Evaluation of the 5th Amendment of the German Gambling Ordinance

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. Design and sub-studies4.2 Sub-studies(4) Sub-study 5: Inspection of gaming arcades with municipal authorities− Randomly selected 36 gaming arcades with 50 licences (target: 36)(5) Sub-study 7: Interviews with experts−−10 expertsReview of the draft report by the interviewees(6) Sub-study 8: review of the existing, mostly grey literature on AWPinspection reports10
5. Major conclusions5.1 Aim 1: Implementation of the AGO: game features(1) The implementation of the revised game features was largely completed−All AWP are licensed correctly(2) The maximum limit of 500 € win per hour is circumvented (legally) by „pointsystems“−−57% of the highest payouts over the original legal limit of 500 € per hour28% over the revised legal limit of 1,000 € per hour(3) Cases of illegal „pre-loading“ of the AWP (13 %)(4) Illegal payouts of point wins (more than 500 € per hour)−12% illegal payouts of the maximum amount during the last five days− 34% of the highest amount won in 2009(5) Operators have little knowledge of the game feature regulations in the AGO11
Page 1: Evaluation of the 5 th Amendment of
Page 4 and 5: 1. Background1.2 Evaluation backgro
Page 6 and 7: 3. Project aimsAim 1:Aim 2:Aim 3:Ai
Page 8 and 9: 4. Design and sub-studies4.1 Design
Page 12 and 13: 5. Major conclusions5.2 Aim 2: Impl
Page 14 and 15: 5. Major conclusions5.3 Aim 3: Impa
Page 16 and 17: 5. Major conclusions5.5 Aim 5: Impa
Page 18 and 19: 6. Recommendations6.1 Better knowle
Page 20 and 21: 6. Recommendations6.3 Improved impl

Evaluation of the 5th Amendment of the German Gambling Ordinance

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?