13.07.2015 Views

The gauge theory - From Sigma Models to Four-dimensional QFT

The gauge theory - From Sigma Models to Four-dimensional QFT

The gauge theory - From Sigma Models to Four-dimensional QFT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Classical GeometryofQuantum IntegrabilityandGauge <strong>The</strong>oryNikita NekrasovIHES


This is a work onexperimentaltheoretical physics•In collaboration withAlexei Rosly(ITEP)andSamson Shatashvili(HMI and Trinity College Dublin)


Earlier workG.Moore, NN, S.Shatashvili.,arXiv:hep-th/9712241;A.Gerasimov, S.Shatashvili.arXiv:0711.1472, arXiv:hep-th/0609024NN, S.Shatashvili,arXiv:0901.4744, arXiv:0901.4748, arXiv: 0908.4052NN, E.WittenarXiv:1002.0888Earlier work on instan<strong>to</strong>n calculusA.Losev, NN, S.Shatashvili.,arXiv:hep-th/9711108, arXiv:hep-th/9911099;NN arXiv:hep-th/0206161;<strong>The</strong> papers ofN.Dorey, T.Hollowood , V.Khoze, M.Mattis,Earlier work on separated variables and D-branesA.Gorsky, NN, V.Roubtsov,arXiv:hep-th/9901089;


In the past few yearsa connectionbetween the followingtwo seemingly unrelatedsubjectswas found


<strong>The</strong> supersymmetric<strong>gauge</strong> theorieswith as little as 4 supersymmetrieson the one hand


<strong>The</strong> supersymmetric vacua ofthe (finite volume)<strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong>are the stationary states ofa quantum integrable system


Opera<strong>to</strong>rs<strong>The</strong> « twisted chiral ring » opera<strong>to</strong>rsO 1 , O 2 , O 3 , … , O nmap <strong>to</strong> the quantum Hamil<strong>to</strong>niansΗ 1 , Η 2 , Η 3 , … , Η n


<strong>The</strong> main ingredient of thecorrespondence:<strong>The</strong> effective twistedsuperpotential of the <strong>gauge</strong><strong>theory</strong>=<strong>The</strong> Yang-Yang function of thequantum integrable system


<strong>The</strong> effective twistedsuperpotential of the <strong>gauge</strong><strong>theory</strong>


<strong>The</strong> effective twisted superpotentialleads <strong>to</strong> the vacuum equations1


<strong>The</strong> effective twistedsuperpotentialIs a multi-valued function onthe Coulomb branch of the <strong>theory</strong>,depends on the parameters of the <strong>theory</strong>


<strong>The</strong> Yang-Yang functionof the quantum integrablesystem<strong>The</strong> YY function was introducedby C.N.Yang and C.P.Yang in 1969For the non-linear Schroedinger problem.


<strong>The</strong> miracle of Bethe ansatz:<strong>The</strong> spectrum of the quantumsystem is described bya classical equation1


EXAMPLE:Many-body systemCalogero-Moser-Sutherland system


<strong>The</strong> elliptic Calogero-MosersystemN identical particles ona circle of radius βsubject <strong>to</strong> the two-body interactionelliptic potential


Quantummany-body systemsOne is interested in the β-periodic symmetric,L 2 -normalizable wavefunctions


It is clear that one shouldget aninfinite discrete energy spectrumβ


Many-body systemvs<strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong><strong>The</strong>infinite discrete spectrumofthe integrable many-body system=<strong>The</strong> vacua of the N=2 d=2 <strong>theory</strong>


<strong>The</strong> <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong><strong>The</strong> N=2 d=2 <strong>theory</strong>, obtainedby subjecting the N=2 d=4 <strong>theory</strong><strong>to</strong> an Ω-background in R 2Φ → Φ - ε D φN=2 d=2


<strong>The</strong> four <strong>dimensional</strong> <strong>gauge</strong><strong>theory</strong> on Σ x R 2 ,viewed SO(2) equivariantly,can be formally treated as aninfinite <strong>dimensional</strong> version of atwo <strong>dimensional</strong> <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong>


<strong>The</strong> two <strong>dimensional</strong> <strong>theory</strong>Has aneffective twistedSuperpotential!


<strong>The</strong> effective twisted superpotentialCan be computed from theN=2 d=4Instan<strong>to</strong>n partition function


<strong>The</strong> effective twisted superpotentialΦ → Φ - ε 1 D φ1- ε 2 D φ2


<strong>The</strong> effective twisted superpotentialhas one-loop perturbativeand all-order instan<strong>to</strong>n corrections


In particular, for the N=2 * <strong>theory</strong>(adjoint hypermultiplet with mass m)


N=2 * <strong>theory</strong>


Bethe equationsFac<strong>to</strong>rized S-matrixThis is the two-body scatteringIn hyperbolic Calogero-Sutherland


Bethe equationsFac<strong>to</strong>rized S-matrixTwo-bodypotential


Bethe equationsFac<strong>to</strong>rized S-matrixHarish-Chandra, Gindikin-Karpelevich,Olshanetsky-Perelomov, Heckmann,final result: Opdam


<strong>The</strong> full superpotentialof N=2 * <strong>theory</strong> leads <strong>to</strong> the vacuumequationsMomentum phase shiftTwo-body scattering<strong>The</strong> finite size correctionsq = exp ( - Nβ )


Dictionary


DictionaryEllipticCMN=2* <strong>theory</strong>system


DictionaryclassicalEllipticCM4d N=2*<strong>theory</strong>system


DictionaryquantumEllipticCMsystem4d N=2*<strong>The</strong>oryin 2dΩΩ-background


Dictionary<strong>The</strong>(complexified)system<strong>The</strong> <strong>gauge</strong>coupling τSize β


Dictionary<strong>The</strong>Planckconstant<strong>The</strong>Equivariantparameterε


Dictionary<strong>The</strong> correspondenceExtends <strong>to</strong> otherintegrable sytems:Toda, relativistic Systems,Perhaps all 1+1 i<strong>QFT</strong>s


Two ways of gettingtwo <strong>dimensional</strong> <strong>theory</strong> startingwith a higher <strong>dimensional</strong> one1) Kaluza-Klein reduction, e.g.compactification on a <strong>to</strong>ruswith twisted boundaryconditions…2) Boundary <strong>theory</strong>, localizationon a cosmic string….


Two ways of gettingtwo <strong>dimensional</strong> <strong>theory</strong> startingwith a higher <strong>dimensional</strong> one1) Kaluza-Klein reduction: givesthe spin chains, e.g. XYZ2) Boundary <strong>theory</strong>, localizationon a cosmic string: gives themany-body systems, e.g. CM,more generally, a Hitchinsystem


PlanNow let us follow<strong>The</strong> quantization proceduremore closely,Starting on the <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong>side


In the mid-nineties of the 20century it was unders<strong>to</strong>od,that<strong>The</strong> geometry of the moduli space ofvacua of N=2 supersymmetric <strong>gauge</strong><strong>theory</strong> is identified with that of a base ofan algebraic integrable systemDonagi, WittenGorsky, Krichever, Marshakov, Mironov, Morozov


Liouville <strong>to</strong>ri<strong>The</strong> Base


Special coordinateson the moduli space<strong>The</strong> moduli spaceofvacua ofd=4 N=2 <strong>theory</strong>


<strong>The</strong> Coulomb branchof the moduli spaceof vacua of thed=4 N=2 supersymmetric<strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong>is the baseof a complex (algebraic)integrable system


<strong>The</strong> Coulomb branchof the same <strong>theory</strong>,compactified on a circle down<strong>to</strong> three dimensionsis the phasespace ofthe same integrable system


This moduli space is ahyperkahler manifold, andit can arise both as a Coulombbranch of one susy <strong>gauge</strong><strong>theory</strong> and as a Higgs branchof another susy <strong>theory</strong>.This is the 3d mirrorsymmetry.


<strong>The</strong> moduli spaceofvacua ofd=3 N=4 <strong>theory</strong>


In particular, one can startwith asix <strong>dimensional</strong> (0,2)ADEsuperconformal field <strong>theory</strong>,and compactify it onΣ x S 1with the genus g Riemann surface Σ


<strong>The</strong> resulting effective susy<strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong> in threedimensions will have 8supercharges (with theappropriate twist along Σ)


<strong>The</strong> resulting effective susy<strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong> in threedimensions will have theHitchin moduli space as themoduli space of vacua.<strong>The</strong> <strong>gauge</strong> group in Hitchin’sequations will be the group ofthe same A,D,E typeas in the definition of the (0,2)<strong>theory</strong>.


<strong>The</strong> Hitchin moduli spaceis the Higgs branch of the5d <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong>compactified on Σ


<strong>The</strong> mirror <strong>theory</strong>, for which theHitchin moduli spaceis the Coulomb branch,is conjectured Gaiot<strong>to</strong> , in the A 1 case,<strong>to</strong> be the SU(2) 3g-3<strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong> in 4d,compactified on a circle,with some matter hypermultiplets inthetri-fundamental and/or adjointrepresentations


One can allow the Riemann surfacewith n punctures,with some local parametersassociated with the punctures.<strong>The</strong> <strong>gauge</strong> group is then SU(2) 3g-3+nwith matter hypermultiplets in thefundamental,bi-fundamental,tri-fundamental representations,and, sometimes, in the adjoint.


For example,the SU(2) with N f =4Corresponds <strong>to</strong> theRiemann surfaceof genus zerowith 4 punctures.<strong>The</strong> local data at the puncturesdetermines the masses


For example,the N=2* SU(2) <strong>theory</strong>Corresponds <strong>to</strong> theRiemann surfaceof genus onewith 1 punctures.<strong>The</strong> local data at the puncturedetermines the mass of the adjoint


<strong>From</strong> now on we shall bediscussing these« generalized quivertheories »• <strong>The</strong> integrable system corresponding <strong>to</strong>the moduli space of vacua of the 4d<strong>theory</strong> is the SU(2) Hitchin system on<strong>The</strong> punctured Riemann surface Σ


Hitchin systemGauge <strong>theory</strong> on a Riemann surface<strong>The</strong> <strong>gauge</strong> field A µ and the twistedHiggsfield Φ µ in the adjointrepresentation are required <strong>to</strong> obey:


Hitchin equations


Hitchin systemModulo <strong>gauge</strong> transformations:We get the moduli space M H


Hyperkahler structure of M H• Three complex structures: I,J,K• Three Kahler forms: ω I , ω J , ω K• Three holomorphic symplectic forms:Ω I , Ω J , Ω K


Hyperkahler structure of M HThree Kahler forms: ω I , ω J , ω KThree holomorphic symplectic forms:Ω I = ω J + i ω K ,Ω J = ω K + i ω I ,Ω K = ω I + i ω J


Hyperkahler structure of M HA = A + i Φ


Hyperkahler structure<strong>The</strong> linear combinations, parametrized by thepoints on a twis<strong>to</strong>r two-sphere S 2a I + b J + c K, wherea 2 +b 2 +c 2 =1


<strong>The</strong> integrable structureIn the complex structure I,the holomorphic functions are: for each Beltramidifferential µ (i) , i=3g-3+n


<strong>The</strong> integrable structure<strong>The</strong>se functions Poisson-commute w.r.t. Ω I{ H i , H j } = 0


<strong>The</strong> integrable structure<strong>The</strong> generalization <strong>to</strong> other groups is known,e.g. for G=SU(N)


<strong>The</strong> integrable structure<strong>The</strong> action-angle variables:Fix the level of the integrals of motion,ie fix the values of all H i ’sEquivalently:fix the (spectral)curve C inside T*ΣDet( λ - Φ z ) = 0Its Jacobian is the Liouville <strong>to</strong>rus, and<strong>The</strong> periods of λdz give the special coordinatesa i , a Di


<strong>The</strong> quantum integrablestructure<strong>The</strong> naïve quantization, using thatin the complex structure IM H is almost = T*MWhere M=Bun GΦ z becomes the derivativeH i become the differential opera<strong>to</strong>rs.More precisely, one gets the space of twisted (by K 1/2 M)differential opera<strong>to</strong>rs on M=Bun G


Thinking about the Ω - deformationof the four <strong>dimensional</strong> <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong>,leads <strong>to</strong> the conclusion thatthe quantum Hitchin systemIs governed by a Yang-Yang function,<strong>The</strong> effective twisted superpotential


Here comes the experimentalfact<strong>The</strong> effective twistedsuperpotential,the YY function ofthe quantum Hitchin system:In fact has aclassical mechanical meaning!


M H as themoduli space of G C flatconnectionsIn the complex structure J theholomorphic variables are:A µ = A µ + i Φ µwhich obey (modulo complexified <strong>gauge</strong> transformations):F= dA+ [A,A] = 0


M H as themoduli space of G C flatconnectionsIn this complex structure M His defined without a reference <strong>to</strong> thecomplex structure of ΣM H = Hom ( π 1 (Σ) , G C ) / G C


M H as themoduli space of G C flatconnectionsHowever M HContains interesting complex Lagrangiansubmanifolds which do depend on thecomplex structure of ΣL Σ= the variety of G-opersBeilinson, DrinfeldDrinfeld, Sokolov


M H as themoduli space of G C flatconnectionsL Σ= the variety of G-opersBeilinson, DrinfeldDrinfeld, Sokolov<strong>The</strong> Beltrami differentialµ is fixed, the projectivestructure T is arbitrary,provided


M H as themoduli space of G C flatconnectionsL Σ= the variety of G-opers<strong>The</strong> Beltrami differential µ is fixed, the projective structure Tis arbitrary, provided it is compatible with the complexstructure defined by


M H as themoduli space of G C flatconnectionsL Σ =i.e.


Opers on a sphereFor example, on a two-sphere with n punctures, theseconditions translate <strong>to</strong> the following definition of the spaceof opers with regular singularities: we are studying thespace of differential opera<strong>to</strong>rs of second order, of the form


Opers on a sphereWhere Δ i are fixed,while the accessory parameters ε i obey


Opers on a sphereAll in all we get a (n-3)-<strong>dimensional</strong> subvariety in the2(n-3) <strong>dimensional</strong> moduli space of flat connections on then-punctured sphere with fixed conjugacy classes of themonodromies around the punctures:m i = Tr (g i )


<strong>The</strong> main conjecture<strong>The</strong> YY function is thegenerating function ofthe variety of opers


<strong>The</strong> variety of opers isLagrangian withrespect <strong>to</strong> Ω J


We shall now constructa system of Darbouxcoordinates on M H


α i , β i


So thatL Σ= the variety of G-opers,is described by the equations


<strong>The</strong> moduli space is going <strong>to</strong> be covered by amultitude of Darboux coordinate charts, one perevery pair-of-pants decomposition(and some additional discrete choice)


Equivalently,a coordinate chartU Γper maximal degenerationΓ of the complex structure on Σ


<strong>The</strong> maximal complex structure degenerations =<strong>The</strong> weakly coupled <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong> descriptions ofGaiot<strong>to</strong> theories, e.g. for the previous example


<strong>The</strong> α i coordinates are nothing but the logarithmsof the eigenvalues of the monodromies aroundthe blue cycles:


<strong>The</strong> α i coordinates are nothing but the logarithmsof the eigenvalues of the monodromies aroundthe blue cycles:cf. Drukker, Gomis, Okuda, Teschner;Verlinde; Verlinde


<strong>The</strong> β i coordinates are defined from the local datainvolving the cycle C i and itsfour neighboring cycles(or one, if the blue cycle belongs <strong>to</strong> a genus onecomponent) :


<strong>The</strong> local data involving the cycle C i andits four neighboring cycles :


C i


<strong>The</strong> local picture:four holes, two interesting holonomiesHol C ~ g 2 g 1Hol Cv~ g 3 g 2


Complexified hyperbolic geometry:


<strong>The</strong> coordinates α i ,β i can bethus explicitly expressed in terms ofthe traces of the monodromies:B = Tr (Hol Cv~ g 3 g 2 )= Tr g i= Tr (Hol C ~ g 2 g 1 )


<strong>The</strong> construction of the hyperbolic polygongeneralizes <strong>to</strong> the case of n punctures:


<strong>The</strong> construction of the hyperbolic polygongeneralizes <strong>to</strong> the case of n punctures:


For g i obeying some reality conditions,e.g. SU(2), SL(2,R), SU(1,1), SO(1,2), or, R 3We get the real polygons inS 3 , H 3 , R 2,1 , E 3our coordinates reduce <strong>to</strong>the ones studied byKlyachko,Kapovich, MillsonKirwan, Foth,NB: <strong>The</strong> Loop quantum gravitycommunity (Baez, Charles, Rovelli,Roberts, Freidel, Krasnov, Livin, …. )uses different coordinates


Our polygons sit in the group manifoldAn interesting problem:Relate our coordinates <strong>to</strong> thecoordinatesIntroduced by Fock and Goncharov,Based on triangulations of theRiemann surface with punctures.


Our polygons sit in the group manifoldAn interesting problem:Relate our coordinates <strong>to</strong> thecoordinatesIntroduced by Fock and Goncharov,Based on triangulations of theRiemann surface with punctures.<strong>The</strong> FG coordinates are the basis ofthe Gaiot<strong>to</strong>-Moore-Neitzkework on the hyperkahler metric onM H


<strong>The</strong> local data involving the cycle C i onthe genus one componentg 2g 1


<strong>The</strong> canonical transformations(the patching of thecoordinates)sut


<strong>The</strong> s-t channel flop:the generating function is thehyperbolic volumest


<strong>The</strong> s-t channel flop:the generating function is thehyperbolic volumeV v is the volume of the dual tetrahedron


<strong>The</strong> s-u flop =composition ofthe 1-2 exchange(a braid group action)and the flop<strong>The</strong> 1-2 braiding acts as:(α,β) goes <strong>to</strong>(α, β ± α + πi)


<strong>The</strong> <strong>theory</strong>Why did the twisted superpotential turn in<strong>to</strong> a generating function?Why did the variety of opers showed up?What is the meaning of Bethe equations forquantum Hitchin in termsof this classical symplectic geometry?Why did these hyperbolic coordinates(which generalize the Fenchel-Nielsen coordinates onTeichmuller space and Goldman coordinates on the moduliof SU(2) flat connections) become the special coordinates in thetwo <strong>dimensional</strong> N=2 <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong>?What is the relevance of the geometry of hyperbolic polygons forthe M5 brane <strong>theory</strong>?For the three <strong>dimensional</strong> gravity?For the loop quantum gravity?


<strong>The</strong> <strong>theory</strong>Why did the twisted superpotential turn in<strong>to</strong> a generating function,and why did the variety of opers showed up?This can be unders<strong>to</strong>od by viewing the 4d <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong> as a 2d<strong>theory</strong> with an infinite number of fields in two different ways(NN+EW)


<strong>The</strong> <strong>theory</strong>What is the meaning of Bethe equations forquantum Hitchin in termsof this classical symplectic geometry?<strong>The</strong>y seem <strong>to</strong> describe an intersection of the brane of opers withanother (A,B,A) brane, a more conventional Lagrangian brane.<strong>The</strong> key seems <strong>to</strong> be in the Sklyanin’s separation of variables(NSR, in progress)


<strong>The</strong> <strong>theory</strong>Why did these hyperbolic coordinates(which generalize the Fenchel-Nielsen coordinates onTeichmuller space and Goldman coordinates on the moduliof SU(2) flat connections) become the special coordinates in thetwo <strong>dimensional</strong> N=2 <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong>?<strong>The</strong> key seems <strong>to</strong> be in the relation <strong>to</strong>the Liouville <strong>theory</strong> and the SL(2,C) Chern-Simons <strong>theory</strong>.A concrete prediction of our formalism is the quasiclassical limit ofthe Liouville conformal blocks:


<strong>The</strong> quasiclassical limit of the Liouville conformal blocks(motivated by the AGT conjecture,but it is independent of the validity of the AGT):


In the genus zero case it should imply the Polyakov’s conjecture(proven for Fuchsian m’s by Takhtajan and Zograf);can be compared with the results of Zamolodchikov,Zamolodchikov; Dorn-Ot<strong>to</strong>


<strong>The</strong> <strong>theory</strong> vs experiment<strong>The</strong> conjecture in <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong>has been tested <strong>to</strong> a few orders ininstan<strong>to</strong>n expansion for simplest theories (g=0,1),and at the perturbative level of <strong>gauge</strong> <strong>theory</strong> for all theories.What is lacking is a good understanding of the theories with trifundamentalhypermultiplets (in progress, NN+V.Pestun)


<strong>The</strong> prediction of the <strong>theory</strong><strong>The</strong> conjecture implies that theTwisted superpotential transforms underthe S-duality in the following way:a generalization of thefour <strong>dimensional</strong> electric-magnetic transformation of theprepotential


For the rest of thepuzzlesthere remains much <strong>to</strong>be said,Hopefully in the nearfuture.Thank you!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!