21 st CENTURYSCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYVol. 12, No. 2Summer 1999Features1 § The Scientific Basis of <strong>the</strong> New Biological ParadigmVladimir Voeikov, Ph.DThe stable non-equilibrium that characterizes living processesbelies <strong>the</strong> reductionist view of biology <strong>to</strong>day, and leads <strong>the</strong> waya real understanding of biological processes, beyond <strong>the</strong> SecondLaw of Thermodynamics\ 9 Introduction: What Western Scientists Can Learn from <strong>the</strong>Vernadsky-Gurwitsch-Bauer SchoolJonathan Tennenbaum34 A View from Space: The Discovery ofNonlinear Waves in <strong>the</strong> Ocean's Near-Surface LayerRobert E. Stevenson, Ph.D4oSoli<strong>to</strong>ns, suloys, and spiral eddies are <strong>the</strong> turbulent phenomenathat make up <strong>the</strong> near-surface layer of <strong>the</strong> ocean—defying linearcomputer models that desdribe ocean and climate dynamics.America's pioneer space oCeanographer reports on how <strong>the</strong>ywere discovered from space.How Can Gamma-Ray Bursts Be Explained?LotharKompThe direction in which astronomers are looking for an answer m. tyhave problems as great as <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>the</strong>y have ruled out.54 Gamma-Ray Bursts Not Local, But Not That Far Away!Hal<strong>to</strong>n Arp56 <strong>Back</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Moon</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Nuclear</strong> <strong>Rockets</strong>Marsha FreemanA <strong>Moon</strong> shuttle trip will be only a 24-hour commute—if we gonuclear.The intense polit calbattle fought by <strong>the</strong>American nationalistindustrialist fac ttpn,of which Thomas divesson was a part, co nesalive in his<strong>to</strong>rian [\n-<strong>to</strong>n Chaitkin's reviewof a recent Edifonbiography, p. 76NewsSPECIAL REPORT8 Boron Neutron Capture Therapy:An Elegant TechnologyThat May Save LivesLinden BlueNUCLEAR REPORT13 Radiation Protection Policy:A PrimerDr. TheodoreRockwellBIOLOGY AND MEDICINE16 'Medical'MarijuanaIs a Dangerous FraudColin LowryFUSION REPORT64 Table-Top, Ultrashort Pulse LaserDefines Frontier of ScienceCharles B. StevensDepartments2 EDITORIAL3 LETTERS4 VIEWPOINTCan Cyberspace ChildrenBecome Engineers?Henry Petroski6 NEWS BRIEFSRESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS66 Space Probe AccelerationAnomalies Suggest NonequivalenceBenedet<strong>to</strong> Soldano, Ph.D.70 Entropy of <strong>the</strong> Universe andLittle Black Hole ManifestationsMario Rabinowitz,76 BOOKS87 BOOKS RECEIVEDPh.D.On <strong>the</strong> cover: A nuclear rocket-poweredtransfer stage leaving Earth orbit, carryinga passenger transport module on a 24-hour trip <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Moon</strong>. Illustration courtesyof Dr. Stanley Borowski/NASA; cover designby Rosemary Moak.Edison National His<strong>to</strong>rical Site, National Park Service
EDITORIAL STAFFManaging Edi<strong>to</strong>rMarjorie Mazel HechtAssociate Edi<strong>to</strong>rsElijah C. BoydDavid CherryMarsha FreemanLaurence HechtCarol HuguninColin M. LowryRogelio A. MaduraJim OlsonCharles B. StevensMark WilseyBooksDavid CherryArt Direc<strong>to</strong>rRosemary MoakAdvertising ManagerMarsha FreemanSCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARDFrancesco Celani, Ph.D.Hugh W. Elisaesser, Ph.D.Bertha Farfan, M.D.James Frazer, Ph.D.John Grauerholz, M.D.Emmanuel GrenierLyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.Wolfgang Lillge, M.D.Ramtanu MaitraGiuliano Preparata, Ph.D.B.A. Soldano, Ph.D.Robert E. Stevenson, Ph.D.Jonathan Tennenbaum, Ph.D.Daniel R. Wells, Ph.D.21st Century Science & Technology(ISSN 0895-6820) is published 4 times ayear in 1999, every third month, by 21 st CenturyScience Associates, 60 Sycolin Road,Suite 203, Leesburg, Va. 20175. Tel. (703)777-7473.Address all correspondence <strong>to</strong> 21st Century,P.O. Box 16285. Washing<strong>to</strong>n, D.C.20041.Second-class postage is paid at Leesburg,Va. and additional mailing offices.21st Century is dedicated <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> promotionof endless scientific progress, ail directed<strong>to</strong> serve <strong>the</strong> proper common aims ofmankind.Opinions expressed in articles are not necessarilythose of 21 st Century Science Associatesor <strong>the</strong> scientific advisory board.We are not responsible for unsolicitedmanuscripts.Subscriptions by mail are $25 for 6 issuesor $48 for 12 issues in <strong>the</strong> USA and Canada.Airmail subscriptions <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries are$50 for 6 issues. <strong>Back</strong> issues are $5 each($6 foreign). Payments must be in U.S. currency.POSTMASTER-. Send address changes<strong>to</strong> 21st Century, P.O. Box 16285, Washing<strong>to</strong>n,D.C. 20041-0285.Copyright ©199921st Century Science AssociatesPrinted in <strong>the</strong> USA ISSN 0895-6820EDITORIALScience and National SecurityThe individuals that produced (or believe)<strong>the</strong> Cox Report suffer from <strong>the</strong>same fatal flaw as those who campaign<strong>to</strong> downsize America's national labora<strong>to</strong>ries:They have no idea what real scienceor real national security is.On <strong>the</strong> question of science, as wehave stressed in many different articles,scientific discovery is not a matter ofamassing "facts" and complex computerprograms in which <strong>to</strong> logically array<strong>the</strong>m, or patenting recipes for inventions.Scientific discovery occurs because<strong>the</strong>re are minds absorbed in solving aproblem, posing a paradox, and sticking<strong>with</strong> it, concentrating on finding a solution,and freely discussing <strong>the</strong>ir ideas<strong>with</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs. The his<strong>to</strong>ry of <strong>the</strong> U.S. nationallabora<strong>to</strong>ries, <strong>the</strong> science cities ofRussia and Japan, and <strong>the</strong> great universityresearch labora<strong>to</strong>ries demonstrates<strong>the</strong> potential for continuous advances inscience and technology <strong>to</strong> keep a strongeconomy growing—which is <strong>the</strong> only<strong>the</strong> source of true national security.The Cox Report is aimed at destroying<strong>the</strong> Clin<strong>to</strong>n administration's policy of engagement<strong>with</strong> China, <strong>the</strong> world's mostpopulous nation, and <strong>the</strong> leading nation<strong>to</strong>day that is putting in<strong>to</strong> practice <strong>the</strong>American System methods—investmentin science, technology, and infrastructureprojects—that built America as anindustrial, science-based nation.No scientists contributed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> opinionsof <strong>the</strong> Cox Report. It is, <strong>to</strong> use <strong>the</strong>words of Democratic Presidential precandidateLyndon LaRouche, "a scientificallyilliterate hoax," which, <strong>with</strong> nofactual basis, alleges that leaks from U.S.national labora<strong>to</strong>ries enabled <strong>the</strong> Chinese<strong>to</strong> develop sophisticated defensetechnologies. The arguments and nonsciencepresented by <strong>the</strong> Cox Report areludicrous. Their effect will be <strong>to</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>rconstrict research on <strong>the</strong> frontiers of scienceat our national labora<strong>to</strong>ries—advancednuclear science, fusion energy,and many o<strong>the</strong>r new areas. In short, U.S.national security, what <strong>the</strong> minds behind<strong>the</strong> Cox Report purport <strong>to</strong> protect, willbe severely damaged.Edward Teller, <strong>the</strong> nation's leadingnuclear weapons scientist, wrote in <strong>the</strong>May 14 New York Times, "The right prescriptionfor safety is not reaction <strong>to</strong> dangersthat are arising, but ra<strong>the</strong>r actionleading <strong>to</strong> more knowledge, and, onehopes, <strong>to</strong>ward positive interaction betweennations." Teller, a former direc<strong>to</strong>rof <strong>the</strong> Lawrence Livermore National Labora<strong>to</strong>ry,and <strong>the</strong> "fa<strong>the</strong>r" of <strong>the</strong> U.S. hydrogenbomb, compared <strong>the</strong> stealing ofnuclear secrets by <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union ahalf century ago, <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> recent allegationsthat China has s<strong>to</strong>len U.S. nuclearweapons secrets.Then, Dr. Teller states, it was verylikely that <strong>the</strong> Soviet nuclear weaponsprogram benefitted materially from <strong>the</strong>information that had been leaked <strong>to</strong>Klaus Fuchs, among o<strong>the</strong>rs. "The situationis in sharp contrast <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> presentposition of <strong>the</strong> Chinese scientists. Theyhave had 50 years <strong>to</strong> consider <strong>the</strong> possibilitiesthat we kept secret. It seems <strong>to</strong> beprobable that <strong>the</strong> Chinese must havemade discoveries that made <strong>the</strong> addedknowledge from intelligence less important."Teller also compared <strong>the</strong> reaction <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> current accusations by politicians inWashing<strong>to</strong>n, <strong>to</strong> those after <strong>the</strong> Fuchscase was discovered. Then, Teller recalls,President Truman "imposed no additionalmeasures for security. Insteadwe have clear knowledge that <strong>the</strong> disclosuresby Fuchs caused Truman <strong>to</strong> call foraccelerated work on all aspects of nuclearweapons." The result was that <strong>the</strong>United States kept ahead of <strong>the</strong> Soviet effort.Teller, who has waged a 40-year campaign<strong>to</strong> declassify science, laments that<strong>the</strong> "proposed remedy" <strong>to</strong>day is "moresecurity, including exclusion from participationof people from abroad." Hesays: "Let us remember that past militarysuccesses have been accomplished byremarkable people from abroad—for instance,Enrico Fermi. I claim that ourcontinuing security is acquired by newknowledge ra<strong>the</strong>r than by conserving oldknowledge."Summer 1999 21st CENTURY EDITORIAL