1.2 Purpose of this waste assessment - Waikato District Council
1.2 Purpose of this waste assessment - Waikato District Council
1.2 Purpose of this waste assessment - Waikato District Council
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>waste</strong> to landfill would include:• Non-household <strong>waste</strong>, particularly small to medium businesses• Organic <strong>waste</strong>, particularly food <strong>waste</strong>• Construction and demolition <strong>waste</strong>• Potentially reusable items.The district is in a fortunate position in that the infrastructure required to divert these <strong>waste</strong> streams islargely available. Analysis does indicate that diverting organic <strong>waste</strong> economically may require more localisedprocessing facilities, as transport to the nearest facility (Envir<strong>of</strong>ert) from the furthest point <strong>of</strong> the districtoutweighs the economic benefit <strong>of</strong> diverting the material 14 .Construction and demolition <strong>waste</strong> could be diverted to local recycling facilities, located centrally to serve thedistrict.Diverting reusable items requires staff and space resources rather than any specific processing infrastructure.6.2.4 Charging mechanismsThe amount <strong>of</strong> residual <strong>waste</strong> per household for Raglan has been calculated to be between 212 kg to 318kg per household per year. This is compared to a national average <strong>of</strong> 410 kg per household per year, and adistrict average <strong>of</strong> 455 kg per household per year.This suggests that the differences between the services provided in Raglan and those provided in the rest <strong>of</strong> thedistrict have a significant impact on the amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong> sent to landfill, being (in no particular order):• Services provided by a community organisation• More items accepted for recycling at the transfer station• Provision <strong>of</strong> a reuse store at the transfer station• Demographic differences and attitude• A mixture <strong>of</strong> targeted rates for kerbside recycling and user-pays charges for residual <strong>waste</strong>.The last point is likely to have a significant impact on residual <strong>waste</strong> quantities and is something that can beeasily transferred to other areas.6.2.5 Economic developmentAs has been noted, the <strong>waste</strong> processing and disposal industry already has a significant presence in the district,and there may be potential to grow <strong>this</strong> industry still further, with a view to making the area a hub for <strong>waste</strong>minimisation related industries. Growth is likely to be driven by growth in surrounding areas forcing operationsthat have a relatively large land requirement into more rural areas such as the <strong>Waikato</strong> district. Economicdevelopment opportunities may exist in the following areas:• Organic <strong>waste</strong> processing• Construction and demolition <strong>waste</strong> processing• Utilising energy from organic <strong>waste</strong>s• Reuse <strong>of</strong> goods (in particularly for small rural towns)• Encouraging tourism through promotion <strong>of</strong> a zero <strong>waste</strong>/<strong>waste</strong> minimisation brand for the district• Utilising organic <strong>waste</strong> derived products on local farms and soils to improve productivity and reduce carbonimpacts.6.2.6 Rural <strong>waste</strong> sourcesLittle is known about the <strong>waste</strong> management practices <strong>of</strong> rural residents and businesses. Although some douse the council refuse and recycling services, many rural properties are not provided with a kerbside collection.It is assumed that they make use <strong>of</strong> the transfer stations; however anecdotal evidence also suggests that there14 Unpublished research carried out for Xtreme Waste, 2011.40