Views
3 years ago

Comments on Draft 7 SERC UFLS Standard_PRC-006-SERC-01_ ...

Comments on Draft 7 SERC UFLS Standard_PRC-006-SERC-01_ ...

1Comment Form for:

1Comment Form for: Draft 7 of the SERC Underfrequency Load Shedding (UFLS)Regional Reliability Standard (PRC-006-SERC-01)Please use this form to submit comments on Draft 7 of the SERC UFLS Regional ReliabilityStandard. ong>Commentsong> must be submitted by March 24, 2011. You must submit the completedform by e-mailing it to the SERC manager of Reliability Standards at regstd@serc1.org withthe words SERC UFLS in the subject line. If you have questions, please contact Pat Huntley(704-940-8228) or phuntley@serc1.org.DO:DO NOT:Do use punctuation and capitalization as needed.Do use more than one form if responses do not fit in the spaces provided.Do submit any formatted text or markups in a separate WORD file.Do not submit a response in an unprotected copy of this form.Commenter InformationGroup Name (if applicable):Contact Name:Carol GerouOrganization:Midwest Reliability OrganizationTelephone: 651-855-1735Email:ca.gerou@midwestreliability.orgBackground:SERC plans to develop regional reliability standards as required to supplement NERCstandards using the SERC Regional Standards Development Procedure. Development ofthese standards will be in accordance with NERC’s schedule. This includes development ofa SERC regional standard addressing UFLS.From July 2, 2008 through August 15, 2008, NERC posted for comments draft requirementsfor regional UFLS standards in a document titled, “UFLS Regional Reliability StandardCharacteristics.” From April 21, 2009 through May 21, 2009, NERC posted for commentsthe second draft of the UFLS program requirements, including a proposed continent-widestandard. Draft 3 of the NERC standard was posted for a 35-day comment period from June11, 2010 through July 16, 2010, with an initial ballot the last 10 days of the period. Draft 3was not approved. Draft 4 was developed in response to the comments received, and wasballoted from July 24, 2010 through August 3, 2010. Draft 4 was not approved. The NERCstandard drafting team developed Draft 5 of the standard and posted it for ballot. The ballotpassed and the NERC Board of Trustees subsequently approved the standard onNovember 4, 2010.Notes for draft SERC UFLS Standard;Draft 1 of the SERC UFLS standard only contained the applicability section and therequirements. It was posted for comments from September 19, 2008 through October 20,

22008. Draft 2 incorporated revisions to address industry comments and to include themeasures and compliance elements. Draft 2 of the standard and a draft implementation planwere posted for comments from November 21, 2008 through December 22, 2008. Draft 3 ofthe standard was developed to address industry comments. It was posted for information onFebruary 9, 2009. Draft 3a SERC UFLS Standard was designed to meet the applicabilityand performance characteristics specified in the then latest NERC draft UFLS Standard. Itwas posted for comments from September 15, 2009 through October 15, 2009. Draft 4 ofthe standard was developed to address industry comments and was posted for ballot fromNovember 13-23, 2009. Draft 4 was not approved.Draft 5 of the standard was developed to address industry comments listed on the Draft 4ballots. The requirement for generators that do not coordinate with the underfrequencyperformance curves to provide compensatory load shedding was removed. To address theindustry comments on timing, additional work on the SERC standard was delayed until theinitial ballot on the NERC continent-wide UFLS standard was scheduled. Draft 5 was alsore-formatted to be consistent with the Results-based Reliability Standards template. Draft 5was posted for comment. Draft 6 was developed in response to comments received andwas posted for ballot from December 9-20, 2011. Draft 6 was not approved. Draft 7 hasbeen developed in response to comments received on the ballot.The SERC UFLS Standard Drafting Team (SDT) is requesting your comments on Draft 7 ofthe SERC UFLS standard.Please enter all comments in simple text format.Insert a “check’ mark in the appropriate boxes by clicking the gray areas.1. Requirement R1 has been modified to allow the PC to adjust island boundaries to differ fromsubregional boundaries where necessary for the sole purpose of producing a contiguoussubregional island more suitable for simulation. Do you agree with Requirement R1, itsmeasures, and its VSLs?YesNoong>Commentsong>: It's not clear how this requirement will be additional to the PRC-006-1R2.3 requirement? A Planning Coordinator may decide to study what they want.The last sentence from the PRC-006-1 R2.3 gives the Planning Coordinator thisflexiblility. The last sentence reads, "Planning Coordinators may adjust islandboundaries to differ from Regional Entity area boundaries by mutual consentwhere necessary for the sole purpose of producing contiguous regional islandsmore suitable for simulation."2. Requirement R2 has been modified for additional clarity. Do you agree with RequirementR2, its measures, and its VSLs?

SERC Compliance Seminar - ReliabilityFirst
NERC GADS Introduction to pc-GAR and pc-GAR MT - SERC Home ...
1. Zavoral FEIS, Response to Comments on Draft - Scandia
Response to Public Comments on draft Screening Framework ...
Edge - Open Forum - Aug 13, 2012 - Paragraph 81.pdf - SERC Home Page
Appendix F - Comments on Draft EA - Norfolk District - U.S. Army
DRAFT FoR public commenT Feb. 22, 2013 - RTC Regional ...
revised-discussion-draft-beps-action-7-pe-status
Standard Drafting Team Rosters – August 2012 - NERC
Appendix F Comments to Draft EA - Norfolk District - U.S. Army
public-comments-action-7-prevent-artificial-avoidance-pe-status
March 7, 2009, pre-publication draft - Wind Turbine Syndrome
Moving Cooler -Standard Briefing draft 7-27-09 - Rail~Volution
Standing Committee Documents Process - SERC Home Page
SERC Reg Criteria_SPS_Rev 7 (10-18-12).pdf - SERC Home Page
SERC Reg Criteria_UVLS_Rev 7 (10-06-11).pdf - SERC Home Page
PSS Minutes (2-21-05) Atlanta.pdf - SERC Home Page
Master NERC CMEP.pdf - SERC
Regional Reliability Plan - SERC Home Page
Deutsch - Open Forum - May 6, 2013 - SERC Home Page
Guidelines for Reporting and Disclosure - SERC
COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REPORT OF THE PRODUCTIVITY ...
SERC Reg Criteria_Reliability Assessments_Rev 4 (10-06-11).pdf
October 26 2011.pdf - SERC Home Page
July 26 2011.pdf - SERC Home Page
FERC Filing - SERC Home Page
MTP/SCS Appendix G-7 Comments on Draft Plan and ... - sacog
REF Q&A - SERC Home Page
Response to Version 1 Comments