22.03.2016 Views

CITY OF PRINCE GEORGE WELLS PROTECTION PLAN

Attch_February%2026%202016%20CPG%20wells%20protection%20report%20FINAL%20DRAFT%20V3

Attch_February%2026%202016%20CPG%20wells%20protection%20report%20FINAL%20DRAFT%20V3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

March 2003 022- 1784<br />

For this scenario, three separate releases were simulated, one for each of the three wells.<br />

For each well, it was assumed that the E was released on the portion of the rail line<br />

located closest to the well.<br />

If a spill of MTBE were to occur alo the rail line near the proposed Fishtrap Island<br />

Collector Well, it would be located ide of the current capture zone but within the<br />

projected average capture zone. Therefore, average pumping conditions were<br />

used in this simulation.<br />

The contaminant plume predicte<br />

xtmds east from the derailment<br />

location (Figure 33). After the rele<br />

nt concentrations at the Proposed<br />

Fishtrap Island Collector<br />

.I% of the source<br />

concentration after approx<br />

relative concentration is then<br />

predicted to gradually increase to a steady-state value o ut 2.4% after about seven<br />

BE, with a reporte<br />

, this would result in a<br />

steady-state concentration signifi g water guidelines.<br />

Concentrations at the well would lik<br />

king water guidelines almost as soon<br />

as the plume reaches the well.<br />

If a spill of MT E were to occur along the rai<br />

within the current capture zone.<br />

simulation.<br />

601, it would be located<br />

ditions were used in this<br />

The simulation predicts that in the event of a release, the contaminant plume would<br />

extend southeast from the derailment ocation (Figure 33). After the release, the<br />

contaminant concentrations at<br />

to increase to .I% of the source<br />

concentration after approximately one month. he dative concentration is then<br />

predicted to gradually increase t a steady-state value of about 5.3% after about five<br />

months. This would predict a steady-state E concentration significantly above<br />

drinking water guidelines, with drinking water guidelines likely being exceeded as soon<br />

as the plume reaches the well.<br />

If a spill of MTBE were to occur along the rail line near 60% it would be located<br />

outside of the current capture zone, but within the projected average capture zone.<br />

Therefore, projected average pumping conditions were used in this simulation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!