13.07.2015 Views

Newborn screening in Europe Expert Opinion document

Newborn screening in Europe Expert Opinion document

Newborn screening in Europe Expert Opinion document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINAL 28/08/2011Table of ContentsAcknowledgments ...................................................................................................................... 5Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. 6Preface ........................................................................................................................................ 71. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9Opportunities and threats for neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the next decade ..................................... 9The need for an overall framework for the assessment of neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong>..................... 10Neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> vs genetic <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> .............................................................................. 12Rare diseases vs common late-onset diseases ...................................................................... 13Neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> vs general healthcare strategies ............................................................ 13Relevant charters, declarations and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples recognised by EU member states................ 142. Work methodology ............................................................................................................... 163. Governance of neonatal <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> ....................................................................................... 18Should NBS be mandated for public health authorities or parents?..................................... 204. Criteria to evaluate whether a <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> program should be performed (desirability) ........ 23Disease ................................................................................................................................. 24Treatment ............................................................................................................................. 26Test ....................................................................................................................................... 27Cost ....................................................................................................................................... 275. Criteria on how a <strong>screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> program should be performed ................................................. 31Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of relevant health care providers ........................................................................... 31Information to prospective parents ....................................................................................... 32Informed consent .................................................................................................................. 32Blood spot sampl<strong>in</strong>g ............................................................................................................. 33Laboratory Procedures ......................................................................................................... 34Blood spot storage ................................................................................................................ 34Communication of positive result ........................................................................................ 35Confirmation of diagnosis and treatment ............................................................................. 36Communication of un<strong>in</strong>tended f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs ............................................................................... 37Quality assurance of laboratory results ................................................................................ 38Screen<strong>in</strong>g program evaluation ............................................................................................. 38Epidemiological evaluation .................................................................................................. 396. Strategies for implementation .............................................................................................. 40Strategies for implementation at <strong>in</strong>ternational level............................................................. 403

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!