13.07.2015 Views

Dynamic Hedging with Stochastic Differential Utility

Dynamic Hedging with Stochastic Differential Utility

Dynamic Hedging with Stochastic Differential Utility

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

process having the stochastic differential representationdW θt = π 0 dS t + dX θ t . (8)2. Preferences of the agent over wealth at time T are given by von Newman-Morgenstern utility function U : R → R, which is monotonic, twicecontinuously differentiable, strictly concave, <strong>with</strong> U 0 and U 00 each satisfyinga (linear) growth condition. This leaves the problemmax E £ ¡ ¢¤t U WθT . (9)θ∈ΘOf course the optimal position now is the one that maximizes statement9. Then we can state the proposition:Proposition 2 The optimal futures position strategy, by maximizing the terminalutility, is θ TV , whereθ TVt·(J ww + J wx )= −(J ww +2J wx + J xx ) (υ tυ 0 t) −1 υ t σ 0 tπ t +J ¸w + J x(J ww + J wx ) m t(10)Proof. Theproofisthesameastheonepresentedinthelastsectionexcept that π t+s = π, c t+s =0, ∀ s, t ≥ 0, andwedefine the value functionJ : R 2 → R byJ (z t )=maxθ∈Θ E £ U ¡ W θtT −t¢¤.Since we are maximizing as expected utility at a future date T , the HJB14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!