<strong>SYNOPSIS</strong>PART I - ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENTS/AGENCIES1. State Secretary Office, Kedah; State Treasury Office, Kedah and Public WorksDepartment, Kedah - The Management of Departmental VehiclesDuring the years 2006 to 2009, the State Government approved an allocation ofRM11.59 million for the acquisition of vehicles of which RM7.83 million was spent. From anallocation of RM11.59 million, RM9.33 million was allocated to the State Secretary Office(SSO), State Treasury Office (Treasury) and Public Works Department (PWD) of whichRM6.68 million was spent. Overall, the vehicles at the three departments were notsatisfactorily managed. Several weaknesses were observed such as no maintenanceschedules, fuel was filled into the vehicles within a short timeframe, double paymentsamounting to RM30,270 and Master Record on Vehicle were not maintained by the SSO.Vehicles under warranty at the Treasury Office were serviced at unauthorized workshopswhile PWD bought diesel beyond the quoted price of the Government. In addition, no actionwas taken to dispose the damaged vehicles and also vehicles which were certified fordisposal.2. Public Works Department, Kedah (PWD) – The Management of the Maintenanceon State RoadPublic Works Department (PWD) is responsible for the planning, implementing andmonitoring on the maintenance of state roads to ensure that the roads are safe and in goodcondition. An allocation of RM223 million for the maintenance of 4,528 kilometer state roadsunder the Ninth Malaysia Plan were approved by the State Government. For the years 2007to 2009, the department spent RM136.61 million from an allocation of RM141 million for themaintenance of roads throughout the state. An audit was carried out between December2009 to February 2010 at PWD of Muda/Sik District and PWD Pendang/Yan District. Overall,the state roads were not satisfactory maintained. There were some weaknesses such asprojects were approved but not implemented instead substituted for urgent projects,procurement of signboards not in accordance to specifications, wrong coding of expenditure,delays in maintenance works, variation orders were not approved by an authorised officerand diesel was purchase not in accordance to the Government approved market price.3. State Agriculture Department, Kedah – The Management of Fruit IndustrialDevelopment ProgrammeThe Fruit Industry Development Programme, implemented by Kedah AgricultureDepartment, is to ensure that the fruits produced are of high quality and sufficient to meet
the local demand as well as the fruit processing industry. During 2007 to 2009, the StateGovernment allocated RM14.40 million for the implementation of this programme, of whichRM11.34 million was spent. An audit carried out in October 2009 to January 2010 showedthat the programme was satisfactorily implemented as it helped to increase the production offruits and the income of farmers in the State. However, there were some weaknesses in themanagement of the programme such as on the selection of participants and the projectareas; agreement with participants not drawn up, projects not implemented according to bestagricultural practices; project delays in implementation and excessive stock of fertilizer in thestore of the Agriculture Department.4. Veterinary Services Department, Kedah – The Management On The Programmeto Increase LivestockThe Kedah Veterinary Services Department (Department) is responsible fordeveloping the livestock industry in the State. The Department introduced the LivestockDevelopment Plan which comprises six programmes including the Programme to IncreaseLivestock (Programme). Through the TRUST Scheme as one of the ways to implement theProgramme, ruminant animals such as buffalo, cattle, goats and sheep were distributed tothe participants. Participants were required to surrender to the Department the first femaleoffspring which meets the stipulated conditions while the parent and other offsprings belongto the farmers. By surrendering the first female offspring at the prevailing market price, theparticipant is deemed to have repay his dues to the Department. The objective of thisProgramme is to increase the source of income of the farmers by increasing the livestock,meat production from local livestock and modernising the animal husbandry with the GoodAnimal Husbandry Practice (GAHP). Overall, the implementation of this Programme is notsatisfactory due to weaknesses in the management of the TRUST Scheme, participants,livestock, records, information and monitoring. The Department should take a seriousapproach to achieve the objectives set out in the TRUST Scheme.5. Kuala Muda Land Office – The Management On The Computerised LandRevenue Collection SystemThe collection of land revenue by Kuala Muda Land Office for the years 2007 to 2009amounted to RM109.32 million. This revenue consists of recurring quit rent, quit rent for thefirst year, arrears of quit, land premiums, licences and permits. In 2007 the Government ofKedah replaced the Computerized Land Revenue Collection System (SPHT) with the OnlineLand Revenue Collection Management System (SUKHAT). The State Governmentappointed a company to implement Online SUKHAT at a cost of RM2.16 million for theperiod 2007 to 2010. The objective of SUKHAT is to reconstruct and replace exitingapplication towards facilitating customers and to enhance the state revenue collection aswell as to reduce the arrears. Overall, the management of land revenue collection throughthe use of Online SUKHAT has assisted the administration on land matters and also reducedstaff workload. However, there were weaknesses in the integrity of data such as the validity