Vol 3 | Issue 3 | July 2016
fDPDQxH
fDPDQxH
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTERACTION WITH :-<br />
Mr. Arvind Kumar, Deputy Secretary, Ministry of<br />
Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises, Govt of India<br />
Q: How difficult and challenging would it be to<br />
implement GST in a large federal system like India?<br />
A federal polity like India is characterised by diverse socio-economic and cultural ethos. While<br />
states like Maharashtra, Gujarat and Tamilnadu are at one end of the development continuum;<br />
North eastern states, Hill states stand at the other end. Implementation of a uniform GST across all<br />
states becomes challenging to that extent. GST implementation envisages a robust IT platform.<br />
Each participating state has to provide IT support on real time basis. In other words, the most<br />
laggard state will decide the pace of GST implementation and its functioning. Nevertheless,<br />
India is determined to take up the challenge and put GST in place very soon.<br />
Q: GST being a destination based tax, what will be its impact on the<br />
revenues of manufacturing states?<br />
GST, by virtue of being destination based tax, does not encompass in its fold the origin based<br />
tax like Central Sales Tax (CST). It is true that in the GST regime the manufacturing states or<br />
the producing states may lose CST revenue, but it is also true that generally these are the very<br />
states that also have large volume of service transactions. Under GST, these states will collect<br />
enough revenue by taxing services. It is also a fact that buoyancy of service tax is much more<br />
than that of CST, VAT (Value Added Tax) or Excise duty. In any case, Central Govt has promised<br />
to compensate those states which report fall in revenue by implementation of GST.<br />
Q: GST will make India one common market. How will it affect our<br />
international trade?<br />
A common market under GST would mean that one buys some inputs from one state, some<br />
from other and sells it in third state, yet he is reimbursed his ITC (Input Tax Credit). In a similar<br />
fashion, one can produce in any state, export from any port and can claim reimbursement from<br />
any state. Under GST, with the removal of cascading effect, the net indirect tax ceteris peribus<br />
will be lower than before, hence the product pricing becomes more competitive in international<br />
market. As far as imports are concerned, GST envisages abolition of CVD (Countervailing Duties)<br />
and SAD (Special Additional Duty) on imports, hence it may be the case that in the short run<br />
imports would rise but in the long run it will adjust to market forces since the Excise duty too is<br />
abolished and manufacturing becomes cheaper.<br />
Q: Will there be less corruption once GST is implemented? What are your<br />
views?<br />
The genesis of corruption perhaps lies in the human interface and exercise of discretionary<br />
powers. GST is expected to avoid human interface and is to work mainly though IT module, for<br />
which Government is designing GST network. The taxes can be filed objectively while sitting at<br />
<strong>Vol</strong>. 3 | <strong>Issue</strong> 3 | JULY <strong>2016</strong> | SAMVAAD 5