Economic Developments in brief 3rd Quarter
Economic Developments in brief 3rd Quarter
Economic Developments in brief 3rd Quarter
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
Page 2<strong>3rd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> 2011G L O B A L E C O N O M I C D E V E L O P M E N T S :T H I R D Q UA R T E R 2 0 1 1<strong>Economic</strong> growth <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>dustrialised countriesrema<strong>in</strong>s modest <strong>in</strong> the<strong>3rd</strong> quarterCh<strong>in</strong>a and Indiacont<strong>in</strong>ue to driveeconomic growth amongemerg<strong>in</strong>g economiesBox 2: Annual Real GDP GrowthREGION 2009 2010 2011 * 2012 **World Output -0.5 5.0 4.0 4.0United States -2.6 2.8 1.5 1.8Japan -6.3 3.9 -0.5 2.3United K<strong>in</strong>gdom -4.9 1.3 1.1 1.6Sub-Sahara Africa 2.8 5.0 5.2 5.8Brazil -0.6 7.5 3.8 3.6Russia -7.8 4.0 4.3 4.1India 5.7 10.3 7.8 7.5Ch<strong>in</strong>a 9.2 10.3 9.5 9.0** ProjectionsSource: Respective Country Bureau of StatisticsCont<strong>in</strong>ued from Page 14. Ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>flation <strong>in</strong> most countries;5. Overheat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some emerg<strong>in</strong>gcountries;In its September 2011,World <strong>Economic</strong> Outlook (WEO),the International MonetaryFund (IMF) estimates globalgrowth to average 4.0% <strong>in</strong> 2011compared to 5.0% <strong>in</strong> 2010. Thisshows that IMF views the globaleconomic situation <strong>in</strong> 2011 asmore gloomy compared to2010. In the United States (US),IMF estimates growth to average1.5% <strong>in</strong> 2011, comparedwith 3,0% <strong>in</strong> 2010 (Box 2). <strong>Economic</strong>growth <strong>in</strong> the euro areais estimated at 1.6% for theyear 2011 compared with 1.8%<strong>in</strong> 2010. In the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom(UK), growth of just 1.1% isprojected for 2011, comparedwith 1.4% <strong>in</strong> 2010. For Japan,the IMF estimates negativegrowth of 0.5% for 2011 comparedwith a positive 4% <strong>in</strong>2010.the highest economic growthdur<strong>in</strong>g the period under review.Strong growth <strong>in</strong> Japanpushed economic growth <strong>in</strong>the OECD grow<strong>in</strong>g from 0.3%<strong>in</strong> the 2nd quarter to 0.6% <strong>in</strong>the <strong>3rd</strong> quarter. Fiscal <strong>in</strong>stability<strong>in</strong> major <strong>in</strong>dustrialisedcountries such as the US, UK,Italy and Spa<strong>in</strong> rema<strong>in</strong> a challengeto global economicoutlook.Emerg<strong>in</strong>g EconomiesIn emerg<strong>in</strong>g marketeconomies, Ch<strong>in</strong>a (9.1%) andIndia (6.9%) cont<strong>in</strong>ued todrive global economic growth<strong>in</strong> the <strong>3rd</strong> quarter. The Ch<strong>in</strong>eseeconomy cooled off dur<strong>in</strong>gthe <strong>3rd</strong> quarter of 2011 aftergrow<strong>in</strong>g at 9.5% <strong>in</strong> the 2ndquarter. The IMF’s Ch<strong>in</strong>a andIndia growth forecasts for 2011are 9.5% and 7.8% respectively(Table 2-1). Buoyant commodityprices (gold, plat<strong>in</strong>um, oil) andrelatively stronger global consumerdemand are the majordrivers of economic growth <strong>in</strong>emerg<strong>in</strong>g markets. However,strong commodity prices maybe temporary, to the detrimentof emerg<strong>in</strong>g markets growthoutlook. The high growth prospects<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a and India comeat a time when growth prospects<strong>in</strong> other emerg<strong>in</strong>g countriesare not pleas<strong>in</strong>g. For <strong>in</strong>stance,with<strong>in</strong> the BRICS groupof countries, the IMF expectseconomic growth to average3.8%, 4.3% and 3.4% <strong>in</strong> Brazil,Russia and South Africa.Growth prospects <strong>in</strong> thesecountries and other emerg<strong>in</strong>gmarkets are weighed down byfactors such as the Euro debtcrisis (which is not favourablefor global trade), high food andfuel prices <strong>in</strong> low-<strong>in</strong>come countriesand debt overhang fromthe recession for both emerg<strong>in</strong>gmarkets and <strong>in</strong>dustrialisedcountries.Box 3: Emerg<strong>in</strong>g Markets Growth TrendsIndustrialised Countries<strong>Economic</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrialisedcountries rema<strong>in</strong>edmodest <strong>in</strong> the <strong>3rd</strong> quarter withthe US (2.5%) and Japan (1.5%)record<strong>in</strong>g the highest growthrate (Box 1). However, on anannual basis Germany postedSource: Respective Country Bureau of Statistics
Page 3<strong>3rd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> 2011E C O N O M I C T R E N D S I N SAEuropean debt crisisand f<strong>in</strong>ancial crisis <strong>in</strong>Greece has negativeimpact on SA’s GDPBox 6 : Annualised <strong>Quarter</strong>-onon-<strong>Quarter</strong> GDP Growth per Sector (%)Industry 2010 2011Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3Agriculture, forestry and fish<strong>in</strong>g 4.9 13.6 16.3 12.5 -3.7 -7.8 -4.3M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and quarry<strong>in</strong>g 18.7 -24.5 33.7 17.1 -4.0 -4.2 -17.4Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g 8.3 5.7 -4.9 4.1 14.5 8.8 -1.9Electricity, gas and water 4.9 -1.7 -2.2 5.6 3.3 1.0 -2.6Construction 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.8 1.8Wholesale and retail trade, hotels, and restaurants3.1 6.0 3.3 3.5 4.4 5.2 6.1Transport, storage and communication 2.4 4.5 3.0 4.2 3.6 4.3 2.3F<strong>in</strong>ance, real estate and bus<strong>in</strong>ess services 3.2 4.0 1.4 1.7 4.8 2.7 4.5General government services 1.2 4.6 0.5 5.7 1.8 5.8 3.9Personal services 3.5 3.6 3.1 3.3 2.7 2.7 2.5Total value added 4.6 2.7 2.6 4.5 4.6 0.8 1.3Taxes less subsidies 6.5 4.0 3.9 4.5 3.4 4.8 2.9GDP at market prices 4.8 2.8 2.7 4.5 4.5 1.3 1.4Source: Stats SA, November 2011ross Domestic ProductG growth cont<strong>in</strong>ued torema<strong>in</strong> depressed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>3rd</strong>quarter of 2011, record<strong>in</strong>g agrowth rate of just 1.4% onthe previous quarter (Box 6).After two previous quarters ofrelatively robust growth (4.5%)the poor performance of thenational economy <strong>in</strong> the 2ndand the <strong>3rd</strong> quarters significantlydampens optimism forstrong, employment-creat<strong>in</strong>ggrowth <strong>in</strong> the immediate future.While GDP grew by 3.1% onan annual comparison, thesharpness of the decl<strong>in</strong>e betweenthe 1st and 2nd quar-ter, and thereafter susta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>the <strong>3rd</strong> quarter of 2011, wouldsuggest that South Africa cont<strong>in</strong>uesto struggle to shrug off thelegacy of the 2009 recession.The European debt crises and thef<strong>in</strong>ancial crisis <strong>in</strong> Greece <strong>in</strong> particular,as well as cont<strong>in</strong>ued sluggisheconomic growth <strong>in</strong> developednations has had a negativeimpact on South Africa’s GDPgrowth <strong>in</strong> the <strong>3rd</strong> quarter. Thisnegative impact is a result oflower <strong>in</strong>ternational demand forexports (exclud<strong>in</strong>g commodities)as well as decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g levels of foreign<strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> South Africa.South Africa’s average GDPgrowth rate for 2011 to date, isbelow the IMF’s 2011 forecastfor South Africa of 3.4%, andwould suggest that the economyhas performed unexpectedlypoorly, particularly <strong>in</strong> the 2ndand <strong>3rd</strong> quarters. Ch<strong>in</strong>a, amember of the BRICS group,experienced an economicgrowth rate of 9.1% <strong>in</strong> the <strong>3rd</strong>quarter just 0.4% below theIMF’s forecast for Ch<strong>in</strong>a for2011. Low GDP growth, alsosignificantly constra<strong>in</strong>s thecountry’s prospects of creat<strong>in</strong>g5 million new jobs by 2020 asthe New Growth Path specifiesthat a growth rate of 4-7% isrequired to meet this targetThe Rand posts weakerexchange rate aga<strong>in</strong>st theUS dollarE XC H A N G E RAT EThe South Africancurrency (ZAR)posted a relativelyweaker exchange rateaga<strong>in</strong>st the dollar <strong>in</strong> the <strong>3rd</strong>quarter of 2011 compared tothe 2nd quarter of 2011. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly,the third quarterregistered an average exchangerate of R7.14, comparedto R6.79 <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>gquarter aga<strong>in</strong>st the USdollar.On average, the rand alsodepreciated aga<strong>in</strong>st other majorcurrencies such as the Euro(€) and the Pound (£) <strong>in</strong> theperiods under review. The October2011 exchange rate wasthe weakest it has been aga<strong>in</strong>stall currencies s<strong>in</strong>ce 2009. For<strong>in</strong>stance the rand value aga<strong>in</strong>stthe US dollar peaked at R7.97<strong>in</strong> October 2011. The last timethe dollar exchange rate wasthis high was <strong>in</strong> July 2009.Dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>3rd</strong> quarter theRand depreciated from R6.79<strong>in</strong> July to R7.09 <strong>in</strong> August2011, and cont<strong>in</strong>ued weaken<strong>in</strong>gto R7.54 <strong>in</strong> September2011.
Page 5<strong>3rd</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> 2011L A B O U R MARKET TRENDSBox 7 : Unemployment <strong>in</strong> KwaZulu-Natal and Other Comparable RegionsDecrease <strong>in</strong>unemployment <strong>in</strong> <strong>3rd</strong>quarterIncrease <strong>in</strong> headl<strong>in</strong>e CPIfor all urban areasSource: DEDT Calculations based on Stats SA, 2011UnemploymentI N F L A T I O Ndecreased by96,000 <strong>in</strong> thethird quarter to atotal of 4.42 million unemployedpeople <strong>in</strong> South Africa. Price Index (for all urban areas)T he headl<strong>in</strong>e ConsumerThis substantial drop <strong>in</strong> unemploymenthas resulted <strong>in</strong> a decreaseof 0.7% <strong>in</strong> the unemployment<strong>in</strong>creased to 5.7% <strong>in</strong> September2011, up from 5.3% <strong>in</strong> Augustafter no <strong>in</strong>crease between July andto a rate of 25%. August. On average the pricesSimilarly the expanded unemploymentrate dropped from36.9% <strong>in</strong> the second quarter to36% <strong>in</strong> the current quarter.This can be attributed to both adecl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> ‘search<strong>in</strong>g’ unemployment(96,000) as well as aslight decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the number of<strong>in</strong>creased by 0.4% between Julyand September (Stats SA, September2011). A comb<strong>in</strong>ation of supplyside shocks (such as a rise <strong>in</strong>oil prices), adm<strong>in</strong>istered prices<strong>in</strong>creases and wage settlementswell <strong>in</strong> excess of <strong>in</strong>flation, resulted<strong>in</strong> the CPI measures <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gdiscouraged work-seekers (-3,000).Seven out of the n<strong>in</strong>e prov<strong>in</strong>cesexperienced decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gstrict unemployment rates <strong>in</strong>the <strong>3rd</strong> quarter of 2011. TheWestern Cape was the onlyprov<strong>in</strong>ce to experience an <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> both its strict (1.5%)and expanded (1.4%) rates ofunemployment <strong>in</strong> the <strong>3rd</strong> quarter(Box 7). KwaZulu-Natalexperienced a 1.2% decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>its’ strict rate and a 1.5% decl<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong> its expanded rate on aquarter by quarter basis anddecl<strong>in</strong>es of 0.6% and 1.1%respectively on an annual basis.The prov<strong>in</strong>ce’s strict rate ofunemployment (19.1%) comparesfavourably with the WesternCape (23.3%) and Gauteng(27.8%), as portrayed <strong>in</strong> Box 7.dramatically from 3.2% <strong>in</strong>September 2010 to 5,7 % <strong>in</strong>the same period this year(2011).The Producer Price Indexcont<strong>in</strong>ued its strong upwardtrend, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g to 10,5 % <strong>in</strong>September, from 9.6% <strong>in</strong> August,and 8,9% <strong>in</strong> July.The September 2011headl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>flation per prov<strong>in</strong>ceregistered an <strong>in</strong>crease relativeto the previous month of yearunder review, throughoutprov<strong>in</strong>ces (see Box 8).Box 8 : Geographical Headl<strong>in</strong>e Inflation (%): )Aug ‘11-Sept ‘11)Source: Stats SA, September 2011