- Page 1 and 2: Cosmic structure, averaging anddark
- Page 3 and 4: Lecture 1What is d
- Page 5 and 6: 6df: voids & bubble walls (A. Faira
- Page 7 and 8: Coarse-graining, averaging, backrea
- Page 9 and 10: Layers of coarse-g
- Page 11: Coarse-graining: further steps(2)
- Page 15 and 16: What is a cosmolog
- Page 17 and 18: Largest typical structuresSurvey Vo
- Page 19 and 20: Scale of st<strong
- Page 21 and 22: I. Coarse-graining at</stro
- Page 23 and 24: Korzyński’s covariant coarse-gra
- Page 25 and 26: Averaging and backreactionAltern<st
- Page 27 and 28: Approach 1: Weak backreactionMuch a
- Page 29 and 30: Zalaletdinov’s macroscopic gravit
- Page 31 and 32: Approach 3: Spatia
- Page 33 and 34: The 3 + 1 decompositionn µN i dtdx
- Page 35 and 36: Buchert-Ehlers-Carfora-Piotrkowska-
- Page 37 and 38: III. Average spati
- Page 39 and 40: Perturbative avera
- Page 41 and 42: The Copernican principleRetain Cope
- Page 43 and 44: What expands? Can
- Page 45 and 46: Semi-tethered latt
- Page 47 and 48: Thought experimentsaverage t = cons
- Page 49 and 50: Finite infinityVirialized=0 θ>0Col
- Page 51 and 52: Better formalism?CEP should be asso
- Page 53 and 54: Two/three scale modelSplit sp<stron
- Page 55 and 56: Other ingredients〈R〉 = k v /a v
- Page 57 and 58: Dust modelSpecialize to dust only;
- Page 59 and 60: Tracker solution limitParameters ǫ
- Page 61 and 62: Physical interpretat</stron
- Page 63 and 64:
Physical interpretat</stron
- Page 65 and 66:
Dressed cosmological parametersH is
- Page 67 and 68:
Cosmic coincidence problem solvedSp
- Page 69 and 70:
Redshift, luminosity distancePerfor
- Page 71 and 72:
Void fraction, lapse functionThe vo
- Page 73 and 74:
Age of universeThe
- Page 75 and 76:
Magnitude of backr
- Page 77 and 78:
Test 1: SneIa luminosity distancesD
- Page 79 and 80:
Test 1: SneIa luminosity distancesT
- Page 81 and 82:
Smale + DLW, MNRAS 413 (2011) 367SA
- Page 83 and 84:
CMB anisotropiesPower in CMB temper
- Page 85 and 86:
Photon to baryon rat</stron
- Page 87 and 88:
Li abundance anomalyBig-bangnucleos
- Page 89 and 90:
CMB - calibration
- Page 91 and 92:
Test 3: Baryon acoustic oscill<stro
- Page 93 and 94:
Dressed “comoving distance” D(z
- Page 95 and 96:
Equivalent “equat</strong
- Page 97 and 98:
Sahni, Shafieloo and Starobinsky Om
- Page 99 and 100:
Sahni, Shafieloo and Starobinsky Om
- Page 101 and 102:
Baryon Acoustic Oscillat</s
- Page 103 and 104:
Gaztañaga, Cabre and Hui 0807.3551
- Page 105 and 106:
Redshift time drift (Sandage-Loeb t
- Page 107 and 108:
Clarkson, Bassett and Lu homogeneit
- Page 109 and 110:
Lecture 5Variance of</stron
- Page 111 and 112:
Result: arXiv:1201.5371v2CMB dipole
- Page 113 and 114:
Spherical averagesDetermine vari<st
- Page 115 and 116:
Analysis of COMPOS
- Page 117 and 118:
Radial variance δH s = (H s − H
- Page 119 and 120:
But why try the LG frame?From viewp
- Page 121 and 122:
Angular varianceTwo approaches; fit
- Page 123 and 124:
Hubble variance: CMB frame15th <str
- Page 125 and 126:
Angular uncertainties LG frame15th
- Page 127 and 128:
Value of β in cz
- Page 129 and 130:
Dipole directionCMB frame: directio
- Page 131 and 132:
Correlation with r
- Page 133 and 134:
Redshift-distance anisotropyAs long
- Page 135 and 136:
Why a strong CMB dipole?Ray tracing
- Page 137 and 138:
Towards a new formalismFor each she
- Page 139 and 140:
Large angle CMB anomalies?Anomalies
- Page 141 and 142:
Comments on ISW amplitudeIntegr<str
- Page 143:
ConclusionApparent cosmic acceler<s