7 Mulcahy K, Maryniuk M, Peeples M, et al. <strong>Diabetes</strong> self-management education core outcome measures. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Educator 2003; 29: 768- 803. 8. Brown SA. Meta-analysis of diabetes patient education research: variations in intervention effects across studies. Res Nurs Health 1992; 15: 409-419. 9. Glasgow RE, Osteen VL. Evaluating diabetes education. Are we measuring the most important outcomes? <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 1992; 15: 1423-1432. 10. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, et al. <strong>Evidence</strong> suggesting that a chronic disease self management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization. Med Care 1999; 37: 5-14. 11. Duke SAS, Colagiuri S, Colagiuri R. Individual patient education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane DB Syst Rev 2009; 1: CD005268. 12. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, et al. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff 2001; 20: 64-78. 13. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, et al. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 2002; 25: 1159-1171. 14. Bodenheimer TS, Lorig K, Holman H, et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002; 288: 2469-2475. 15. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technology Appraisal 60. Guidance on the use of patient-education models for diabetes. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2003. http://www.nice.org.uk. 16. Piette JD, Glasgow RE. Education and home glucose monitoring. In: Gerstein HC, Haynes RB (eds). <strong>Evidence</strong> <strong>base</strong>d diabetes care. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker; 2001: 207-2051. 17. Gary TL, Genkinger JM, Gualler E, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized educational and behavioral interventions in type 2 diabetes. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Educator 2003; 29: 488-501. 18. Warsi A, Wang PS, LaValley MP, et al. Self-management education programs in chronic disease. A systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1641-1649. 19. Fisher EB, Brownson CA, O’Toole ML, et al. Ecological approaches to self-management: the case of diabetes. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 1523-1535. 20. Siminerio L, Piatt G, Emerson S, et al. Deploying the chronic care model to implement and sustain diabetes self-management training programs. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Educator 2006; 32: 1-8. 21. Peyrot M, Rubin R, Funnell M, et al. Access to diabetes self-management education: results of national surveys of patients, educators and physicians. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Educator 2009; 35: 246-263. 22. Osborn CY, Fisher JD. <strong>Diabetes</strong> education. Integrating theory, cultural considerations, and individually tailored content. Clin Diab 2008; 26: 148- 150. 23. Skinner TS, Carey ME, Cradock S, et al, the DESMOND Collaborative. Educator talk and patient change: some insights from the DESMOND (<strong>Diabetes</strong> Education and Self Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed) randomized controlled trial. Diab Med 2008; 25: 1117-1120. 24. Albano MG, Crozet C, d’Ivernois JF. Analysis of the 2004-2007 literature on therapeutic patient education in diabetes: results and trends. Acta Diabetol 2008; 45: 211-219. 25. Heisler M. Building peer support programs to manage chronic disease: seven models for success. Oakland, CA: California Health Care Foundation; 2006. 3 EDUCATION 25
Global Guideline for Type 2 <strong>Diabetes</strong> 26 26. Lewin S, Dick J, Pond P, et al. Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases. Cochrane DB Syst Rev 2005; 17: CD004015. 27. Rotheram-Borus MJ, Tomlinson M, Gwegwe M, et al. <strong>Diabetes</strong> buddies: peer support through a mobile phone buddy system. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Educator 2012; 38: 357-365.
- Page 1: INTERNATIONAL DIABETES FEDERATION,
- Page 4: Correspondence, and related literat
- Page 7 and 8: Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabete
- Page 10 and 11: Methodology The following methodolo
- Page 12 and 13: GLOBAL GUIDELINE FOR TYPE 2 DIABETE
- Page 14 and 15: 1 SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS Recommend
- Page 16 and 17: Evidence-base Diabetes is associate
- Page 18 and 19: Implementation A clear and transpar
- Page 20 and 21: 2 CARE DELIVERY Recommendations Rec
- Page 22 and 23: Evidence-base Systems underlying st
- Page 24 and 25: Potential indicator Indicator Denom
- Page 26 and 27: 3 EDUCATION Recommendations Recomme
- Page 28 and 29: The evidence from eight trials (six
- Page 32 and 33: 4 PSYCHOLOGICAL CARE Recommendation
- Page 34 and 35: Consideration People coping with di
- Page 36 and 37: 18. van Bastelaar KM, Pouwer F, Cui
- Page 38 and 39: Comprehensive care LS C 1 Advice on
- Page 40 and 41: Implementation Recognition of the i
- Page 42 and 43: 17. Banister NA, Jastrow ST, Hodges
- Page 44 and 45: Glucose measurement Plasma glucose
- Page 46 and 47: Consideration The assessment/interv
- Page 48 and 49: 7 CLINICAL MONITORING Recommendatio
- Page 50 and 51: The introduction of continuous ambu
- Page 52 and 53: Evaluation There should be records
- Page 54 and 55: 24. Mittman N, Desiraju B, Fazil I,
- Page 56 and 57: Comprehensive care SM C 1 The princ
- Page 58 and 59: Implementation Provision should be
- Page 60 and 61: 9 GLUCOSE CONTROL THERAPY Recommend
- Page 62 and 63: Comprehensive care GC C 1 The princ
- Page 64 and 65: Outcomes studies compared with othe
- Page 66 and 67: as new evidence, particularly the r
- Page 68 and 69: 6. International Diabetes Federatio
- Page 70 and 71: 10 BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL Recommend
- Page 72 and 73: Evidence-base The evidence-base on
- Page 74 and 75: Consideration Blood pressure manage
- Page 76 and 77: Anglo‐Scandinavian Cardiac Outcom
- Page 78 and 79: CV9 Consider other medications for
- Page 80 and 81:
The Australian guidelines recommend
- Page 82 and 83:
Consideration Cardiovascular risk p
- Page 84 and 85:
2. Evans JMM, Wang J, Morris AD. Co
- Page 86 and 87:
12 EYE SCREENING Recommendations Th
- Page 88 and 89:
hormone, anti-vascular endothelial
- Page 90 and 91:
diabetes population coverage. Evide
- Page 92 and 93:
13 KIDNEY DAMAGE Recommendations Th
- Page 94 and 95:
Evidence-base CKD is defined as a g
- Page 96 and 97:
References 1. Kidney Foundation Dis
- Page 98 and 99:
2. Evaluate footwear - provide appr
- Page 100 and 101:
The output from these documents is
- Page 102 and 103:
15 NERVE DAMAGE Recommendations Rec
- Page 104 and 105:
disturbance, orthostatic hypotensio
- Page 106 and 107:
16 OLDER PEOPLE Recommendations Thi
- Page 108 and 109:
Limited care OPL1 The principles ar
- Page 110 and 111:
Diabetes is associated with an incr
- Page 112 and 113:
3. Brown AF, Mangione CM, Saliba D,
- Page 114 and 115:
17 IN-PATIENT CARE Recommendations
- Page 116 and 117:
Comprehensive care HO C 1 The princ
- Page 118 and 119:
measurement of blood glucose is occ
- Page 120 and 121:
MDRD modification of diet in renal
- Page 122 and 123:
Disclaimer The IDF is not engaged i
Change language