13.07.2015 Views

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet - Fenwick & West LLP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. The Right of Distributi<strong>on</strong> Under WIPO Implementing Legislati<strong>on</strong>(a) United States Legislati<strong>on</strong>The DMCA does not c<strong>on</strong>tain any provisi<strong>on</strong>s that would modify <strong>the</strong> right of distributi<strong>on</strong>as it exists under current United States law. Thus, <strong>the</strong> DMCA implicitly deems <strong>the</strong> current rightof public distributi<strong>on</strong> to be equivalent to <strong>the</strong> Article 6 right.(b) The European <str<strong>on</strong>g>Copyright</str<strong>on</strong>g> DirectiveArticle 4(1) of <strong>the</strong> European <str<strong>on</strong>g>Copyright</str<strong>on</strong>g> Directive requires member states to “provide forauthors, in respect of <strong>the</strong> original of <strong>the</strong>ir works or of copies <strong>the</strong>reof, <strong>the</strong> exclusive right toauthorize or prohibit any form of distributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> public by sale or o<strong>the</strong>rwise.” Use of <strong>the</strong>phrase “any form” of distributi<strong>on</strong> suggests that a broad right is intended, although, as in <strong>the</strong>United States, <strong>the</strong> right applies <strong>on</strong>ly with respect to <strong>the</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> of “copies.” 460 C<strong>on</strong>sistentwith <strong>the</strong> Agreed Statement of <strong>the</strong> WIPO <str<strong>on</strong>g>Copyright</str<strong>on</strong>g> Treaty, <strong>the</strong> comments to Article 4(1) of <strong>the</strong>European <str<strong>on</strong>g>Copyright</str<strong>on</strong>g> Directive recite that “<strong>the</strong> expressi<strong>on</strong>s ‘copies’ and ‘originals and copies,’being subject to <strong>the</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> right, refer exclusively to fixed copies that can be put intocirculati<strong>on</strong> as tangible objects.” 461Thus, although use of <strong>the</strong> phrase “any form” of distributi<strong>on</strong> might suggest that all <strong>on</strong>linetransmissi<strong>on</strong>s of copyrighted works would fall within <strong>the</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> right of <strong>the</strong> European<str<strong>on</strong>g>Copyright</str<strong>on</strong>g> Directive, <strong>the</strong> comments limit <strong>the</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> right “to fixed copies that can be putinto circulati<strong>on</strong> as tangible objects.” It seems that <strong>the</strong> drafters of <strong>the</strong> European <str<strong>on</strong>g>Copyright</str<strong>on</strong>g>Directive intended <strong>the</strong> right of communicati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> public, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> right of distributi<strong>on</strong>,to cover <strong>on</strong>line transmissi<strong>on</strong>s of copyrighted works, for Recital (23) states that <strong>the</strong> right ofcommunicati<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> public “should be understood in a broad sense covering all communicati<strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> public not present at <strong>the</strong> place where <strong>the</strong> communicati<strong>on</strong> originates. This right shouldcover any such transmissi<strong>on</strong> or retransmissi<strong>on</strong> of a work to <strong>the</strong> public by wire or wireless means,including broadcasting. This right should not cover any o<strong>the</strong>r acts.”E. The Right of Importati<strong>on</strong>Secti<strong>on</strong> 602(a) of <strong>the</strong> copyright statute provides that “importati<strong>on</strong> into <strong>the</strong> United States... of copies or ph<strong>on</strong>orecords of a work that have been acquired outside <strong>the</strong> United States is aninfringement of <strong>the</strong> exclusive right to distribute copies ....” One purpose of Secti<strong>on</strong> 602(a) wasto allow a copyright owner to prevent distributi<strong>on</strong> into <strong>the</strong> United States of copies of works that,if made in <strong>the</strong> United States, would have been infringing, but were made abroad outside <strong>the</strong>reach of United States copyright law.460461Art. 4(2) deals with exhausti<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> right under <strong>the</strong> first sale doctrine, and will be discussed inSecti<strong>on</strong> III.F below.Commentary to Art. 4, 1.- 108 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!