13.07.2015 Views

Water in the Green Economy - Global Water Partnership

Water in the Green Economy - Global Water Partnership

Water in the Green Economy - Global Water Partnership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PERSPECTIVES PAPERThe <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong>’s vision is for a water secure world. Its mission is to support <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>abledevelopment and management of water resources at all levels.GWP is a global network of 13 Regional <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong>s, 80 Country <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong>s and more than2,500 Partner organisations <strong>in</strong> 164 countries.GWP was founded <strong>in</strong> 1996 by <strong>the</strong> World Bank, <strong>the</strong> United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and <strong>the</strong>Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) to foster <strong>in</strong>tegrated water resource management(IWRM).IWRM is <strong>the</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>ated development and management of water, land and related resources <strong>in</strong> order tomaximise economic and social welfare without compromis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ability of eco-systems and <strong>the</strong>environment.The network is open to all organisations <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> water resources management: developed and develop<strong>in</strong>gcountry government <strong>in</strong>stitutions, agencies of <strong>the</strong> United Nations, bi- and multi-lateral development banks,professional associations, research <strong>in</strong>stitutions, non-governmental organisations, and <strong>the</strong> private sector.GWP Perspectives Papers are available at <strong>the</strong> GWP IWRM ToolBox: www.gwptoolbox.orgTowards Integrated Urban <strong>Water</strong> Management (2011)Increas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Water</strong> Security - A Development Imperative (2012)<strong>Water</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Economy</strong> (2012)©<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong>, June 2012Portions of <strong>the</strong> text of this publication may be reproduced for educational or non-commercial use without priorpermission from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> (GWP), provided that <strong>the</strong> source is acknowledged, with mention of <strong>the</strong>complete name of <strong>the</strong> report, and that <strong>the</strong> portions are not used <strong>in</strong> a mislead<strong>in</strong>g context. No use of this publicationmay be made for resale or o<strong>the</strong>r commercial purposes without prior written permission of GWP. Op<strong>in</strong>ions expressed<strong>in</strong> this publication do not imply endorsement by GWP.2


<strong>Water</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>The Stockholm Statement (2011) described water as<strong>the</strong> ‘bloodstream of <strong>the</strong> green economy’. Yet waterresources are limited <strong>in</strong> many parts of <strong>the</strong> world andpressures are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>the</strong> demand for water forpeople, food, <strong>in</strong>dustry and <strong>the</strong> environment grows. If<strong>the</strong> world cont<strong>in</strong>ues to use water at current rates it isestimated that demand could outstrip supply by asmuch as 40% by 2030, putt<strong>in</strong>g both water and foodsecurity at risk, constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able economicdevelopment, and degrad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ‘green <strong>in</strong>frastructure’on which everyth<strong>in</strong>g else depends.Momentum is now build<strong>in</strong>g to highlight water andits role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> green economy as a priority issue forRio+20. In November 2011, world leaders andprofessionals ga<strong>the</strong>red <strong>in</strong> Bonn to prepare for Rio+20and <strong>the</strong>y exam<strong>in</strong>ed water as <strong>the</strong> common threadconnect<strong>in</strong>g food, energy, and climate change. TheBonn conference highlighted that susta<strong>in</strong>abledevelopment and growth beyond poverty eradicationcan be achieved by better management of <strong>the</strong> world’secosystems and a more <strong>in</strong>formed and optimal use ofwater, land, and o<strong>the</strong>r natural resources.We argue that water is not just part of <strong>the</strong> economy;it is embedded with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy. Without it <strong>the</strong>economy could not function. Thus water will becentral to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>novative th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and effectivesolutions required to establish <strong>the</strong> green economy. Inthis paper we set out <strong>the</strong> case for an Integrated <strong>Water</strong>Resources Management (IWRM) approach to watersecurity (Box 1) and its potential to lead <strong>the</strong> processof ‘green<strong>in</strong>g’ <strong>the</strong> world’s economies.Shocks and challengesTwenty years on from <strong>the</strong> first Rio Conference <strong>in</strong> 1992– <strong>the</strong> world summit that addressed susta<strong>in</strong>abledevelopment – <strong>the</strong> world is still fac<strong>in</strong>g immensechallenges. Meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Millennium DevelopmentGoals (MDGs) has been clouded by major issues thathave slowed progress. Over <strong>the</strong> past decade we haveseen <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g globalization, rapid demographicchanges, and <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ued presence of hunger andpoverty, particularly <strong>in</strong> Africa and South Asia, where<strong>the</strong>re is little prospect of meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> MDGs by 2015.The world has also experienced several, and <strong>in</strong> somecases, unexpected shocks.Box 1: GWP’s vision of a water secureworldA water secure world is vital for a better future: afuture <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>re is enough water for social andeconomic development and for ecosystems. A watersecure world <strong>in</strong>tegrates a concern for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sicvalue of water toge<strong>the</strong>r with its full range of uses forhuman survival and well-be<strong>in</strong>g. A water secure worldharnesses water's productive power and m<strong>in</strong>imises itsdestructive force. It is a world where every person hasenough safe, affordable water to lead a clean, healthyand productive life. It is a world where communitiesare protected from floods, droughts, landslides,erosion and water-borne diseases. <strong>Water</strong> security alsomeans address<strong>in</strong>g environmental protection and <strong>the</strong>negative effects of poor management, which willbecome more challeng<strong>in</strong>g as climatic variability<strong>in</strong>creases. A water secure world reduces poverty,advances education, and <strong>in</strong>creases liv<strong>in</strong>g standards. Itis a world where <strong>the</strong>re is an improved quality of lifefor all, especially for <strong>the</strong> most vulnerable—usuallywomen and children—who benefit most from goodwater governance.<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> (GWP) Strategy 2009-2013These <strong>in</strong>clude:• <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>in</strong> energy prices <strong>in</strong> 2008 and 2010 andconcerns about energy security;• related food and commodity price rises;• worries about water and food security and how tofeed 9 billion people by 2050;• decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ecosystem services; and• <strong>the</strong> global economic recession.Climate change adds ano<strong>the</strong>r level of risk, which maybr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> prospect of more extreme and unpredictablefloods and droughts to those parts of <strong>the</strong> world thatare already struggl<strong>in</strong>g to cope with climateuncerta<strong>in</strong>ties.All <strong>the</strong>se shocks and challenges impact bothdevelop<strong>in</strong>g and developed countries and <strong>the</strong>y aretest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> optimistic global vision of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gprosperity and <strong>the</strong> relevance of <strong>the</strong> economic growthmodel accepted by <strong>in</strong>dustrialized societies. There is agrow<strong>in</strong>g realization that <strong>the</strong> earth’s resources are3


PERSPECTIVES PAPERbut it is also a threat because of its destructivepowers which can cause poverty and death throughdroughts and floods, and can cause contam<strong>in</strong>ation,disease, dispute, and conflict. All aspects of productiondepend on water – agriculture, <strong>in</strong>dustry,energy, and transport. Most <strong>in</strong>dustrialised nationshave a legacy of ‘easy hydrology’ – low ra<strong>in</strong>fallvariability and ra<strong>in</strong> distributed throughout <strong>the</strong> yearand perennial rivers susta<strong>in</strong>ed by groundwater baseflows (Grey and Sadoff, 2007). They <strong>in</strong>vested heavily <strong>in</strong>water <strong>in</strong>frastructure, <strong>in</strong>stitutions and managementcapacity to both exploit <strong>the</strong> benefits of water and to<strong>in</strong>sulate society and economic growth aga<strong>in</strong>st water’sdestructive powers.Develop<strong>in</strong>g countries recognise this but lack <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>vestment, <strong>in</strong>stitutional structures, and capacity toimprove <strong>the</strong>ir water security. Most have large ruralpopulations that rely on subsistence agriculture andare exposed to <strong>the</strong> vagaries of unpredictable seasonsand also to <strong>the</strong> ‘difficult hydrology’ of absolute waterscarcity and severe flood risk, usually at differenttimes but often <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same place (Grey and Sadoff,2007). More difficult hydrology usually means morecostly <strong>in</strong>frastructure to control and manage water.<strong>Water</strong> security is <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> aim of <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> water.But does <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> water drive growth or doesgrowth drive <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> water? In most caseswater security is a driver of growth and a prerequisitefor bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>vestment. But <strong>in</strong> some placesgood water management comes as a consequence ofgrowth. Improved water supply and sanitation, forexample, can boost economic growth. Poor countrieswith improved access to clean water enjoy averageannual growth rates of 3.7% whereas countries with<strong>the</strong> same per capita <strong>in</strong>come without access haveaverage growth of only 0.1% (WHO, 2005). What isclear is that water security and growth are symbiotic.The power of Integrated <strong>Water</strong>Resources Management (IWRM)Agenda 21 (agreed at <strong>the</strong> UNCED <strong>in</strong> 1992) explicitlysupports <strong>the</strong> use of natural resources for social equity,economic development, and a susta<strong>in</strong>able environment.Integrated <strong>Water</strong> Resources Management(IWRM) offers a set of pr<strong>in</strong>ciples which help tooperationalize Agenda 21 (Box 4). It addresses keywater related challenges by seek<strong>in</strong>g to balance <strong>the</strong>‘three Es’ – efficiency, to make water resources go asfar as possible; equity <strong>in</strong> allocat<strong>in</strong>g water acrossdifferent social and economic groups; and environmentalsusta<strong>in</strong>ability, to protect <strong>the</strong> water resourcesbase and eco-systems. These pr<strong>in</strong>ciples recognise thatwater is a public good with both social and economicvalues and that good water manage-ment requiresboth a broad holistic perspective and <strong>the</strong> appropriate<strong>in</strong>volvement of users at different levels (Muller andLenton, 2009). The <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach explicitlychallenges conventional, fractional water developmentand management systems and emphasizes morecoord<strong>in</strong>ated decision mak<strong>in</strong>g across sectors and scales.IWRM is not an end <strong>in</strong> itself; ra<strong>the</strong>r, it is a means toachiev<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> three strategic objectives.6


PERSPECTIVES PAPERhas for many years supported countries to adopt anIWRM approach. The approach is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly seen asa pillar of green growth. A fragmented approach willnot lead to green growth. For example, when awatershed is deforested, it is <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> timberand <strong>the</strong> cost to harvest that timber that is generallyaccounted for <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> economic analysis and price, not<strong>the</strong> clean water no longer be<strong>in</strong>g produced by <strong>the</strong>watershed or <strong>the</strong> carbon no longer be<strong>in</strong>g sequesteredby <strong>the</strong> trees (UNEP, 2011b). <strong>Water</strong> security cannot beachieved without a more enlightened green growthapproach to economic development. <strong>Water</strong> securityand green growth are synergistic and mutuallyre<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g.to <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>able management and use of ecosystemsas <strong>the</strong> ‘green <strong>in</strong>frastructure’ which supports economicgrowth and food and water security, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gprotection from floods and droughts.Reth<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water storage holistically is essential,whe<strong>the</strong>r through small-scale solutions such asra<strong>in</strong>water harvest<strong>in</strong>g and natural storage, or largescalemanagement of reservoirs, storm-water systemsand aquifers. We can seek solutions <strong>in</strong> time-honouredtraditional ways of safeguard<strong>in</strong>g water as a preciousresource and at <strong>the</strong> same time utilise <strong>the</strong> latesttechnologies of remote sens<strong>in</strong>g and geospatialmapp<strong>in</strong>g to better understand <strong>the</strong> water system.Box 5: Synergies between water security and green growthCharacteristics of green growth• More effective use of natural resources <strong>in</strong> economicgrowth• Valu<strong>in</strong>g eco-systems• Inter-generational economic policies• Increased use of renewable sources of energy• Protection of vital assets from climate relateddisasters• Reduce waste of resources – and f<strong>in</strong>anceCharacteristics of water security• Ensure enough water for social and economicdevelopment• Ensure adequate water for ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g eco-systems• Susta<strong>in</strong>able water availability for future generations• Balance <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic value of water with its uses forhuman survival and welfare• Harness productive power of water• M<strong>in</strong>imise <strong>the</strong> destructive power of water• Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> water quality and avoid pollution anddegradationIWRM is now well accepted <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple but it takestime and skill to apply it <strong>in</strong> practice as it requiresconsiderable coord<strong>in</strong>ation and <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>gamong multiple sectors and different layers ofauthority. Adm<strong>in</strong>istrations are still structuredpr<strong>in</strong>cipally by economic sectors (as are InternationalF<strong>in</strong>ancial Institutions) whereas water, as a naturalresource, impacts on and is impacted by <strong>the</strong>se sectorsbut often has no <strong>in</strong>stitutional home. <strong>Water</strong> resourcesare thus easily exploited and polluted by users due toits weak management and/or regulation.Manag<strong>in</strong>g water better can provide ‘no regrets’opportunities and solutions to support green growthand build resilience to climate change. The profligateuse of water is common <strong>in</strong> many countries and this iscoupled with low rates of <strong>in</strong>novation and <strong>in</strong>vestment<strong>in</strong> water worldwide. Fortunately, <strong>the</strong>re is tremendousscope for adaptation. This applies to all economicsectors <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g energy, <strong>in</strong>dustry, and agriculture, andRecycl<strong>in</strong>g and reus<strong>in</strong>g both domestic and <strong>in</strong>dustrialwastewater multiplies <strong>the</strong> volume of water availablefor human use, and treat<strong>in</strong>g waste can produceenergy. Agriculture is a key sector where future waterproductivity ga<strong>in</strong>s are essential to achieve greengrowth. S<strong>in</strong>ce agriculture uses <strong>the</strong> lion’s share ofwater <strong>in</strong> many countries (as much as 90% <strong>in</strong> some),<strong>the</strong>se shifts will have benefits across o<strong>the</strong>r sectors –be it environment, energy, domestic waterconsumption, <strong>in</strong>dustry, and flood protection.There is a risk that political attention and fund<strong>in</strong>g willbe targeted entirely at climate mitigation related toenergy issues while neglect<strong>in</strong>g water or o<strong>the</strong>r naturalresources. Of course, <strong>in</strong> many develop<strong>in</strong>g countriesadaptation is <strong>the</strong> prime issue and build<strong>in</strong>g resilienceto climate change is closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to achiev<strong>in</strong>g watersecurity. (AMCOW & GWP, 2012)8


<strong>Water</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>Manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> transitionA key question is how to best manage <strong>the</strong> transitionto a water secure green economy. It will requireprioritisation as not everyth<strong>in</strong>g can be done at once.Possible actions will need categoris<strong>in</strong>g to optimisesp<strong>in</strong>offs and sequence activities for <strong>the</strong> short,medium, long term. The transition will require:• Policy <strong>in</strong>struments that promotecomplementarities (economic, social,environmental) and leverage change• Fiscal <strong>in</strong>struments that give a price toenvironmental goods• Streng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements thatfunction with<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g complexity, cutt<strong>in</strong>gacross sectoral silos and sovereign boundaries• A new generation of f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>struments thatshare risk between governments and <strong>in</strong>vestors andmake new technology affordable• Skills development that support <strong>the</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>ggreen sectors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> economy• Information and monitor<strong>in</strong>g: set targets, def<strong>in</strong>etrajectories and ga<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> right <strong>in</strong>formation tomonitor progress (e.g., on water/energyefficiencies)• Innovation plann<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g water productivity,develop<strong>in</strong>g stress tolerant materials that canaddress water scarcity, sal<strong>in</strong>ization, groundwatercontam<strong>in</strong>ation, as well as water quality andwastewater treatment.The transition to a water secure and green economywill require contextualization and differentiation, andthis will depend on each country’s specific conditions.In <strong>the</strong> richer countries, <strong>the</strong> challenge will be tochange lifestyles and reduce <strong>the</strong> consumption ofnatural resources to susta<strong>in</strong>able levels. In <strong>the</strong>develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, <strong>the</strong> transition will follow adifferent path as <strong>the</strong> challenge will be to stimulateeconomic growth <strong>in</strong> a way that water security and <strong>the</strong>green economy co<strong>in</strong>cide with susta<strong>in</strong>able development.While hunger and poverty prevail, both waterand food security will be high on <strong>the</strong> political agenda.A traditional approach to development through aidthat tries to stimulate production is <strong>in</strong>sufficient, and<strong>in</strong>novative ways of achiev<strong>in</strong>g growth are needed (Box6).9


PERSPECTIVES PAPERBox 6: Achiev<strong>in</strong>g green growth – <strong>the</strong> roleof food securityIn sub-Saharan Africa, where more than 80% of<strong>the</strong> population are smallholder farmers, with fewexceptions all <strong>the</strong> effort and <strong>in</strong>vestment bygovernments and development agencies over <strong>the</strong>past 50 years have failed to improve productivityand stimulate growth <strong>in</strong> agriculture. Attentionhas focused on improv<strong>in</strong>g seed varieties, us<strong>in</strong>gfertilizers, and build<strong>in</strong>g agricultural extensionservices and on restor<strong>in</strong>g water and ecosystemsto reverse anthropogenic damage. But farmersrarely adopt productivity enhanc<strong>in</strong>g technologieswhen <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ks to cash markets are poor. So <strong>the</strong>reare few <strong>in</strong>centives to grow more than householdneeds and <strong>in</strong> such circumstances people becometrapped <strong>in</strong> subsistence farm<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong> poverty.Push<strong>in</strong>g productivity is necessary but notsufficient. It is equally important to considerhow to deal with crops once <strong>the</strong>y are harvested;how to develop agricultural value cha<strong>in</strong>s whichl<strong>in</strong>k farmers and consumers; how to improvepostharvest handl<strong>in</strong>g, value addition process<strong>in</strong>g,and develop thriv<strong>in</strong>g and profitable market-drivenfood sectors. These are <strong>the</strong> ‘pull’ factors whichdrive most modern market economies and <strong>in</strong> turndrive productivity and growth. Fewer farmers maybe needed as productivity <strong>in</strong>creases but morepeople will be needed to work along <strong>the</strong> valuecha<strong>in</strong>. So employment shifts from farm<strong>in</strong>g toagriculture <strong>in</strong> its broadest sense. In <strong>the</strong> UK forexample, less than 4% of <strong>the</strong> population work <strong>in</strong>farm<strong>in</strong>g whereas up to 25% work <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> food<strong>in</strong>dustry. The opportunities are <strong>the</strong>re and <strong>the</strong> tw<strong>in</strong>pressures of scarce water resources and agrow<strong>in</strong>g consumer demand for safe, quality foodproducts with sound provenance can provide <strong>the</strong>conditions for both growth and susta<strong>in</strong>abledevelopment – <strong>the</strong> very essence of <strong>the</strong> greeneconomy.Kilimo Trust, 2012River bas<strong>in</strong>s are a natural and logical place for spatialplann<strong>in</strong>g and mak<strong>in</strong>g visible upstream/downstreameffects on resource use. Stimulat<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess developmentwill require a trans-discipl<strong>in</strong>ary approach whichbr<strong>in</strong>gs toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> different sectors and stakeholderlevels. By focus<strong>in</strong>g on responsible bus<strong>in</strong>ess developmentthis would encourage ‘river bas<strong>in</strong> developmentand management plann<strong>in</strong>g’ ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> moretraditional focus on water and ‘river bas<strong>in</strong> managementplann<strong>in</strong>g’. This would br<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r private<strong>in</strong>vestors to work with spatial planners and watermanagers <strong>in</strong> a more constructive dialogue. Thedevelopment of new bus<strong>in</strong>ess could be guided by <strong>the</strong>participatory processes of IWRM. This would enablebus<strong>in</strong>esses to assess <strong>the</strong> reliability of available waterresources from an <strong>in</strong>vestment perspective and wouldenable planners to elaborate strategies for manag<strong>in</strong>gdrought and flood risks and <strong>in</strong>dicate clear limitationsfor <strong>in</strong>vestors.However, mov<strong>in</strong>g from a conservative approach tosusta<strong>in</strong>ability to someth<strong>in</strong>g more dynamic will requirea strong and flexible framework to guide development<strong>in</strong>itiatives. Froebrich (2011) suggests us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> IWRMapproach toge<strong>the</strong>r with ‘Basis-Boost-Balance’ as auseful framework for achiev<strong>in</strong>g growth (Box 8).Such frameworks are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>fancy and whateveremerges, for <strong>the</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g world boost<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novationand bus<strong>in</strong>ess must be at <strong>the</strong> centre of development.Tools will be needed to quantify <strong>the</strong> magnitude ofproduction upstream with restrictions downstream <strong>in</strong>a manner that is easily communicated to stakeholders,decision makers, and planners. Shared understand<strong>in</strong>gand agreements between bus<strong>in</strong>ess development and10


<strong>Water</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>Box 7: Facilitat<strong>in</strong>g green growth by extend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> IWRM process• Putt<strong>in</strong>g an organized process for bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>in</strong>novation at <strong>the</strong> centre of development• Specify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> related needs on land, water, energy, and biodiversity• Specify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> acceptable damages from risks of droughts and floods• Specify<strong>in</strong>g related <strong>in</strong>ter sector <strong>in</strong>teractions• Elaborat<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able production limits and related adaptations for bus<strong>in</strong>ess development• Specify<strong>in</strong>g related uses of land and water resources at bas<strong>in</strong> scale• Formulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> River bas<strong>in</strong> development and management plansresource management will be essential. It will becrucial, for example, for water and environmentalmanagers to understand that farmers are driven byquestions of <strong>in</strong>vestment, harvest risks, and <strong>the</strong> impactof markets ra<strong>the</strong>r than by manag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> restrictedavailability of natural resources. Only when all <strong>the</strong>actors are <strong>in</strong>volved can <strong>the</strong>re be a common accordand successful discussions on green growth.Demographic, economic, and social transitions will allbe needed as well as core changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions andgovernance. Domestic <strong>in</strong>stitutions may play a majorrole <strong>in</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r facilitat<strong>in</strong>g or <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> transition.The higher <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>in</strong>stitutionalization andgovernance, <strong>the</strong> more <strong>the</strong> transition is likely to befacilitated. Technology and solidarity are two keydrivers for this transition. It <strong>in</strong>cludes both South-South solidarity and cooperation, ma<strong>in</strong>ly with regardsto shar<strong>in</strong>g trans-boundary waters, and North-Southsolidarity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of transfers of technology,tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and capacity build<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>vestments, andgreater market access (Figure 1).Figure 111


PERSPECTIVES PAPERMov<strong>in</strong>g forwardAn IWRM approach to development is a potentiallypowerful tool to facilitate and lead <strong>the</strong> process of‘green<strong>in</strong>g’ <strong>the</strong> world’s economies.<strong>Green</strong> growth requires a significant shift <strong>in</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>gon <strong>the</strong> way economies are run. There is a risk thatchange will be too slow. There are dangers that greengrowth will be hijacked by advocates who manipulateBox 8: Extend<strong>in</strong>g IWRM to encourage entrepreneurship (Basis - Boost – Balance)‘Basis’ is about susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g production systems – ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and protect<strong>in</strong>g land, water, and ecosystems as<strong>the</strong> foundation for green growth.‘Boost’ is about economic growth. There are examples of development, such as irrigated farm<strong>in</strong>g, that havehelped to <strong>in</strong>crease production but have not necessarily contributed to poverty eradication and <strong>the</strong> developmentof entrepreneurship. Transboundary water resource issues are often restricted to compacts andagreements only to share water and often overlook <strong>the</strong> opportunities to share products and trade amongriparian states. Economic development does not necessarily emerge by itself, ra<strong>the</strong>r it requires stimulus to<strong>in</strong>itiate <strong>in</strong>novative bus<strong>in</strong>ess opportunities. <strong>Green</strong> growth requires dedicated <strong>in</strong>itiation of activities that leadto both technical and non-technical <strong>in</strong>novations which can speed up poverty eradi-cation and economicdevelopment us<strong>in</strong>g implicit knowledge, public participation, and co-creation processes.‘Balance’ is about gett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> right balance between economic growth and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> naturalresource base. There are many examples, such as <strong>the</strong> disappearance of <strong>the</strong> Aral Sea <strong>in</strong> Central Asia andLake Chad <strong>in</strong> Central Africa and <strong>the</strong> irreversible biodiversity losses worldwide that have resulted from notgett<strong>in</strong>g this balance right. There are helpful, widely available <strong>in</strong>struments such as environmental impactassessments, water footpr<strong>in</strong>ts, and lifecycle analyses. But <strong>the</strong>y are often used only for s<strong>in</strong>gle activities suchas build<strong>in</strong>g a dam. So it is still difficult to address <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic <strong>in</strong>teractions at different scales – local,catchment, regional, global.Froebrich, 201112


<strong>Water</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>The transition from current practice will require aparadigm shift. Integration is central to achiev<strong>in</strong>gsuch a fundamental shift, as is harness<strong>in</strong>g strongpartnerships between policy makers, professionals andlocal communities <strong>in</strong> both <strong>the</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g anddeveloped world.it to fit <strong>the</strong>ir own political agendas. This could lead to<strong>in</strong>efficient and costly policies that achieve nei<strong>the</strong>rgrowth, nor natural resources protection, nor <strong>in</strong>tergenerationalequity. There is discussion about employmentimpacts with some see<strong>in</strong>g opportunities ando<strong>the</strong>rs us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> rhetoric of ‘green jobs’ to promoteunrelated policy aims. Poverty reduction is a keyelement of green growth but some may use it topromote anti-trade positions that militate aga<strong>in</strong>streduc<strong>in</strong>g poverty. Similarly, bus<strong>in</strong>esses can market <strong>the</strong>‘green’ label while cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to pollute or lobbyselectively aga<strong>in</strong>st policies that threaten <strong>the</strong>ir nongreenpractices.Such approaches are unhelpful, not thought through,and contradicted by both economic <strong>the</strong>ory and <strong>the</strong>experience of <strong>the</strong> world economy.Experience shows that such concepts can lead toendless academic debate, studies, and revised policiesand plans, all of which delay action. <strong>Green</strong> growth hasto address natural resources more broadly, <strong>in</strong> particularfor water. However, <strong>the</strong>re is a risk that politicalattention and fund<strong>in</strong>g will be targeted entirely atclimate mitigation related to energy issues whileneglect<strong>in</strong>g water or o<strong>the</strong>r natural resources. This isalready happen<strong>in</strong>g to some extent.Governments need policy <strong>in</strong>struments that accelerateprogress to a green economy. Seek<strong>in</strong>g a greeneconomy will not be easy and will require unpopulardecisions. For example, <strong>the</strong> price of natural resourceswill have to <strong>in</strong>crease. This is happen<strong>in</strong>g for oil andm<strong>in</strong>erals, and water and food may have to go <strong>the</strong>same way if it is to be taken as a serious part of <strong>the</strong>green economy and not just exploited. Similarly,subsidies for environmental ‘bads’, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g waterpollution, have to be removed and taxes reformed topromote natural resource efficiency not profligatewaste. Incentives are needed for bus<strong>in</strong>ess to adoptgreen practices and government <strong>in</strong>vestmentprogrammes should target climate adaptation (e.g.,flood measures, water reuse and recycl<strong>in</strong>g) andresearch for new green technologies. This will have tobe accompanied by public awareness to promotegreen solutions. It is essential that we develop aframework for green growth and water security that<strong>in</strong>corporates <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach and addresseswater with<strong>in</strong> wider socio-economic goals.Box 9: <strong>Green</strong> growth creates new watermarket opportunities and new employmentThe global water <strong>in</strong>dustry is on <strong>the</strong> cusp ofmassive change. By 2016 <strong>the</strong> capital expenditureon water <strong>in</strong>frastructure is estimated to <strong>in</strong>crease1.5 times from US$90 billion <strong>in</strong> 2010 to US$ 131billion (<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Intelligence, 2011)About 0.5 million new jobs will be created by2025 <strong>in</strong> South Africa as a direct result of greeneconomic <strong>in</strong>itiatives, half of <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> naturalresources management. This is accord<strong>in</strong>g to astudy by <strong>the</strong> Industrial Development Cooperation,<strong>the</strong> Development Bank of Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa, andTrade and Industry Policy and Strategies.Maia et al, 201113


PERSPECTIVES PAPER14


<strong>Water</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>ReferencesAit Kadi M (2010) Explor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> role of water security<strong>in</strong> regional economic development. Keynote at 2010GWP Consult<strong>in</strong>g Partners Meet<strong>in</strong>g, www.gwp.org.Ait Kadi M (2011) <strong>Water</strong> Security and <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>:l<strong>in</strong>ks through IWRM – Panel communication at <strong>the</strong>EU <strong>Green</strong> Week, Brussels, 24-27 May 2011AMCOW and GWP (2012) <strong>Water</strong> Security and ClimateResilient Development: Strategic FrameworkFroebrich J (2011) GWP Perspectives note on Enabl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>Green</strong> Growth – Unpack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> concept (draft note)<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Intelligence (2011) <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> MarketReport, www.globalwater<strong>in</strong>tel.comGrey D and Sadoff C (2007) S<strong>in</strong>k or Swim? <strong>Water</strong>security for growth and development. <strong>Water</strong> Policy 9:545–571GWP (2000) Integrated <strong>Water</strong> Resources Management.Technical Committee Background Paper No 4. <strong>Global</strong><strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong>, www.gwp.orgGWP (2004) IWRM and <strong>Water</strong> efficiency Plans,Technical Committee Background Paper No. 10,<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong>, www.gwp.orgGWP (2009) GWP Strategy 2009-2013, www.gwp.orgHall A (2011) GWP Perspectives note on <strong>Green</strong> Growthand <strong>Water</strong> (draft note)Hiroki K (2011) <strong>Green</strong> Growth with <strong>Water</strong>. Bullet<strong>in</strong> of<strong>the</strong> Academy Hassan II for Sciences and Techniques,No 10, December 2011Kilimo Trust (2012) Mak<strong>in</strong>g Markets for FoodStaples Work <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> East African Community.Kampala, UgandaMaia J, Giordano T, Kelder N, Bardien G, Bodibe M, DuPlooy P, Jafta X, Jarvis D, Kruger-Clote E, Kuhn G,Lepple R, Makajulule L, Mosoma K, Neoh S, NetshitomboniN. Ngozo T. Swanepole J (2011) <strong>Green</strong>Jobs: Estimate of <strong>the</strong> direct employment potential ofa green<strong>in</strong>g South African economy, IDC, DBSA andTIPS. ISBN 987-0-620-51994-6Muller M and R Lenton (eds) (2009) Integrated <strong>Water</strong>Resources Management <strong>in</strong> Practice: Better Managementfor Development. <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> andEarthscan, LondonOECD (2011) Towards <strong>Green</strong> Growth, A Summary forPolicy MakersSEI (2011) Understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Nexus: Background paperfor <strong>the</strong> Bonn 2011 Nexus Conference, 16-18 November2011. Stockholm Environment InstituteSIWI (2011) Stockholm Statement to Rio+20,www.worldwaterweek.orgSIWI (2005) Mak<strong>in</strong>g water a part of economic development.Swedish International <strong>Water</strong> Institute <strong>in</strong> collaborationwith World Health Organisation and <strong>the</strong>Norwegian Agency for Development CooperationUNEP (2011a) Towards a <strong>Green</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>: Pathways toSusta<strong>in</strong>able Development and Poverty Eradication,www.unep.org/greeneconomyUNEP (2011b) Putt<strong>in</strong>g Ecosystems Management <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Vision of Africa’s Development. Policy Brief 7UN-<strong>Water</strong> (2012) Status Report on <strong>the</strong> Application ofIntegrated Approaches to <strong>Water</strong> Resources Management15


<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> (GWP) SecretariatDrottn<strong>in</strong>ggatan 33SE-111 51 Stockholm, SWEDENPhone: +46 8 522 126 30Fax: +46 8 522 126 31Email: gwp@gwp.orgWebsites: www.gwp.org, www.gwptoolbox.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!