11.08.2016 Views

Treatment of Sex Offenders

HVe51N

HVe51N

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34<br />

L.A. Craig and M. Rettenberger<br />

(Prentky & Knight, 1991 ). Thornton (2002) likens this construct to that <strong>of</strong> Factor<br />

2 in the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 1991 ) which has been<br />

found to predict sexual recidivism (Firestone et al., 1999 ; Rice & Harris, 1997 ).<br />

An Initial Deviancy Assessment (IDA) is calculated from the SARN-TNA and<br />

organized into three levels <strong>of</strong> deviance: low deviance, when no dynamic marked risk<br />

factors are apparent (i.e., no risk factor within any SARN-TNA domain scores a 2 in<br />

both generality and <strong>of</strong>fense chain); moderate deviance, where only one domain contains<br />

a risk factor/risk factors scoring a 2 in both generality and <strong>of</strong>fense chain; and<br />

high deviance, where there are two or more domains containing a risk factor with a<br />

score <strong>of</strong> 2 for both generality and <strong>of</strong>fense chain. This is translated to low , medium ,<br />

or high dynamic risk/treatment need. Assessors are trained in applying the framework<br />

and have to pass a competency test and checked for inter-rater reliability. A triangulation<br />

method <strong>of</strong> assessment is used including psychometric evidence, <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

records (court documents, prison or probation files, treatment logs and reports,<br />

prison wing records), and <strong>of</strong>fender interviews (Tully, Browne, & Craig, in press ).<br />

Despite its wide use within NOMS, research into the SRA and adapted SARN<br />

framework as a risk assessment tool is limited. In one <strong>of</strong> the two studies described<br />

in the original paper, Thornton ( 2002 ) compared <strong>of</strong>fenders with previous convictions<br />

for child molestation (repeat) against <strong>of</strong>fenders who had been convicted for<br />

child sexual <strong>of</strong>fenses for the first time (current only). Using psychometric measures<br />

to approximate three <strong>of</strong> the four domains, Thornton found that the repeat <strong>of</strong>fenders<br />

demonstrated more distorted attitudes, more socio-affective dysfunction, and poorer<br />

self-management.<br />

In a follow-up study using a similar methodology, Thornton and Beech ( 2002 )<br />

found that the number <strong>of</strong> dysfunctional domains made a statistically significant contribution<br />

to prediction over and above the Static-99 risk category. Craig, Thornton,<br />

Beech, and Browne ( 2007 ) conducted similar research into psychometrically<br />

assessed deviant domains in a sample <strong>of</strong> 119 sexual <strong>of</strong>fenders and found that the<br />

SRA deviancy index predicted sexual reconviction independent <strong>of</strong> the Static-99<br />

(SRA AUC = 0.69). Craig et al. ( 2007 ) calculated a Psychological Deviance Index<br />

(PDI) by standardizing each <strong>of</strong> these scale scores for a domain. Of the four dynamic<br />

risk domains, the <strong>Sex</strong>ual Interests domain obtained a large effect in predicting sexual<br />

reconviction over 2-year (AUC = 0.86) and 5-year follow-up periods<br />

(AUC = 0.72). The Self-Management factor obtained moderate results (AUC = 0.71)<br />

in predicting sexual reconviction at 2 years. In comparison, Static-99 obtained moderate<br />

accuracy in predicting sexual reconviction, at 2 years (AUC = 0.66) and 5 years<br />

(AUC = 0.60). When the rates <strong>of</strong> sexual recidivism were compared with the PDI, it<br />

was found that the increase in rates <strong>of</strong> sexual recidivism mirrored the increase in the<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> PDI. As the PDI increased from zero, one, two, three, and four, the rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> reconviction were 3 %, 10 %, 8 %, 14 %, and 26 %, respectively. However, when<br />

the PDI was grouped into low (0), moderate (1–2), and high (3+) categories, it was<br />

found the degree <strong>of</strong> PDI and rates <strong>of</strong> reconviction were linear at 3 %, 18 %, and<br />

40 %, respectively.<br />

Wakeling, Beech, and Freemantle ( 2013 ) recently examined the relationship<br />

between psychometric changes in treatment and recidivism in a sample <strong>of</strong> 3773 sex

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!