Pearson-Exploring-Effective-Pedagogy-in-Primary-Schools
Pearson-Exploring-Effective-Pedagogy-in-Primary-Schools
Pearson-Exploring-Effective-Pedagogy-in-Primary-Schools
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Group A: Excellent <strong>Schools</strong>: Academically effective schools with goodquality pedagogyTable 3: Criteria for <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> Group A: Excellent schools(academically effective, good quality pedagogy) *SourceNational AssessmentResidual Scores (RS)(a measure of schooleffectiveness)InstructionalEnvironmentObservation (IEO)Classroom ObservationSystem (COS-5)Possible scoresrange from(low to high)M<strong>in</strong>imum scores required to be <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>in</strong> the academically effective, good qualitypedagogy group1 to 5 RS ≥ 3 <strong>in</strong> both English and mathsANDat least one RS ≥ 41 to 3 IEO ≥ 2 if COS-5 = 5ORIEO = 3 if COS-5 = 3 or 4 **1 to 5 COS-5 ≥ 3 if IEO = 3ORCOS-5 = 5 if IEO = 2 *** Percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals (FSM) was available for each school and was checked to ensurethat schools with both higher and lower proportions of pupils eligible for FSM were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> each category.** <strong>Schools</strong> where quality of pedagogy on both scales was medium (IOE=2; COS-5=3) but both residual scoreswere high (RS≥4) would also have been <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this group; however, none of the schools fell <strong>in</strong>to this category.The only other schools <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Group A were those with medium rat<strong>in</strong>gs on bothpedagogical quality scales, where both the English and maths residual scores were rated ashigh (RS≥4). The criteria were str<strong>in</strong>gent and only 10 of the 82 schools (12%) fell <strong>in</strong>to the“academically effective, good quality pedagogy” category.Group B: Good <strong>Schools</strong>: Medium academic effectiveness and medium qualitypedagogyTable 4: Criteria for <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> Group B: Good schools(medium academic effectiveness, medium quality pedagogy) *SourceNational AssessmentResidual Scores (RS)(a measure of schooleffectiveness)InstructionalEnvironmentObservation (IEO)Classroom ObservationSystem (COS-5)Possible scoresrange from(low to high)M<strong>in</strong>imum scores required to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong>the medium academic effectiveness, mediumquality pedagogy group1 to 5 RS = 3 <strong>in</strong> both English and maths1 to 3 IEO = 21 to 5 COS-5 = 3* Percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals (FSM) was available for each school and was checked to ensurethat schools with both higher and lower proportions of pupils eligible for FSM were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> each category.14 | <strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Effective</strong> <strong>Pedagogy</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Primary</strong> <strong>Schools</strong>