e-Business in the chemical, rubber and plastics industryReferences"CIDX® White Paper Defines Roadmap for Cross-Industry eBusiness Interoperability", Press release byCIDX, 15 August 2007 (www.cidx.org)"Von Rekord zu Rekord", by Michael Psotta, in: FAZ.net, Branchen und Märkte, 30 April 2007(www.faz.de).Acemoglu, D. 2002. Technical change, inequality and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature40(1), 7-72.Aiginger, L. and W. Leitner (2004), The single market and geographic concentration in Europe, Review ofInternational Economics, 12(1), 1-11.Ark, B. van, R. Inklaar and R.H. McGuckin (2003), ICT and productivity in Europe and the United States.Where do the differences come from? CESifo Economic Studies, Vol. 49, 3/2003, pp. 295-318.Arrow, K. J. (1964). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Innovation, in R. R. Nelson(ed.), The Rate and Direction of Innovative Activity. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Arrow, K.J. (1962), The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. Review of Economic. Studies, vol.29, 155-173.Atrostic B. K. and Nguyen S. (2002). Computer Networks and US Manufacturing Plant Productivity, Newevidence from the CNUS Data. Centre for Economic Studies.Bain, J. S. (1951). Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American manufacturing, 1936-40.Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol 65, pp. 293-324.Barrios, S. and E. Strobl (2004), Industry mobility and geographic concentration in the European Unions,Economic Letters, 82, 71-75.Baumol, W. J. (1967). Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crises. AmericanEconomic Review 57, no. 3 (June): 415-26.Bresnahan, T. F. and Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General Purpose Technologies "Engines of Growth? NBERWorking Paper Series, Vol. w4148.Brülhart, M. and R. Traeger (2004), An account of geographic concentration pattern in Europe, RegionalScience and Urban Economics, 35, 597-624.Brynjolfsson, E, Malone, T. W., Gurbaxani, V., Kambil, A. (1994). Does Information Technology Lead toSmaller Firms? Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 1628-1644.Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to informationsystems spending. Management Science 42(4), 541-558.Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (2000) Beyond Computation: Information Technology, OrganisationalTransformation and Business Performance, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.23-48.Brynjolfsson, E. and Yang, S. (1999). The Intangible Costs and Benefits of Computer Investments:Evidence from the Financial Markets. Atlanta, Georgia: Proceedings of the International Conferenceon Information Systems.Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A., Sorell, M. and Zhu, F. (2006). Scale without Mass: Business ProcessReplication and Industry Dynamics. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 07-016.Cairncross, F. (1997) The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change our Lives,Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Carr, Nicholas (2003). "IT Doesn't Matter". In: Harvard Business Review, May 2003CEFIC (2006). Facts and Figures: The European chemical industry in a worldwide perspective.CEFIC (2007). Facts and Figures: The European chemical industry in a worldwide perspective.CEFIC: Facing the energy challenge: why the chemical industry matters. Brochure (no quotation ofpublication year).207
e-Business in the chemical, rubber and plastics industryCesaroni, Fabrizio, A. Gambardella, W. Garcia-Fontes, and M. Mariani (2004): "The Chemical SectoralSystems: Firms, Markets, Institutions and the Process of Knowledge Creation and Diffusion," inSectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analysis of Six Major Sectors in Europe, ed.by Malerba, Franco. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Chan, Y., (2000). IT value: The great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual andorganisational measures. Journal of Management Information Systems 16(4), pp. 225-261.Clayton, T. and Waldron, K. (2003). E-commerce adoption and business impact: A progress report.Economic Trends No. 591, pp 33–40.Clemons, E. K. and Reddi, S. P. (1994). The Impact of I.T. on the Degree of Outsourcing, the Number ofSuppliers and the Duration of Contracts, Working Paper 95-12, The Wharton School, Univer-sity ofPennsylvania.Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm, Economica, New Series, Vol. 4, No. 16, pp. 386-405.Cohen, W and Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and Learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal,Vol. 99. No.397, pp. 569-596.Commonwealth of Australia (2001). From Sheep’s Back to Cyberspace: Trade and Regional Australia inChanging Times, Canberra: Dept. of Foreign Affairs and Trade.David, P. A. (1990). The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern ProductivityParadox, American Economic Review, Vol. 80(2), 355-61.Doms, M. E., Jarmin, R. S. and Klimek, S. D. (2002). IT investment and firm performance in US retailsector. Economic Studies, No 02-14, Washington D.C.: Bureau of the Census, Department ofCommerce.Duffy, J., Papageorgiou, C., Perez-Sebastian, F. (2004), Capital-Skill Complementarity? Evidence from aPanel of Countries, in: The Review of Economics and Statistics, February 2004, 86(1), 327–344.eBusiness 2007/2008. Jahrbuch der deutschen Wirtschaft. Edited and published by Wegweiser GmbH,Berlin.Edquist, C., Hommen, L. and McKelvey, M. (2001). Innovation and Employment. Edward Elgar,Cheltenham and Northampton.EITO (2007). European Information Technology Observatory.Elemica – Connect once connect to all. Company presentation by Mike Mc Guigan, May 2007Erber, G. (2005). Benchmarking Efficiency of Telecommunication Industries in the US and Major EuropeanCountries A Stochastic Possibility Frontiers Approach in: Communication & Strategies, no. 60, 157-179.Erber, G., Hagemann, H. (2005): The New Economy in a Growth Crisis, in: The Regional Divide, Promisesand Realities of the New Economy in a Transatlantic Perspective, ed. Kurt Hübner, RoutledgeErber, G., Sayed-Ahmed, A. (2005), Offshore Outsourcing – A Global Shift in the Present IT Industry, in:Intereconomics, Volume 40, Number 2, March 2005, 100-112European Commission (2004). e-Commerce and firm performance. An assessment using multiple surveysources and linked data. European Commission.European Commission (2005). Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: A policy framework tostrengthen EU manufacturing – towards a more integrated approach for industrial policy.Communication from the Commission, COM(2005) 474 final, 5.10.2005European Commission (2007): European Competitiveness Report 2007. Commission Staff WorkingDocument, SEC(2007) 1444, 31 October 2007European Commission (2007a): "Raising productivity growth: key messages from the EuropeanCompetitiveness Report 2007", Communication from the Commission, COM(2007) 666 final, 31October 2007European Commission (2008). Towards an increased contribution from standardisation to innovation inEurope. Communication from the Commission, COM(2008) 133 final.European Commission (2008a): “Think Small First”. A “Small Business Act” for Europe. Communicationfrom the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and SocialCommittee and the Committee of the regions. COM(2008) 394 final. Brussels, 25.6.2008.208
- Page 1 and 2:
ICT and e-Business Impact in theChe
- Page 3 and 4:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 5 and 6:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 7 and 8:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 9 and 10:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 11 and 12:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 13 and 14:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 15 and 16:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 17 and 18:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 19 and 20:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 21 and 22:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 23 and 24:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 25 and 26:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 27 and 28:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 29 and 30:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 31 and 32:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 33 and 34:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 35 and 36:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 37 and 38:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 39 and 40:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 41 and 42:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 43 and 44:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 45 and 46:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 47 and 48:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 49 and 50:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 51 and 52:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 53 and 54:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 55 and 56:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 57 and 58:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 59 and 60:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 61 and 62:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 63 and 64:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 65 and 66:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 67 and 68:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 69 and 70:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 71 and 72:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 73 and 74:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 75 and 76:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 77 and 78:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 79 and 80:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 81 and 82:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 83 and 84:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 85 and 86:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 87 and 88:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 89 and 90:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 91 and 92:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 93 and 94:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 95 and 96:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 97 and 98:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 99 and 100:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 101 and 102:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 103 and 104:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 105 and 106:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 107 and 108:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 109 and 110:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 111 and 112:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 113 and 114:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 115 and 116:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 117 and 118:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 119 and 120:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 121 and 122:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 123 and 124:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 125 and 126:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 127 and 128:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 129 and 130:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 131 and 132:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 133 and 134:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 135 and 136:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 137 and 138:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 139 and 140:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 141 and 142:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 143 and 144:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 145 and 146:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 147 and 148:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 149 and 150:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 151 and 152:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 153 and 154:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 155 and 156:
e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 157 and 158: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 159 and 160: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 161 and 162: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 163 and 164: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 165 and 166: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 167 and 168: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 169 and 170: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 171 and 172: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 173 and 174: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 175 and 176: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 177 and 178: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 179 and 180: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 181 and 182: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 183 and 184: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 185 and 186: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 187 and 188: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 189 and 190: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 191 and 192: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 193 and 194: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 195 and 196: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 197 and 198: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 199 and 200: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 201 and 202: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 203 and 204: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 205 and 206: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 207: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 211 and 212: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 213 and 214: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 215 and 216: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 217 and 218: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 219 and 220: e-Business in the chemical, rubber
- Page 221 and 222: e-Business in the chemical, rubber