Newborn screening in Europe Expert Opinion document
Newborn screening in Europe Expert Opinion document
Newborn screening in Europe Expert Opinion document
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINAL 28/08/2011Table of ContentsAcknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... 5Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. 6Preface ........................................................................................................................................ 71. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9Opportunities and threats for neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the next decade ..................................... 9The need for an overall framework for the assessment of neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong>..................... 10Neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> vs genetic <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> .............................................................................. 12Rare diseases vs common late-onset diseases ...................................................................... 13Neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> vs general healthcare strategies ............................................................ 13Relevant charters, declarations and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples recognised by EU member states................ 142. Work methodology ............................................................................................................... 163. Governance of neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> ....................................................................................... 18Should NBS be mandated for public health authorities or parents?..................................... 204. Criteria to evaluate whether a <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> program should be performed (desirability) ........ 23Disease ................................................................................................................................. 24Treatment ............................................................................................................................. 26Test ....................................................................................................................................... 27Cost ....................................................................................................................................... 275. Criteria on how a <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> program should be performed ................................................. 31Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of relevant health care providers ........................................................................... 31Information to prospective parents ....................................................................................... 32Informed consent .................................................................................................................. 32Blood spot sampl<strong>in</strong>g ............................................................................................................. 33Laboratory Procedures ......................................................................................................... 34Blood spot storage ................................................................................................................ 34Communication of positive result ........................................................................................ 35Confirmation of diagnosis and treatment ............................................................................. 36Communication of un<strong>in</strong>tended f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs ............................................................................... 37Quality assurance of laboratory results ................................................................................ 38Screen<strong>in</strong>g program evaluation ............................................................................................. 38Epidemiological evaluation .................................................................................................. 396. Strategies for implementation .............................................................................................. 40Strategies for implementation at <strong>in</strong>ternational level............................................................. 403