14.03.2016 Views

Community

06-Spring-Newsletter-2016

06-Spring-Newsletter-2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ovarian cancer charity<br />

WEIGHING UP THE RISK<br />

Consultant<br />

gynaecologist Adam<br />

Rosenthal (left) interprets<br />

the UKCTOCS results for<br />

BRCA-carriers at high risk<br />

of ovarian cancer.<br />

Women who are BRCAcarriers<br />

are still advised<br />

that risk-reducing surgery to remove the fallopian<br />

tubes and ovaries is the only way to prevent ovarian<br />

cancer and is the first option to consider.<br />

It is difficult to extrapolate the results of UKCTOCS<br />

directly to high-risk women, as the trial deliberately<br />

excluded this group. This was because it was<br />

designed to answer the question of whether<br />

screening the general population aged over 50 could<br />

save lives. However, the majority of the ovarian<br />

cancers occurring on UKCTOCS were ‘high grade<br />

serous’, which is by far the commonest type seen in<br />

BRCA-carriers, so it is reasonable to anticipate that<br />

the encouraging results seen in UKCTOCS apply in<br />

the high-risk population.<br />

Impetus for screening<br />

I think the UKCTOCS data strengthens the<br />

argument for screening with the Risk of Ovarian<br />

Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) test used in the trial. This<br />

is the most accurate way of detecting ovarian cancer<br />

in apparently healthy women, and it seems likely to<br />

have saved the lives of some women who develop<br />

the disease (at least in the general population).<br />

Therefore if a high-risk woman wants to undergo<br />

screening until she has surgery, as long as she is fully<br />

informed about its limitations (such as the possibility<br />

of having a false positive result), she should consider<br />

screening with the ROCA test.<br />

Some women delay surgery until completing<br />

their families or until they have gone through the<br />

menopause, in the latter case to avoid the need to<br />

take hormone replacement therapy (HRT) until the<br />

age of natural menopause (around 51 years). HRT<br />

is necessary to alleviate menopausal symptoms<br />

and reduce the increased risks of osteoporosis and<br />

heart disease seen in women who have a premature<br />

menopause. However, there is a real risk that<br />

delaying the surgery until the menopause may be<br />

too late, particularly in BRCA1 carriers who tend to<br />

get ovarian cancer younger. On balance we wouldn’t<br />

advise women to delay surgery until the menopause.<br />

For now, women wanting screening can pay for<br />

it in the private sector. The National Screening<br />

Committee has advised that NHS commissioners<br />

and providers would be unwise to actively pursue or<br />

allow screening of high-risk women before the results<br />

of phase two of the UK Familial Ovarian Cancer<br />

Screening Study (UK FOCSS) of over 4,500 high risk<br />

women are available later this year.<br />

However, there is evidence from the first phase of<br />

UK FOCSS that screening reduces the proportion of<br />

women diagnosed at stage 3b and above. Whilst this<br />

does not prove that screening high-risk women saves<br />

lives, it might have other benefits, such as reducing<br />

the complexity and morbidity of treatment. This first<br />

phase of UK FOCSS used annual screening with<br />

ultrasound scans and CA125 blood tests, but these<br />

were not interpreted using the ROCA test.<br />

In phase two of UK FOCSS, women had an annual<br />

scan and three CA125 tests per year, analysed using<br />

the ROCA test - which we now know detects twice as<br />

many ovarian cancers as CA125 used with a simple<br />

cut-off value - in the hope of detecting cancers earlier.<br />

Women also had an annual scan (sooner if their<br />

ROCA test was not normal).<br />

Phase two of UK FOCSS will therefore provide<br />

some evidence as to whether frequent screening<br />

using these techniques has advantages over annual<br />

screening with scans and CA125 used with a cut-off.<br />

High-risk women wanting screening should follow the<br />

UK FOCSS phase two protocol if the study shows it<br />

has advantages over annual screening.<br />

The introduction of a screening programme for<br />

women at increased risk of ovarian cancer would<br />

probably depend on whether NICE feels it is costeffective<br />

and would probably also take into account<br />

the further mortality analysis from UKCTOCS.<br />

• Disclosure: Adam Rosenthal is clinical lead of UK FOCSS and<br />

has a consultancy agreement with Abcodia.<br />

Ovarian cancer news 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!