Truckload Authority - Winter 2014/15
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
But like Reagle, O’Neill brings up the issue of money.<br />
“I don’t believe we will see one funding mechanism that will be the primary<br />
source for a highway bill,” she said. “I think we will likely see an amalgamation<br />
of sources that help disperse the impact on any one demographic. Truckers<br />
will likely see an increase in the diesel tax because large segments of the<br />
industry have been receptive to that idea, but it won’t be the sole source.”<br />
Heather Caygle, who reports on transportation issues for Politico Pro-<br />
Transportation, said finding the money will be a tough sell.<br />
“A broad range of infrastructure advocates are hopeful that lawmakers will<br />
take a bold step by approving both a long-term policy bill and the roughly $100<br />
billion needed to fund it,” Caygle wrote in a post-election report. “But that’s a<br />
tough sell, and time is limited. Members have until the end of May to approve<br />
either an ambitious plan or to ‘plus-up’ the trust fund and pass another policy<br />
extension. A number of lawmakers and transportation watchers say tax reform<br />
is the best bet on the funding side of the equation, but there are several big<br />
political hurdles in the way, and even if tax reform happens, you can bet that<br />
transportation won’t be the only area clamoring for a slice of the money pie.”<br />
Reagle said tax reform as a source of money for the Highway Trust Fund<br />
would be a by-product of a Republican-led Congress, but that lawmakers<br />
would be reluctant to increase the federal tax on diesel and gasoline, the option<br />
most trucking industry stakeholders believe is the best way to come up<br />
with that $100 billion.<br />
“Republicans are opposed to tax increases, so you would have to present<br />
it as something other than a gas tax increase and I don’t know if that’s possible,”<br />
Reagle said. “One of the things I’ve heard from experts is that the highway<br />
bill may be tied to tax reform. I think there will be a growing desire to do<br />
tax reform. That issue is important to anybody in business and in particularly<br />
the trucking industry. If you compare our tax rate for business to the rest of the<br />
world, we pay much higher business taxes than anybody else.”<br />
Americans seem to agree with Republicans.<br />
A recent survey commissioned by the American Trucking Associations<br />
showed that only 29 percent of Americans favor raising federal taxes on gas<br />
and diesel by 5 cents a year every other year for the next eight years.<br />
There’s one other ambitious, and probably controversial, solution to solving<br />
the trust fund shortfall.<br />
It’s called devolution.<br />
“There is a small group of GOP senators who want to devolve the program<br />
and say the purpose of the highway bill was to build the infrastructure and<br />
now it’s time to turn it back to the states,” Reagle said. “That discussion has<br />
been there forever, but I’m hearing it a little more loudly than in the past, so<br />
we have to mix that issue into the equation as well. It’s a very small group but<br />
it’s very vocal.”<br />
Regardless of the funding bill’s final language, Shuster promised accountability<br />
to the American public.<br />
“Congress has not yet reached agreement on how to fund the Highway<br />
Trust Fund and our surface transportation infrastructure into the future,” he<br />
said. “While any such proposals in the House would originate in the Ways<br />
and Means Committee, I will work with incoming Chairman Paul Ryan, House<br />
leadership, and others to try to identify the most fiscally responsible and effective<br />
solutions to addressing our needs.”<br />
The makeup of Shuster’s committee for the 114th Congress had not been<br />
finalized by early December, but it will be quite different than the 113th T and<br />
I Committee.<br />
Several current members were defeated for re-election, some retired, a<br />
few left to run for other offices and there will be more Republican members<br />
because the GOP gained more seats in the House.<br />
The biggest change is at the leadership level, where DeFazio takes over<br />
the ranking member position following the defeat of current ranking member<br />
Rahall of West Virginia, who lost his bid for a 20th term.<br />
Gaygle and Adam Snider, also who reports for Politico Pro-Transportation,<br />
said DeFazio, known for his fiery temperament (he was the most vocal opponent<br />
of the trucking cross-border demonstration project and led the fight to<br />
kill the first pilot project in 2009), will play a significant role in negotiations for a<br />
new highway bill, trying to ensure that at least some Democratic priorities are<br />
included in any long-term bill.<br />
“Unlike Rahall, DeFazio represents a district that is safely Democratic and<br />
his priorities as ranking member could reflect that,” Caygle and Snider wrote.<br />
“He’s also been known to vocally clash with Republicans and won’t be shy if<br />
there are things he doesn’t like in a GOP-led transportation bill.”<br />
On the need for a long-term highway bill, DeFazio has taken a strong<br />
stance.<br />
“For far too long, Congress has taken the easy way out when it comes to<br />
investing in our nation’s transportation infrastructure, relying on short-term<br />
patches for long-standing problems,” he said shortly after being chosen as<br />
ranking member. “But we can’t afford to merely kick the can down the road<br />
yet again. We are approaching a critical juncture concerning transportation<br />
issues in our country.<br />
“Millions of American jobs are directly tied to infrastructure and it’s not acceptable<br />
to keep shortchanging future generations by allowing the American<br />
TCA <strong>2014</strong>-<strong>15</strong> www.<strong>Truckload</strong>.org | <strong>Truckload</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>