- Page 1 and 2: MedicalDiscriminationAgainstChildre
- Page 3 and 4: idments • Section 504 • Medical
- Page 5: LETTER OF TRANSMITTALThe PresidentT
- Page 10 and 11: Conclusion 606. The Rehabilitation
- Page 13 and 14: Executive SummaryIntroductionIn con
- Page 15 and 16: in the context of medical treatment
- Page 17: to be enacted. Because providing su
- Page 20 and 21: initiate legal proceedings in a cou
- Page 23 and 24: the discriminating party, thus fulf
- Page 25 and 26: autonomy is given serious sympathet
- Page 27 and 28: 9. During the period in which enfor
- Page 29 and 30: 10. The Office of Human Development
- Page 31 and 32: questions of discrimination. It add
- Page 33 and 34: arrest, he was not to be put on a r
- Page 35 and 36: technology-assisted children; Charl
- Page 37 and 38: support or of managing their own af
- Page 39 and 40: Parents of a newborn spina bifida c
- Page 41 and 42: "They said she'd only know pain and
- Page 43 and 44: disability is not legally adequate
- Page 45: This said, we can get back to talki
- Page 49 and 50: drome can acquire skills that advan
- Page 51 and 52: These studies and anecdotes demonst
- Page 53 and 54: smiles and hugs and screams and pla
- Page 55 and 56: etween 5 and 42. . . .He is totally
- Page 57 and 58:
the prophecies themselves help to b
- Page 59 and 60:
persons to achieve their maximum po
- Page 61 and 62:
999 grams at birth and who were bor
- Page 63 and 64:
ability to live independently (say
- Page 65 and 66:
criminal offense, punishable by a f
- Page 67 and 68:
ai gains skills and income but rema
- Page 69 and 70:
ing their children that the only pe
- Page 71 and 72:
disabled. The degree of permanent d
- Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 6The Rehabilitation Act of
- Page 75 and 76:
In May 1977, under the compulsion o
- Page 77 and 78:
tive agency, and that the failure t
- Page 79 and 80:
Commission primarily meant hospital
- Page 81 and 82:
He also ruled that Secretary of Hea
- Page 83 and 84:
HHS agreed that when it investigate
- Page 85 and 86:
Next, the Second Circuit reviewed t
- Page 87 and 88:
nonhandicapped child. Or discrimina
- Page 89 and 90:
eporting cases of medical neglect t
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 7The Child Abuse Amendments
- Page 93 and 94:
occur. . . .We got involved because
- Page 95 and 96:
Perhaps the best short statement of
- Page 97 and 98:
cally all children with disabilitie
- Page 99 and 100:
incorporated the nondiscrimination
- Page 101 and 102:
proposed the more restrictive langu
- Page 103 and 104:
ital impairments and infants or chi
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 8Constitutional IssuesSince
- Page 107 and 108:
State and local laws provide simila
- Page 109 and 110:
DR. OWENS. I think that's a little
- Page 111 and 112:
the Supreme Court's concern for par
- Page 113 and 114:
policy judgments related to their n
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 9The Incidence of Discrimin
- Page 117 and 118:
decisions based on the presence of
- Page 119 and 120:
to cause an infant's death," and ap
- Page 121 and 122:
Surgeon General Koop testified that
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 10Child Protective Services
- Page 125 and 126:
grapevine from medical personnel of
- Page 127 and 128:
CPS Agencies' Failure to Comply wit
- Page 129 and 130:
In 1981 a State legislative committ
- Page 131 and 132:
decision. 8 The court wrote that th
- Page 133 and 134:
From this perspective, as Carl Schn
- Page 135 and 136:
treating physicians that life-prese
- Page 137 and 138:
have found these principles to be h
- Page 139 and 140:
een initiated in at least the two c
- Page 141 and 142:
suffering should be consulted, not
- Page 143 and 144:
Department employees interviewed al
- Page 145 and 146:
Kimberly was placed in the Newborn
- Page 147 and 148:
finding on May 18, 1984. 31 In the
- Page 149 and 150:
Office for Civil Rights (OCR) took
- Page 151 and 152:
Yale-New Haven Hospital. No legal a
- Page 153 and 154:
However, after reviewing a draft of
- Page 155 and 156:
not include the more than 160,000 i
- Page 157 and 158:
several provisions designed to enha
- Page 159 and 160:
additional funding for the P&As wil
- Page 161 and 162:
evidence strongly suggests that the
- Page 163 and 164:
5. The logic of the Bowen plurality
- Page 165 and 166:
process, both as advocates for the
- Page 167 and 168:
is provided of the various figures,
- Page 169 and 170:
antecedents—the legacy of bigotry
- Page 171 and 172:
illustrated by the resistance to ho
- Page 173 and 174:
questionnaire sent to the 1,007 mem
- Page 175 and 176:
"Section 504 does not authorize the
- Page 177 and 178:
trouble, but can distract from the
- Page 179 and 180:
my timidity. Accordingly, I will se
- Page 181 and 182:
ather undermines standards moral an
- Page 183 and 184:
for a cumbersome, jerry-rigged stru
- Page 185 and 186:
is right, and we may succeed. But,
- Page 187 and 188:
tenderness. A more understanding re
- Page 189 and 190:
INTRODUCTIONThe terra baby doe refe
- Page 191 and 192:
FINDINGSSTATE BABY DOE PROCEDURES E
- Page 193 and 194:
Prompt Notification Systems Establi
- Page 195 and 196:
ESTABLISHMENT OF HOSPITAL INFANT CA
- Page 197 and 198:
SIX BABY DOE CASES CONFIRMED SINCE
- Page 199 and 200:
STATE COMMENTS ON BABY DOE RESPONSI
- Page 201 and 202:
OBSERVATIONSThe Federal baby doe am
- Page 203 and 204:
INTRODUCTIONThe term baby doe refer
- Page 205 and 206:
FINDINGSHOSPITAL ETHICS COMMITTEES
- Page 207 and 208:
COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES VARYThe
- Page 209 and 210:
BASIC CASE REVIEW CRITERIA ARE COMP
- Page 211 and 212:
COMMITTEE CASE REVIEW EXPERIENCEAmo
- Page 213 and 214:
DESCRIPTION OF AN ETHICS COMMITTEET
- Page 215 and 216:
ETHICS COMMITTEE COMMENTS_ON. IMPAC
- Page 217 and 218:
Appendix 4AmericanAcademy ofPediatr
- Page 219 and 220:
Statement of Commissioner Robert A.
- Page 221 and 222:
Association 7 case, even though the
- Page 223 and 224:
Those who need evidence of the grow