Revenues & EXPENSES
2015 Division I RE report
2015 Division I RE report
- No tags were found...
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
values and, especially, frequency distributions also better enable institutional<br />
officials to determine their relative position within their peer group.<br />
Findings and Observations. Following are general “global” findings and<br />
observations for the eleven-year period, with related table numbers shown<br />
in parentheses. Readers are referred to the Introduction for a more detailed<br />
listing of the findings and to the respective tables for the supporting data.<br />
• There was an upward movement in median generated revenues for<br />
Division I institutions from 2013 to 2014 — FBS = 6.1 percent<br />
increase; FCS = 9.1 percent increase; DI w/o FB saw median<br />
generated revenues increase by 9.8 percent in the past year. (2.1)<br />
• Total expenses for the last year increased at a slower rate than generated<br />
revenues for Division I institutions. FBS median expenses increased<br />
2.8 percent from the prior year, the increase was 4.6 percent at the<br />
FCS level and the increase was 2.1 percent at DI w/o FB institutions.<br />
(2.1)<br />
• A related observation is the portion of total athletics revenues that<br />
are allocated by the institutions — 20 percent in the FBS; 71 percent<br />
in the FCS; 76 percent in DI w/o FB. This rate remained steady in all<br />
three subdivisions and represents the extent to which the institution<br />
is subsidizing athletics. (3.14, 4.14, 5.14)<br />
• Of particular interest are the growth rates in total expenses after<br />
removal of the inflationary effect — 0.2 percent decrease in the FBS;<br />
1.5 percent increase in the FCS; and 0.9 percent decrease in DI w/o<br />
FB. (3.3, 4.3, 5.3)<br />
• The increase gap, which measures the difference in growth rates of<br />
athletics spending and overall institutional spending, was lower than<br />
the previous year, but still showed that athletics expenditures grew<br />
at a faster rate than institutional expenditures. In FBS, the median<br />
percentage increase in athletics expenses was 2.3 percent higher<br />
than the median increase in institutional expenses. The gap was<br />
2.0 percent at the FCS level and 1.4 percent among the Division I<br />
institutions without football programs. (2.7)<br />
• A total of 24 athletics programs in the FBS reported positive net<br />
revenues for the 2014 fiscal year. The net gap between the<br />
“profitable” programs and the remainder, over $23 million, was<br />
greater than was observed in 2013. (3.5)<br />
• As in prior years, three revenue sources accounted for 75 percent<br />
of generated revenues at the FBS level. These were ticket sales,<br />
contributions and NCAA/Conference distributions. (3.14)<br />
• Similarly, in all subdivisions, two expense line items, grants-in-aid<br />
and salaries and benefits, accounted for more than 50 percent of<br />
total expenses. (3.15, 4.15, 5.15)<br />
• In all subdivisions, the number of participating student-athletes<br />
remains fairly constant, while the expense per student-athlete<br />
continues to increase slightly, as a result of rising expenses. (2.1)<br />
• Total athletic expenditures as a percentage of total institutional<br />
expenditures increased by approximately 0.1 percentage points since<br />
2013. (2.7) For the 2014 fiscal year, FBS Athletics expenditures were<br />
5.6 percent of total institutional budgets; FCS were 7.0 percent; DI<br />
w/o FB were 6.0 percent. It should be noted that this percentage<br />
does not include revenues generated by athletics. When generated<br />
revenues are netted against expenses, the median percentage of<br />
athletics expenditures of total institutional expenditures remains less<br />
than three percent in the FBS.<br />
NCAA® <strong>Revenues</strong> / Expenses Division I Report • 2004 – 2014 8