13.07.2015 Views

In-flight upset - 154 km west of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008,

In-flight upset - 154 km west of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008,

In-flight upset - 154 km west of Learmonth, WA, 7 October 2008,

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

After the passengers disembarked, there were some difficulties in the liaisonbetween the organisations that were involved in managing and processing thepassengers. Those issues were reviewed during a multi-agency debrief after theoccurrence that was coordinated by the Westralia Airports Corporation andincluded representatives from the private, government and non-governmentorganisations that were involved in the emergency response. As the identifiedproblems were not relevant to the safety-related focus <strong>of</strong> the ATSB investigation,they are not discussed further in this report.4.3 Cabin examinations4.3.1 Post-accident inspectionAn inspection <strong>of</strong> the aircraft’s interior found significant damage to the overheadfittings (passenger service units, overhead stowage compartments and ceilingpanels), mainly in the centre and rear sections <strong>of</strong> the passenger cabin. The damagewas consistent with impact by persons or objects.There was evidence <strong>of</strong> damage or impact to overhead fittings above one seat in thefront section, 16 seats in the centre section (9% <strong>of</strong> the seats), and 27 seats in the rearsection <strong>of</strong> the cabin (22% <strong>of</strong> the seats). Examples <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the more significantdamage are shown in Figure 48 and Figure 49.None <strong>of</strong> the ceiling panels above the cabin aisle-ways in the front section exhibitedany damage or movement from their fixed position. However, 11 <strong>of</strong> the 28 ceilingpanels in the centre section, three <strong>of</strong> the six ceiling panels in the toilet area betweenthe centre and rear sections, and 14 <strong>of</strong> the 22 ceiling panels in the rear sectionshowed some damage or movement. Examples <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the more significantdamage are shown in Figure 50 and Figure 51.The doors <strong>of</strong> three <strong>of</strong> the overhead compartments in the centre section and two <strong>of</strong>the doors in the rear section were not attached, and a small number <strong>of</strong> other doors inthese two sections were partially dislodged.Damage to overhead panels and fittings was evident in two <strong>of</strong> the toilets betweenthe centre and rear sections, and one <strong>of</strong> the toilets at the rear <strong>of</strong> the aircraft.Other notable findings from the cabin inspection included that:• There was no apparent damage to any <strong>of</strong> the seat belts. A more detailedexamination <strong>of</strong> a sample <strong>of</strong> seat belts was subsequently conducted(section 4.3.2).• The seat squabs (horizontal cushions or pads that a passenger sits on) for three<strong>of</strong> the seats in the centre section and two <strong>of</strong> the seats in the rear section were noton the seats. Passengers advised that the squabs became detached during the first<strong>upset</strong>.• Oxygen masks had deployed from above nine <strong>of</strong> the seats, and also in the reargalley. These masks were deployed during the first <strong>upset</strong> as a result <strong>of</strong> impactdamage.• Some <strong>of</strong> the cabin portable oxygen cylinders and some <strong>of</strong> the aircraft’s first aidkits had been deployed. Cabin crew advised that this equipment was used fortreating the passengers.- 168 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!