17.08.2016 Views

Vol 3 | Issue 3 | July 2016

fDPDQxH

fDPDQxH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTERACTION WITH :-<br />

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Deputy Secretary, Ministry of<br />

Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises, Govt of India<br />

Q: How difficult and challenging would it be to<br />

implement GST in a large federal system like India?<br />

A federal polity like India is characterised by diverse socio-economic and cultural ethos. While<br />

states like Maharashtra, Gujarat and Tamilnadu are at one end of the development continuum;<br />

North eastern states, Hill states stand at the other end. Implementation of a uniform GST across all<br />

states becomes challenging to that extent. GST implementation envisages a robust IT platform.<br />

Each participating state has to provide IT support on real time basis. In other words, the most<br />

laggard state will decide the pace of GST implementation and its functioning. Nevertheless,<br />

India is determined to take up the challenge and put GST in place very soon.<br />

Q: GST being a destination based tax, what will be its impact on the<br />

revenues of manufacturing states?<br />

GST, by virtue of being destination based tax, does not encompass in its fold the origin based<br />

tax like Central Sales Tax (CST). It is true that in the GST regime the manufacturing states or<br />

the producing states may lose CST revenue, but it is also true that generally these are the very<br />

states that also have large volume of service transactions. Under GST, these states will collect<br />

enough revenue by taxing services. It is also a fact that buoyancy of service tax is much more<br />

than that of CST, VAT (Value Added Tax) or Excise duty. In any case, Central Govt has promised<br />

to compensate those states which report fall in revenue by implementation of GST.<br />

Q: GST will make India one common market. How will it affect our<br />

international trade?<br />

A common market under GST would mean that one buys some inputs from one state, some<br />

from other and sells it in third state, yet he is reimbursed his ITC (Input Tax Credit). In a similar<br />

fashion, one can produce in any state, export from any port and can claim reimbursement from<br />

any state. Under GST, with the removal of cascading effect, the net indirect tax ceteris peribus<br />

will be lower than before, hence the product pricing becomes more competitive in international<br />

market. As far as imports are concerned, GST envisages abolition of CVD (Countervailing Duties)<br />

and SAD (Special Additional Duty) on imports, hence it may be the case that in the short run<br />

imports would rise but in the long run it will adjust to market forces since the Excise duty too is<br />

abolished and manufacturing becomes cheaper.<br />

Q: Will there be less corruption once GST is implemented? What are your<br />

views?<br />

The genesis of corruption perhaps lies in the human interface and exercise of discretionary<br />

powers. GST is expected to avoid human interface and is to work mainly though IT module, for<br />

which Government is designing GST network. The taxes can be filed objectively while sitting at<br />

<strong>Vol</strong>. 3 | <strong>Issue</strong> 3 | JULY <strong>2016</strong> | SAMVAAD 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!