22.03.2016 Views

CITY OF PRINCE GEORGE WELLS PROTECTION PLAN

Attch_February%2026%202016%20CPG%20wells%20protection%20report%20FINAL%20DRAFT%20V3

Attch_February%2026%202016%20CPG%20wells%20protection%20report%20FINAL%20DRAFT%20V3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

March 2015<br />

City of Prince George Well Protection Plan<br />

In addition, it would be important to update the numerical flow model to assess the capture zones specifically<br />

in the vicinity of the CN rail tracks, once actual groundwater and surface water levels in these two areas have<br />

been monitored. Given that models are based on assumptions, an independent review of the numerical model<br />

may also be prudent.<br />

Further, it is necessary to evaluate potential mitigation options such as interceptor wells vs lined trench<br />

protective measures in conjunction with the groundwater hydrogeological models for PW660, PW605, and<br />

PW601. These studies would assure the most effective measures are selected and costs are appropriately<br />

quantified.<br />

Defining risks related to CN spill incidents beyond the City’s boundaries are outside the scope of this<br />

assignment. A further assessment by hydrogeologists of the potential risks due to a rail spill into the Nechako<br />

River upstream of the City may have merit due to the speed with which contaminants could be transported into<br />

the City’s aquifer by this point of entry.<br />

4.2 Preventative Measures<br />

Benjamin Franklin once said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” This is especially true when<br />

dealing with aquifer contamination. A municipality faced with a compromised well can look forward to<br />

exorbitant clean-up bills (with minimal financial support from other levels of government), loss of public<br />

confidence in both the water supply and decision makers, long-term temporary or permanent loss of the<br />

affected well(s), and potential health and environmentally-related legal action.<br />

In a worst case scenario, the City could lose the entire aquifer and all its related wells. DNAPL contaminated<br />

sites for example, which are discussed in An Introduction to Characterizing Sites Contaminated with DNAPLs<br />

(ITRC, 2003) have one of the biggest challenges in the field of environmental remediation because DNALPs:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

behave in an relatively unpredictable fashion as they are effected by minute variations in subsurface<br />

pore size distributions, soil texture, soil structure, and mineralogy<br />

often go undetected with standard investigation techniques such as soil borings and monitoring wells<br />

some investigation measures can expand the zone of chemical contamination or develop misleading<br />

chemical concentration data<br />

typically require very small concentrations to render water ‘unsafe’<br />

can become more soluble in water over time, and thus, more toxic<br />

migrate through the subsurface under the influence of gravity and capillary effects so that they can be<br />

present in different places than would be expected by simple groundwater mapping<br />

often require costly remediation<br />

Fortunately, there are a wide variety of preventative measures which can be put into place to mitigate the risk<br />

of a derailment or collision-related spill:<br />

Installation of Interceptor Wells & Trenches<br />

Interceptor wells and lined trenches can be used to prevent the migration of contaminants into and within an<br />

aquifer. The efficiency of either method depends upon:<br />

Page | 42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!