existing site with proposed principles set out against the BREEAM headings.The BREEAM heading are used to provide the framework of sustainable criteria withconsideration of aspects beyond BREEAM.04.1.1 Existing siteThe existing site consists of student residences, car parking and the Student HealthCentre. Semi mature trees are located around the perimeter of the site, which areparticularly concentrated to the south east of the site with areas of potential biodiversityvalue to the west adjacent to the railway sidings. Welford Road and Putney road surrounda large proportion of the site, with the main train line to the west, creating sources ofnoise and pollution on the site.Survey work and site investigations will be required at an early stage to address planningrequirements and to meet BREEAM credits as follows:◦ Ecological and biodiversity value: Phase 1 habitat survey to establish existing andpotential opportunities regarding ecology and biodiversity, which will also identifywhether further habitat surveys will be required. This could influence areas oflandscaping which may need to be retained or adapted at specific times of year.◦ Arboricultural survey: There are a range of semi-mature trees on the site whichLeicester City Council has recently given notice of a tree preservation order for thewhole site. A detailed survey will enable the value of the trees to be established toinform the design and support any tree removal where necessary.◦ Flood Risk Assessment (FRA): Existing FRA for Nixon Court has been reviewed forthe purposes of this report, although a detailed site specific one will be required toestablish how the drainage strategy will be developed.◦ Site investigation: As the FRA Nixon Court site investigation report has beenreviewed for this feasibility study. A site specific investigation will be carried out asset out within the structural report.◦ Noise survey: noise surveys will be required to establish the impact of noise, inparticular traffic noise from the adjacent roads. This will have an impact on theventilation strategies for the buildings and whether natural ventilation will have tobe ruled out in some instances.◦ Low and zero carbon (LZC) feasibility study: A study will be carried out to investigateall appropriate LZC technologies for the site. This will be required at an early stageto ensure that all opportunities can be incorporated, such as orientating buildingsto maximise the use of photovoltaic panels.Although these surveys have not been carried out potential issues have been consideredin the development of the feasibility study which has been addressed in the relevantsections of the report.The majority of the existing buildings on the site will be demolished as they are not fitfor purpose for the future teaching requirements on the campus, as set out in earliersections of this report. The inflexibility of the buildings for current teaching and futureteaching practices would also reduce the inefficiencies in energy use and environmentalconditions within the spaces which is not sustainable in the long term.Each of the buildings will be assessed to utilise demolition material for reuse in theproposed development rather than removing the waste from site and importing newmaterials onto the site.The only exception is the listed part of the Student Health Centre, the former Freemen’sCottages, which is being retained for its historical and cultural value. Although thisbuilding has limited value in terms of academic space, a range of options are beingconsidered, including; café, community use and offices. Due to its listed nature,upgrading the current building in terms of thermal performance will be challenging.Despite this, a range of measures will be reviewed, such as upgrading roof insulationand draught sealing doors and windows which can substantially improve upon currentenergy performance.04.1.2 BREEAM RequirementsMeeting BREEAM requirements has already been established by the University ofLeicester within their Invitation to Tender document, with the target of BREEAM Excellentset for all new buildings. Following consultation with the University EnvironmentalTeam the target of Outstanding was noted as aspirational, which is likely to be includedwithin the updated Environmental Sustainability Policy due out in May 2010. In additionto BREEAM assessments being required for individual buildings we also understandthat there is a requirement for a BREEAM Communities assessment which covers thesite as a whole.Meeting an Excellent rating involves achieving a score of 70% or above. We wouldrecommend that a score of at least 76% is targeted in order to leave some margin ofcomfort. When aiming to meet an Outstanding score, 85% or above is required, again amargin of around 5%+ can provide a level of comfort. In addition to achieving this scorefurther actions are required to meet the Outstanding level, consisting of:◦ Material must be provided to the BRE for the production and publication of a casestudy.◦ The building is required to obtain a BREEAM In Use Certification of Performancewithin the first three years of the building’s operation and use (with regular reviewsin accordance with that scheme in order to maintain the rating).Further information can be provided regarding BREEAM In Use if required.The current preliminary pre-assessments identify potential scores ranging abovethose noted above except for meeting an Outstanding rating for the Academic buildingwhich is noted as 87.81%. Despite this there are credits which could be improved andthese would be highlighted at the start of the assessment process to identify how aslightly higher score could be met. These include; daylighting, recycled aggregates andreduction of CO2.04.1.3 Assessment TypesThe range of building types on the proposed site are Student Residential Accommodation,Academic Accommodation potentially for the College of Medicine, Biological andPsychological Sciences and a new Sports facility including a swimming pool and squashcourts. In addition a waste management facility and car park are to be included on thesite.These building types are likely to require assessments against the following BREEAMtypes:Student residential accommodation BREEAM Multi-residentialMedical Academic Accommodation BREEAM EducationSports Facility BREEAM Other Buildings (Bespoke)© architects design partnership llp Page 37

04Environmental & BREEAM AssessmentPreliminary BREEAM pre-assessments have been carried out against the 2008 versionfor the academic and residential developments to establish the requirements to achievean Excellent rating, which are included within the Appendices.A pre-assessment has not been carried out for the Sports Facility as it would requirea BREEAM Other Building (Bespoke) assessment. This would involve BRE puttinga calculator tool together based on preliminary information, which is not currentlyavailable. Despite this, the majority of the credits included in BREEAM Education willalso apply to the Sports Facility under BREEAM Other Buildings and it is thereforereasonable to consider that if measures are incorporated as the Education building inthe Sports Facility it is likely to meet the same BREEAM target with some marginalvariation in requirements.We have also reviewed the projects against the University’s aspiration to achieve carbonneutral status for all new buildings, which would link in with meeting an Outstandingrating, further commentary, is added under specific headings below.We note that BREEAM are aiming to update the BREEAM types from the 2008 versionin spring 2011 which may affect these projects. At this point we do not know what thisupdate will involve but if the proposed projects are to be assessed against the newversion there is likely to be an increase in the requirements which may affect the abilityof the projects to achieve the current target rating.04.1.4 Integrating BREEAM and low carbon strategyMeeting high BREEAM requirements involves integration of the process at an earlystage in the design. This helps ensure that the design takes on specific measuresnecessary to address crucial aspects of the target rating, such as, passive measuresto meet a low carbon target or carrying out sufficient consultation in line with BREEAMrequirements.We would advocate including a BREEAM assessor on the design team from the onsetof the project, with the assessor having the BREEAM Accredited Professional status toenable an additional two credits to be met. This sets up the need for them to be includedin design discussions throughout the design process including the construction phase,maximising their effect on the project.Early review enables specific credits to be targeted enabling the design team to putmeasures in place to meet those targets. Reviews should continue to happen at regularintervals to ensure that the project is on course for meeting the credit requirements.04.2 Specific IssuesA large proportion of the BREEAM credits are repeated for all the building types, asdemonstrated in the pre-assessment calculator tools. As this is the case, the summaryof the main headings has been set out below and includes all of the buildings withspecific areas of note or variance highlighted where applicable.ManagementManagement credits are relatively straight forward to meet, with the majority beingnoted as achievable. As the project is reasonably large, wide consultation will be requiredincluding carrying out a degree of public consultation, which is required to be carriedout at feasibility stage. This in turn will enable other credits to be met, particularly inBREEAM Education, where there are links to Shared Facilities and using the building asa Learning Resource.Credits for Life Cycle Analysis and Contractor impacts have also been included, and canbe relatively straightforward to achieve if Contractor selection has criteria for meetingthese credits, tender information is robust and the Contractor is briefed on how theseshould be dealt with prior to works commencing on site. The innovation credit forMan 2 Considerate Constructors has been included for meeting an Outstanding ratingrequiring the Contractor to achieve a score of 36 under the Considerate ConstructorsScheme.Credits for Commissioning including ongoing seasonal commissioning, have alsobeen targeted. Continuing to monitor, review and educate users on an ongoing basisis essential in ensuring the effectiveness of low energy buildings. This requirement isalso set out as one of the additional BREEAM Outstanding elements through the useof the BREEAM In-Use assessment tool, which would further reinforce the University’scommitment to sustainability.In addition users will need to fully understand how the building operates, with buildingmanuals, support and incentives in place to ensure this occurs. The University maywant to investigate initiatives such as incorporating energy allowances into key cards,with charges to the individual once these have been used, which have are in use at theUniversity of Kent to assist with meeting ongoing efficiency.Health and WellbeingA reasonable proportion of credits are being targeted with the aim to achieve acomfortable, easily controlled and healthy environment.Good daylighting is crucial in reducing energy use in buildings as well as providing abetter quality of environment. This will form part of the energy strategy for achievinga low carbon building, with daylight modelling helping to inform the building design.However, with the Academic building this may be challenging, where briefingrequirements could contradict aims. Despite this, daylighting will be seen as a prioritywith use of elements such as; rooflights, atria, lightwells, high level glazing and lightshelves being explored.The daylighting credit for the student residences has not been included, due to theheight of the proposed residential blocks and the overshadowing which is likely tooccur. Despite this a number of options have been explored with the aim to reduceovershadowing and increase the ability for good daylighting in all occupied spaces, withfurther analysis as the design develops.© architects design partnership llp Page 38

04Environmental & BREEAM AssessmentOptions have been reviewed for siting both the residential and academic facilitiesreviewing the impact of noise and pollution combined with how ventilation strategiesare likely to operate for the different building types. Landscaping has been identified asplaying a part by acting a buffer to the noise and pollution. The favourable position forthe residential buildings is to the north west of the site, further from the road, potentiallyenabling a natural ventilation strategy to be utilised when heating is not required.Mechanical ventilation is likely to be the most energy efficient solution for ventilatingthe residential building when heating is used, as heat recovery be utilised reducing theheating requirement for the building where a highly efficient thermal envelope is used.The academic building is less likely to use a natural ventilation strategy, particularlyif it is sited to the south east end of the site due to the issues with noise and pollution.Again heat recovery in winter months will enable the building to be highly efficient, withmechanical ventilation required with some cooling for summer months to provide acomfortable internal environment.An acoustic consultant will be appointed at an early stage to carry out noise surveys toestablish the specific noise issues on the site and to advise on measures required forthe proposed development. Their input will inform how ventilation strategies can beaddressed, potentially looking at devices such as acoustic baffles in addressing noiseissues.Car parking has been considered for above ground and below ground options. Theseprovide a number of issues, with above ground car parking taking up valuable areawhich could be green space and below ground solutions forming a number of issues,largely the energy requirements of lighting and ventilating an underground space.EnergyLow energy buildings are a high priority for the University with the aspiration for newbuildings to be carbon neutral, to assist in meeting their carbon reduction targetsacross the campus.BREEAM measures the energy performance of buildings based on the EnergyPerformance Certificate EPC, with a mandatory requirement of 40 for Excellent and 25for Outstanding.Based on the initial briefing for an Excellent rating an EPC level of 28 was felt to beappropriate. This takes into account the likely 25% reduction in CO2 emissions of theimpending Building Regulations part L and Leicester City Council’s policy target settingout use of renewables.When considering improving this in order to address a carbon neutral development anEPC of 0 would be produced, resulting in going considerably beyond the mandatoryOutstanding requirement of an EPC rating of 25. If a carbon neutral building was achievedan Innovation credit could also be awarded for meeting this level, meeting this levelwould require further consultation between the University, Council and consultants toidentify technologies in meeting this target. At this stage a more conservative target, ofan EPC rating of 18 resulting in 13 credits has been highlighted as being achievable intargeting Outstanding.In addition the score would be improved by the higher proportion of low and zero carbontechnologies required in moving towards carbon neutral and an Outstanding rating, with3 credits and 1 innovation credit noted.CPW have set out options for aiming to meet a carbon neutral target within their report.In summary to meet these low energy targets, passive design is critical which we wouldapply whether the development is aiming for Excellent or beyond. In order to achievea carbon neutral development, thermal elements will have to be more rigorouslyexamined with standards adopted, such as PassivHaus, enabling heating requirementsto be significantly reduced. This standard was recently adopted for student residencesat Leeds Metropolitan University.Once passive measures have been incorporated reducing the carbon emissions toneutral will rely on a low energy service strategy combined with client buy in to enablethis to be met, for example, by using low energy white goods and reviewing operationalaspects which impact on energy use. Low and zero carbon technologies can then beanalysed to enable carbon emissions to be brought to zero or exported in order tooffset emissions. Achieving this level is challenging and is likely to be site dependent,influencing which technologies are appropriate and effective on this specific site.Passive design has been taken into consideration with key features noted as follows:◦ Orientation: Residential blocks which are to be dual sided will aim to haveaccommodation facing east and west to increase the potential for solar warmth,where possible. The academic accommodation will have solar shading to reducesolar gains where possible with the potential to benefit from solar warmth in theheating months.◦ Micro-climate has been considered to reduce the impact of northerly winds and toreduce the impact of prevailing winds across the site creating a wind tunnel effect.◦ External spaces will be considered to provide areas which are comfortable to usewith shading in summer and sun traps in winter or evenings.◦ Daylighting will be important to reduce the level of artificial lighting with carefulanalysis of the balance of opaque elements to glazing, building depth and form tomaximise daylighting while avoiding overheating.◦ Careful planning of room types where there are potential heat gains to the northelevation, such as IT suites in academic accommodation◦ Use of thermal mass and ventilation strategies to reduce temperature variationsand the need for cooling.◦ Incorporating elements, such as green roofs to reduce the heat island effect◦ Highly efficient thermal envelope, potentially to PassivHaus to reduce heatingload.◦ Utilise free energy for example by tempering incoming air through the use of earthtubesPart of meeting a low carbon solution is the proposed possibility of using CHP with trigeneration,or the ability to cool with waste heat utilising absorption chillers. This wouldalso meet additional points under BREEAM Education for the Free Cooling credit, whichhas been included as part of the strategy in meeting an Outstanding rating.The credit for Ene 20 Energy Efficient IT solutions has not currently been targeted asthe University are not aiming to incorporate measures such as, ‘Thin client’ technology.Other measures within the credit will be reviewed to be incorporated into the scheme,such as only utilising cooling at higher temperatures. The credit will be reviewed as theproject progresses. Using ‘Thin client’ technology would help reduce the heating loadwithin IT suites and offices, thereby reducing the requirement to cool these spaces.An additional credit will apply for the Sports Facility, credit Ene 12 Swimming PoolVentilation and Heat Loss. To meet this credit the pool will require an automatic or semiautomaticpool cover which covers the whole of the pool. In addition the air temperaturein the pool needs to be controlled to 1°C above the water temperature.© architects design partnership llp Page 39

04Environmental & BREEAM AssessmentTransportAll of the buildings should perform well against this section of the BREEAM assessment,as the site has been planned to address all of the issues set out within the credit, byvirtue of taking on the aims within the University Travel Plan. In addition the site hasreasonable public transport provision, with local amenities provided on the site and onthe main campus. Specific areas which have been met are the need for adequate cycleprovision, safe pedestrian and cycle routes and adequate delivery areas.Freemen’s Common has been proposed as the site to relocate the main campus parkingprovision, to create a cleaner, safer and more attractive centre to the main Universitycampus. A number of options have been reviewed to reduce the impact of the facilityand to remove cars from the centre of the site.The key element of the proposals is to provide a safe, pedestrian focused heart to thesite which acts as a route across the site providing links from Nixon Court to the maincampus, with social spaces linked around and off routes creating opportunities forinteraction and mingling. The bridge extends this route to avoid the issue of crossingWelford Road with cycle routes combined with pedestrian routes to seamlessly linkcycle access from the road onto the bridge over to the main campus.Delivery areas have also been rationalised in line with the University Travel Plan to beremoved from parking, pedestrian and cycle areas.WaterAll of the credits under this section are highlighted as being met. Reducing water useis the first point of managing water resources, with low water use sanitaryware as astraightforward and cost effective solution.Rainwater recycling has also been included, which although expensive due to the cost ofa holding tank and additional pipework is effective in reducing the volume of rainwaterrunoff as well as reducing the volume of potable water required for the building.Rainwater recycling is particularly effective where toilets are located together andstacked across floors. When considering residential accommodation it may be worthreviewing the lifecycle cost of incorporating rainwater recycling due to the amount ofpipework required to service ensuite WC’s spread across the building.MaterialsMaterial selection will be based on a number of aspects with environmental benefitsbeing a key issue. The following criteria set out our broad approach with a number ofitems addressing other credit areas, such as waste reduction;◦ Use materials with low embodied energy through review against the Green Guidefor Specification to maximise on A+ and A ratings.◦ Retain and or reuse existing building elements where possible to reduce the impactof using virgin materials. The majority of the existing buildings are not suitable forrefurbishment; however these buildings could be crushed and reused on site forfill material.◦ Use natural materials with low VOC (Volatile organic compound) content and 0ODP and GWP of less than 5 for a healthier environment (applicable in Health andWellbeing credit Hea 9 VOC’s◦◦◦◦◦◦Maximise recycled content through use of recycled aggregates or/ and precastunits where concrete is used for thermal mass to reduce the impact and volume ofusing a high embodied energy material.Aim to use local products to reduce transport impacts and support local economyReview potential for offsite & prefabricated construction to reduce constructionwasteResponsibly source materials, such as, use of FSC timber, EMS certification forother productsUse of green roofs to reduce impact of buildings within landscape, be in keepingwith site ecology, reduce rainwater run off and assist with thermal mass andreducing the heat island effect.Use robust materials which can withstand wear and tear associated with studentuse, to avoid replacing materials too often.In meeting an Outstanding rating, greater effort will be required to ensure that Greenguideratings are A+ for all products where possible and using materials with a higher ratingin terms of responsible sourcing, such as timber. This can be challenging when thermalmass is required to reduce temperature fluctuation, and reduce the requirement forcooling. In addition windows and curtain walling can be difficult to meet an A+ ratingwithout using timber, which presents additional issues of ongoing maintenance.WasteThe largest section of this heading is for waste minimisation through the constructionprocess. This is dealt with through setting specific targets for the volume of wastecreated during construction and the subsequent volume which is diverted from landfillincorporated in the Construction Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP). To enable thiscredit to be addressed waste minimisation needs to be considered from the start of theproject, with review of:◦◦◦◦◦Involve the whole design team to review all elements of the projectCan excavation waste be reused elsewhere on site as part of the landscapingschemeConstruction methods such as off-site and prefabricated construction to reducewaste on siteUtilise modular and simple construction formsUtilise recycled materials, where possible, in particular existing buildings whichcannot be reused can have masonry crushed for fill and hardcore on site.A lower proportion of waste produced on site and sent to landfill is likely to be requiredfor an Outstanding rating, with a greater degree placed on the items noted above tomeet the innovation credit for Wst 1.Although using recycled aggregates in the project will be a key aim, it can be difficult tomeet the criteria for the credit Wst 2 Recycled Aggregates depending on the availabilityof recycled aggregates for high grade use within the local area. The credit has thereforebeen noted as not achievable but should be reviewed as the project is developed.The University are proactive with waste management and measures for recycling wasteand composting will be incorporated in line with University Waste Policy and BREEAMrequirements. In addition the waste management facility will incorporate a compactoror baler to further reduce the volume of waste collected and meet the BREEAM credit.© architects design partnership llp Page 40

04Environmental & BREEAM Assessment◦ Transport and Movement Section: Public Transport provision, Public TransportAvailability/ Frequency, Facilities (Public Transport – quality of bus stops, welllit etc), Local Amenities, Cycling (cycle networks and infrastructure), CyclingFacilities , Car Clubs, Flexible Parking, Local Parking (minimising car use), HomeZones (residential/ mixed use streets designed for pedestrian priority), TransportAssessment and improvements◦ Resources: Low Impact Materials (Green Guide Rating), Locally Sourced Materials,Road Construction (Reclaimed, recycled), Waste Operation (Composting),Masterplanning strategy – Water Resources (current capacity/ grey and rainwaterrecycling), Groundwater (polluting public or private surface or ground waterabstractions)◦ Business and Economy Section: Business Priority Sectors (to promote businessgrowth), Labour and Skills (only applicable to government funded and PPPdevelopments), Employment (job creation), New Business (New business space),Investment (encouraging commercial outlets to be let – what is demand?)◦ Buildings Section: Domestic (CSH or Ecohomes rating), Non Domestic (BREEAM)04.2 Sustainability SummaryThe University of Leicester are progressive in their actions on Sustainability, movingforward policies to set targets in place which will substantially affect the way theyoperate and develop in the future. As a university they see their standpoint as anopportunity to demonstrate by example and to influence their students some of whomwill be the policy makers and leaders of the future.Part of the key to sustainable development is the interdependency between social,environmental and economic elements. The success of the Freemen’s Common sitewill rely on all of these components through; good quality buildings and externalspaces combined with soft landscaping with ecological value, providing opportunitiesfor interaction between students, staff and the public, with facilities, such as cafes andcinemas which extend the use and increase the vibrancy of the area.Our approach is to fully integrate measures throughout, working with the designteam and client by recognising that sustainable issues are interlinked, complex andaffect most aspects of design. When elements are combined the message and impactis effective and powerful, evident where nature can flourish within a socially thrivingurban environment.© architects design partnership llp Page 42

05 Civil & Structural Assessment

05Civil & Structural AssessmentThe existing Freemen Common Campus site is located between the A5199, WelfordRoad and Putney Road, Leicester. The site sits on the opposite side of Welford Roadfrom the main University of Leicester Campus.The site has coordinates 52.6183N, 1.1283W and falls from a level of approximately84.3m to 80.0 at the junction between Welford Road and Putney Road.The site currently accommodates a health centre, student accommodation blocks andcar parking. The majority of the site is developed or hard paved.05.1 DemolitionThe existing health care centre is a listed building and therefore cannot bedemolished.The existing student accommodation blocks will need to be demolished to allowthe proposed development of the site. The existing buildings were erected in twodevelopment phases between 1973 and 1976. The buildings are traditional three storeymasonry buildings with loading bearing walls, precast concrete floors and timber trussroofs.Given the age of the properties it is possible that some asbestos may be present and aType 3 asbestos survey would be required prior to their demolition.It would be hoped that the masonry elements of the buildings could be recycled bycrushing on site and using as hardcore material beneath the proposed buildings or hardlandscaped area.05.2 Ground ConditionsA ground investigation survey has not yet been carried out on the site and this would benecessary before progressing further with the design.Existing reports from neighbouring sites indicate that the ground conditions would be 1-1.5m of made ground overlying stiff boulder clay to some depth. This clay is somewhatvariable and hence an allowable ground bearing pressures can be expected to be around150kN/m2.Given the scale of the proposed buildings and the likely foundation loads then this wouldresult in excessively large pad foundations and it is recommended that piled foundationsare the most suitable option.Groundwater is unlikely to be an issue on this site and it is not expected to be a problemduring excavation works.The historical maps of the site indicate that the site remained undeveloped until around1973 when the first of the accommodation blocks were constructed. Until this time thesite had been used as rural land and allotments granted to the Freemen of Leicester.On the basis of this previous use as well as its current development we would notexpect to find any significant issues with contamination. A full site investigation has notbeen carried out and no chemical testing done, so it remains a possibility that somecontamination could be found but this would be unexpected.05.3 Flood Risk AssessmentIt is likely that a full flood risk assessment will be needed to comply with planningrequirements and to gain the Breeam points available.Our initial investigations show that the full extent of the site is located in an area of lowflood risk, Flood Zone 1 as shown on the Environment Agency Flood Zone Map. This zoneindicates land as having a less than 1 in 1000 (< 0.1%) annual probability of flooding.Therefore it can be presumed that the site will have very little risk of flooding and in factthere are no historical records of any flooding incidents. It does help that the site is atthe top of quite a large hill.05.4 DrainageThe existing Severn Trent Water sewer drawings indicate that a 225mm dia. Publicsurface water sewer, together with a 225mm dia. Public foul water sewer run North toSouth along the A5199 Welford Road.The existing site accommodation layout shows the foul drainage currently running outtowards Welford Road and connecting into the public sewer. It would appear feasiblethat the foul drainage for the proposed scheme would also run into this main publicsewer. This will of course be subject to the capacity of the existing sewer system andapproval from Severn Trent Water.The current storm water drainage to the existing buildings on the site and the car parkareas fall via a drainage network into an attenuation pond located at the southern tip ofthe site. It is highly likely that both the planning authorities, Severn Trent Water and theEnvironment Agency will all wish for this pond to be retained, both from a storm run-offposition and to retain the existing ecological aspect of the pond.The size and location of the pond may well restrict the potential development footprintof the site and this is an issue that will need to be addressed with all relevant parties.The existing site is almost completely developed with either building roof areas or carpark hard paving. As a result it is unlikely that surface run-off will be increased with thenew proposed layout. The statutory bodies now insist that any new drainage systemshould be designed to try to decrease the load on the existing system and make dueallowance for climate change.As a result further attenuation is likely to be necessary and this should be achievedthrough the use of Sustainable Urban Drainage Solutions (SUDs), where practicable.The following should be considered:◦ Swales/ PondsSwales can be used to convey and attenuate surface water run off. The proposeddevelopment is of a fairly urban nature, however swales could be accommodatedwithin the landscaping where appropriate. This maybe a possibility along thewestern and southern boundaries of the site.◦ Filter stripsFilter strips to slow and clean surface water flows running adjacent to roads arepossible around hard and soft landscaped areas.◦ Soakaways and permeable pavingA geotechnical investigation indicates that generally the underlying soil is clay andhas poor infiltration characteristics. On this basis soakaways are unlikely to beviable. Areas of permeable paving with granular areas below, although would notact as soakaways, can significantly contribute to overall attenuation.Further detailed discussions will be required with Severn Trent and the EA to establishagreed discharge flows that are acceptable for the site and then the above measurescan be employed to achieve flows within these constraints.Image 1 below_Environment Agency Flood Zone Map© architects design partnership llp Page 44

05Civil & Structural Assessment05.5 Site Access & HighwayAt the moment the site is accessed via a separate access and egress point along WelfordRoad on the eastern sided of the site. At the southern end of the site is a major junctionwhere the Welford Road crosses the Putney and Victoria Park Roads.The access to the site is a major aspect of the proposed development of the site withthe planning and highway authorities. Their current position is that they do not wishto see more traffic movements generated onto Welford Road and the main junction.By increasing the car parking on the Freemen Common site, then these numbers willincrease. There may be a balancing decrease from the main university site to counteractthis but the overall impact will have to carefully assessed.At this stage it is difficult to explore these issues further as the ideal access points tothe site will depend on the positioning of the various building elements particularly thecar park. It would appear that an access off Putney Road which is somewhat quieterwould seem more appropriate than the Welford Road access but this would have to beassessed in terms of its impact on the crossroads and the change in vehicle turningmovements.In order to satisfy the various bodies it is likely that traffic surveys, counts and modellingwill be required to form part of a detailed Traffic Impact Assessment to explore the likelyimpact of increased and altered traffic movements.It is apparent that any new access to the site will involve some highway works and thiswill have to be carried out under a Section 278 agreement with the highway authority. Itis also quite likely that the planning authority will impose a Section 106 condition ontoany planning approval.05.6 Pedestrian & Cycle BridgeOne of the central aspirations of the proposed development is to improve links betweenthe main University Campus and Freeman’s Common both for pedestrian and cycletraffic. This is a fundamental part of the University’s green travel plan and is an essentialpart of reducing vehicular journeys to the University site, thereby reducing congestion,emissions and parking issues.To facilitate this, it is the intention to provide a wide pedestrian and cycle boulevardalongside University Road. This would then link across to the Freeman’s CommonCampus via a cycle and footbridge constructed over Welford Road. It is considered thatthis is, by far, the best option for crossing Welford Road. An underpass is possible andhas been suggested by the highway authorities but this is not considered to be attractiveto users and has a variety of safety issues. Additional or upgraded crossing points werealso considered and although this may improve the present situation it would not beideal with large numbers waiting at the roadside to cross and the inevitable delays totraffic on Welford Road.The exact location will depend on the overall scheme for Freeman’s Common andthe design of the footbridge will be subject to requirements of both the planning andhighway authorities, and lengthy discussions will probably be required to resolve theissues to all parties satisfaction.The following are some of the main requirements of the footbridge:◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Suitable location to link University and Freeman’s Common.Width to safely accommodate pedestrian and cycle traffic.Aesthetically suitable to its location and use.Easily accessible from multiple directions, particularly for cycles.Gently sloping approach ramps.Well litEasier and more convenient to use than crossing Welford Road at grade level.DDA compliant05.7 Structural SolutionAcademic BuildingsThe structural solution for the teaching block will be a framed solution. This is likely tofundamentally be a choice between a steel frame or concrete frame, with the variousflooring options that are available. The final choice of solution will depend on a numberof factors including the external cladding, span requirements, height restrictions andservicing requirements.Some structural options that could be developed and evaluated in the following designstages are:◦◦◦◦◦Steel frame with composite metal deckingSteel frame with precast concrete floor slabsIn situ concrete frame with ribbed or traditional slabIn situ concrete flat slab constructionPrecast concrete frameEach of these options have pros and cons that will need to be assessed against theactual building and take into account such aspects as cost, functionality, thermal masscontribution, speed of construction, quality, flexibility etc.It is quite likely that to achieve the Breeam and low carbon emission targets then theoverall building design would benefit from the maximum thermal mass contributionthat the structure can provide. From this point of view then a concrete frame or flat slabwould be the most likely solution to adopt. This will be subject to various design optionsand costing exercises being carried out in the later stages of the design process.As discussed previously foundations will be a piled solution to accommodate therelatively high loads being carried.Residential BuildingsThe residential building will likely be around seven storeys high or higher and the layoutby its nature will be regular and repetitive. There are numerous structural optionsthat can be applicable including precast modular systems, timber framed solutions,insitu concrete flat slab and steel options. The final choice will depend on many factorsincluding architectural and building services requirements.Foundations will be similar to the teaching block utilising a piled solution05.8 Parking FacilitiesThe current design options investigates a separate multi-story car park option and againthis could be constructed in either concrete or steel framed options. Further designdecisions can be made once the location and scale of the car park has been established.The location of the car park will very much depend on the final access positions to thesite which will need agreement with the local authorities.The option of providing underground car parking either below the teaching or residentialblocks has not been discounted following meeting with the Planning Authority, and thiswould involve significant excavation and retaining structures. It would be more efficientto utilise the natural slope of the site and provide car parking towards the southern endwhere levels are lower and closer to the likely access positions.© architects design partnership llp Page 45

© architects design partnership llp

06 Mechanical & Electrical Assessment

06Mechanical & Electrical AssessementThis report provides details of the existing site infrastructure and the new infrastructurestrategy associated with the redevelopment of the Freeman’s Common site at theUniversity of Leicester.The Freeman’s Common site is currently occupied by 7 No. student housing buildings, astudent Medical Centre, waste management facility and associated surface car park.The redevelopment of the site the following accommodation requirements are beinginvestigated with the potential of a new 12,000m2 Medical School building, 600-800 bedstudent residential accommodation; maintain existing waste management facilities, carpark for 500 spaces, Sports Hall building and a new Energy Centre building.06.1 Service DiversionTo date we have requested & received record drawings from BT Openreach, EON &National Gas which are included in the appendices of this report. Further requests toother Supply Companies will be made at the next stage of the design & procurementprocess. We have looked through the University archives to glean any record informationbut unfortunately to no avail. Based on our discussions in the consultation meetings wehave recommended that the University employ a Specialist Contractor to carry out asite subtronic survey & record any finding on a CAD site plan drawing. The subtronicsurvey will provide details of the existing infrastructure currently present. On receipt ofthe additional record & survey information, it is likely that additional service diversionworks will be necessary.To enable the new buildings to be constructed, the existing buildings will be demolished.Prior to any demolition works the existing infrastructure services will be isolated,decommissioned or diverted to ensure continued service to buildings. An importantaspect of the subtronic survey will be locate existing local isolation valves which willallow the phased isolation of services.The 11,000V/400V electrical sub-station, owned and maintained by EON, houses a ringmain unit and a 300kVA rated oil transformer. An 11,000V underground ring circuit runsacross the site to connect onto the EON network in Welford Road and Putney Road.In the early stages of the redevelopment, the new sub-station within the new EnergyCentre will be established with a temporary connection made to the existing sub-stationto maintain services. It is likely, but yet to be confirmed, that the existing Medical Centreis served from the existing EON sub-station. If confirmed & to avoid running back tothe new Energy Centre, an Application for Electricity will be made for a separate 400Vsupply taken from Welford Road.Three gas fired boiler houses exist on the site, located in the Medical Centre, Q Blockand SS Block. The Q Block boiler house, which takes a 150mm diameter gas supply fromWelford Road, provides the space heating to blocks A-Q and AA-JJ. The boiler house inthe SS Block, which takes a gas supply from the Q Block, provides the space heating toBlocks KK – W. The Medical Centre boiler house only serves the Medical Centre and isserved via a 100mm diameter gas supply from Welford Road.From our discussions with the IT Department, we understand that a fibre optic cableruns from the Main Campus to Nixon Court via the Block H server room. As part of anyenabling works package, the cable will be re diverted around the Freemen’s Commonsite and a temporary connection made to Block H to maintain services until demolitiontakes place.The underground BT services that run from two points of connection along Welford Roadwill be stripped out by BT Openreach to meet the redevelopment programme of works.The underground Virgin Media services that run from the site boundary will be strippedout by Virgin Media to meet the redevelopment programme of works.06.2 Proposed Infrastructure StrategyA new energy centre building & associated service yard will be provided adjacent to theexisting waste management facilities with direct vehicle access from Putney Road. Thenew energy centre building & associated service yard would potentially accommodatethe major plant listed below;◦ Gas fired boilers or Biomass boilers or a mixture of both. Underground districtLTHW pipe work mains will run from the Energy Centre to each new building toprovide space heating.◦ Gas combined heat & power or Biomass combined heat & power unit (CHP).The electrical output of the combined heat & power unit will be synchronised &connected onto the University electrical distribution network. The heat output of thecombined heat & power unit will be connected onto the LTHW distribution networkfor space heating in the winter months, year round domestic hot water generationand potentially used to satisfy the Medical School Building summer time cooling‘base load’ using Absorption Chillers. This approach will maximise the potentialuse of the CHP throughout the year and generate the greatest carbon savings.◦ Standby diesel generator & associated fuel storage to provide alternative power tolife safety system (to comply with EN BS 9999) & any other critical loads advised bythe University.◦ Provision of an 11,000V/400V electrical sub-station & 400V Main LV Switch rooms.◦ Absorption chiller for comfort cooling in the Medical School building. Undergroundchilled water mains will run from the Energy Centre to the Medical School roofmounted ventilation plant.◦ Water storage & pumps to distribute water via underground pipe work to each newbuilding.◦ Delivery, off loading & storage of the wood source (pellets or chips) for the Biomass plant.◦ Any other carbon reduction plant to achieve the final agreed Energy Strategy.Centralised plant for heating and cooling offers the most economic method of meetingthe lower carbon emission aspirations.It would be possible to invite separate tenders from other Parties to provide & run theEnergy Centre facility whereby the energy delivered to each University building wouldbe purchased at pre agreed rates.Applications for new Supplies will be made with the Supply Companies for the provisionof new incoming services into the Energy Centre taken via Putney Road06.3 Refurbishment of Existing AccommodationScheme proposals will include an element of remodelling of the existing Listed MedicalCentre accommodation but will entail the total renewal of the mechanical and electricalservices. The existing Listed Building was originally built for residential use so has alimited floor to ceiling height & is naturally ventilated via open able windows. Due tothe close proximity of the busy Welford Road the opening of the windows are very rarelyused by the building users (noise & dust issues) so the current environment would notmeet current building regulations and modern environmental standards (in terms ofindoor air quality and internal temperatures). This use of this existing building mustbe carefully considered based upon these existing building limitations, it is necessaryto avoid high occupancy densities and high internal gains to avoid making the internalconditions unacceptable in terms of legal and industry best practice guidelines. It wouldbe wise therefore to use the building as residential with low occupancy density & limitedheat gain equipment such as computers.The remodelling of the existing Listed Medical Centre for residential use will includea basic mechanical ventilation system for the en suites bathrooms and the kitchenfacilities to comply with Building Regulations Part F. Consideration will be given toindividual local ventilation systems & whole house centralised ventilation systems.© architects design partnership llp Page 48

06Mechanical & Electrical Assessement06.4 Energy StrategyOur aim is to design the most energy efficient building and services that meet the needsof occupants, are responsive to the external climate, and meet the University briefoutlined below;◦ Invitation to Fee Tender Enquiry document produced by the University calls forBREEAM ‘Excellent’. Based on our discussions in the consultation meetings weunderstand that the revised brief is that the buildings should achieve BREEAM‘Outstanding’. This is a very ambitious requirement. The BREEAM assessmentfor the residential blocks will be based on the BREEAM Multi – residential 2008standard criteria & the Medical School building will be based on the BREEAMEducation 2008 standard criteria. An informal pre assessment will be included inthis report.◦ Following the introduction of the 2006 edition of the Part L of the BuildingRegulations it now a requirement that all new buildings & refurbishments shallmeet enhanced targets on carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction. We await the imminentpublication of the updated new Part L 2010 which comes into force in October 2010.The new Part L 2010 will tighten up emission standards, with the changes requiringa 25 per cent improvement in energy efficiency above current standards.◦ City of Leicester Local Plan (CLLP) adopted in January 2006 provides the foundationin conformity with other development plans and national guidance for the energypolicies. In particular, energy policies UD04, BE16 & BE17 will need to be compliedto achieve Planning Approval. The basic requirement is that 14% (this figure willincrease by 1% increments every year) of the total annual operational energydemand should be via on site renewable technologies. Based on our discussions inthe consultation meetings we understand that the University has agreed with thelocal Planners that the electrical output of any gas fired combined heat & powerwill be assumed to be on- site renewable technologies. This approach is ideal forthe centralised CHP and absorption cooling proposed.◦ To adhere to the University of Leicester Energy Strategy, which calls for a reductionof carbon emissions by 60% by 2012 (based on 2004/2005 figures) & based on ourdiscussions in the consultation meetings, we believe that all new developments willneed to be carbon neutral. Therefore, the residential blocks will adopt ‘PassivHaus’principles, the refurbishment of existing buildings will have Part L betterment &the provision of new buildings will have Part L betterment. Although these passivemeasures will greatly reduce the carbon emissions for each building we envisagethat carbon reduction plant will be needed to ensure that the carbon neutral criteriais realised.Passive energy efficiency design measures invariably prove to be the most economicaland socially acceptable inclusions on any scheme. Consequently, the focus of thedesign to meet the brief outlined above will be initially by means of good passive designmeasures combined with an efficient engineering approach & the introduction of carbonreduction plant when all the passive measures have been adopted. In summary, thepassive engineering approach will be as listed below;Passive energy efficiency design measures invariably prove to be the most economicaland socially acceptable inclusions on any scheme. Consequently, the focus of thedesign to meet the brief outlined above will be initially by means of good passive designmeasures combined with an efficient engineering approach & the introduction of carbonreduction plant when all the passive measures have been adopted. In summary, thepassive engineering approach will be as listed below;◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Heavy weight concrete building for improved thermal mass & to limit temperatureswings within the building.Night purging of the structure when the ambient temperature is cooler to improve/ limit the following peak day time internal temperatures.Solar protection to minimise solar gains.Improved Building Insulation to minimise heat losses & gains.Improved Air Tightness to limit infiltration.Day lighting to be maximised to limit artificial lighting usage.Allow a slight increase in internal peak summertime design conditions to reducecapital & running costs. This is particularly important as to meet the reducedcarbon emissions it is important to avoid the requirement for unnecessary comfortcooling.Heavy Weight BuildingA heavyweight concrete structure provides high thermal mass to the buildings and isvital in stabilising the internal temperature profile and reducing summertime internaltemperatures. Extreme swings in external ambient temperatures together with theinternal transient heat gains from the occupants, processes and IT equipment will havea much lower impact on the room temperature if exposed thermal mass is employed.It is recognised that exposed thermal mass does create other challenges, in particulardetailing with the acoustic properties of a concrete box (which tend to make the roomsmore acoustically ‘lively’) and concealing the services. There is however solutions tothese issues which will need to be developed further during the concept design stages.Night purging facilities (displacement air via the floor void) will be provided in theMedical School to pre-cool the building structure prior to occupancy the next day. Thiseffectively reduces the internal temperatures that occur in the rooms the following daywhile limiting and in some cases avoiding mechanical cooling requirements.Solar ProtectionAny fenestration, facing any direction other than North, will definitely be designed tolimit summer solar gain to the building. Overhangs, brise soleil type external shading,solar control glazing or a combination of these are acceptable, should be allowed for anddeveloped during the course of the concept design. The inclusion of high performancesolar glazing to the facades in order to maximise daylight but reduce solar heat gainswill be essential for this scheme.Building InsulationThe insulation of the building envelope will need to be significantly better than thelimiting values required under the Part L2 of the Building Regulations. The limitingvalues quoted within the regulations are the minimum acceptable levels of insulation foreach element of the envelope. It is usually necessary to make a significant improvementon these minimum values in order to gain a compliant CO2 emission figure for theproposed design just for Part L2 compliance. In order to obtain the desired BREEAMrating it will be necessary to reduce the CO2 emissions further below the currentBuilding Regulation requirements.VentilationAdopting the correct ventilation principle is critical to the success of the project for anumber of reasons including: -◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Minimum ventilation rates are required for occupant comfort and these levels aredictated by Building Regulations.The provision of mechanical ventilation is a significant consumer of energy withinthe building.Carefully designed ventilation systems combined with high thermal massconstruction significantly reduce summertime temperatures during the academicyear.Ventilation prevents occupants being exposed to air borne contaminants.Achieving good air quality in teaching spaces is important to providing a goodteaching environment.For a low energy building, heat recovery ventilation facilities in winter areessential.Mechanical ventilation will be needed within any spaces which have a sealedfenestration system to reduce or negate external noise and pollution from traffic orother sources. This is a key issue for this particular project with the busy WelfordRoad & the railway line on the site boundary.Displacement air distribution via the floor to provide night purging in the MedicalSchool. Displacement ventilation tends to provide improved indoor air quality andcomfort than more traditional mixed mode mechanical ventilation systems for thesame overall air quantity.◦To achieve the stringent carbon neutral requirement for the development it is paramountthat we take any opportunity to omit any energy demands by specifying alternativepassive measures. The design of the multi storey car park is a good example of thiswhereby a natural ventilation solution (to comply with BS 7346-7) will be provided in lieuof a mechanical ventilation solution© architects design partnership llp Page 49

06Mechanical & Electrical AssessementHeat Recovery VentilationNatural ventilation provides a very cost effective solution to ventilating shallow planbuildings. However, such a ventilation strategy, predominantly provided by openingwindows for fresh air, can pose acoustic issues as a result of external noise pollutionfrom sources such as traffic. This is a principle concern at Freemen’s Common sitedue to the sites location within the town centre, proximity to the railway lines and theadjacent major ‘A-road’ network. An acoustic assessment will need to be undertakento clarify the suitability of a natural ventilated solution for the buildings and it is likelyto conclude that we should not propose natural ventilation for the ventilation of generalteaching & office accommodation which will form the major areas of the buildings. Itis therefore proposed that a mechanical ventilation system is incorporated within theMedical School with an open able windows solution being available in the studentaccommodation for additional ventilation boosting as required.The mechanical ventilation system will incorporate high efficiency heat recovery asa means of utilising the waste heat from the building generated by the occupants,equipment and lighting which would otherwise be lost to atmosphere and its associatedenergy wasted. In heat recovery ventilation systems, the warm outgoing ‘exhaust’air stream passes through a heat exchanger (typically a rotary regenerator (thermalwheel), plate heat exchanger or run-around coils) where most of the thermal energy istransferred to the cold incoming ‘supply’ air. This reduces the amount of heat needed tobe added to the supply air, often to the point where no additional heat is required at allwhen the buildings are occupied and essentially become self heating due to the passivemeasures adopted as listed above.Air TightnessThe air tightness of the building significantly impacts on its energy consumption andhence CO2 emission. The more air tight the building, the less energy is required to heatthe building in winter. Part L2 of the Building Regulations states that air permeabilitymust be less than 10m3/h/m2 @ 50Pa. Experience working with the new regulationshas shown that it is usually necessary to make significant improvements on thestatutory limit to achieve CO2 emission compliance. Pending the CO2 modelling wewould recommend that the Medical School & Sports Building target a value of 3m3/h/m2 @ 50Pa. The residential block will achieve the air tightness requirements withinPassivHaus guidelines (1m3/h/m2 @50Pa). In order to achieve this, the appointeddesign team will need to have a very robust design in terms of air tightness and wewould advise that the architectural design stipulates that the Contractor engages anindependent air-tightness consultant during the construction period.DaylightingThe provision of good daylighting is essential in a low energy building. The CO2emissions associated with artificial lighting installations in most buildings are oftenbetween 25 and 30% of the total CO2 emissions. Providing good daylighting penetrationinto the core of the building will significantly reduce the CO2 emissions for the schemeand will greatly enhance the quality of the teaching environment in the areas served.To enhance the daylighting available, large atria areas will be considered in the MedicalSchool which will incorporate high levels of roof lights. This will assist with providingsome ‘borrowed’ light to the deeper plan areas of the building.Daylight modelling will be carried out during the concept design to check that glazingareas are optimised to achieve the minimum daylight levels required. External glazingareas will require enhanced U-values to minimise heat loss. Maximising beneficialday light against limiting unwanted solar gains is an important consideration with anyproject of this type.Plant & Control EfficiencyThe provision of an effective control and metering philosophy is fundamental to theefficient operation of the building environmental services. The following providesan overview of the plant efficiency and control measures that are proposed for thescheme:-◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦High efficiency, low NOx gas fired condensing heating boilers to have a goodCoefficient of Seasonal Performance (COSP).Low pressure hot water heating flow and return temperatures - lower thantraditional installations to maximise heat generating efficiency.Zoning of HVAC systems including zoning of mechanical ventilation systems.Occupancy detection control strategies to be linked to mechanical ventilationsystems wherever practical, resulting in ‘on-demand’ zoned ventilation control,lower delivered fan power and increased flexibility in building usage.Occupancy detection and density control strategies to be linked to heating systemswith un-occupied set-back temperature provision such that heating is provided‘on-demand’ where relevant. Reducing the supply air to a space by 20% results ingreater than 48% electrical consumption saving so is very beneficial in any variableoccupancy building.Heat recovery devices to be used wherever practical on all supply air mechanicalventilation systems.Mechanical ventilation systems to include automatic control strategies that providefor secure night time purging and free cooling, maximising the benefit of exposedbuilding mass to help limit the requirement for cooling.Automatic control routines to ensure HVAC systems are enabled/disabled atoptimum times (i.e. latest possible start-up time and earliest shut-down time)using intelligent ‘self learning’ controls.Lighting solutions to employ low energy lamps and high frequency control gear.Lighting installations to be provided with automatic control systems for occupancydetection and daylight linking.Motors to be used to drive mechanical ventilation systems.Variable speed pumps and fans to be used to promote lower operating costs andhelp match energy usage with the operating profile of the building.Sub-metering to be provided such that a minimum of 90% of the input energy fromeach utility service may be accounted for at end use. The Building ManagementSystem (BMS) shall be interfaced to provide automatic monitoring and targeting ofall sub-meters to promote energy management and deliver lower consumption.In addition to the above, the BMS shall also raise an identifiable alarm in the event thatout of normal range values or end use energy consumption is detected as a result ofout of ordinary building use, failure of automatic control systems or inefficient plantoperation.Internal Peak Summertime Design ConditionsIn the low energy Medical School building hopefully the University will accept that thebuilding that they are being provided with is not a fully air conditioned building althoughsome form of cooling may be provided to the whole of the mechanical ventilation systemsto minimise or ‘cap’ high internal temperatures caused by elevated external ambientconditions. Some localised cooling will be provided to areas that are subject to higherheat gains but the whole of the building will not be maintained within strict temperaturedead band values. The University hopefully must accept a certain fluctuation in theinternal temperatures, tracking the external ambient, in order to benefit from a buildingwith reduced energy consumption and this approach must be fully agreed by the endusers for this type of low energy scheme to be successful.It would not be our intention to provide cooling with relative humidity (RH) control forthis project.Further discussions will take place with the University to agreed maximum ‘realistic’design values that will be used for the computational thermal modelling and designvalues when selecting mechanical services equipment.Low Energy Cooling OptionThe nature of the Medical School will be that many areas will have high density ofpeople & computers producing high heat gains. To maintain acceptable environmentalconditions it is likely that the mechanical ventilation system will include backgroundcooling. This will be enhanced with mechanical top up cooling facility to keep peaksummertime temperatures below a pre agreed value. The challenge for the appointeddesign team will be to provide this cooling at the lowest capital & running costs forthe most energy efficient system. These cost/benefit analysis during the next conceptdesign stage should include, but not limited to, the cooling systems listed below;◦ Ground cooling via water which is pumped from the ground water source to acooling heat exchanger to provide the cooling energy required.◦ Ground cooling via air which uses ‘earth tubes’ to pre cool the ventilation air. Earthtubes are essentially buried concrete / plastic ducts though which the incomingfresh air is drawn.◦ Absorption cooling which utilises ‘waste’ heat energy to generate cooling energyvia a thermodynamic energy exchange in absorption machine. Absorption chillerscan take waste heat from the combined heat & power plant to generate chilledwater.◦ Evaporative cooling whereby a wet heat exchanger is used to evaporative cool theexhaust air which is transferred across to the supply air via a heat exchang© architects design partnership llp Page 50

06Mechanical & Electrical AssessementPassivism Solution for the Residential BuildingsThe first PassivHaus dwelling was constructed in Darmstadt Kranichstein, Germany andcompleted in 1991. The success of the construction methods led to the establishment ofthe PassivHaus Institution in 1996. Mainland Europe has many examples of this type ofconstruction with the examples in the UK being completed in more recent times. CPWare currently appointed to design three dwellings to PassivHaus & CfSH Level 6 ZeroCarbon standards for the Diocese of Worcester & a PassivHaus Office Development. Thekey features of the PassivHaus concept are noted below;◦ Improved U – values & air permeability for the envelope (U 0.15W/m2K & 1m3/h/m2 @ 50Pa).◦ Improved U – values & air permeability for the windows & doors including tripleglazing (U 0.8 W/m2K).◦ Highly efficient mechanical ventilation heat recovery systems and consideration ofearth ducts such as those manufactured by Rehau products.◦ Active shading and south facing Orientation for solar gain.If the brief is confirmed that the development must be carbon neutral, we wouldrecommend that the new residential blocks are built to BREEAM & PassivHausstandards.Renewable & Low Carbon Technology Energy OptionClearly, a key driving factor for the redevelopment will be to realise the stringent energyreduction & carbon neutral requirements outlined above in some detail. To this end,the design team at the early stages of the concept design process will need to agreethe brief, resolve the interface with the City of Leicester Scheme & thereafter conduct adetailed review of all the options. The detailed review of all the renewable & low carbontechnology energy options will address the issue listed below;◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Define the University Brief.Consider current utility costs, indicative payback & feed-in tariffs.Noise from wind turbines (aero-generators) & combined heat & power plant.Local Planning Requirements.Available Grants.BREEAM Credits.Outline the benefits, issues & recommendations for each technology including solarphotovoltaic, solar thermal for domestic hot water generation, ground source heatpumps, air source heat pumps, wind turbines, gas fired combined heat & powerplant, biomass combined heat & power plant, biomass boilers and fuel cells whenintegrated into the district heating from the energy centre.SummaryAt the concept design stage the appointed team will consider, in conjunction with theUniversity, the items listed below.◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Any additional diversion works identified by the subtronic survey & the Utility SupplyCompany record drawings. The scope of works will include the lowering or diversionof pavement services to allow the new vehicle bell mouths to be constructed.Electronic systems links to the Main University Campus to be defined. On the basisthat the electronic systems will run over the IT network, the links are likely to befibre optic cables which may come via Nixon Court.Agree the extent of carbon reduction plant to achieve the final agreed brief.We understand that some of the existing IT equipment is owned & maintained byKeycom. The Keycom/University 2 year Agreement should be considered as part ofthese proposals.Confirm the University Insurers requirements, in particular sprinklers which willhave a major impact on the building design.Define the DDA, Part M & BS 8300 requirements.Fire strategy for each building to be agreed.Lift requirements, LTA, fire fighting, evacuation, goods, etc.Standardisation of any plant, equipment, suppliers, etc.Sequence of works/phasing.Mobile phone coverage.University to consider the Thin Client concept for the Medical School to help reducethe heat gain in the general accommodation spaces.The Medical School may attract attention from Animal Right Organisations sohigher security measures may be required.Agree any interfaces with the City of Leicester combined heat & power system,the Main Campus combined heat & power system, Nixon Court & any futuredevelopments.Define the spare space in the Energy Centre or the expansion of the Energy Centrefor any future developments.Scope of works to be agreed for the pedestrian link to the main Campus.University to decide on which elements of the re development will be built by others,if any.Height of the buildings to be considered in terms of life safety systems. Certainadditional requirements apply at 18 metres (floor to floor) & 30 metres (floor tofloor).Existing radio & microwave masts linking to the Main Campus.◦© architects design partnership llp Page 51

07 Cost Report

07Cost Report07.1 IntroductionThis report is a feasibility cost report in response to the brief issued by LeicesterUniversity for the redevelopment of the Freemen’s Common Campus.07.2 Executive Summary07.2.1 Project SummaryThree options to be assessed, including sports facilities, 500 space carpark, public realm and energy centre◦◦◦Option A – 598 beds, 12,000m2 teaching, sports centreOption B – 598 beds, 12,000m2 teaching, sports centreOption C – 598 beds, 12,000m2 teaching, sports centreAfter consultation additional two options to be assessed, including 400space car park, public realm and energy centre◦◦Option E – 375 beds, 12,000m2 teaching, sports centreOption F – 375 beds, 12,000m2 teaching07.2.2 Cost SummaryStandard Construction cost - inline with planning guidanceEnhanced construction cost -extra over planning guidanceand including BREEAMoutstanding07.2.3 Top Risks and ActionsOption A Option B Option C Option D Option E Option F£ 80,432,430 £ 81,405,735 £ 77,755,842 n/a £ 63,308,351 £ 60,543,281includes sports centre includes sports centre includes sports centre no allowance for sportscentren/a n/a n/a n/a £ 97,519,897 £ 78,252,644option discounted afterconsulatation - notcostedInitial options offered forconsultationincludes sports centrepreferred options afterconsultationno allowance for sportscentre07.3 Design Option07.3.1 Structural OptionsThe Structural report has identified some structural options that could be developedand evaluated in the following design stages, which are:◦◦◦◦◦Steel frame with composite metal deckingSteel frame with precast concrete floor slabsIn situ concrete frame with ribbed or traditional slabIn situ concrete flat slab constructionPrecast concrete frameThe choice of structural frame will depend on:◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Programme – steel is quicker to erect on siteCost – currently steel is more economic, but it does not deliver the long termrunning cost savings available as a result of the use ofconcrete thermal mass. Steel costs are also more susceptible to worldwide marketfluctuations.Appearance – concrete frames allow for alternate soffit options, whereas generallya steel frame will be coveredSpan – the final design will dictate which solution is most cost effective to achievethe required layoutBuilding height – the final design will dictate which solution is most cost effectivegiven the heights to be achievedSustainability – the requirement to have a BREEAM Outstanding and carbonneutral building may negate the possibility of the use of a steel frame, subject tofull BREEAM assessment.07.3.2 BREEAMClient needs to confirm if BREEAM Outstanding is to be targeted. Currently there isvery little benchmark information available to provide comparison on the overall costaddition for moving from BREEAM Excellent to Outstanding. No student or UniversityAccommodation has yet to be completed in the UK that has achieved this level.Assessments should be carried out on a project specific basis and require a BREEAMpre-assessment to be carried out. The earlier that this is done then the more costeffective the choices available to the University.07.4 Basis of Costing07.4.1 Generally◦◦All elements of the report have been generated as part of a feasibility study only.Preliminary schemes have been prepared based on feasibility drawings preparedby ADP Architects and reports from Couch Perry Wilkes and Couch Consulting.07.4.2 Basis of estimate◦ All rates are based on “cost per m2” derived from historical benchmark cost dataand works of a similar nature.◦ National Tender Prices are currently indicated to continue to deflate until the end of2011, as a result of the current economic conditions. However input costs, such asmaterial and energy costs continue to rise over the same period. Due to the lengthof construction programme for a project of this size it would therefore be prudentto allow for inflation to a mid point in the construction programme to ensure thatprovision is made for future market movement. As such an allowance of 0% hasbeen added to account for this.◦ An allowance of 14% has been made for preliminaries which is reflective of worksof this size and nature.◦ A design contingency of 10% has been allowed to account for design developmentfrom feasibility stage.07.4.3 Assumptions and ExclusionsAssumptions◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦Works to commence on site 4Q 2011The works are to be carried out as one complete phase of works by a singlecontractor.The building will be constructed from insitu concreteA piled foundation solution will be requiredAir tightness of medical centre to target 3m3/h/m2 @ 50PaAir tightness of Student Accommodation to target 1m3/h/m2 @50PaProvisional allowances have been made in the budget cost build up for:Extending or replacing the existing services infrastructure to support the newbuildingsDemolition and site clearance, excluding asbestos removal – subject to survey.Public Realm worksHighways works to form new site accessFootbridge over Welland RoadNo allowance has been made for:◦ The requirement for sprinklers by the University’s Insurers◦ Unforeseen ground conditions.◦ Addressing ground contamination or remediation.◦ Services diversions – subject to survey◦ Pedestrian link works outside of the site, eg. University Road boulevard, except forthe pedestrian bridge itself◦ Interfaces with the City of Leicester combined heat & power system, the MainCampus combined heat & power system, Nixon Court & any future developments.◦ S278, s106 agreements◦ Land purchase costs◦ Funding costs◦ Financing costs◦ VAT◦ Planning and Building Control fees◦ Professional Fees© architects design partnership llp Page 54

07Cost Report07.4.3 Assumptions and Exclusions (continued)◦ Surveys◦ Rights of Light Issues◦ Oversailing Licences◦ Archaeological Works◦ Loose FFE, except for bedroom furniture to Student Accommodation◦ Internal University costs eg. Project manager, clerk of works, etc.4.1.3 Statutory and Other Design ComplianceBudget costs have been prepared on the basis that:◦◦◦◦The new building will comply with the requirements of current Building Regulationsincluding meeting the specific requirements of Part L -Conservation of Fuel and Power 2010.The new building and infrastructure will be designed to achieve an ExcellentBREEAM 2008 rating.The new building will be designed to ensure the essential relationship betweensustainability and high quality design.07.5 Bench markingStep 3 – Develop options study exploring the opportunities to reduce VAT to be appliedto the projectStep 4 – Develop Cost Benefit analysis report on the optionsStep 5 - Option selection and implement procedures to secure VAT exemptionA consultation meeting was held with James Hunt, Director of Finance during which theVAT liability of the University was discussed. It was advised that VAT should be appliedusing a partial exemption method:◦◦◦◦Residential – zero ratedTeaching – standard ratedSports facilities – standard ratedCar park – standard ratedBased on the level of drawn information and end use clarity available at feasibility stageit is not currently possible to proceed further beyond Step 1, with any detailed analysisof the baseline VAT liability. Should the design be instructed to proceed to more detaileddesign then it will be possible to carry out this analysis based on the confirmed use ofindividual rooms.07.7 Funding Options07.7.1 Student AccommodationThere are many companies who currently operate in the Student Accommodationmarket who offer the opportunity to Universities to upgrade or extend existing facilitieswhilst reducing the capital cost to the university, such as Campus Living Villages, UPPand Opal.07.6 VAT07.6.1 Optimisation of design and project planning to mitigate VAT liabilitiesThe brief required that a review of the likely VAT position was, made in order to mitigateVAT liabilities on the project. In order to do this the following process should befollowed:Step 1 – Understand the University’s VAT accounting protocols and standard rated andzero accommodation◦ Classify the VAT status of the various end users / Departments involved in theproject (non business use / VAT exempt or business use standard rated).◦ Confirm the VAT partial exemption recovery rate applied by the University to anyVATable Supplies (or business uses) under its capital goods scheme.◦ Establish all potential non-business use or dedicated research facilities that mayqualify for VAT exemption (non business use classification).Step 2 – Estimate the baseline VAT liability applicable to the project◦ Using the schedule of accommodation, calculate the VAT to be applied against thefit out costs for each end user/department depending on their VAT status (businessuse or non business use and VAT exempt).◦ Determine the overall percentage of total gross floor area to be either standardrated or zero rated for VAT purposes (e.g. 60 / 40). Calculate the VAT liability acrosscommon costs such as shell and core and professional fees etc using the sameratio (e.g. if 40% of the floor area is zero rated accommodation, then VAT will onlybe applied at standard rate to 60% of the remainderThey offer a number of ways of providing such funding :Establishment of a charitable vehicleSale and lease back, within a charitable vehicleSale and lease backSole own and operateThe suitability of any such route will depend on the University’s own attitude to financialrisk, the extent of University ownership and management required of the accommodationand long term flexibility.7.2 Medical Centre2009 Business Case identified the following potential funding streams for the medicalcentre:◦ SIFT (recurrent, funding University borrowing) £15,000,000◦ Donations £2,000,000◦ University Capital £3,000,000◦ HEFC Capital Funding 21012-2014 (anticipated 2010) £5,000,000◦ Existing Medical School Capital £1,500,000◦ TOTAL £26,500,000In the light of changes in Higher Education funding allocations and the recent changein Government the robustness of this funding allocation will need to be challenged toensure these funds remain available.It is also possible that alternate funding arrangements, such as those currently beingseen in the Student Accommodation market are now being made available to provideteaching accommodation.© architects design partnership llp Page 55

07Cost Report07.7 Funding Options (continued)07.7.3 Car ParkIn order to reduce the capital expenditure required to provide car parking facilitiesand also to mitigate the ongoing maintenance and administrative costs of runningthe facilities it may be economic to invite tenders from outside parking managementfirms. Such firms would either construct and operate the facility or operate the facilityto generate income for the university. The choice of this would be influenced by theUniversity’s long term property strategy and the desire to create income.07.7.4 Energy CentreIt would be possible to invite separate tenders from other Parties to provide & run theEnergy Centre facility whereby the energy delivered to each University building wouldbe purchased at pre agreed rates.07.7.5 Sustainable Funding OpportunitiesAdditional opportunity to receive Central, Local or even European funding for innovativesolutions also exist:◦ Grants◦ Feed In Tariffs (FiT) / Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI)◦ Enhanced Capital Allowances07.8 Schedule of AccomodationOption A Option B Option C Option D Option E Option FStudent Accommodation 598 student bedrooms. The main blocks at 6floors combined with a 10 floor tower.630 student bedrooms over 7 floors. 510 student bedrooms at 7 floor or 588 at 8floors.350 student bedrooms over 4 - 7 floors. 375 student bedrooms over 4-5 floors (535student bedrooms over 6-7 storeys if plannersallow)375 student bedrooms over 4-5 floors (535student bedrooms over 6-7 storeys if plannersallow)Teaching Accommodation 12,000sqm of teaching space over 7 floors. 12,000sqm of teaching space over 6 floors. 12,000sqm of teaching spaceaccommodated in 2-3 storey blocks.12,000sqm of teaching space over 4 - 5 floors. 12,000sqm of teaching space over 6 floors,with glazed atrium12,000sqm of teaching space over 6 floors.Car Parking 500 spaces across two sub-levels. 500 spaces across two sub-levels. 500 spaces across two sub-levels. 487 spaces across 7 multi storey levels. 400 spaces across two sub-levels 400 spaces across two sub-levelsSports facilities2 x sports hall, 600 sq m gym, 25m x 13mpool, 225 sq m sprung wooden floor activityroom, 4 x Squash courts, 2 x Dojo mats,Dance studio, climbing wall, Indoor runningtrack, Sports Injury treatment room,café/sports bar, changing facilities2 x sports hall, 600 sq m gym, 25m x 13mpool, 225 sq m sprung wooden floor activityroom, 4 x Squash courts, 2 x Dojo mats,Dance studio, climbing wall, Indoor runningtrack, Sports Injury treatment room,café/sports bar, changing facilities2 x sports hall, 600 sq m gym, 25m x 13mpool, 225 sq m sprung wooden floor activityroom, 4 x Squash courts, 2 x Dojo mats,Dance studio, climbing wall, Indoor runningtrack, Sports Injury treatment room,café/sports bar, changing facilitiesX2 x sports hall, 600 sq m gym, 25m x 13mpool, 225 sq m sprung wooden floor activityroom, 4 x Squash courts, 2 x Dojo mats,Dance studio, climbing wall, Indoor runningtrack, Sports Injury treatment room,café/sports bar, changing facilitiesXRefurbish Listed Building Public Space Energy Centre Waste Management Centre Pedestrian footbridge option discounted - not costedpreferred options after consultationInitial options offered for consultation© architects design partnership llp Page 56

07Cost Report07.8.1 Option A07.8.3 Option C07.8.5 Option FDemolition/Site Clearance Provisional Allowance £ 650,000.00Services Diversions Provisional Allowance tbcStudent Accommodation - inc loosefurniture07.8.2 Option BOption A598 student bedrooms. The mainblocks at 6 floors combined with a 10floor tower. 598 rooms £ 22,000.00 £ 13,156,000.00Teaching Accomodation 12,000sqm of teaching space over 7floors. 12,000 m2 £ 1,410.00 £ 16,920,000.00Car Parking500 spaces across two levels,undercroft, retaining structure 500 spaces £ 10,000.00 £ 5,000,000.00Sports facilities2 x sports hall, 600 sq m gym, 25m x13m pool, 225 sq m sprung woodenfloor activity room, 4 x Squash courts,2 x Dojo mats, Dance studio, climbingwall, Indoor running track, SportsInjury treatment room, café/sports bar,changing facilities8,000 m2 £ 1,310.00 £ 10,480,000.00Refurbish Listed Building 852 m2 £ 1,000.00 £ 852,000.00Public Space - mixed hard and softlandscaping 22,195 m2 £ 100.00 £ 2,219,500.00Energy Centre Provisional Allowance £ 2,500,000.00Waste Management Centre Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Pedestrian footbridgewide enough to allow foot and cycletraffic, DDA compliant Provisional Allowance £ 5,000,000.00Highways worksFormation of new access - PutneyRoad Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Utilities Provisional Allowance £ 400,000.00Construction Cost £ 58,177,500.00Part L changes Provisional Allowance 5% £ 2,908,875.00Preliminaries 14% £ 8,552,092.50OHP 5% £ 3,481,923.38Contingency 10% £ 7,312,039.09Total @ 2Q2010 £ 80,432,429.96Option BDemolition/Site Clearance Provisional Allowance £ 650,000.00Services Diversions Provisional Allowance tbcStudent Accommodation - inc loose furn 630 student bedrooms over 7 floors. 630 rooms £ 22,000.00 £ 13,860,000.00Teaching Accomodation 12,000sqm of teaching space over 7floors. 12,000 m2 £ 1,410.00 £ 16,920,000.00Car Parking500 spaces across two levels,undercroft, retaining structure 500 spaces £ 10,000.00 £ 5,000,000.00Sports facilities2 x sports hall, 600 sq m gym, 25m x13m pool, 225 sq m sprung woodenfloor activity room, 4 x Squash courts,2 x Dojo mats, Dance studio, climbingwall, Indoor running track, SportsInjury treatment room, café/sports bar,changing facilities8,000 m2 £ 1,310.00 £ 10,480,000.00Refurbish Listed Building 852 m2 £ 1,000.00 £ 852,000.00Public Space - mixed hard and softlandscaping 22,195 m2 £ 100.00 £ 2,219,500.00Energy Centre Provisional Allowance £ 2,500,000.00Waste Management Centre Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Pedestrian footbridgewide enough to allow foot and cycletraffic, DDA compliant Provisional Allowance £ 5,000,000.00Highways worksFormation of new access - PutneyRoad Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Utilities Provisional Allowance £ 400,000.00Construction Cost £ 58,881,500.00Part L changes Provisional Allowance 5% £ 2,944,075.00Preliminaries 14% £ 8,655,580.50OHP 5% £ 3,524,057.78Contingency 10% £ 7,400,521.33Total @ 2Q2010 £ 81,405,734.60Demolition/Site Clearance Provisional Allowance £ 650,000.00Services Diversions Provisional Allowance tbcStudent Accommodation - inc loose furn 510 student bedrooms at 7 floor or 588at 8 floors. 510 rooms £ 22,000.00 £ 11,220,000.00Teaching Accomodation 12,000sqm of teaching space over 7floors. 12,000 m2 £ 1,410.00 £ 16,920,000.00Car Parking500 spaces across two levels,undercroft, retaining structure 500 spaces £ 10,000.00 £ 5,000,000.00Sports facilities2 x sports hall, 600 sq m gym, 25m x13m pool, 225 sq m sprung woodenfloor activity room, 4 x Squash courts,2 x Dojo mats, Dance studio, climbingwall, Indoor running track, SportsInjury treatment room, café/sports bar,changing facilities8,000 m2 £ 1,310.00 £ 10,480,000.00Refurbish Listed Building 852 m2 £ 1,000.00 £ 852,000.00Public Space - mixed hard and softlandscaping 22,195 m2 £ 100.00 £ 2,219,500.00Energy Centre Provisional Allowance £ 2,500,000.00Waste Management Centre Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Pedestrian footbridgewide enough to allow foot and cycletraffic, DDA compliant Provisional Allowance £ 5,000,000.00Highways worksFormation of new access - PutneyRoad Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Utilities Provisional Allowance £ 400,000.00Construction Cost £ 56,241,500.00Part L changes Provisional Allowance 5% £ 2,812,075.00Preliminaries 14% £ 8,267,500.50OHP 5% £ 3,366,053.78Contingency 10% £ 7,068,712.93Total @ 2Q2010 £ 77,755,842.2007.8.4 Option EOption COption EDemolition/Site Clearance Provisional Allowance £ 650,000.00Services Diversions Provisional Allowance tbcStudent Accommodation - inc loose 375 student bedrooms over 5 floors.furniture375 rooms £ 22,000.00 £ 8,250,000.00Teaching Accomodation 12,000sqm of teaching space over 5 -6 floors. 12,000 m2 £ 1,410.00 £ 16,920,000.00EO for Glazed central atrium 2,000 m2 £ 1,000.00 £ 2,000,000.00Car Parking400 spaces across two levels,undercroft, retaining structure 400 spaces £ 10,000.00 £ 4,000,000.00EO undercroft carparking for additionaldig to accommodate TPO and pond100 spaces £ 20,000.00 £ 2,000,000.00Refurbish Listed Building 852 m2 £ 1,000.00 £ 852,000.00Public Space - mixed hard and softlandscaping 22,195 m2 £ 100.00 £ 2,219,500.00Energy Centre Provisional Allowance £ 2,500,000.00Waste Management Centre Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Pedestrian footbridge200m long, wide enough to allow footand cycle traffic, DDA compliant -enhanced design requirement Provisional Allowance £ 5,000,000.00Highways worksFormation of new access - PutneyRoad Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Utilities Provisional Allowance £ 400,000.00Construction Cost £ 45,791,500.00Part L changes Provisional Allowance 5% £ 2,289,575.00Preliminaries 14% £ 6,731,350.50OHP 5% £ 2,740,621.28Contingency 10% £ 5,755,304.68Total @ 2Q2010 £ 63,308,351.45Demolition/Site Clearance Provisional Allowance £ 650,000.00Services Diversions Provisional Allowance tbcStudent Accommodation - inc loose 375 student bedrooms over 5 floors.furnitureTeaching Accomodation 12,000sqm of teaching space over 6375 rooms £ 22,000.00 £ 8,250,000.00floors. 12,000 m2 £ 1,410.00 £ 16,920,000.00Car Parking500 spaces across two levels,undercroft, retaining structure 400 spaces £ 10,000.00 £ 4,000,000.00EO undercroft carparking for additionaldig to accommodate TPO and pond100 spaces £ 20,000.00 £ 2,000,000.00Refurbish Listed Building 852 m2 £ 1,000.00 £ 852,000.00Public Space - mixed hard and softlandscaping 22,195 m2 £ 100.00 £ 2,219,500.00Energy Centre Provisional Allowance £ 2,500,000.00Waste Management Centre Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Pedestrian footbridge200m long, wide enough to allow footand cycle traffic, DDA compliant -enhanced design requirement Provisional Allowance £ 5,000,000.00Highways worksFormation of new access - PutneyRoad Provisional Allowance £ 500,000.00Utilities Provisional Allowance £ 400,000.00Construction Cost £ 43,791,500.00Part L changes Provisional Allowance 5% £ 2,189,575.00Preliminaries 14% £ 6,437,350.50OHP 5% £ 2,620,921.28Contingency 10% £ 5,503,934.68Total @ 2Q2010 £ 60,543,281.45Student Accommodation - inc loosefurnitureOption FEO 160 rooms if planners accept 6-7storey blocks 160 rooms £ 30,000.00 £ 4,800,000.00Construction Cost £ 73,468,137.41Part L changes Provisional Allowance 5% £ 3,673,406.87BREEAM Outstanding Provisional Allowance 10% £ 7,714,154.43Preliminaries 14% £ 11,879,797.82OHP 5% £ 4,836,774.83Contingency 10% £ 10,157,227.13Total @ 2Q2010 £ 111,729,498.48Student Accommodation - inc loosefurnitureSports facilitiesEO 160 rooms if planners accept 6-7storey blocks 160 rooms £ 30,000.00 £ 4,800,000.002 x sports hall, 600 sq m gym, 25m x13m pool, 225 sq m sprung woodenfloor activity room, 4 x Squash courts,2 x Dojo mats, Dance studio, climbingwall, Indoor running track, SportsInjury treatment room, café/sports bar,changing facilities8,000 m2 £ 1,310.00 £ 10,480,000.00Construction Cost £ 78,588,351.45Part L changes Provisional Allowance 5% £ 3,929,417.57BREEAM Outstanding Provisional Allowance 10% £ 8,251,776.90Preliminaries 14% £ 12,707,736.43OHP 5% £ 5,173,864.12Contingency 10% £ 10,865,114.65Total @ 2Q2010 £ 119,516,261.12© architects design partnership llp Page 57

08 CDM Elements

08CDM Elements08.1 IntroductionEC Harris LLP Health Safety and Statutory Compliance Team have been asked tocompile a feasibility study for Leicester University on their proposed development atFreemen’s Campus, Welford/Putney Road, Leicester. All elements of the Construction(Design and Management) Regulations 2007 have been taken into account and areas ofthe regulations that may give rise to concern have been addressed in the subsequentsections below.The purpose of the document is to ensure that issues are brought to the attention of thedeveloper for the purposes of risk mitigation and minimisation of foreseeable incidents,also to ensure that all surveys and permits that may be required have been factored intothe design process and project risk register. The desired outcomes of this process are;◦◦◦◦◦No incidents concerning live servicesNo incidents involving SecurityNo spillagesMinimise wastage of resources and materialsDispose of arisings in approved manner08.2 CDM ElementsOwing to the construction processes and number of satellite projects it will benecessary to run the projects as individual ‘work packages’ each having it’s own projectmanagement plan but feeding into a main project document encompassing the entireworks.Each individual project can be issued with a generic ‘site wide’ Pre ConstructionInformation Pack (PCIP) and a separate area/project specific PCIP individual to thework package. The F10’s will also need to be specific to each construction area totallingat least 2 and possibly 3 submissions per build - Initial notification, Updated details andAmended programme dates.08.3 Surveys Required08.31 AsbestosA demolition Asbestos survey will be required prior to any demolition and given the ageof the buildings to be demolished, circa 1970 – 1976, there is a high risk of AsbestosContaining Materials within the structure of the building.08.32 Historical Land Usage - Soil SamplingHaving searched through historical maps dating back to the early 1800’s there appearsto be no significant industrial activity taking place within the confines of the proposedsite. This search also extended to any historical burial grounds and the maps show theWelford Road Cemetery to be the only consecrated grounds in the vicinity and withinthe dates mentioned above. It should be remembered that in the 1700 – 1800’s it wascommon practice to bury people outside of consecrated ground if their character andlifestyle was considered to be unsuitable by the Church. It is unclear whether this burialsite is historical or modern (within the last century) With that in mind it must always be aconsideration when digging footings into previously un-excavated land in what was oncecommon ground adjacent to a burial site.Historical surveys will also need to make allowances for any early settlements in thearea who may have been involved in the production of Iron products utilising smallfurnaces which will have produced a lot of coal tar from the process and this will beevident within the ground and identified by dark grey/black streaks within the strata.Heightened levels of PAH’s (Poly Aromatic Hydrocarbons) will also show up on the soilsurvey.08.33 Building ContaminationSurveys will need to be undertaken of the roof voids, not only for the Asbestos but alsoevidence of nesting Bats and Bird Faeces. A specialist environmental clean up operationwill need to be undertaken prior to stripping out these areas.08.34 Ecological & EnvironmentalThe area will need to be proven clear of indigenous, protected wildlife such as badgers,slow worms etc, where there areas of land that are undeveloped. There is a low risk ofNewts given that there are no visible natural water features that would be used by themfor breeding etc. Should there be any natural water features within the site boundarythen this will need to be taken into account.The aerial views of the site show the 2 areas below as places to concentrate andecological surveys. Although the first area is ‘off site’ there is obviously the risk ofmigratory and territorial patterns for species overlapping onto the site.There is a possibility for invasive species on site - Japanese Knotweed / HimalayanBalsam etc. An environmental survey is required to identify and control invasive species.Consider site as local to nature reserve and ensure all fauna & flora is identified andprocedures are in place to protect the eco system. Ensure procedures are in place toprevent use of contaminated soils & waste. During the Construction phase, control useof oils & chemicals on site.Design that meets requirements of BREEAM / Code for Sustainable Homes etc ifrequired by Client / Planning Authority. If so, ensure all new buildings comply with theBREAM Code of practice.08.34 Traffic SurveyThere will be a large increase in road traffic use on the supply roads surroundingthe proposed site. A traffic survey will be needed to ensure that deliveries andconstruction operations are conducted safely and with all due regard to the surroundinginfrastructure.08.4 Buildability08.41 Proximity of Railway LinesThe railway line runs adjacent to the site and the developer will probably need toapproach Network Rail if the distance between the development and Network rail landfalls within a certain distance. At time of producing this report I believe the distanceto be within 25meters. The reason for this is to ensure that Network rail are aware ofany construction related incidents that may occur – Accidental collapse/topple of anyconstruction plant such as cranes that may straddle and railway line. Service strikewhich may effect the operation of the line or control of waste which may blow onto thelines and cause a hazard.08.42 PilingGiven the proximity of the adjacent Welford Road Cemetery it will probably be a conditionthat Augured piles are used as opposed to vibro piles owing to the noise issue that Vibropiling produces. There will be an amount of soil/clay to be disposed of as a result of theauguring process but this can be utilised elsewhere on site.Image 1 above_ Areas of the site to concentrate ecological surveysImage 2 above_ Areas of the site to concentrate ecological surveys© architects design partnership llp Page 59

08CDM Elements08.43 Construction MaterialsWith the unpredictable regional weather at any time of the year the best constructionmethod from a timeframe perspective would be Timber Frame given the fact that unitscan be weather proofed fairly rapidly and do not rely on the relatively slow processof brick and block construction. If steel frame is to be used then consideration mustbe given to the prefabrication of as much of the steelwork as possible at ground levelto minimise the amount of work at height that would be required. If the floors are tobe of concrete slab formation (Bison Beam) then the spans need to be considered –the longer the span the fewer lifts need to be undertaken. Also with concrete slabsthere is a need to be fully aware of all beam penetration prior to construction – Anypost positioning penetration would need to be approved by the manufacturer and/orstructural engineer.Consideration:-◦◦◦◦Design which incorporates materials from non-renewable resources or withhazardous properties.Ensure resources only come from renewable and sustainable sources.Design which incorporates energy efficiency principles should also be given dueconsideration and energy efficient processes should be usedDesign with potential for light pollution should be avoided therefore design inlighting solutions must consider the controlling of potential nuisances.08.5 Associated Construction Hazards08.51 DustDust will need to be controlled very carefully throughout the project both duringdemolition and construction. It should be a recommendation of the CDM Coordinatorto ensure that demolition plant are fitted with water spray attachments to achieve acontinuous damping down procedure.08.55 Falling from heightPrevention methods should be in place for these situations occurring. Designers shouldconsider the requirements of Personal protective equipment (PPE) where this cannotbe avoided. The following points need to be considered and put into place:◦◦◦◦◦Adequate means of access/egress for work at heightCollective fall prevention (e.g. guard rails and toe boards)Adequate working platformsCollective fall arrest (e.g. nets, airbags etc)Personal fall protection (e.g. work restraints, work positioning, fall arrest and ropeaccess)08.56 Confined SpacesIt is not possible to provide a comprehensive list of confined spaces. Some placesmay become confined spaces when work is carried out, or during their construction,fabrication or subsequent modification.Dangers can arise in confined spaces because of:◦◦◦◦◦◦◦A lack of oxygen.Poisonous gas, fume or vapourLiquids and solids which can suddenly fill the space, or release gases into it, whendisturbed.Fire and explosions (eg from flammable vapours, excess oxygen etc).Residues left in tanks, vessels etc, or remaining on internal surfaces which cangive off gas, fume or vapour.Dust may be present in high concentrationsHot conditions leading to a dangerous increase in body temperature.Confined space risk assessment must take into consideration:Consideration should also be given to the positioning of any aggregate filtering/crushingplant as generally damping down has little effect on these items if there is more than aslight wind present.08.52 NoiseNoise levels should be maintained at the lowest possible level at the site boundary.Obviously some noise from a construction site is inevitable but mitigation methods suchas bunds and acoustic panels will need to be considered.08.53 FirePlan & Control Emergency procedures on site as there is always the potential for fire,given the amount of combustibles on site. Environmental air pollution also needs to becontrolled which can result from fires amongst other serious issues.08.54 Flood RisksBuild into project flood defences & introduce emergency contingencies with EA. Thereare different levels etc hence this can induce a flood risk. Topographical surveys arerecommended.◦◦◦◦◦The taskThe working environmentWorking materials and tools;The suitability of those carrying out the taskArrangements for emergency rescue© architects design partnership llp Page 60

09 Summary

09Summary09.1 Summary09.2 Risk RegisterThe purpose of this study was to review the strategic proposals made in the developmentplan in terms of the accommodation that could be placed on the Freeman’s Commonsite. Subsequent to the development plan the university has reviewed the size and typeof accommodation to be located at Freeman’s common. Those preferences formed thebasis of the brief identified for this project.The study has aimed to review proposals made in the brief and test them against certainapplicable design and construction criteria and also the views and the considerations ofprobable project stakeholders.The study has shown that there are numerous ways that the accommodation originallyhighlighted in the brief might be placed and arranged on the site. However, there areprobable issues and risks associated with arranging the accommodation as shown andthese are identified in the accompanying risk analysis. The most significant of theserisks is that of achieving an arrangement of accommodation that is not seen as overdevelopment of the site and thus would not be supported by the local planning authority.Consultation with the planning officers has suggested that a lower rise developmentwill be more likely to secure a successful planning application. This will impact on theextent of accommodation that can be placed on the site, and in addition will probablyaffect the numbers of parking spaces that can also be placed on the site.By considering the limitations the site places on the extent of development it is anticipatedthat the total extent of accommodation originally requested coupled with the additionalaccommodation highlighted through the course of the consultation will be too extensiveto be successfully combined on the Freeman’s common site. The university will needto appraise the level of accommodation and the typology of that accommodation that itwould want to have developed on the site. Until that process has been carried out it isdifficult for this study to be completely conclusive in terms of that accommodation andthe extent of it.Outline costs are highlighted in section 7.0. In options E and F the basis of fitting theaccommodation on site is the development of semi basement car parking decks. Theuniversity has identified that to retain the correct number of campus wide parking spacesin line with the green travel plan there will need to be 500 spaces on the FreemansCommon site. The two storey deck option allows for a maximum of 400, and this limitmay be compounded by the restrictions to development imposed by the site wide treepreservation order and also by the requirement from the planning officers for suitableboundary treatment to ensure improvements (and not worsening) of the public realmadjacent to the site. Therefore to retain the parking numbers either further subterraneandevelopment is required or there will be a compromise on the above ground facilities;be that landscaping or building footprint.The suggested development options which all still demonstrate the scale of developmentif the full accommodation as requested in the brief is developed on the site, all have anumber of elements of risk that are defined in the risk analysis associated with them,e.g. Ability to be phased, correspond to sustainable development, or achieve targets forcar parking on the site as part of the campus wide traffic plan. However common to allof the options is the identified risk of overdevelopment and a failure to achieve planningpermission unless the extent of development is rationalised and probably reduced.A further study leading to an outline planning application level of information wouldbe necessary to conclude some of the issues, particularly the risk of perceived overdevelopment that are raised by the development of the requirements of the briefingdocument.RISK REGISTERNo Area of Concern1.0 Statutory External Factors1.1 Compliance with Legislation1.2 Environmental1.3 Travel Plan1.4 Environmental & BREEAM assessmentsPlanning Permission and/or BuildingRegulation ApprovalExisting rights of way, presence of protectedwild animals, undiscovered watercourses andthe like, cause delays/redesignNot achieving planning consent for theproposed development.The Travel plan is integral to the 2008The Travel Plan produced by the University Development Framework Plan. A site specificunder the direction of the sustainable Travel transport assessment will have to beImplementation Group.produced to submit as part of the planningapplication.Clients requirement to achieve BREEAMExcellent/Outstanding1.5 Environmental & BREEAM assessments LCC planning polices guidelines.1.6 Legislation/Political1.7 Sustainable Urban Drainage1.8 Section 278 Agreement2.0 Non-Statutory External Factors2.1 Community objectionsChanges in Law etc EC directives imposeadditional requirementsLCC expect a SUD system to beincorporated into the development.BREEAM requirements involves integrationof the process at an early stage in thedesign. This is to ensure crucial aspects of tetarget rating, such as passive measures tomeet low carbon targets are met.Ensuring the these policies itemised in04.0.1 are met, this includes BE16renewable energy - 13 % energy reductionfrom 2009 with 1% year on year increasethrough use of on site renewable.Any works to highway required by LCC Unknown cost associated with section 278similar to the section 278 agreement to Nixon and the extent of works that will be imposedCourt.by LCC highway department.Complaints from the local community whichmay cause delays2.2 Service Rediversions Existing services on site.2.3 Inflation3.0 Project definition3.1 Compliance with LegislationCost of materials and services to constructthe buildings increaseTo meet the clients accommodationrequirements the building proposed forOptions E & F are 6/7 storey high.3.2 Academic Building University's stimulation for 12000sqm3.3Post Graduate Student AccommodationBuilding3.4 Car parking facilities3.5 Car parking facilities3.5 Pedestrian & Cycle BridgePotential RisksUniversity's requirement for 800 bedsNumber of spaces in line with the University,and in line with the parking strategy torelocate 500 spaces from the main campusto Freemen's Common site.Number of spaces in line with the University,and in line with the parking strategy torelocate 500 spaces from the main campusto Freemen's Common site.Bridge linking the Freemen's Common Siteand the University main campus.DetailsComplaints due to the disruption to WelfordRoad and impact on the constructionprogressRequire a subtronic survey & the utilitysupply company record drawings. The scopeof works will include the lowering anddiversion of existing services.LCC suggest that the accommodationblocks should be between 4/5 stories high.Difficulties in accommodating this extent ofacademic facilities on the site with other briefrequirements. This would become a potentialhigher risk should the local authority notpermit buildings in this site more than 4/5storeysDifficulties in accommodating this extent ofstudent accommodation on the site withother brief requirements. This would becomea potential higher risk should the localauthority not permit buildings in this sitemore than 4/5 storeysOption E&F proposal allows for 300/400below ground car parking spaces, which arelocated under the residential blocks. Thenumber of car parking spaces have beenreduced from the earlier schemes which had500 spaces. The reduction in spaces wasdue the imposed TPO by LCC whichreduced the actual area for the below groundparking.As mentioned in item 3.3 above therequirements for 500 spaces will requirefurther detailed analysis to be carries out.This potentially man that the car parkingspaces will encroach under the academicbuilding, increasing the level of excavation onthe site.Objections may be raised from the LCC withregard the bridge link over Welford Road.LCC recommendation is to relocate andupgrade the existing pedestrian crossing.Risks96663296999669RISK REGISTERNo Area of Concern4.04.1Design and TechnologyDesign development4.2 Passiv Haus5.0 Site Conditions5.1 Archaeological5.2 Japanese Knotweed5.3 Grade II Listed Building5.4 Land Use & Ecology6.0 Duration / Schedule & Urgency6.1 Programme7.0 Financial and Commercial7.1 Fund availabilityPotential RisksDesign does not fulfil criteria andperformance required by UoLTo achieve the University aspiration toachieve carbon neutral buildings.Passive Haus option recommended, howeverhigh associated build cost and and within theUK there are examples being completedhowever have not been certified.Discovery of fossils, antiques and all otherobjects having artistic, historic or monetaryvalue and human remains. Works may needFull extent of risk unknown, LCC requireto cease dependant upon the nature as itarchaeological desk based assessmentmay have to be preserved for maximum of 6business days, if no such instruction isissued works can commenceDiscovery of knotweed adjacent to siteboundary and pub car park?Existing grade II listed Freemen's CommonCottages.Maximise the ecological value of the sitethrough enhancing existing features.Any potential delays disruptive butparticularly over runs into examinationperiods would cause most adverse reactionfrom Uol and Student ResidentsPartnership agreement and funding not inplace may disrupt programme timescalesRisks 3 - HIGH2 - MEDIUM1 - LOWDetailsJapanese Knotweed present on the railwayboundary and on the Nixon Court site.Any alteration work to the existing buildingwill require to be assessed in detail andappropriate applications for alterationsubmitted to the local authority.LCC require commission studies into theexact location of the site togetherRisks666669© architects design partnership llp Page 62

10 Appendices

10Appendix AUtility Record Drawings - ElectricsWARNING: This area contains network operating at 33,000 volts (33kV), or above. If you are likely to encroach within therecommended minimum distances, specified in the 'Safe Digging Guide' on this DVD please call: 0800 0150927 .WARNING: This area contains network operating at 33,000 volts (33kV), or above. If you are likely to encroach within therecommended minimum distances, specified in the 'Safe Digging Guide' on this DVD please call: 0800 0150927 .© Crown copyright (Licence Nos. 100024877 & 100021807)Overhead Line + Poles Other Network Duct© Crown copyright (Licence Nos. 100024877 & 100021807)Overhead Line + Poles Other Network DuctOverhead Line + TowerSubstationsOverhead Line + TowerSubstationsFor further information on how to usethe application or to obtain furthercopies, contact:Underground Cables + JointsDistribution BoxesWL - Wall Line KL - Kerb Line VL - Verge Line HL - Hedge Line FL - Fence Line CL - Centre Line BL - Building LineNB. Blue symbols above will be colour coded: LV 6.6kV 11kV 33kV 132kVFor further information on how to usethe application or to obtain furthercopies, contact:Underground Cables + JointsDistribution BoxesWL - Wall Line KL - Kerb Line VL - Verge Line HL - Hedge Line FL - Fence Line CL - Centre Line BL - Building LineNB. Blue symbols above will be colour coded: LV 6.6kV 11kV 33kV 132kVCentral Networks, CNDS,Toll End Road, Tipton, DY4 0HHTelephone: 01332 393387Printed by efinnegan on 24/03/10IMPORTANT NOTICE. Owing to the scale of this plan, apparatus positions are approximate only and few service locations are shown.Exact locations of all cables including service cables should be verified by cable locator and careful use of hand tools. The cost ofrectifying any damage will be charged. Further advice, if required may be obtained by calling 0800 0963080. Work must be carried out inaccordance with all current Health and Safety Regulations. Guidance notes are available from The Health and Safety Executive.ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE MUST BE REPORTED TO 0800 0150921 IMMEDIATELY - MEANWHILE KEEP WELL CLEAR!Central Networks, CNDS,Toll End Road, Tipton, DY4 0HHTelephone: 01332 393387Printed by efinnegan on 24/03/10IMPORTANT NOTICE. Owing to the scale of this plan, apparatus positions are approximate only and few service locations are shown.Exact locations of all cables including service cables should be verified by cable locator and careful use of hand tools. The cost ofrectifying any damage will be charged. Further advice, if required may be obtained by calling 0800 0963080. Work must be carried out inaccordance with all current Health and Safety Regulations. Guidance notes are available from The Health and Safety Executive.ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE MUST BE REPORTED TO 0800 0150921 IMMEDIATELY - MEANWHILE KEEP WELL CLEAR!Page 1 of 2 ( LV )Page 2 of 2 ( HV )Scale: 1:1532Centre: 459.14km, 302.66kmExtent: 311.98m x 329.81mThis plan is based upon the Ordnance Survey map by Central Networks with the sanction of the Controller of the H.M. Stationery Office.Crown Copyright Reserved. Subject to any specific exceptions this copy must not be copied without the prior permission of the copyrightowner. Any information provided by Central Networks is copyright and may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission ofCentral Network.Scale: 1:1532Centre: 459.14km, 302.66kmExtent: 311.98m x 329.81mThis plan is based upon the Ordnance Survey map by Central Networks with the sanction of the Controller of the H.M. Stationery Office.Crown Copyright Reserved. Subject to any specific exceptions this copy must not be copied without the prior permission of the copyrightowner. Any information provided by Central Networks is copyright and may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission ofCentral Network.© architects design partnership llp Page 64

This plan is reproduced from or based on theOS map by National Grid Gas plc, with the sanctionof the controller of HM Stationery Office.Crown Copyright Reserved.Local MachineMAPS Viewer Version 5.6.3.0This plan shows those pipes owned by National Grid Gas plc in their role as aLicensed Gas Transporter (GT). Gas pipes owned by other GTs, or otherwise privately owned, may be present in this area.Information with regard to such pipes should be obtained from the relevant owners. The information shown on this planis given without warranty, the accuracy thereof cannot be guaranteed. Service pipes, valves, syphons, stub connections,etc. are not shown but their presence should be anticipated. No liability of any kind whatsoever is accepted byNational Grid Gas plc or their agents, servants or contractors for any error oromission. Safe digging practices, in accordance with HS(G)47, must be used to verify and establish the actual position ofmains, pipes, services and other apparatus on site before any mechanical plant is used. It is your responsibility to ensurethat this information is provided to all persons (either direct labour or contractors) working for you on or near gasapparatus. The information included on this plan should not be referred to beyond a period of 28 days from the dateof issue. Further information on all DR4s can be determined by calling the DR4 hotline on 01455 892426 (9am-5pm)A DR4 is where a potential error has been identified within the asset record and a process is currently underway toinvestigate and resolve the error as appropriate.NHP MAINSLHP MAINSIP MAINSMP MAINSLP MAINSCENTRE: 459093, 302642MAP REF: SK5902EXTRACT DATE: 11/12/2009DATE: 24/03/2010USER ID: MGordonSCALE: Not to scale© architects design partnership llp Page 6510Appendix AUtility Record Drawings_ Gas & BT

10Appendix BSevern Trent Water Records© architects design partnership llp Page 66

ManagementHealth &WellbeingEnergyTransportWaterMaterialsWasteLand Use & EcologyPollutionInnovation© architects design partnership llp Page 67BREEAM Scheme: BREEAM Education 2008Pass 30%Building Name: Academic Building, Freeman's CommonGood 45%BREEAM Registration No.: 0Very Good 55%BREEAM Assessor: 0Excellent 70%Licensed Assessor organisation: ADPOutstanding 85%Stage of AssessmentInterim - Design StageRating Level Pass Good Very Good Excellent OutstandingMinimum Standards Achieved YES YES YES YES NOEnvironmentalweightingBREEAM Score76.66%Minimum BREEAM StandardsBuilding Performance by SectionBREEAM RatingEXCELLENTCredits available Credits achieved % Achieved Weighted ScoreManagement 12.00% 20.00 18.00 90.00% 10.80%Health & Wellbeing 15.00% 15.00 12.00 80.00% 12.00%Energy 19.00% 29.00 19.00 65.52% 12.45%Transport 8.00% 14.00 11.00 78.57% 6.29%Water 6.00% 8.00 8.00 100.00% 6.00%Materials 12.50% 15.00 9.00 60.00% 7.50%Waste 7.50% 8.00 6.00 75.00% 5.63%Land Use & Ecology 10.00% 10.00 8.00 80.00% 8.00%Pollution 10.00% 12.00 6.00 50.00% 5.00%Innovation 10.00% 10.00 3.00 30.00% 3.00%Total BREEAM Score 76.66%Assessed Building's BREEAM Performance by Section20%18%16%14%Management 12% 11%Health &Wellbeing 15% 12%Energy 19% 12%Transport 8% 6%Water 6% 6%Materials 13% 8%Waste 8% 6%Land Use & Ecology 10% 8%Pollution 10% 5%Innovation 10% 3%12%10%8%6%4%2%0%Score Available Score Achieved10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008BREEAM Scheme: BREEAM Education 2008Building Name: Academic Building, Freeman's CommonBREEAM Registration No.: 0BREEAM Assessor: 0Minimum BREEAM StandardsPass Good Very Good Excellent OutstandingAchieved? YES YES YES YES NORef Title Higher Education CriteriaMulti-residential CriteriaNumber ofBREEAM creditsavailableTotal BREEAMcredits achievedMinimum required credits by BREEAM issue and ratingManagementMan 1CommissioningOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an appropriate project team One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an appropriate project teammember has been appointed to monitor commissioning on behalf of the client to ensure member has been appointed to monitor commissioning on behalf of the client to ensurecommissioning will be carried out in line with current best practice.commissioning will be carried out in line with current best practice.Two credits where, in addition to the above, evidence provided demonstrates thatseasonal commissioning will be carried out during the first year of occupation, postconstruction (or post fit out).Two credits where, in addition to the above, evidence provided demonstrates thatseasonal commissioning will be carried out during the first year of occupation, postconstruction (or post fit out).2 2 1 1 1 1 2Man 2Considerate ConstructorsOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that there is a commitment tocomply with best practice site management principles.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that there is a commitment to gobeyond best practice site management principles.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that there is a commitment tocomply with best practice site management principles.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that there is a commitment to gobeyond best practice site management principles.2 2 - - - 1 2One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that 2 or more of items a-g (listedbelow) are achieved.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that 2 or more of items a-g (listedbelow) are achieved.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that 4 or more of items a-g (listedbelow) are achieved.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that 4 or more of items a-g (listedbelow) are achieved.Man 3Construction Site ImpactsThree credits where evidence provided demonstrates that 6 or more of items a-g areachieved:a. Monitor, report and set targets for CO2 or energy arising from site activitiesb. Monitor, report and set targets for CO2 or energy arising from transport to and from b. Monitor, report and set targets for CO2 or energy arising from transport to and fromsitesitec. Monitor, report and set targets for water consumption arising from site activities c. Monitor, report and set targets for water consumption arising from site activitiesd. Implement best practice policies in respect of air (dust) pollution arising from the sited. Implement best practice policies in respect of air (dust) pollution arising from the sitee. Implement best practice policies in respect of water (ground and surface) pollutionoccurring on the sitef. Main contractor has an environmental materials policy, used for sourcing ofconstruction materials to be utilised on siteg. Main contractor operates an Environmental Management System.Three credits where evidence provided demonstrates that 6 or more of items a-g areachieved:a. Monitor, report and set targets for CO2 or energy arising from site activitiese. Implement best practice policies in respect of water (ground and surface) pollutionoccurring on the sitef. Main contractor has an environmental materials policy, used for sourcing ofconstruction materials to be utilised on siteg. Main contractor operates an Environmental Management System.4 4 - - - - -One additional credit where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of sitetimber is responsibly sourced and 100% is legally sourced.One additional credit where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of sitetimber is responsibly sourced and 100% is legally sourced.Man 4Building user guideFirst creditA Building User Guide that contains the information described under the ‘User GuideContents’ heading (see additional guidance) has been developed. The guide is relevantto the non-technical building user and appropriate to the stakeholder(s) that will occupythe building.Second creditA Laboratory User Guide that contains the information described under the ‘User GuideContents’ heading (see additional guidance) has been developed. The guidance isrelevant to the laboratory users that will occupy and use the facilitiesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the provision of a simple guide thatcovers information relevant to the tenant/occupants and non-technical building manageon the operation and environmental performance of the building.1 1 - - - 1 1Man 5Site InvestigationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the design team has carried outN/Aa detailed site investigation of the selected site.1 1 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 68

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008Man 6ConsultationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that consultation has been, or isbeing, undertaken and feedback given to the local community and building users.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that consultation has been, or isHigher Education Labporatory Building type or function present:being, undertaken and feedback given to the local community and building users. InA stakeholder engagement workshop has been undertaken at RIBA stage B. addition, advice should also have been sought from any relevant national and localA design team meeting has been undertaken at RIBA stage C or equivalent with a history, archaeological bodies or military history groups regarding the heritage value offocus on appropriate sizing, optimisation and integration of laboratory equipment and the building/site/surroundings.systemsThe results of the above activities have been summarised in a design intent document, Two credits where, in addition to the above, evidence provided demonstrates thatwhich has been approved by all parties involved and formed the basis of subsequentquality control.Two credits where, in addition to the above, evidence provided demonstrates that theconsultation process is being, or has been, undertaken using an independent methodsuch as DQI, DQM or School Works, facilitated by a third party.changes to the design and/or action has been taken as a result of the aboveconsultation process. This should include the protection of any parts of the building (orsite) having historic or heritage value in accordance with independent advice from therelevant body.2 1 - - - - -Man 7Shared FacilitiesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that shared facilities have beenprovided as a consequence of consultation feedback.N/ATwo credits where, in addition to the above, evidence provided demonstrates that these2 1 - - - - -facilities can be accessed without compromising the safety and security of the buildingand its occupants.Man 8SecurityOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an Architectural Liaison Officer One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an Architectural Liaison Officer(ALO) or Crime Prevention Design Advisor (CPDA) from the local police force has bee (ALO) or Crime Prevention Design Advisor (CPDA) from the local police force has beeconsulted at the design stage and their recommendations incorporated into the design consulted at the design stage and their recommendations incorporated into the designof the building and its parking facilities (if relevant).of the building and its parking facilities (if relevant).1 1 - - - - -Man 9Man 10Publication of building informationDevelopment as a learning resourceOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the design team are committedto publicising information about the environmental performance of the new developmentvia the internet, newsletters, site visits, presentations etc.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the proposed building AND/ORlandscape design provides a learning resource that can be used to facilitatedevelopment of environmental issues for building users and visitors.N/A 1 1 - - - - 1N/A 1 1 - - - - 1Man 11Ease of MaintenanceOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that specifications for the buildingand the building services/systems and landscaping have considered ease andefficiency of maintenance in line with best practice.N/A 1 1 - - - - -Man 12Life Cycle CostingOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a Life Cycle Cost (LCC)analysis based on the feasibility study proposals has been undertaken on the buildingdesign at a strategic and system level.Two credits where, in addition to the above, evidence provided demonstrates that theresults of the feasibility study and consideration of LCC have been implemented.N/A 2 2 - - - - -Hea 13Acoustic PerformanceTwo credits where evidence provided demonstrates that all spaces in the building meetthe appropiate standards required for indoor ambient noise levels and reverberation N/A 2 2 - - - - -times.© architects design partnership llp Page 69

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008Health & WellbeingHea 1DaylightingUp to two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that all occupied spaces areadequately daylit.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of floor area ineach occupied space is adequately daylit.21-- - --Hea 2 View Out One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all relevant building areas have an One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all relevant building areas have an- - - -adequate view out.adequate view out.-10Hea 3Glare ControlOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an occupant-controlled shading One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an occupant-controlled shadingsystem (e.g. internal or external blinds) is fitted in relevant building areas.system (e.g. internal or external blinds) is fitted in relevant building areas. 1 1 - - - - -Hea 4High frequency lightingOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that high frequency ballasts areinstalled on all fluorescent and compact fluorescent lamps.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that high frequency ballasts areinstalled on all fluorescent and compact fluorescent lamps. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Hea 5Internal and external lighting levelsOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all internal and external lighting, One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all internal and external lighting,where relevant, is specified in accordance with the appropriate maintained illuminance where relevant, is specified in accordance with the appropriate maintained illuminancelevels (in lux) recommended by CIBSE.levels (in lux) recommended by CIBSE.1 1 - - - - -Hea 6Lighting zones & controlsOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that, in all relevant building areas,lighting is appropriately zoned and occupant controllable with the option for commonlyrequired lighting settings to be selected quickly and easily.N/A 1 1 - - - - -Hea 7Potential for natural ventilationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that fresh air is capable of being One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that fresh air is capable of beingdelivered to the occupied spaces of the building via a natural ventilation strategy, and delivered to the occupied spaces of the building via a natural ventilation strategy, andthere is sufficient user-control of the supply of fresh air.there is sufficient user-control of the supply of fresh air.1 0 - - - - -Hea 8Indoor air qualityOne credit where air intakes serving occupied areas avoid major sources of externalpollution and recirculation of exhaust air.One credit where air intakes serving occupied areas avoid major sources of externalpollution and recirculation of exhaust air. 1 1 - - - - -Hea 9Volatile Organic CompoundsOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the emissions of VOCs andother substances from key internal finishes and fittings comply with best practicelevels.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the emissions of VOCs andother substances from key internal finishes and fittings comply with best practicelevels.1 1 - - - - -Hea 10Thermal comfortOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that thermal comfort levels in One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that thermal comfort levels inoccupied spaces of the building are assessed at the design stage to evaluate occupied spaces of the building are assessed at the design stage to evaluateappropriate servicing options, ensuring appropriate thermal comfort levels are achieved. appropriate servicing options, ensuring appropriate thermal comfort levels are achieved.1 1 - - - - -Hea 11Thermal zoningOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that local occupant control isavailable for temperature adjustment in each occupied space to reflect differing userdemands.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that local occupant control isavailable for temperature adjustment in each occupied space to reflect differing userdemands.1 1 - - - - -Hea 12Microbial contaminationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the risk of waterborne andairborne legionella contamination has been minimised.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the risk of waterborne andairborne legionella contamination has been minimised. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1© architects design partnership llp Page 70

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008EnergyEne 1Reduction of CO2 EmissionsUp to fifteen credits where evidence provided demonstrates an improvement in theenergy efficiency of the building’s fabric and services and therefore achieves lowerbuilding operational related CO2 emissions.Up to fifteen credits where evidence provided demonstrates an improvement in theenergy efficiency of the building’s fabric and services and therefore achieves lowerbuilding operational related CO2 emissions.15 9 - - - 6 10Ene 2Sub-metering of Substantial EnergyUsesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the provision of direct sub-metering One credit where evidence provided demonstrates the provision of direct sub-meteringof energy uses within the building.of energy uses within the building. 1 1 - - 1 1 1Ene 3Sub-metering of high energy loadAreas and TenancyOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates sub-metering of energy consumptioN/Aby tenancy/building function area is installed within the building.1 1 - - - - -Ene 4External LightingOne credit where energy-efficient external lighting is specified and all light fittings arecontrolled for the presence of daylight.One credit where energy-efficient external lighting is specified and all light fittings arecontrolled for the presence of daylight. 1 1 - - - - -One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a feasibility study considering One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a feasibility study consideringlocal (on-site and/or near site) low or zero carbon (LZC) technologies has been carried local (on-site and/or near site) low or zero carbon (LZC) technologies has been carriedout and the results implemented.out and the results implemented.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the first credit has beenachieved and there is a 10% reduction in the building’s CO2 emissions as a result ofthe installation of a feasible local LZC technology.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the first credit has beenachieved and there is a 10% reduction in the building’s CO2 emissions as a result ofthe installation of a feasible local LZC technology.Ene 5Low zero carbon technologiesThree credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the first credit has beenachieved and there is a 15% reduction in the building’s CO2 emissions as a result ofthe installation of a feasible local LZC technology.Three credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the first credit has beenachieved and there is a 15% reduction in the building’s CO2 emissions as a result ofthe installation of a feasible local LZC technology.3 3 - - - 1 1Or alternatively:Or alternatively:A maximum of one credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a contract with aA maximum of one credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a contract with aenergy supplier is in place to provide sufficient electricity used within the assessed energy supplier is in place to provide sufficient electricity used within the assessedbuilding/development to meet the above criteria from a 100% renewable energy source. building/development to meet the above criteria from a 100% renewable energy source.(Note: a standard Green Tariff will not comply)(Note: a standard Green Tariff will not comply)Ene 6Building fabric performance &avoidance of air infiltrationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that appropriate design and as builtperformance measures (as identified in the compliance requirements) are taken tominimise heat loss and air infiltration through the building fabric.N/A 1 1 - - - - -One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the cold storage refrigerationplant components are on the ECA Energy Technology Product List.Ene 7Cold storage equipmentOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the cold food storage plant isdesigned to minimise energy consumption in operation.N/A 3 1 - - - - -One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that opportunities for heat recovery,free cooling or thermal storage are identified and taken advantage of.Ene 8LiftsUp to two credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates the installation ofN/Aenergy-efficient lift(s).2 2 - - - - -Ene 10Free CoolingOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the building incorporates a freecooling strategy that completely displaces the need for conventional mechanical coolingsystems (excluding exceptional localised circumstances with small scale systems, forexample server rooms) and the thermal comfort requirements of credit Hea 10 areachieved.N/A 1 0 - - - - -Ene 20Energy Efficient IT solutionsOne credit where evidence demonstrates that data centres and server-based IT suitesare designed in accordance with the EU Code for Data Centres and best practiceenergy efficiency measures.1 0 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 71

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008TransportTra 1Provision of public transportUp to five credits are awarded on a sliding scale based on the assessed buildings’accessibility to the public transport network.Up to three credits are awarded on a sliding scale based on the assessed buildings’accessibility to the public transport network. 5 3 - - - - -Up to two credits are available:Tra 2Proximity to amenitiesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the building is located within500m of accessible local amenities appropriate to the building type and its users.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the building is located within500m of key accessible local amenities appropriate to the building type and its usersOne additional credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the building is locatedwithin 1000m of at least 5 additional accessible local amenities appropriate to thebuilding type and its users1 1 - - - - -Tra 3Cyclist FacilitiesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that covered, secure and well-litcycle storage facilities are provided for all building users.Two credits where, in addition to the above, adequate changing facilities are providedfor staff use.One credit where evidence is provided to demonstrate that there is adequate provisionof:a. covered, secure and well lit cycle racks for staff and residentsb. secure storage for wheelchairs and electric buggies2 2 - - - - -Tra 4Pedestrian and cycle safetyOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the site layout has been One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the site layout has beendesigned in accordance with best practice to ensure safe and adequate pedestrian and designed in accordance with best practice to ensure safe and adequate pedestrian andcycle access.cycle access.1 1 - - - - -Tra 5Travel planOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a travel plan specific to thebuilding has been prepared, which encourages the reduction of user reliance on formsof travel that have the higest environmental impact.N/A 1 1 - - - - -Up to two credits are available:Where evidence provided demonstrates that the number of parking spaces provided fothe building has been limitedTra 6Maximum car parking capacityFirst creditFor Sheltered housing and care homes:Where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no more than one parking spaceprovided for every four building usersOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates no more than one parking space isprovided for every fifteen building users.For all other users:Where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no more than one parking spaceTwo credits where evidence provided demonstrates no more than one parking space is provided for every three building usersprovided for every twetny building users.Second creditFor Sheltered housing and care homes:Where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no more than one parking spaceprovided for every five building users2 1 - - - - -For all other users:Where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no more than one parking spaceprovided for every four building usersTra 7Travel information pointOne credit is available where evidence provided up-to-date information on transportroutes and timetables.N/A 1 1 - - - - -Tra 8Deliveries & manoeuvringOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that vehicle access areas have beendesigned to ensure adequate space for manoeuvring delivery vehicles and providespace away from manoeuvring area for storage of refuse skips and pallets.N/A 1 1 - - - - -Water© architects design partnership llp Page 72

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008Up to five credits are available:Wat 1Water ConsumptionFour credits available where evidence provided demonstrates that the specificationUp to three credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the specification includes taps, urinals, WCs and showers that consumes less potable water in use thanincludes taps, urinals, WCs and showers that consume less potable water in use than standard specifications for the same specifications for the same type of fittings.standard specifications for the same type of fittings.One additional credit available where evidence provided demonstrates that thespecification of systems that collect, store and, where necessary treat, rainwater orgreywater for WC and urinal flushing purposes.3 3 - 1 1 1 2Wat 2Water meterOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a water meter with a pulsedoutput will be installed on the mains supply to each building/unit.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a water meter with a pulsedoutput will be installed on the mains supply to each building/unit. 1 1 - 1 1 1 1Wat 3Major leak detectionOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a leak detection system isspecified or installed on the building's water supply.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a leak detection system isspecified or installed on the building's water supply. 1 1 - - - - -Wat 4Sanitary supply shut offOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that proximity detection shut-off isprovided to the water supply to all toilet areas.N/A 1 1 - - - - -Wat5Water recyclingOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the specification of systems thatcollect, store and, where necessary treat, rainwater or greywater for WC and urinalflushing purposes.N/A 1 1 - - - - -Wat 6Irrigation systemsOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a low-water irrigation One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a low-water irrigationstrategy/system has been installed, or where planting and landscaping is irrigated via strategy/system has been installed, or where planting and landscaping is irrigated viarainwater or reclaimed water.rainwater or reclaimed water.1 1 - - - - -MaterialsMat 1Materials Specification (major building Up to six credits are available, determined by the Green Guide to Specificationelements)ratings for the major building/finishing elements.Up to six credits are available, determined by the Green Guide to Specification ratingsfor the major building elements. 6 4 - - - - -Mat 2Hard landscaping and boundaryprotectionOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of the combined One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of the combinedarea of external hard landscaping and boundary protection specifications achieve an A area of external hard landscaping and boundary protection specifications achieve an Aor A+ rating, as defined by the Green Guide to Specification.or A+ rating, as defined by the Green Guide to Specification.1 1 - - - - -Mat 3Re-use of building façadeOne credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 50% of the One credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 50% of thetotal façade (by area) is reused and at least 80% of the reused façade (by mass) total façade (by area) is reused and at least 80% of the reused façade (by mass)comprises in-situ reused material.comprises in-situ reused material.1 0 - - - - -Mat 4Re-use of building structureOne credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that a design reuses at One credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that a design reuses atleast 80% of an existing primary structure and for part refurbishment and part new least 80% of an existing primary structure and for part refurbishment and part newbuild, the volume of the reused structure comprises at least 50% of the final structure’s build, the volume of the reused structure comprises at least 50% of the final structure’svolume.volume.1 0 - - - - -Mat 5Responsible sourcing of materialsUp to 3 credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates that 80% ofthe assessed materials in the following building elements are responsiblysourced:a. Structural Frameb. Ground floorc. Upper floors (including separating floors)d. Roofe. External wallsf. Internal wallsg. Foundation/substructureh. StaircaseUp to 3 credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates that 80% ofthe assessed materials in the following building elements are responsiblysourced:a. Structural Frameb. Ground floorc. Upper floors (including separating floors)d. Roofe. External wallsf. Internal wallsg. Foundation/substructureh. Staircase3 1 - - - - -Additionally 100% of any timber must be legally sourced.Additionally 100% of any timber must be legally sourced.Mat 6InsulationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that thermal insulation productsused in the building have a low embodied impact relative to their thermal properties,determined by the Green Guide to Specification ratings.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that thermal insulation productsused in the building have been responsibly sourced.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that thermal insulation productsused in the building have a low embodied impact relative to their thermal properties,determined by the Green Guide to Specification ratings.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that thermal insulation productsused in the building have been responsibly sourced.2 2 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 73

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008Mat 7Designing For RobustnessOne credit where protection is given to vulnerable parts of the building such as areasexposed to high pedestrian traffic, vehicular and trolley movements.One credit where protection is given to vulnerable parts of the building such as areasexposed to high pedestrian traffic, vehicular and trolley movements. 1 1 - - - - -WasteWst 1Up to three credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates that the Up to three credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates that theamount of non-hazardous construction waste (m3/100m2 or tonnes100m2) generated amount of non-hazardous construction waste (m3/100m2 or tonnes100m2) generatedon site by the development is the same as or better than good or best practice levels. on site by the development is the same as or better than good or best practice levels.Construction Site Waste ManagementOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a significant majority of nonhazardousconstruction waste generated by the development will be diverted from hazardous construction waste generated by the development will be diverted fromOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a significant majority of non-landfill and reused or recycled.landfill and reused or recycled.4 3 - - - - -Wst 2Recycled aggregatesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the significant use of recycled orsecondary aggregates in ‘high-grade’ building aggregate uses.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates the significant use of recycled orsecondary aggregates in ‘high-grade’ building aggregate uses. 1 0 - - - - -Up to two credits are available:Wst 3Recyclable waste storageOne credit where storage space is provided for recyclable household waste in each:• Self contained dwelling/bedsitOne credit where a central, dedicated space is provided for the storage of the building’s• Communal kitchen or other suitable communal roomrecyclable waste streams.One additional credit where a central, dedicated space is provided for the storage of thebuilding's recyclable waste streams1 1 - - - 1 1Wst 4Compactor / BalerOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that either an industrial wastecompactor or baler is installed for compacting/baling waste materials generated on siteanda. A water outlet is provided for cleaningb. The development achieves the BREEAM credit for storage of recyclable waste.N/A 1 1 - - - - -One credit where individual home composting facilities are provided for individualdwellings/communal kitchensWst 5CompostingOne credit w here evidence provided demonstrates there is a vessel on site forcomposting food waste, and adequate storage for such waste generated by thebuilding’s users and operation.ORANDWhere evidence provided demonstrates there is a vessel on site for composting foodwaste, and adequate storage for such waste generated by the building’s users andoperation1 1 - - - - -Where space or access is limited, there is a dedicated space for compostablefood waste to be stored prior to removal and composting at an alternative site.ORWhere space or access is limited, there is a dedicated space for compostablefood waste to be stored prior to removal and composting at an alternative site.Land Use & EcologyLE1Re-use of landOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the majority of the footprint ofthe proposed development falls within the boundary of previously developedland.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the majority of the footprint ofthe proposed development falls within the boundary of previously developedland.1 1 - - - - -LE2Contaminated landOne credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that the land used forthe new development has, prior to development, been defined as contaminated andwhere adequate remedial steps have been taken to decontaminate the site prior toconstruction.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the land used for the newdevelopment has, prior to development, been defined as contaminated and whereadequate remedial steps have been taken to decontaminate the site prior toconstruction.1 0 - - - - -LE3Ecological value of site ANDProtection of ecological featuresOne credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that the constructionzone is defined as land of low ecological value and all existing features of ecologicalvalue will be fully protected from damage during site preparation and constructionworks.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the construction zone isdefined as land of low ecological value and all existing features of ecological value willbe fully protected from damage during site preparation and construction works.1 0 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 74

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008Up to two credits are available:LE4Mitigating Ecological impactOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the change in the site’s existingOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the change in the site’s existingecological value, as a result of development, is minimal.ecological value, as a result of development, is minimal.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no negative change inTwo credits where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no negative change inthe site’s existing ecological value as a result of development.the site’s existing ecological value as a result of development.2 2 - - 1 1 1Up to three credits are available:LE5Enhancing Site EcologyOne credit where the design team (or client) has appointed a suitably qualified ecologist toadvise and report on enhancing and protecting the ecological value of the site;and implemented the professional’s recommendations for general enhancementand protection of site ecology.Two credits where, in addition to the above, there is a positive increase in the ecological valueof the site of up to (but not including) 6 species.Two credits where, in addition to the above, there is a positive increase in the ecologicalvalue of the site of up to (but not including) 6 species.Three credits where, in addition to the above, evidence is provided to demonstrate a positiveincrease in the ecological value of the site of 6 species or greater.One credit where the design team (or client) has appointed a suitably qualified ecologistto advise and report on enhancing and protecting the ecological value of the site; andimplemented the professional’s recommendations for general enhancement andprotection of site ecology.Three credits where, in addition to the above, evidence is provided to demonstrate apositive increase in the ecological value of the site of 6 species or greater.3 3 - - - - -LE6Long term impact on biodiversityOne credit where the client has committed to achieving the mandatory requirementslisted below and at least two of the additional requirements.Two credits where the client has committed to achieving the mandatory requirementslisted below and at least four of the additional requirements.One credit where the client has committed to achieving the mandatory requirementslisted below and at least two of the additional requirements.Two credits where the client has committed to achieving the mandatory requirementslisted below and at least four of the additional requirements.2 2 - - - - -PollutionPol 1Refrigerant GWP - Building servicesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the use of refrigerants with a global One credit where evidence provided demonstrates the use of refrigerants with a globalwarming potential (GWP) of less than 5 or where there are no refrigerants specified for warming potential (GWP) of less than 5 or where there are no refrigerants specified foruse in building services.use in building services.1 0 - - - - -Up to two credits are available:Pol 2Preventing refrigerant leaksOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that refrigerant leaks can beOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that refrigerant leaks can bedetected or where there are no refrigerants specified for the development.detected AND that the provision of automatic refrigerant pump down is made to a heatexchanger (or dedicated storage tanks) with isolation valves. Or where there are noOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the provision of automaticrefrigerants specified for the development.refrigerant pump down is made to a heat exchanger (or dedicated storage tanks) withisolation valves. Or where there are no refrigerants specified for the development.1 0 - - - - -Pol 3Refrigerant GWP - Cold storageOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the use of refrigerants within coldstorage systems with a global warming potential (GWP) of less than 5.N/A 1 0 - - - - -Pol 4NOx emissions from heating sourceOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the maximum dry NOxemissions from delivered space heating energy are ≤100 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the maximum dry NOxemissions from delivered space heating energy are ≤70 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).Up to three credits are available:One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the dry NOx emissions fromdelivered space heating energy are ≤100 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the dry NOx emissions fromThree credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the maximum dry NOx delivered space heating energy are ≤70 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).emissions from delivered space heating energy are ≤40 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2)andThree credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the dry NOx emissions fromemissions from delivered water heating energy are 100 mg/kWh or less (at 0% excess delivered space heating energy are ≤40 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).O2).3 0 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 75

10Appendix CBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Education 2008Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development islocated in a zone defined as having a low annual probability of flooding.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development islocated in a zone defined as having a low annual probability of flooding.Pol 5Flood riskOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development is One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development islocated in a zone defined as having a medium or high annual probability of flooding ANlocated in a zone defined as having a medium or high annual probability of flooding ANthe ground level of the building, car parking and access is above the design flood level the ground level of the building, car parking and access is above the design flood levelfor the site’s location.for the site’s location.3 3 - - - - -One further credit where evidence provided demonstrates that surface water run-off One further credit where evidence provided demonstrates that surface water run-offattenuation measures are specified to minimise the risk of localised flooding, resulting attenuation measures are specified to minimise the risk of localised flooding, resultingfrom a loss of flood storage on site due to development.from a loss of flood storage on site due to development.Pol 6Minimising watercourse pollutionOne credit here evidence provided demonstrates that effective on site treatment suchas Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDs) or oil separators have been specified inareas that are or could be a source of watercourse pollution.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that effective on site treatment suchas Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDs) or oil separators have been specified inareas that are or could be a source of watercourse pollution.1 1 - - - - -Pol 7Reduction of Night Time LightPollutionOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the external lighting design is in One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the external lighting design is incompliance with the guidance in the Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) Guidance compliance with the guidance in the Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE) Guidancenotes for the reduction of obtrusive light, 2005.notes for the reduction of obtrusive light, 2005.1 1 - - - - -Pol 8Noise AttenuationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that new sources of noise from thedevelopment do not give rise to the likelihood of complaints from existing noise-sensitipremises and amenity or wildlife areas that are within the locality of the site.N/A 1 1 - - - - -Where non-hazardous construction waste generated by the building’s development Where non-hazardous construction waste generated by the building’s developmentmeets or exceeds the resource efficiency benchmark required to achieve three credits meets or exceeds the resource efficiency benchmark required to achieve three credits(as outlined in the guidance).(as outlined in the guidance).InnovationWst 1 Construction Site WasteManagementWhere at least 90% by weight (80% by volume) of non-hazardous construction wasteand 95% of demolition waste by weight (85% by volume) (if applicable) generated bythe buildhas been diverted from landfill and either:a. Reused on site (in-situ or for new applications)b. Reused on other sitesc. Salvaged/reclaimed for reused. Returned to the supplier via a ‘take-back’ schemee. Recovered from site by an approved waste management contractor and recycled.Where at least 90% by weight (80% by volume) of non-hazardous construction wasteand 95% of demolition waste by weight (85% by volume) (if applicable) generated bythe buildhas been diverted from landfill and either:a. Reused on site (in-situ or for new applications)b. Reused on other sitesc. Salvaged/reclaimed for reused. Returned to the supplier via a ‘take-back’ schemee. Recovered from site by an approved waste management contractor and recycled.1 0Where all key waste groups are identified for diversion from landfill at pre-constructionstage SWMP.Where all key waste groups are identified for diversion from landfill at pre-constructionstage SWMP.Innovation - BREEAM Accredited Professional or Suitably Qualified BREEAM AssessorInnovationBREEAM Accredited Professional /Suitably Qualified AssessorUp to two credits are available for the comprehensive use of a BREEAM AccreditedProfessional (AP) or Suitably Qualified BREEAM Assessor (SQA) throughout projectwork stages.Up to two credits are available for the comprehensive use of a BREEAM AccreditedProfessional (AP) or Suitably Qualified BREEAM Assessor (SQA) throughout projectwork stages.2 2Innovation - BRE Global Approved Innovation creditsInnovationApproved InnovationsAdditional BREEAM Innovation Credits can be awareded where an application is made Additional BREEAM Innovation Credits can be awareded where an application is madeto, and approved by the BREEAM office using the Innovation Application Form and the to, and approved by the BREEAM office using the Innovation Application Form and theassessor confirms compliance with the criteria set out within the Innovation Application assessor confirms compliance with the criteria set out within the Innovation ApplicationForm.Form.© architects design partnership llp Page 76

ManagementHealth &WellbeingEnergyTransportWaterMaterialsWasteLand Use & EcologyPollutionInnovation10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi Residential© architects design partnership llp Page 77BREEAM Scheme: BREEAM Multi-residential 2008Pass 30%Building Name: Freeman's Common Student ResidencesGood 45%BREEAM Registration No.: 0Very Good 55%BREEAM Assessor: 0Excellent 70%Licensed Assessor organisation: ADPOutstanding 85%Stage of AssessmentInterim - Design StageRating Level Pass Good Very Good Excellent OutstandingMinimum Standards Achieved YES YES YES YES NOEnvironmentalweightingBREEAM Score78.32%Minimum BREEAM StandardsBuilding Performance by SectionBREEAM RatingEXCELLENTCredits available Credits achieved % Achieved Weighted ScoreManagement 12.00% 12.00 12.00 100.00% 12.00%Health & Wellbeing 15.00% 17.00 14.00 82.35% 12.35%Energy 19.00% 23.00 16.00 69.57% 13.22%Transport 8.00% 9.00 7.00 77.78% 6.22%Water 6.00% 8.00 8.00 100.00% 6.00%Materials 12.50% 17.00 10.00 58.82% 7.35%Waste 7.50% 8.00 6.00 75.00% 5.63%Land Use & Ecology 10.00% 10.00 8.00 80.00% 8.00%Pollution 10.00% 11.00 5.00 45.45% 4.55%Innovation 10.00% 10.00 3.00 30.00% 3.00%Total BREEAM Score 78.32%Assessed Building's BREEAM Performance by Section20%18%16%14%Management 12% 12%Health &Wellbeing 15% 12%Energy 19% 13%Transport 8% 6%Water 6% 6%Materials 13% 7%Waste 8% 6%Land Use & Ecology 10% 8%Pollution 10% 5%Innovation 10% 3%12%10%8%6%4%2%0%Score Available Score Achieved

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialBREEAM Scheme: BREEAM Multi-residential 2008Building Name: Freeman's Common Student ResidencesBREEAM Registration No.: 0BREEAM Assessor: 0Minimum BREEAM StandardsPass Good Very Good Excellent OutstandingAchieved? YES YES YES YES NORefTitleMulti-residential CriteriaNumber ofBREEAM creditsavailableTotal BREEAMcredits achievedMinimum required credits by BREEAM issue and ratingManagementMan 1CommissioningOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an appropriate project teammember has been appointed to monitor commissioning on behalf of the client toensure commissioning will be carried out in line with current best practice.Two credits where, in addition to the above, evidence provided demonstrates thatseasonal commissioning will be carried out during the first year of occupation, postconstruction (or post fit out).2 2 1 1 1 1 2Man 2Considerate ConstructorsOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that there is a commitment tocomply with best practice site management principles.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that there is a commitment to gobeyond best practice site management principles.2 2 - - - 1 2One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that 2 or more of items a-g (listedbelow) are achieved.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that 4 or more of items a-g(listed below) are achieved.Man 3Construction Site ImpactsThree credits where evidence provided demonstrates that 6 or more of items a-g areachieved:a. Monitor, report and set targets for CO2 or energy arising from site activitiesb. Monitor, report and set targets for CO2 or energy arising from transport to andfrom sitec. Monitor, report and set targets for water consumption arising from site activitiesd. Implement best practice policies in respect of air (dust) pollution arising from thesitee. Implement best practice policies in respect of water (ground and surface) pollutionoccurring on the sitef. Main contractor has an environmental materials policy, used for sourcing ofconstruction materials to be utilised on siteg. Main contractor operates an Environmental Management System.4 4 - - - - -One additional credit where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of sitetimber is responsibly sourced and 100% is legally sourced.© architects design partnership llp Page 78

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialMan 4Building user guideOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the provision of a simple guidethat covers information relevant to the tenant/occupants and non-technical buildingmanager on the operation and environmental performance of the building.1 1 - - - 1 1Man 6ConsultationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that consultation has been, or isbeing, undertaken and feedback given to the local community and building users. Inaddition, advice should also have been sought from any relevant national and localhistory, archaeological bodies or military history groups regarding the heritage valueof the building/site/surroundings.Two credits where, in addition to the above, evidence provided demonstrates thatchanges to the design and/or action has been taken as a result of the aboveconsultation process. This should include the protection of any parts of the building(or site) having historic or heritage value in accordance with independent advice fromthe relevant body.2 2 - - - - -Man 8SecurityOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an Architectural LiaisonOfficer (ALO) or Crime Prevention Design Advisor (CPDA) from the local police forcehas been consulted at the design stage and their recommendations incorporated intothe design of the building and its parking facilities (if relevant).1 1 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 79

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialHealth & WellbeingOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of floor area inHea 1 Daylightingeach occupied space is adequately daylit.10- - - --One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all relevant building areas have anHea 2 View Outadequate view out.11- - - --Hea 3Glare ControlOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that an occupant-controlledshading system (e.g. internal or external blinds) is fitted in relevant building areas. 1 1 - - - - -Hea 4High frequency lightingOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that high frequency ballasts areinstalled on all fluorescent and compact fluorescent lamps. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Hea 5Internal and external lighting levelsOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all internal and externallighting, where relevant, is specified in accordance with the appropriate maintainedilluminance levels (in lux) recommended by CIBSE.1 1 - - - - -Hea 7Potential for natural ventilationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that fresh air is capable of beingdelivered to the occupied spaces of the building via a natural ventilation strategy, andthere is sufficient user-control of the supply of fresh air.1 1 - - - - -Hea 8Indoor air qualityOne credit where air intakes serving occupied areas avoid major sources of externalpollution and recirculation of exhaust air. 1 0 - - - - -Hea 9Volatile Organic CompoundsOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the emissions of VOCs andother substances from key internal finishes and fittings comply with best practicelevels.1 1 - - - - -Hea 10Thermal comfortOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that thermal comfort levels inoccupied spaces of the building are assessed at the design stage to evaluateappropriate servicing options, ensuring appropriate thermal comfort levels areachieved.1 1 - - - - -Hea 11Thermal zoningOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that local occupant control isavailable for temperature adjustment in each occupied space to reflect differing userdemands.1 1 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 80

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialHea 12Microbial contaminationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the risk of waterborne andairborne legionella contamination has been minimised. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Hea 15Outdoor SpaceOne credit where evidence demonstrates the provision of an adequate outdooramenity space accessible for use by the building's occupants 1 1 - - - - -Hea 20Home OfficeOne credit for the provision of a space and services which allows the occupants to setup a home office in a quiet room 1 1 - - - - -Up to four credits are available:One credit where evidence demonstrates that:- airborne sound insulation values are at least 3dB higher- impact sound insulation values are at least 3dB lower ORThree credits where evidence demonstrates that- airborne sound insulation values are at least 5dB higher- impact sound insulation values are at least 5dB lower ORHea 21Sound InsulationFour credits where evidence demonstrates that- airborne sound insulation values are at least 8dB higher- impact sound insulation values are at least 8dB lowerThan the performance standards set out in the Building Regulations for England andWales, AD E (2003 edition, with ammendments on 2004)4 3 - - - - -Default casesFour credits for detached dwellingsThree credits for attached dwellings where separating walls or floors only occurbetween non-habitable rooms© architects design partnership llp Page 81

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialEnergyEne 1Reduction of CO2 EmissionsUp to fifteen credits where evidence provided demonstrates an improvement in theenergy efficiency of the building’s fabric and services and therefore achieves lowerbuilding operational related CO2 emissions.15 9 - - - 6 10Ene 2Sub-metering of Substantial EnergyUsesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the provision of direct submeteringof energy uses within the building. 1 1 - - 1 1 1Ene 4External LightingOne credit where energy-efficient external lighting is specified and all light fittings arecontrolled for the presence of daylight. 1 1 - - - - -One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a feasibility study consideringlocal (on-site and/or near site) low or zero carbon (LZC) technologies has beencarried out and the results implemented.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the first credit has beenachieved and there is a 10% reduction in the building’s CO2 emissions as a result ofthe installation of a feasible local LZC technology.Ene 5Low zero carbon technologiesThree credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the first credit has beenachieved and there is a 15% reduction in the building’s CO2 emissions as a result ofthe installation of a feasible local LZC technology.3 3 - - - 1 1Or alternatively:A maximum of one credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a contract withan energy supplier is in place to provide sufficient electricity used within the assessedbuilding/development to meet the above criteria from a 100% renewable energysource. (Note: a standard Green Tariff will not comply)Up to two credits are available:One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that all domestic scale fridges,freezes and fridge/freezers have an A+ rating under hte EU Energy EfficiencyLabelling SchemeEne 15Provision of Energy EfficientEquipmentOne additional credit available where evidence provided demonstrates that:- domestic washing machines and dishwashers have an A rating AND- domestic washer dryers and tumble dryers have a B rating under the EU EnergyEfficiency Labelling Scheme ANDcommercial scale laundry facilities within the development will maximiseopportunities for energy efficient operation2 2 - - - - -Or alternatively:A maximum of one credit available where no (or not all) white goods are provided butinformation on the EU Energy Labelling Scheme of efficient white goods is providedto residential aspects of the buildingOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that:Ene 18Drying spaceSelf contained dwellings:Space with posts and footings, or fixings capable of holding:- 1-2 bedrooms: 4m+ of drying line- 3+ bedrooms: 6m of drying line1 0 - - - - -AND/OR© architects design partnership llp Page 82

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialTransportTra 1Provision of public transportUp to three credits are awarded on a sliding scale based on the assessed buildings’accessibility to the public transport network. 3 2 - - - - -Up to two credits are available:Tra 2Proximity to amenitiesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the building is located within500m of key accessible local amenities appropriate to the building type and its usersOne additional credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the building islocated within 1000m of at least 5 additional accessible local amenities appropriate tothe building type and its users2 2 - - - - -Tra 3Cyclist FacilitiesOne credit where evidence is provided to demonstrate that there is adequateprovision of:a. covered, secure and well lit cycle racks for staff and residentsb. secure storage for wheelchairs and electric buggies1 1 - - - - -Tra 4Pedestrian and cycle safetyOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the site layout has beendesigned in accordance with best practice to ensure safe and adequate pedestrianand cycle access.1 1 - - - - -Up to two credits are available:Where evidence provided demonstrates that the number of parking spaces providedfor the building has been limitedFirst creditFor Sheltered housing and care homes:Where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no more than one parkingspace provided for every four building usersTra 6Maximum car parking capacityFor all other users:Where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no more than one parkingspace provided for every three building users2 1 - - - - -Second creditFor Sheltered housing and care homes:Where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no more than one parkingspace provided for every five building usersFor all other users:Where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no more than one parkingspace provided for every four building usersWaterUp to five credits are available:Wat 1Water ConsumptionFour credits available where evidence provided demonstrates that the specificationincludes taps, urinals, WCs and showers that consumes less potable water in usethan standard specifications for the same specifications for the same type of fittings.5 5 - 1 1 1 2One additional credit available where evidence provided demonstrates that thespecification of systems that collect, store and, where necessary treat, rainwater orgreywater for WC and urinal flushing purposes.© architects design partnership llp Page 83

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialWat 2Water meterOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a water meter with a pulsedoutput will be installed on the mains supply to each building/unit. 1 1 - 1 1 1 1Wat 3Major leak detectionOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a leak detection system isspecified or installed on the building's water supply. 1 1 - - - - -Wat 6Irrigation systemsOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a low-water irrigationstrategy/system has been installed, or where planting and landscaping is irrigated viarainwater or reclaimed water.1 1 - - - - -MaterialsMat 1Materials Specification (majorbuilding elements)Up to six credits are available, determined by the Green Guide to Specification ratingsfor the major building elements. 6 4 - - - - -Mat 2Hard landscaping and boundaryprotectionOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 80% of the combinedarea of external hard landscaping and boundary protection specifications achieve anA or A+ rating, as defined by the Green Guide to Specification.1 1 - - - - -Mat 3Re-use of building façadeOne credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that at least 50% ofthe total façade (by area) is reused and at least 80% of the reused façade (by mass)comprises in-situ reused material.1 0 - - - - -Mat 4Re-use of building structureOne credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that a design reuses atleast 80% of an existing primary structure and for part refurbishment and part newbuild, the volume of the reused structure comprises at least 50% of the finalstructure’s volume.1 0 - - - - -Mat 5Responsible sourcing of materialsUp to 3 credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates that 80% ofthe assessed materials in the following building elements are responsiblysourced:a. Structural Frameb. Ground floorc. Upper floors (including separating floors)d. Roofe. External wallsf. Internal wallsg. Foundation/substructureh. Staircase3 1 - - - - -Additionally 100% of any timber must be legally sourced.Mat 6InsulationOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that thermal insulation productsused in the building have a low embodied impact relative to their thermal properties,determined by the Green Guide to Specification ratings.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that thermal insulation productsused in the building have been responsibly sourced.2 2 - - - - -Mat 7Designing For RobustnessOne credit where protection is given to vulnerable parts of the building such as areasexposed to high pedestrian traffic vehicular and trolley movements 1 1 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 84

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialMat 8Responsible sourcing of materials -finishing elementsUp to 2 credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates 80% of theassessed materials in the following finishing elements are responsibly sourced:a. Stairsb. Windowsc. External and internal doorsd. Skirtinge. Panellingf. Furnitureg. Fasciash. Any other significant use2 1 - - - - -Additionally 100% of any timber must be legally sourced.WasteWst 1Construction Site WasteManagementUp to three credits are available where evidence provided demonstrates that theamount of non-hazardous construction waste (m3/100m2 or tonnes100m2)generated on site by the development is the same as or better than good or bestpractice levels.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a significant majority of nonhazardousconstruction waste generated by the development will be diverted fromlandfill and reused or recycled.4 3 - - - - -Wst 2Recycled aggregatesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the significant use of recycled orsecondary aggregates in ‘high-grade’ building aggregate uses. 1 0 - - - - -Up to two credits are available:Wst 3Recyclable waste storageOne credit where storage space is provided for recyclable household waste in each:• Self contained dwelling/bedsit• Communal kitchen or other suitable communal room2 2 - - - 1 1One additional credit where a central, dedicated space is provided for the storage ofthe building's recyclable waste streamsOne credit where individual home composting facilities are provided for individualdwellings/communal kitchensANDWst 5CompostingWhere evidence provided demonstrates there is a vessel on site for composting foodwaste, and adequate storage for such waste generated by the building’s users andoperation1 1 - - - - -ORWhere space or access is limited, there is a dedicated space for compostablefood waste to be stored prior to removal and composting at an alternative site.Land Use & EcologyLE1Re-use of landOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the majority of the footprint ofthe proposed development falls within the boundary of previously developedland.1 1 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 85

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialLE2Contaminated landOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the land used for the newdevelopment has, prior to development, been defined as contaminated and whereadequate remedial steps have been taken to decontaminate the site prior toconstruction.1 0 - - - - -LE3Ecological value of site ANDProtection of ecological featuresOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the construction zone isdefined as land of low ecological value and all existing features of ecological valuewill be fully protected from damage during site preparation and construction works.1 0 - - - - -Up to two credits are available:LE4Mitigating Ecological impactOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the change in the site’sexisting ecological value, as a result of development, is minimal.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that there is no negative changein the site’s existing ecological value as a result of development.2 2 - - 1 1 1Up to three credits are available:LE5Enhancing Site EcologyOne credit where the design team (or client) has appointed a suitably qualifiedecologist to advise and report on enhancing and protecting the ecological value ofthe site; and implemented the professional’s recommendations for generalenhancement and protection of site ecology.Two credits where, in addition to the above, there is a positive increase in theecological value of the site of up to (but not including) 6 species.3 3 - - - - -Three credits where, in addition to the above, evidence is provided to demonstrate apositive increase in the ecological value of the site of 6 species or greater.LE6Long term impact on biodiversityOne credit where the client has committed to achieving the mandatory requirementslisted below and at least two of the additional requirements.Two credits where the client has committed to achieving the mandatory requirementslisted below and at least four of the additional requirements.2 2 - - - - -PollutionPol 1Refrigerant GWP - Building servicesOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates the use of refrigerants with aglobal warming potential (GWP) of less than 5 or where there are no refrigerantsspecified for use in building services.1 0 - - - - -Up to two credits are available:Pol 2Preventing refrigerant leaksOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that refrigerant leaks can bedetected or where there are no refrigerants specified for the development.One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the provision of automaticrefrigerant pump down is made to a heat exchanger (or dedicated storage tanks) withisolation valves. Or where there are no refrigerants specified for the development.2 0 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 86

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialUp to three credits are available:One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the dry NOx emissions fromdelivered space heating energy are ≤100 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).Pol 4NOx emissions from heating sourceTwo credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the dry NOx emissions fromdelivered space heating energy are ≤70 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).3 0 - - - - -Three credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the dry NOx emissionsfrom delivered space heating energy are ≤40 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed developmentis located in a zone defined as having a low annual probability of flooding.Pol 5Flood riskOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the assessed development islocated in a zone defined as having a medium or high annual probability of floodingAND the ground level of the building, car parking and access is above the designflood level for the site’s location.3 3 - - - - -One further credit where evidence provided demonstrates that surface water run-offattenuation measures are specified to minimise the risk of localised flooding,resulting from a loss of flood storage on site due to development.Pol 6Minimising watercourse pollutionOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that effective on site treatmentsuch as Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDs) or oil separators have been specifiedin areas that are or could be a source of watercourse pollution.1 1 - - - - -Pol 7Reduction of Night Time LightPollutionOne credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the external lighting design isin compliance with the guidance in the Institution of Lighting Engineers (ILE)Guidance notes for the reduction of obtrusive light, 2005.1 1 - - - - -© architects design partnership llp Page 87

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialInnovation - Exemplary Level CriteriaWhere post construction, a Considerate Constructors Scheme certificate can beprovided demonstrating that the site achieved CCS Code of Considerate Practicewith a score of at least 36.InnovationMan 2: Considerate ConstructorsOR1 0Where post construction, the site has complied in full with the alternative,independently assessed scheme, and the alternative scheme addresses all themandatory and optional items in Checklist A2.InnovationHea 1: DaylightingAt least 80% of the floor area (for the building spaces/room identified above in thestandard requirements) has an average daylight factor of 3% in multi-storey buildingsand 4% in single-storey buildings.1 0InnovationEne 1: Reduction of CO2 emissionsOne additional innovation credit can be awarded where evidence provideddemonstrates the building is designed to be a carbon neutral building as defined bythe NCM (i.e. in terms of building services energy demand), as follows:a. A new building achieves a CO2 index less than 0 on the benchmark scale.b. A refurbished building achieves a CO2 index equal to or less than 0 on thebenchmark scale.2 0Two additional innovation credits can be awarded where evidence provideddemonstrates the building is designed to be a True zero carbon building (in terms ofbuilding services and operational energy demand).InnovationEne 5: Low or Zero CarbonTechnologiesA local LZC energy technology has been installed in line with the recommendationsof a compliant feasibility study and this method of supply results in a 20% reduction inthe building’s CO2 emissions.1 0Where sub meters are fitted to allow individual water-consuming plant or buildingareas to be monitored such as cooling towers, car washes, catering areas, etc. If thebuilding does not have any major water consuming plant this exemplar credit is notavailable.Each sub meter has a pulsed output to enable connection to a Building ManagementSystem (BMS) for the monitoring of water consumption.InnovationWat 2: Water MeterIn addition to the above, for sites with multiple departments e.g. large health centresor acute hospitals, separate pulsed sub meters are fitted on the supply to thefollowing areas where present:1 1a. Staff and public areasb. Clinical areas and wardsc. Letting areas: On the water supply to each tenant unitd. Laundriese. Main production kitchenf. Hydrotherapy poolsg. Laboratoriesh. CSSD/HSDU, pathology, pharmacy, mortuary and any other major process wateruser.One exemplary BREEAM credit can be awarded as follows:InnovationMaterials Specificationa. Where assessing four or more applicable building elements, the building achievesat least two points additional to the total points required to achieve maximum creditsunder the standard BREEAM requirements. 1 0© architects design partnership llp Page 88

10Appendix DBREEAM Pre-Assessment - Multi ResidentialInnovationResponsible Sourcing of MaterialsWhere, in addition to the standard BREEAM requirements, 95% of the applicablematerials, comprised within the applicable building elements, have been responsiblysourced.1 0Where non-hazardous construction waste generated by the building’s developmentmeets or exceeds the resource efficiency benchmark required to achieve threecredits (as outlined in the guidance).InnovationWst 1 Construction Site WasteManagementWhere at least 90% by weight (80% by volume) of non-hazardous construction wasteand 95% of demolition waste by weight (85% by volume) (if applicable) generated bythe buildhas been diverted from landfill and either:a. Reused on site (in-situ or for new applications)b. Reused on other sitesc. Salvaged/reclaimed for reused. Returned to the supplier via a ‘take-back’ schemee. Recovered from site by an approved waste management contractor and recycled.1 0Where all key waste groups are identified for diversion from landfill at preconstructionstage SWMP.Innovation - BREEAM Accredited Professional or Suitably Qualified BREEAM AssessorInnovationBREEAM Accredited Professional /Suitably Qualified AssessorUp to two credits are available for the comprehensive use of a BREEAM AccreditedProfessional (AP) or Suitably Qualified BREEAM Assessor (SQA) throughout projectwork stages.2 2Innovation - BRE Global Approved Innovation creditsInnovationApproved InnovationsAdditional BREEAM Innovation Credits can be awareded where an application ismade to, and approved by the BREEAM office using the Innovation Application Formand the assessor confirms compliance with the criteria set out within the InnovationApplication Form.© architects design partnership llp Page 89

33A Vittoria StreetBirmingham B1 3NDT +44 (0) 121 2346440F +44 (0) 121 2346450bham@adp-architects.co.ukPlantain PlaceCrosby RowLondon SE1 1YNT +44 (0) 20 7089 1720F +44 (0) 20 7089 1740london@adp-architects.co.ukStudios1 Portland StreetManchester M1 3BET +44 (0) 161 2389460F +44 (0) 161 2389469mch@adp-architects.co.ukCantay HousePark End StreetOxford OX1 1JDT +44 (0) 1865 248045F +44 (0) 1865 790729oxford@adp-architects.co.ukHendford Manor33 HendfordYeovil BA20 1UNT +44 (0) 1935 444610F +44 (0) 1935 444619yeovil@adp-architects.co.ukwww.adp-architects.co.uk