Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
18<br />
<strong>Deadly</strong> <strong>Pleasures</strong><br />
THE JUDAS WIN-<br />
DOW was published<br />
under Carr’s pseudonym<br />
“Carter Dickson.” About<br />
25 years later it was reprinted<br />
in the U.S. under<br />
the rather obvious,<br />
but logical, paperback<br />
title The Crossbow Murder.<br />
The victim was murdered<br />
in a locked room,<br />
and an arrow is in his<br />
body, but where is the<br />
crossbow that shot it?<br />
Certainly, it is not within<br />
the room that was locked<br />
from the inside.<br />
This is also one of the<br />
best courtroom mysteries I’ve read. Dickson’s series sleuth,<br />
Sir Henry Merrivale, acts as defense attorney because he<br />
believes the accused to be innocent. Faced with a locked<br />
room, he claims that there is always a “Judas Window,” a<br />
way to get around it, but what it is will await his summation<br />
to the jury. Meanwhile, “the Old Man,” as he calls himself,<br />
complains of “the blinkin’ awful cussedness of things in<br />
general,” while he proceeds to break the law to defend his<br />
client. The world’s leading expert on impossible crime<br />
mysteries, Robert Adey, has called this book “perhaps the<br />
best locked room novel ever written.” Right now, I can’t<br />
think of a better one.<br />
Rue Morgue Press has consistently reprinted<br />
humorous mysteries from the past. Recently, they have<br />
reprinted more “serious” writers such as Carr, Catherine<br />
Aird, and H. C. Bailey, but there are subtle touches of<br />
humor in all their work. Take Bailey, whose SHADOW<br />
ON THE WALL (1934), the first book about his most<br />
famous series detective, Doctor Reggie Fortune, has<br />
recently been reprinted by Rue Morgue at $14.95.<br />
Fortune is an unofficial advisor to Scotland Yard and helps<br />
out in a case involving the wealthy and politically connected,<br />
one in which he is present at the first crime. Drug<br />
addiction among the rich, very prevalent in England<br />
between the World Wars, is important to the story. He is<br />
pitted against a group he playfully calls “the mischief<br />
makers unlimited.” Fortune is an appealing character with<br />
his common sense and strong social awareness. It is too bad<br />
that his speech tends to be so annoying, with his dropping<br />
most g’s and incessant exclaiming of phrases such as “My<br />
dear chap!” and “My only aunt!”<br />
The mystery is a bit slow getting started, and<br />
Reggie’s detective work is never totally plausible or entirely<br />
fair to the reader. I prefer him in short stories, a form<br />
in which he wrote for many years before essaying a novel.<br />
Still, the writing in SHADOW ON THE WALL is civilized,<br />
the ending is satisfactory, and the book introduces, in an<br />
inside joke, Bailey’s other series detective, shady attorney<br />
Joshua Clunk.<br />
John Laurence, the pen name of John Laurence<br />
Pritchard (1885-1968), is another of those worthwhile<br />
writers almost completely forgotten now. Perhaps it is<br />
because of his 15 mysteries, only one was reprinted in the<br />
U.S. He was a versatile author, writing about science,<br />
airplane construction, and true crime in addition to his<br />
fiction.<br />
MURDER IN THE STRATOSPHERE (1938)<br />
displays his knowledge of science with its tale of a balloon<br />
expedition into space to do what satellites do so much<br />
better now: forecasting the weather. One of the crew dies<br />
in the air, creating a sensation since the victim was<br />
broadcasting live from twenty miles up when stricken. The<br />
death might have been passed as due to natural causes<br />
were it not for Dr. Thomas Morton who claims that it was<br />
due to botulism poisoning.<br />
Laurence makes the journey compelling since the<br />
balloon is due to go up 25 miles, “higher than any humans<br />
have ever gone,” on “the greatest adventure the world had<br />
yet known.” The trip is suspenseful, and the detection<br />
stimulating. Unfortunately, limning characters is not a<br />
particular Laurence strength. Of the five people in the<br />
balloon (not counting the victim), two are almost complete<br />
ciphers, so the number of legitimate suspects is small.<br />
There are a few good fair-play clues, though most of the<br />
detection and the motivation, are far from persuasive.<br />
Still, Laurence writes well and does a good job of creating<br />
additional interest by holding his solution until almost the<br />
very end.<br />
Books About the Mystery<br />
It’s hard to think of anyone more important to the<br />
mystery field than Anthony Boucher, and finally he has his<br />
own biography. Better than that, ANTHONY BOUCHER:<br />
A BIOBIBLIOGRAPHY by Jeffrey Marks features a<br />
remarkably complete listing of all that the prolific Boucher<br />
wrote. A bonus is finding, in one place, all of Boucher’s<br />
selections of the best mysteries of each year, as he<br />
published them each December, from 1951 through<br />
1967, in his “Criminals at Large” column in the New York<br />
Times Book Review. This book is published in trade<br />
paperback, for $35, by McFarland (phone 800-253-<br />
2187 or on the web at www.mcfarlandpub.com).<br />
Other pluses in this book include discussion of how<br />
far ahead of his time Boucher was on social issues and his<br />
translations of Latin American mysteries, including the first<br />
by Jorge Luis Borges to appear in English. We get a good<br />
picture of the various illnesses that beset Boucher, who<br />
appears not to have had a truly healthy day in his life. His<br />
mother was a doctor and accompanied him when, as an<br />
adult, his chronic asthma forced him to go away for periods<br />
to the desert. I wish there was more information on their<br />
relationship.<br />
With all that is good in this book, there are also<br />
distractions. There are grammatical errors and some<br />
awkward word usage. “Typos” are many, as is repetition.<br />
The biographical portion of the book is divided into<br />
Boucher as respectively man, author, editor, and critic. His<br />
radio work is repeated in two places, as is discussion of his