13.07.2015 Views

China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian

China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian

China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964-69* Chen Jian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong> <strong>War</strong>, <strong>1964</strong>-69 359improv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> position <strong>in</strong> its confrontation with <strong>the</strong> United States <strong>in</strong>East Asia.'"Under <strong>the</strong>se circumstances and <strong>in</strong> response to Hanoi's requests, Ch<strong>in</strong>aoffered substantial military aid to <strong>Vietnam</strong> before 1963. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to onehighly reliable Ch<strong>in</strong>ese source, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1956-63 period, <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong>military aid to <strong>Vietnam</strong> totalled 320 million yuan. <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> arms shipmentsto <strong>Vietnam</strong> <strong>in</strong>cluded 270,000 guns, over 10,000 piece of artillery,200 million bullets of different types, 2.02 million artillery shells, 15,000wire transmitters, 5,000 radio transmitters, over 1,000 trucks, 15 planes,28 naval vessels, and 1.18 million sets of military uniforms." Without adirect military presence <strong>in</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>, Beij<strong>in</strong>g's leaders used <strong>the</strong>se supportsto show to <strong>the</strong>ir comrades <strong>in</strong> Hanoi <strong>the</strong>ir solidarity.Beij<strong>in</strong>g's Decision to Increase Aid to Hanoi, 1963-64Beij<strong>in</strong>g's policy towards <strong>Vietnam</strong> began to turn more radical <strong>in</strong> late1962 and early 1963. In <strong>the</strong> summer of 1962, a <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese delegation ledby Ho Chi M<strong>in</strong>h and Nguyen Chi Thanh visited Beij<strong>in</strong>g. The <strong>Vietnam</strong>esesummarized <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>in</strong> South <strong>Vietnam</strong>, emphasiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> possibilitythat with <strong>the</strong> escalation of military conflicts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> South, <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates might use air and/or land forces to attack <strong>the</strong> North. The Ch<strong>in</strong>esewere very much alarmed by this assessment and offered to equip anadditional 230 battalions for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vietnam</strong>ese.'2Beij<strong>in</strong>g made general security commitments to Hanoi throughout 1963.In March, a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese military delegation headed by Luo Ruiq<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong>chief of staff, visited Hanoi. Luo said that if <strong>the</strong> Americans were to attackNorth <strong>Vietnam</strong>, Ch<strong>in</strong>a would come to its defence. The two sides alsodiscussed how <strong>the</strong>y should co-ord<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong>ir operations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> event of anAmerican <strong>in</strong>vasion of North <strong>Vietnam</strong>. In May, Liu Shaoqi, <strong>the</strong> secondmost important leader <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, visited <strong>Vietnam</strong>. In his meet<strong>in</strong>gs with Ho10. In late 1958, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Taiwan Straits crisis, Mao Zedong <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>the</strong> concept of"noose strategy." Accord<strong>in</strong>g to this concept, overseas American military presence served ashangman's nooses for <strong>the</strong> United States. Every military commitment abroad would add onemore noose to <strong>the</strong> Americans, and f<strong>in</strong>ally strangle <strong>the</strong> "U.S. imperialism." Mao <strong>the</strong>reforebelieved that <strong>the</strong> overextension of America's strength would lead to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al failure of<strong>the</strong> U.S. foreign policy <strong>in</strong> general and its policy toward Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> particular. See MaoZedong's speech to <strong>the</strong> Supreme State Council, 8 September 1958, <strong>Jian</strong>guo yilai Mao Zedongwengao (Mao Zedong's Manuscripts s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> Formation of <strong>the</strong> People's Republic, 8 vols.)(Beij<strong>in</strong>g: The Central Press of Historical Documents, 1987-93), Vol. 7, pp. 391-92. Fordetailed discussions of <strong>the</strong> "noose strategy," see Zhang Shuguang Deterrence and StrategicCulture: Ch<strong>in</strong>ese-American Confrontations, 1949-1958 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press,1992), ch. 8.11. Li Ke and Hao Shengzhang, Wenhua dagem<strong>in</strong>g zhong de renm<strong>in</strong> jiefangjun (ThePeople's Liberation Army dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Cultural Revolution) (Beij<strong>in</strong>g: CCP Historical MaterialsPress, 1989), pp. 408-409. This work offers one of <strong>the</strong> best accounts of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong> militarydevelopment from <strong>the</strong> mid-1960s to <strong>the</strong> mid-1970s. As <strong>the</strong> authors were alleged to havereleased confidential <strong>in</strong>formation without proper authorization, <strong>the</strong> book was withdrawn fromcirculation shortly after its publication.12. Guo M<strong>in</strong>g et al., Zhongyue guanxi yanbian sish<strong>in</strong>ian, p. 69; Wang Xiangen, Kang Meiyuanyue shilu (A Factual Account of Resist<strong>in</strong>g America and Assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Vietnam</strong>) (Beij<strong>in</strong>g:International Cultural Development Press, 1990), pp. 25-26; see also Beij<strong>in</strong>g Review, 23November 1979.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!