02.12.2012 Views

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

Relativism and Universalism in Linguistics - Fachbereich 10 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Workshop 2 – Anc 155<br />

This pattern is also followed by English θencju, which is often used <strong>in</strong> lieu of Greek (e)fxaristo<br />

(‘(I) thank you’). In addition to be<strong>in</strong>g restricted by register, the distribution of these two variants<br />

<strong>in</strong> the spoken corpus data reveals differences <strong>in</strong> their politeness import. θencju typically occurs<br />

at the clos<strong>in</strong>g of transactional exchanges, often alongside other greet<strong>in</strong>g formulae such as pa pai<br />

(‘bye bye’), <strong>and</strong> seems to function more as an appropriate slot filler largely bleached of its<br />

thank<strong>in</strong>g semantics. (e)fxaristo, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, appears to have reta<strong>in</strong>ed its thank<strong>in</strong>g<br />

potential <strong>and</strong> is reserved for genu<strong>in</strong>e expressions of thanks, for <strong>in</strong>stance when the person be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

thanked has gone out of his/her way to help the speaker. This accords with the fact that<br />

(e)fxaristo is often accompanied by the <strong>in</strong>tensifier poli/pol:a (‘a lot’), a possibility not attested<br />

for θencju (*very much/a lot). The situational distribution of the two variants thus suggests that,<br />

when a choice between them is possible (i.e. only <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal sett<strong>in</strong>gs), acts that fall with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

normal rights <strong>and</strong> obligations of <strong>in</strong>terlocutors tend to receive only token acknowledgement <strong>in</strong><br />

the form of borrowed θencju, while acts that go beyond <strong>in</strong>terlocutors’ normal rights <strong>and</strong><br />

obligations can only be acknowledged by <strong>in</strong>herited (e)fxaristo.<br />

It is possible to account for the politeness import of these two variants with<strong>in</strong> Brown <strong>and</strong><br />

Lev<strong>in</strong>son’s theory, if we take (e)fxaristo to be the negative politeness marker, reserved for<br />

acts of greater Weight<strong>in</strong>ess—prompted by either formality (=high Distance+Power), or a high<br />

Rank<strong>in</strong>g—compared to θencju, which should be considered the positive politeness marker.<br />

However, native speakers comment that, when used <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal sett<strong>in</strong>gs, (e)fxaristo is more<br />

s<strong>in</strong>cere, <strong>and</strong> therefore more highly valued than θencju. Seen from the native speaker’s<br />

perspective, to consider (e)fxaristo a negative politeness marker <strong>in</strong> these sett<strong>in</strong>gs seems<br />

somewhat misguided: the essence of (e)fxaristo is not to respect the hearer’s “peace <strong>and</strong> selfdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation”<br />

(B&L:74), but rather to function as an “expression of [the speaker’s] regard”<br />

(ibid.). Conversely, <strong>in</strong> these same sett<strong>in</strong>gs, it is θencju that serves to acknowledge the hearer’s<br />

“peace <strong>and</strong> self-determ<strong>in</strong>ation.” Their situational distribution thus appears to square badly<br />

with Brown & Lev<strong>in</strong>son’s prediction that acts of <strong>in</strong>creased Rank<strong>in</strong>g are universally performed<br />

by address<strong>in</strong>g negative politeness concerns. The fact that positive politeness concerns<br />

motivate the use of (e)fxaristo with acts of high R <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal sett<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Cypriot Greek<br />

suggests that either aspect of face may take priority <strong>in</strong> context. Moreover, only close<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>to the culture- <strong>and</strong> situation-specific determ<strong>in</strong>ants of face can reveal which<br />

aspect of face is addressed each time, exclud<strong>in</strong>g a 1:1 correspondence between l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />

expressions <strong>and</strong> their face-constitut<strong>in</strong>g potential.<br />

Criteria of language choice as face-sav<strong>in</strong>g strategies <strong>in</strong> a<br />

multil<strong>in</strong>gual society: the case of Dakar (Senegal)<br />

Versluys, El<strong>in</strong>e<br />

University of Antwerp<br />

el<strong>in</strong>e.versluys@ua.ac.be<br />

In this abstract I will describe some of the l<strong>in</strong>guistic strategies <strong>and</strong> attitudes belong<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />

group of young <strong>in</strong>habitants of Dakar (Senegal). The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are based on two periods of<br />

ethnol<strong>in</strong>guistic fieldwork <strong>in</strong> 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2006, conducted <strong>in</strong> Yoff, a suburban neighbourhood of<br />

Dakar. 14 young <strong>in</strong>habitants of the neighbourhood, between the age of 18 <strong>and</strong> 30, constituted<br />

the ma<strong>in</strong> group of <strong>in</strong>formants. In perform<strong>in</strong>g a detailed case study, based on participant<br />

observation, <strong>in</strong>formal talks, <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>and</strong> group discussions, I have tried to<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>e how young urban dwellers construct language attitudes <strong>and</strong> how this relates to their<br />

composed identities, which are characteristic of urban <strong>and</strong> postcolonial life.<br />

As <strong>in</strong> many other postcolonial cities, the sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic situation of Dakar is characterised by<br />

extended multil<strong>in</strong>gualism. Extremely rapid urbanization causes a range of quick social<br />

changes, mak<strong>in</strong>g Dakar <strong>in</strong>to a bustl<strong>in</strong>g urban centre with various <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g cultural spheres.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!