kTPFpissue 6

Recommendations

Info

KTPF Magazine Issue 6 - Oct/Nov 2015 The September 11 th debate between Ben Emlyn-Jones and Andy Mercer was the first time we’d tried something like this. A live discussion, on any subject, where two people present opposing views on the same subject could easily descend into argument and chaos! Thankfully this was not the case and our two debaters listened to each other’s argument and responded respectfully. Neither was intent on trying to convince the other that their view was right; but as this was never the intent of the debate it was not a problem. And it was certainly not a ‘point scoring’ exercise. It was more about expounding theories and ideas based on each person’s interpretation of the presented evidence, and as such I believe the debate was a success – The Editor The following article written by Ben is a summation of his position regarding the events of 9/11 9/11- What really happened? – Ben Emlyn-Jones Everybody remembers where they were when it happened. A news flash appeared on TV explaining how an airliner had crashed into the side of one of the world's tallest buildings. A short while later another rammed the wall of its twin in New York City USA. A similar attack at the Pentagon followed soon afterwards. It occurred to me that I was watching mass murder being broadcast live. After burning fiercely for a while longer, first one and then the other tower of the World Trade Centre collapsed to the ground. For many months afterwards it never occurred to me that I should doubt or reconsider anything related to the atrocity. Like most other people I was simply stunned and dismayed by what had been done to so many innocent people. However in 2001 I was already a long way down the road to becoming a "conspiracy theorist". I put that term in quotes because it is laden with so much pejorative baggage, but it is literally true and it would be dishonest of me to deny it; I theorize about conspiracies, ergo. It did not take long for the authorities to explain what had happened. Apparently 9/11 had been planned by Osama bin Laden, a Muslim extremist living in hiding in the mountains of Afghanistan. Nineteen of his agents had infiltrated the United States of America and carried out the attacks by hijacking airliners. Some of them were trained as pilots and so were able to direct the aircraft at the WTC and Pentagon in suicide strikes like the Japanese Kamikaze bombers of World War II. 39
KTPF Magazine Issue 6 - Oct/Nov 2015 The damage to the buildings by the impact of the aircraft plus the fires caused the towers to collapse completely into rubble. When the police investigate a crime they first have to work out what happened before they can find out who did it. This is why they do a forensic pathology examination of the body. Does it have bullet wounds? Is there poison in the bloodstream? Are there strangulation bruises on the neck etc? When it comes to 9/11, the evidence definitely does not fit with the official narrative given to us by the authorities. Several years after the disaster I came across an organization calling itself "9/11 Truth". I joined the local chapter of the group and got involved in its activism events. I carried placards down the street yelling "Nine Eleven was an inside job!" The reason this tendency were suspicious of the 9/11 official story was because they believed that the twin towers had been brought down by controlled demolition. Explosives had been planted in the towers along with thermite, a chemical mixture that burns through steel structure. I did not question this hypothesis because it seemed natural to me that when you turn away from a lie you will invariably come across the truth. If you search the internet for "9/11 truth UK" you will find this group straight away and so for anybody who finds themselves travelling away from the official story of 9/11, this is their first and most obvious port of call. (3) However, it didn't take long for me to become dissatisfied with the 9/11 Truth UK group. To begin with, they objected to my interest in other paranormal and conspiratorial phenomena. 9/11 Truth UK is determined not to be associated with "that sort of thing!" (Interestingly the UFOlogist Bryce Zabel once wrote an article called UFO's and 9/11 Truth don't Mix making the exact opposite proposition, that UFO research is tainted if it becomes associated with 9/11 conspiracies). I also came across some new information that I found very credible, but the 9/11 Truth UK was not interested in, indeed they consider it nonsensical and misleading. One of the slogans of the Truth movement is "Reinvestigate 9/11!" You'll see it printed on banners, T-shirts and scrawled on walls as graffiti. However there already has been a proper scientific reinvestigation of 9/11. It was carried out by one Dr Judy Wood, a professor of mechanical engineering at Clemson University in North Carolina USA. She has published a detailed book called Where Did the Towers Go? explaining her discovery. Also, along with two other people, she has filed a lawsuit against the National Institute of Standards and Technology for the falsehoods in the original 9/11 "investigation", so-called. Dr Wood has proved that no conventional explosives were used to destroy the World Trade Centre, instead a weapon was deployed based on the "Hutchison Effect"; which was itself discovered by the Canadian investigator John Hutchison. Hutchison runs a private laboratory in which has been attempting to repeat some of the experiments of the Serbian electrical genius Nikola Tesla. He found that if electromagnetic fields interfere in a certain way strange things start to happen 40
Page 2 and 3: KTPF Magazine The KTPF Magazine Iss
Page 4 and 5: KTPF Magazine Issue 6 - Oct/Nov 201
Page 20 and 21: KTPF Magazine 20 Issue 6 - Oct/Nov
Page 22 and 23: KTPF Magazine This is the remarkabl
Page 24 and 25: KTPF Magazine So, to summaries Issu
Page 56: KTPF Magazine Issue 6 - Oct/Nov 201

kTPFpissue 6

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?