02.09.2016 Views

Treatment of Sex Offenders

Z6tvpY

Z6tvpY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58<br />

R.J.B. Lehmann et al.<br />

justified on the grounds that they provide incremental information (Babchishin<br />

et al., 2012b ; Welsh, Schmidt, McKinnon, Chattha, & Meyers, 2008 ). For some<br />

scales the developers propose starting with a commonly used risk scale and adjusting<br />

the overall rating based on the scores <strong>of</strong> an incrementally valid, additional risk<br />

instrument (e.g., Helmus, Hanson, Babchishin, & Thornton, 2014 ). Also, recent<br />

research indicates that averaging the risk ratios <strong>of</strong> different risk tools is a promising<br />

approach to obtaining a better overall evaluation <strong>of</strong> relative risk (Lehmann, Hanson<br />

et al. 2013 ), as opposed to other approaches, such as taking the highest or lowest<br />

risk estimate. Hence, a strength <strong>of</strong> actuarial risk assessment is the inclusion <strong>of</strong> a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> empirically validated risk factors or scales, which under certain circumstances<br />

(see Lehmann, Hanson et al. 2013 ) could be combined into an overall risk<br />

judgment <strong>of</strong> recidivism risk with better predictive accuracy than a single scale.<br />

Selected Examples <strong>of</strong> Actuarial Risk Scales for <strong>Sex</strong> <strong>Offenders</strong><br />

Below, specific examples <strong>of</strong> risk scales for sex <strong>of</strong>fenders will be discussed. Note<br />

that they are not meant as an exhaustive list <strong>of</strong> scales available—they are illustrative<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> scales we are most familiar with. This chapter was not intended to<br />

provide a detailed review <strong>of</strong> actuarial risk scales available.<br />

The Static-99/R<br />

The most commonly used static sex <strong>of</strong>fender risk assessment tools in Canada and<br />

the United States are the Static-99 and Static-99R (Hanson & Thornton, 2000 ;<br />

Helmus, Thornton, Hanson, & Babchishin, 2012 ; Interstate Commission for Adult<br />

Offender Supervision, 2007 ; Jackson & Hess, 2007 ; McGrath, Cumming, Burchard,<br />

Zeoli, & Ellerby, 2010 ; Neal & Grisso, 2014 ). The Static-99/R is 10-item actuarial<br />

scales designed to assess sexual recidivism risk <strong>of</strong> adult male sex <strong>of</strong>fenders. The<br />

items and scoring rules for Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000 ) and Static-99R<br />

(Helmus, Thornton et al., 2012 ) are identical with the exception <strong>of</strong> updated age<br />

weights for the Static-99R. The scale developers have recommended that Static-<br />

99R be used in place <strong>of</strong> the original scale (Helmus, Thornton et al., 2012 ). Static- -<br />

99/R contains items covering the broad constructs <strong>of</strong> age and relationship status<br />

(i.e., whether the <strong>of</strong>fender has ever lived with a lover for two or more years), sexual<br />

deviance (e.g., stranger victims, noncontact sexual <strong>of</strong>fences, prior sex <strong>of</strong>fenses), and<br />

general criminality (e.g., number <strong>of</strong> prior sentencing occasions, index nonsexual<br />

violence, prior nonsexual violence) identified in meta-analytic research (Hanson &<br />

Bussière, 1998 ; Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2005 ).<br />

Accordingly, the strength <strong>of</strong> the risk tool is that it only uses risk factors empirically<br />

associated with sexual recidivism. Also, explicit rules for combining the factors<br />

into a total risk score are provided (A. Harris, Phenix, Hanson, & Thornton, 2003 ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!