China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian
China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian
China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
358 The Ch<strong>in</strong>a Quarterly1956.6 In <strong>the</strong> summer of 1958 <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese Politburo formally askedBeij<strong>in</strong>g's advice about <strong>the</strong> strategies of <strong>the</strong> "Sou<strong>the</strong>rn revolution." In awritten response, <strong>the</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g leadership emphasized that "<strong>the</strong> most fundamental,most important and most urgent task" fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>eserevolution was "how to promote socialist revolution and reconstruction <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> North." "The realization of revolutionary transformation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>South," accord<strong>in</strong>g to Beij<strong>in</strong>g, "was impossible at <strong>the</strong> current stage."Beij<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>refore suggested that Hanoi should adopt <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> South astrategy of "not expos<strong>in</strong>g our own forces for a long period, accumulat<strong>in</strong>gour own strength, establish<strong>in</strong>g connections with <strong>the</strong> masses, and wait<strong>in</strong>gfor <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g of proper opportunities."' The nation-wide fam<strong>in</strong>e follow<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> failure of <strong>the</strong> Great Leap Forward forced <strong>the</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g leadership tofocus on deal<strong>in</strong>g with domestic issues. Dur<strong>in</strong>g Zhou Enlai's meet<strong>in</strong>gswith Ho Chi M<strong>in</strong>h and Pham Van Dong, North <strong>Vietnam</strong>'s Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister,<strong>in</strong> Hanoi <strong>in</strong> May 1960, he advised <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese that <strong>the</strong>y shouldadopt a flexible approach <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> South by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g political and militarystruggles. He emphasized that even when military struggle seemed <strong>in</strong>evitable,it was still necessary for political struggle to take an importantposition.8 All this <strong>in</strong>dicates that Beij<strong>in</strong>g's leaders were not enthusiasticabout <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese comrades start<strong>in</strong>g military struggles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> South<strong>in</strong> 1959-60, and that "to resume <strong>the</strong> resistance" <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> South was basicallyan <strong>in</strong>itiative by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese <strong>the</strong>mselves.However, Beij<strong>in</strong>g took no active steps to oppose a revolution <strong>in</strong> South<strong>Vietnam</strong>. The relationship between Communist Ch<strong>in</strong>a and <strong>Vietnam</strong> wasvery close <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late 1950s and early 1960s.9 The close connection withHanoi, as well as Beij<strong>in</strong>g's revolutionary ideology, would not allow <strong>the</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese to go so far as to become an obstacle to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese causeof revolution and reunification. The late 1950s and early 1960s also witnessed<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous propaganda that Beij<strong>in</strong>g was a natural allyof <strong>the</strong> oppressed peoples of <strong>the</strong> world <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir struggles for national liberation.It would be <strong>in</strong>conceivable, <strong>in</strong> such a circumstance, for Beij<strong>in</strong>g toplay too negative a role toward <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese revolution. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, froma strategic po<strong>in</strong>t of view, as S<strong>in</strong>o-American relations experienced severalcrises dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, especially <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Taiwan Straits <strong>in</strong> 1958, <strong>the</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese leaders would not ignore <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g revolutionary<strong>in</strong>surgence <strong>in</strong> South <strong>Vietnam</strong> could extend America's commitment, thus6. The Editorial Group for <strong>the</strong> History of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Military Advisers <strong>in</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong> (ed.),Zhongguo junshi guwentuan yuanyue kangfa douzheng shishi (A Factual Account of <strong>the</strong>Participation of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Military Advisory Group <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Struggle of Assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Vietnam</strong> andResist<strong>in</strong>g France) (Beij<strong>in</strong>g: People's Liberation Army Press, 1990), pp. 142-43.7. Guo M<strong>in</strong>g et al., Zhongyue guanxi yanbian sish<strong>in</strong>ian, p. 66; for a <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese versionof <strong>the</strong> story, see The Truth about <strong>Vietnam</strong>o-Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Relations over <strong>the</strong> Past Thirty Years(Hanoi: M<strong>in</strong>istry of Foreign Affairs, 1979), pp. 29-33.8. Guo M<strong>in</strong>g et al., Zhongyue guanxi yanbian sish<strong>in</strong>ian, p. 67; and <strong>the</strong> Institute ofDiplomatic History under Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Foreign M<strong>in</strong>istry (eds.), Zhou Enlai waijiao huodongdashiji, 1949-1975 (A Chronicle of Zhou Enlai's Important Diplomatic Activities) (Beij<strong>in</strong>g:World Affairs Press, 1993), pp. 279-280.9. See Huang Zheng, Hu Zhim<strong>in</strong>g yu Zhongguo (Ho Chi M<strong>in</strong>h and Ch<strong>in</strong>a) (Beij<strong>in</strong>g:People's Liberation Army Press, 1987), ch. 6.