PSYCHOLOGY
2bwO2e
2bwO2e
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Social Psychology<br />
Responses to people in authority – Milgram<br />
MILGRAM, S. (1963) Behavioural study of obedience<br />
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, (4), 371-378.<br />
6. Key findings<br />
• There was considerable agreement between the 14 Yale Seniors on the expected behaviour of hypothetic subjects. All respondents predicted<br />
that only an insignificant minority would go through to the end of the shock series (estimates ranged from 0 to 3%, class mean was 1.2%).<br />
• All participants ( 40/ 40) / 100% continued to 300 volts.<br />
•<br />
26 / 40 / 65% of participants continued to the full 450 volts.<br />
Distribution of break-off points (/40 participants)<br />
No. of participants<br />
Voltage / shock level reached<br />
26 450<br />
1 375<br />
1 360<br />
1 345<br />
2 330<br />
4 315<br />
5 300<br />
• 26 participants were obedient, 14 disobedient/defiant.<br />
• Many participants showed signs of extreme stress whilst administering the shocks eg sweating, trembling, stuttering, laughing nervously. 3 had<br />
full-blown uncontrollable seizures.<br />
• On completion of the test many obedient participants heaved sighs of relief, mopped their brows, or nervously fumbled cigarettes. Some<br />
shook their head, apparently in regret; some remained calm throughout.<br />
• Milgram offered 13 possible explanations for the high levels of obedience shown by participants eg The fact that the study was carried out<br />
in the prestigious university of Yale influenced participants as to the worthiness of the study and the competence of the researcher; the<br />
participants were told the shocks were not harmful; the situation was completely new for the participant so he had no past experience to<br />
guide his behaviour.<br />
7