01.09.2015 Views

Ceiling

The Minnesota - Finance & Commerce

The Minnesota - Finance & Commerce

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cautious Optimism<br />

The percentage of women in corporate leadership is small, but inching forward.<br />

REFLECTIONS<br />

In the four years they’ve conducted research for The<br />

Minnesota Census of Women in Corporate Leadership,<br />

St. Catherine University associate professors Joann Bangs<br />

and Rebecca Hawthorne have seen less progress than<br />

they’d like in the percentages of women serving on the<br />

boards or in the executive suites of the state’s largest<br />

public companies.<br />

The good news: A growing body of research supports their<br />

view that greater gender diversity makes good business sense.<br />

The following is culled from interviews with the professors.<br />

Why should corporations care about gender diversity?<br />

It’s a business issue, not a women’s issue. Studies in the<br />

United States and in the European Union have identified<br />

higher returns on equity and total returns to shareholders<br />

from companies with a high representation of women<br />

corporate directors. And organizational innovation<br />

has been demonstrated to increase when at least three<br />

women are in the boardroom.<br />

What’s the good news in the 2011 Census data?<br />

Minnesota’s percentage of women executive officers<br />

continues to lead the nation. We’ve seen a rise in the percentage<br />

of women executive officers from 15.2 percent in<br />

2009 to 17.4 percent in 2011. This rise happened while<br />

the raw number of executive officers dropped. This suggests<br />

a positive trend, which we find hopeful for women<br />

in corporate leadership.<br />

Is there a correlation between the number of female executives<br />

and the number of female directors in companies?<br />

Research indicates a positive association between women<br />

corporate directors and the number of women on companies’<br />

leadership teams. You can assume that women<br />

achieving top levels have experience that prepares them<br />

to be directors. The pool of female talent is broadening<br />

and deepening.<br />

What particular experience are companies seeking<br />

in directors?<br />

As women are moving into leadership roles they are<br />

demonstrating operational P&L (profit and loss) experi-<br />

Increase Board Diversity<br />

Look for executives in the nonprofit sector.<br />

Identify talent from within the company.<br />

Use a search firm to recruit board members.<br />

ence, and that is a key criterion for board service. Not<br />

coincidently, many women serving on Minnesota boards<br />

are chief financial officers.<br />

What will help women achieve more executive<br />

and director roles?<br />

The role of the CEO is critical. He or she must make<br />

diversity a visible goal through strategies and methods<br />

of accountability and integrate those throughout the<br />

corporate culture. Companies need to define for themselves<br />

the value of more women as employees, customers<br />

and leaders.<br />

Why aren’t more women recruited for<br />

corporate boards?<br />

When boards are looking for board members, they typically<br />

look for someone with board experience. The traditional<br />

director is a retired or active CEO. Few women<br />

have reached the CEO level so few women have gained<br />

public board experience.<br />

What will jump-start women’s stalled progress?<br />

Internationally, there is a lot of movement toward quotas<br />

and regulations. Quotas aren’t likely in the United States<br />

— nor would we argue for them — but the Securities<br />

and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires companies to<br />

tell shareholders how diversity factors into their nominations.<br />

However, the SEC has left it up to each company<br />

to define diversity as it wishes.<br />

How can companies become more inclusive?<br />

Diversity and inclusion need to be embedded through<br />

all the policies and practices of a corporation to create<br />

an inclusive culture. It’s not enough to bring women<br />

on board. We have to engage them and allow them to<br />

impact governance.<br />

LEARN MORE View this year’s report online, as well as the past three years of The Minnesota<br />

Census of Women in Corporate Leadership, at mncensus.stkate.edu.<br />

Resources for Information<br />

Bilimoria, D. (2006), “The Relationship Between<br />

Women Corporate Directors and Women Corporate Officers,”<br />

Journal of Managerial Issues 18.1 (spring), 47.<br />

Catalyst (2007), “The Bottom Line: Corporate Performance<br />

and Women’s Representation on Boards,”<br />

www.catalyst.org.<br />

Deloitte (2010), “Diversifying the American Board:<br />

Thought Leaders Collaborate on Current Challenges and<br />

Practical Solutions,” www.deloitte.com (Board Diversity<br />

Report, a PDF).<br />

Ernst & Young (2009), “Groundbreakers: Using the<br />

Strength of Women to Rebuild the World Economy,”<br />

www.ey.com/groundbreakers.<br />

Hay Group (2010), “Report of the 2010 Best Companies<br />

for Leadership Study,” www.haygroup.com/<br />

bestcompaniesforleadership.<br />

Kang, E., Ding, D.K. and Charoenwong, C. (2009),<br />

“Investor Reaction to Women Directors,” Journal of<br />

Business Research 63 (2010), 888–894.<br />

Kramer, V.W., Konrad, A.M.& Erkut, S. (2006), “Critical<br />

Mass on Corporate Boards: Why Three or More<br />

Women Enhance Governance,” Wellesley Centers for<br />

Women, Report No. WCW 11, www.wcwonline.org/<br />

pubs/title.php?id=487.<br />

Matsa, D. and Miller, A. (2011), “Chipping Away at the<br />

Glass <strong>Ceiling</strong>: Gender Spillovers in Corporate Leadership,”<br />

The American Economic Review, 101 (3), 635–639.<br />

Terjesan, S., Sealy, R. and Singh, V. (2009), “Women<br />

Directors on Corporate Boards: A Review and Research<br />

Agenda,” Corporate Governance: An International Review<br />

17(3), 320–337.<br />

Torchia, M., Calabro, A. and Huse, M. (2011), “Women<br />

Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to<br />

Critical Mass,” Journal of Business Ethics 102: 299–317.<br />

Credits and Contributions<br />

The 2011 Minnesota Census of Women in Corporate Leadership<br />

was produced by St. Catherine University and the<br />

Minnesota Women’s Economic Roundtable (MWER).<br />

• Co-chairs: Paula J. King, Ph.D., dean of the School of<br />

Business and Leadership, St. Catherine University; and<br />

Pamela A. Wheelock, member, MWER<br />

• Researchers: Rebecca Hawthorne, Ph.D., associate<br />

professor and director, Master of Arts in Organizational<br />

Leadership (MAOL), St. Catherine University; and<br />

Joann Bangs, Ph.D., associate professor of economics<br />

and MAOL, St. Catherine University<br />

• Research assistants: Kimberly Popp and Cassandra<br />

Sawerwein, MAOL graduate students<br />

• Editor: Amy Gage, director of marketing and communications,<br />

St. Catherine University<br />

• Research and editorial coordinators: Maha El-Wailli,<br />

communications specialist, St. Catherine University;<br />

and Valerie Krech, MAOL program coordinator<br />

• Writer: Elizabeth Child, principal, Elizabeth Child &<br />

Company<br />

• Special thanks to Marjorie Mathison Hance, vice<br />

president for external relations, St. Catherine University,<br />

and Deborah Hopp, vice president of publishing,<br />

MSP Communications, and member, MWER<br />

20 APRIL 2012 MINNESOTA CENSUS OF WOMEN IN CORPORATE LEADERSHIP<br />

MINNESOTA CENSUS OF WOMEN IN CORPORATE LEADERSHIP APRIL 2012 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!