Cleveland Housing Court
A detailed look at the 35th Anniversary of the Cleveland Municipal Court's Housing Division.
A detailed look at the 35th Anniversary of the Cleveland Municipal Court's Housing Division.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
We Shape Our Cities, And Thereafter, They Shape Us<br />
C l e v e l a n d M u n i c i p a l H o u s i n g C o u r t
Acknowlegements<br />
The <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> wishes to<br />
acknowledge the community<br />
policymakers, legislators,<br />
attorneys, judges, and residents<br />
of the City of <strong>Cleveland</strong> whose<br />
tireless advocacy made the<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> a reality.<br />
The <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> would like to<br />
recognize, as well, its staff, past<br />
and present, whose knowledge,<br />
expertise and passion have helped<br />
Finally, thanks to the following<br />
individuals, for their assistance<br />
in telling this story of the<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> and its work:<br />
Benjamin Faller<br />
Gaylord Consulting<br />
Holly Hagen<br />
Ben Kotowski Design<br />
Aaron Kotowski Photography<br />
Jerome Krakowski<br />
Mary Mihaly<br />
Barbara Reitzloff<br />
Diana Twymon<br />
Heather Veljković
he <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> has jurisdiction over criminal cases involving violations<br />
of the City’s housing, building, fire, zoning, health, waste collection, sidewalk, agricultural<br />
and air pollution codes. The <strong>Court</strong> also hears civil cases involving landlord/tenant disputes,<br />
foreclosures, actions for nusiance abatement and receiverships.<br />
At the <strong>Cleveland</strong> Municipal <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, we are committed to improving the quality of life<br />
in our neighborhoods. Through fair, tough, and compassionate adjudication and<br />
mediation the court strives to protect the health, safety and aesthetics of the properties and<br />
physical environments of our communities.
Dear Reader,<br />
The <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> celebrated its 35th anniversary in 2015.<br />
<strong>Court</strong> – from its inception, through its growth, to the present. In doing so, we considered, as well,<br />
at the City of <strong>Cleveland</strong>, and the social and political forces at work during those times.<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> has seen its share of struggle during the past three and a half decades. We have worked<br />
to keep our communities intact, though some streets have given way to crime and disorder. As<br />
property owners have lost their jobs and homes, or simply relocated, our strong housing stock has<br />
deteriorated. Despite improvement in some neighborhoods over the past 35 years, others have<br />
unraveled before our very eyes.<br />
At the same time, p eople and organizations with new or renewed energy have given us hope.<br />
In the 1970s, for example, neighborhood organizers and the community development network<br />
enforcement in cases involving property owners and code violations. The <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong> was one of the products of this community activism.<br />
We are now in the midst of another surge of renewal in <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s neighborhoods. A building<br />
is b eginning<br />
to<br />
turn<br />
the<br />
City<br />
around.<br />
Organizations<br />
are<br />
creating<br />
partnerships,<br />
collaborating<br />
their creativity on neighborhoods and neighborhood issues, including abandoned and distressed housing.<br />
number of bank-owned properties in the City, has presented the <strong>Court</strong> with caseloads which are larger, more complicated and more challenging. The<br />
increase in property owners who live out of state, or even out of the country, has made the process of securing the attendance of criminal defendants<br />
orders. At the same time, the number of resources available to distressed owner-occupants has decreased sharply, requiring the <strong>Court</strong>’s staff to work<br />
even more creatively with homeowners to achieve compliance with City codes.<br />
The <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> remains committed to bringing new solutions to the City’s increasingly-complicated housing problems.<br />
Fortunately, it is not acting alone. The City is demolishing abandoned structures at an unprecedented rate.<br />
Neighborhoods host new construction, from townhomes to apartment buildings and business centers.<br />
Banks and other lenders are beginning to see the value in releasing liens to clear title, helping move<br />
new uses for old spaces. Slowly, but surely, hope is returning to<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong>’s neighborhoods.
It has been my privilege to be the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Judge for more than half of the <strong>Court</strong>’s life. During that time, the expertise of the <strong>Court</strong>’s staff has<br />
of housing-related problems in the City of <strong>Cleveland</strong>.<br />
The <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>’s accomplishments have earned it a reputation for implementing the “best practices” among similar problem-solving courts. At the<br />
same time, it is clear that a great deal of work remains. While the <strong>Court</strong> has increased its educational programs, many property owners and tenants are<br />
still uninformed about their basic rights and responsibilities. The <strong>Court</strong>, through community control sanctions, has encouraged owners with multiple<br />
properties to develop comprehensive management plans for their units. But many more owners reject the <strong>Court</strong>’s advice and assistance, leading the<br />
<strong>Court</strong> to explore more avenues through which to bring these property owners into compliance with City codes and regulations. And, while an increasing<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> staff bring passion, dedication, knowledge and expertise to their positions. When new tools are needed for new problems,<br />
Work on the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>’s second 35 years has already begun. However, as Shakespeare said, “what’s past is prologue.” So, please,<br />
where we are going. If you have thoughts or ideas about the direction of your <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, I would welcome your comments.<br />
Please email me at clevelandhousingcourt@gmail.com, or call me at (216) 664-4988.<br />
Thank you for your continued support<br />
of the <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
and its mission.<br />
Judge Raymond L. Pianka
“The <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> is part courtroom, part emergency<br />
room that performs legal triage on a mix of criminal and civil<br />
cases for people who fall behind on their rent and mortgage<br />
payments — financial problems that lead to other charges,<br />
such as housing, zoning and fire code violations.”<br />
Ohio Supreme <strong>Court</strong> Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer (1939-2010)<br />
he Years: The Emergence of an Idea<br />
The creation of the <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> was not an accident. It was a lengthy, sometimes rocky<br />
saga stretching across four decades. As the forty years preceding the creation of the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
demonstrated, the need for a specialized, housing-focused court was clear. But making the <strong>Court</strong> a<br />
reality was no easy task.<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> issues began to come to the forefront in <strong>Cleveland</strong> in the 1940s. During World War II,<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong>’s population swelled with wartime factory workers. <strong>Cleveland</strong> factories offered industrial<br />
jobs, and thousands of families migrated from Appalachia and the Deep South to take advantage of the<br />
wartime industrial production boom. But the sudden influx of families in search of wartime jobs led to<br />
scarce quality, affordable housing. To meet the housing demand, the City’s single-family homes were<br />
parceled into apartments. This effectively was the first step in <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s path to overcrowding and,<br />
eventually, neighborhood blight.<br />
Comfortable, economical housing was even scarcer after the War as servicemen returned home. “By<br />
the early 1950s, <strong>Cleveland</strong> stood at a crossroads,” wrote Dennis Keating and Norman Krumholz. 1 “Its<br />
central business district and its neighborhoods were deteriorating, crime was worsening, and thousands<br />
of city residents were leaving for new homes in the suburbs.” 2<br />
Even the U.S. Supreme <strong>Court</strong> supported efforts to eliminate urban blight in the nation’s cities. In<br />
Berman v. Parker, the <strong>Court</strong> upheld legislation intended to beautify and redevelop the District of<br />
5
Columbia, holding Congress could consider aesthetic as well as health<br />
concerns when enacting the legislation. 3 The <strong>Court</strong> noted:<br />
“Miserable and disreputable housing conditions<br />
may do more than spread disease and crime and<br />
immorality. They may also suffocate the spirit by<br />
reducing the people who live there to the status of<br />
cattle. They may indeed make living an insufferable<br />
burden. They may also be an ugly sore, a blight<br />
on the community which robs it of charm, which<br />
makes it a place from which men turn. The misery<br />
of housing may spoil a community as an open<br />
sewer may ruin a river.” 4<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> was first awakened to the housing court concept when several<br />
city councilmen attended the National Conference of Councilmen<br />
& Aldermen in Baltimore, Maryland in March 1950. 5 Baltimore’s<br />
housing court, the first in the nation, had been established in 1947. The<br />
Plain Dealer reported that the Baltimore <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> combined<br />
features of <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s board of appeals and municipal court, and<br />
dealt with violations of the housing, zoning and sanitary codes. 6<br />
In late April 1950, the Plain Dealer published a statement by the editor<br />
of American Builder magazine, E.G. Gavin, that cities should “clean<br />
up slums, don’t tear them down . . . and in the case of rental units—<br />
which most slum dwellings are—to make owners conform to the<br />
law.” 7 Gavin advocated the creation of a housing court to prosecute<br />
property owners who otherwise did not comply with code violation<br />
notices. His attitude was a prelude to the spirit and process of the<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> today.<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong>ers again put the spotlight on Baltimore’s housing court in<br />
1952, inviting that city’s redevelopment director, Richard Steiner, to<br />
speak to the <strong>Cleveland</strong> chapter of the American Institute of Architects<br />
(AIA). His message: if voters fully understand the benefits of<br />
redevelopment, which depends on enforcement of building codes, they<br />
will allocate money for it as they did in Baltimore. 8<br />
By 1953, <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s activist community started to advocate a housing<br />
court as a way of preserving the City’s neighborhoods. “Speak out,” Rev.<br />
Hubert N. Robinson, pastor of St. James AME Church, told the annual<br />
meeting of the Central Areas Community Council. “It is our right to have<br />
decent housing, but it is also our responsibility to get all those plans off<br />
the drawing board.” To residents of the Central neighborhood, he issued<br />
his strongest challenge: “. . . be vocal and be loud. . . .If you don’t speak<br />
out as an individual, as a citizen, as a victim of bad housing, how can you<br />
expect hopefully that someone else will?” 9<br />
Locally and nationally, momentum for redevelopment and eliminating<br />
slums was building. <strong>Housing</strong> courts often were part of the proposals.<br />
The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) released a threepart<br />
plan in July 1953 to eliminate blight. It called for creation of a<br />
housing code to “put a floor of decency under every home,” housing<br />
inspectors to check violations, and the establishment of a housing court<br />
to ensure compliance. The plan further contemplated an aggressive<br />
public relations campaign to inform the public. 10 The movement was<br />
bolstered in 1954, when <strong>Cleveland</strong> Municipal Judge John V. Corrigan<br />
called for a <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>. The current system, he noted,<br />
was ineffective and slow, and he cited Baltimore’s success in enforcing<br />
housing, sanitary and fire codes. 11<br />
No one took action on the idea for five years. In January 1959, <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
Mayor Anthony J. Celebrezze, along with several suburban mayors,<br />
met with Cuyahoga County’s state legislators. They recommended<br />
establishment of a housing court as a branch of <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s alreadyexisting<br />
judicial structure. In October of that year, the City hired fifteen<br />
new housing inspectors, doubling their ranks. In an editorial, The Plain<br />
Dealer conceded there “may be a need” for a housing court: “Frankly,”
Witt and Wisdom in a Problem-Solving <strong>Court</strong><br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> works hard to give parties opportunities to resolve cases without trial. The <strong>Court</strong> reserves the most<br />
complicated and delicate of these cases for Alternative Dispute Resolution Specialist, C. David Witt. In the summer of 2010, Mr. Witt<br />
helped parties resolve a contentious dispute involving a Warehouse District nightclub. Residential tenants and nearby businesses<br />
complained about the large, unruly crowds attracted by the hip-hop club. The owner of the building took legal action against<br />
the owner of the club, who, backed by the NAACP, claimed that racism was behind the efforts to shut down his business.<br />
Three lawsuits were filed, including one in <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>. The landlord claimed that the club’s noise levels violated the lease.<br />
Judge Pianka directed the case to Mr. Witt for alternative dispute resolution (ADR). After multiple settlement conferences, the<br />
parties resolved the case with an agreement that encompassed noise levels, the role of bouncers and the eventual expiration<br />
of the club’s lease. Though hardly typical of the cases he handles, Mr. Witt points to it as an example of how ADR works. “We<br />
don’t settle everything, but we settle almost everything,” he says. In fact, 92 percent of 235 civil cases that went to Mr. Witt<br />
for ADR in 2014 resulted in non-trial settlements. “Ruling on a case is usually about winning and losing. At least half your parties<br />
leave disappointed. Mediation, on the other hand, is not about winning and losing. It’s about problem solving. In that sense, a<br />
successful mediation is a better resolution of a dispute, both emotionally and practically.”<br />
ADR isn’t just for the large and complex cases, however. Many<br />
eviction cases also are resolved through mediation. Gary Katz,<br />
a <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Mediator, estimated that he handles 1,400 of<br />
the more than 10,000 civil cases that come before the court<br />
each year. In a typical resolution to an eviction case, the tenant<br />
agrees to leave, and the landlord gives the tenant more time<br />
to find other accommodations. The Judge and Magistrates<br />
can refer cases to mediation or other ADR opportunities,<br />
or the parties involved can request it at any stage. “It’s a<br />
practical thing to bring a case to an agreed resolution and<br />
know what that resolution is, rather than leave it up to a third<br />
party like a magistrate,” Witt says. “Sometimes mediation<br />
can be a cathartic experience. Finally they get to tell their<br />
story, and having told the story, they might be more amenable to<br />
reaching a settlement.”<br />
editors wrote, “we think the Municipal <strong>Court</strong> judges who now try<br />
these cases have not given enough thought to the cancer which slums<br />
and rank overcrowding have created in this city. . . The wrist-slapping<br />
business must be stopped.” 12<br />
The clarion call for a housing court continued into the 1960s. The<br />
Urban League formed a community action group in April 1961 to keep<br />
up the pressure for immediate action on unsafe housing. They asked<br />
that landlords’ and tenants’ responsibilities be posted in multi-family<br />
dwellings throughout the city, and were charged with exploring the<br />
usefulness of a housing court in <strong>Cleveland</strong>. 13<br />
In 1964, freshman councilman (and former housing inspector) George<br />
L. Forbes, moved City Council to request the General Assembly to<br />
establish a housing division within <strong>Cleveland</strong> Municipal <strong>Court</strong>. 14<br />
Several months later, on February 1, 1965, three councilmen<br />
consented to make the request of state legislators as part of their<br />
proposal for a new neighborhood rehabilitation program. 15 Forbes<br />
responded in April by proposing a “housing clinic” to augment the<br />
work of <strong>Cleveland</strong> Municipal <strong>Court</strong> in fighting neighborhood blight. 16<br />
The rhetoric intensified that September, when mayoral candidate Carl<br />
B. Stokes declared war on slum landlords as part of his campaign<br />
platform: “I would make absentee slum ownership an unprofitable<br />
business,” he declared. He added that as mayor, he would set up a<br />
housing court independent of <strong>Cleveland</strong> Municipal <strong>Court</strong>. 17 The<br />
rallying cry persisted through the remainder of the decade, with<br />
local and state candidates and officers of both political parties calling<br />
for housing reform. Actual progress toward creation of <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> did not come about, however, until well into the<br />
tumultuous 1970s.<br />
7
ocial and Political Change Bolsters<br />
the Call for a <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
The 1970s were a difficult decade for <strong>Cleveland</strong>. Still smarting from the legendary 1969 Cuyahoga River<br />
fire, the city lost almost one in four residents between 1970 and 1980 as homeowners, jobs, and wealth<br />
fled the city for the suburbs. As the population fell, the city’s aging housing stock suffered from decay and<br />
abandonment. <strong>Cleveland</strong> became the first major American city to enter default since the Depression.<br />
In the midst of these struggles, <strong>Cleveland</strong> experienced a heyday of community organizing. Community<br />
development corporations and grassroots community groups led the charge in creating a new generation<br />
of organizers set on combating poverty and its effects. The new federal block grant program, which gave<br />
neighborhood groups a voice in how to spend blight-fighting funds on a local level, empowered these<br />
groups in their efforts. The Ohio General Assembly also overhauled Ohio’s landlord and tenant laws. The<br />
Ohio Landlord-Tenant Act clarified the obligations of both landlords and tenants, expanded tenant rights,<br />
and created clearer consequences for owners of substandard rental housing. 18<br />
Community and legal advocates stepped up calls for a new approach to property-related code enforcement.<br />
For many years, ineffective processes and procedures plagued the city’s housing code enforcement program.<br />
This effectively allowed owners of blighted and unsafe properties to avoid significant penalties and fines for<br />
code violations. Few code violation cases made it to court; even when charges resulted in fines, many went<br />
unpaid. In 1971, city inspectors identified over 37,000 violations, but referred only 309 for prosecution. 19<br />
Advocates were concerned that housing cases passed like hot potatoes from judge to judge, resulting in<br />
delayed resolution and inconsistent or weak penalties.<br />
9
Their concerns were valid — <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s municipal court system<br />
lacked an efficient way to adjudicate code violations cases. Violations<br />
sometimes languished for years before offenders were brought to<br />
court. As no separate division existed for housing cases, judges<br />
rotated through the housing docket, each spending two weeks hearing<br />
cases. Frequently, the judges, with few resources to which to refer<br />
parties, continued the cases, which then became the problem of the next<br />
session’s judge.<br />
Meager fines failed to deter offenders, and only reinforced<br />
the inferior status of housing cases. A 1966 study found that housing fines<br />
were on average less than $15.00. 20 Not only did this process often result<br />
in delay, but it permitted serial offenders to hide in plain sight without<br />
ever facing elevated penalties. And as cases languished, the problems<br />
and the decay in <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s neighborhoods only got worse. A 1967<br />
study published by the Plan of Action for Tomorrow’s <strong>Housing</strong> (PATH)<br />
described <strong>Cleveland</strong> as in a “housing crisis,” with an “ever-widening,<br />
rotting and impoverished core, surrounded by an affluent and unconcerned<br />
. . . ring of suburbs.” 21<br />
These problems further precipitated calls for a housing court in <strong>Cleveland</strong>.<br />
By the 1970s, Baltimore’s housing court was not the only one in the<br />
nation. Specialized courts for housing had also taken root in other cities<br />
such as Pittsburgh, Boston, and New York. The campaign for a <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> took on new political viability when Oberlin College<br />
student and City Councilman James Rokakis wrote a paper on the idea.<br />
Rokakis advocated for a housing court in <strong>Cleveland</strong>, and<br />
enlisted the support of State Senator Charles L. Butts, who<br />
sponsored the bill in the General Assembly to create such a<br />
court 22, and Terence Copeland to help him lead the effort.<br />
“<strong>Cleveland</strong> at that time was a divided city,” Copeland recalls, “and it<br />
was rare for councilmen on the east and west sides of town to partner on<br />
anything. But both sides of town had dilapidated housing,” he says. “We<br />
thought it would be good for <strong>Cleveland</strong> to have this <strong>Court</strong> to address the<br />
problem. We worked as a team, speaking at various meetings across the<br />
city talking about <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>. We made it our goal to let everyone<br />
know it was needed on both sides of town, and enlisted the support of<br />
about 20 neighborhood leaders and housing advocates to help us.”<br />
Despite Rokakis’s advocacy and Butts’s support, the housing court<br />
proposal was met with vocal opposition, particularly from the judiciary.<br />
The Chief Administrative Judge of the <strong>Cleveland</strong> Municipal <strong>Court</strong>, Edward<br />
F. Katalinas, opposed the bill, telling the <strong>Cleveland</strong> Plain Dealer that<br />
“[if] you put one judge on housing full time, he wouldn’t know what to do<br />
with himself…we have less than one case per day filed for the entire city<br />
of <strong>Cleveland</strong> on the housing code.” 23 Then-Governor James Rhodes also<br />
disapproved of the idea.<br />
But the chorus in favor of a housing court was louder. Almost as one voice,<br />
community groups, neighborhood activists and many lawyers, politicians<br />
and judges urged the creation of a specialized court in <strong>Cleveland</strong> to address<br />
the City’s many housing-related challenges and the growing number of<br />
housing-related disputes. 24 They recognized, even before its creation, that<br />
the <strong>Court</strong> would need to take a unique approach: seeking compliance,<br />
rather than simply imposing fines.<br />
On November 30, 1979, the Ohio General Assembly passed a bill authored<br />
by Harry J. Lehman of Beachwood, paving the way for the bill to become<br />
law on January 1, 1980. 25 Though advocates feared a veto, Rokakis was<br />
able to convince then-Mayor George Voinovich to persuade Rhodes to<br />
allow the bill to become law without his signature, and the housing court<br />
became a reality. 26 The <strong>Court</strong>’s creation “was viewed as both an important<br />
urban reform and a grassroots advocacy victory,” said Robert Jaquay,<br />
associate director of the George Gund Foundation and a <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
prosecutor in the early 1980s. 27<br />
10
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> – Justice Beyond the Four Walls of the <strong>Court</strong>room<br />
“The <strong>Housing</strong> Division of the <strong>Cleveland</strong> Municipal <strong>Court</strong> is now in session.” These are words you normally would hear inside<br />
<strong>Court</strong>room 13B at the Justice Center – the heart and home of the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>. But today, these words are being spoken in the<br />
living room of a dilapidated single family home in the City’s Slavic Village area. The <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Judge, his bailiff, City prosecutor<br />
and the public defenderr stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the defendants, a middle-aged couple who own and live in the house; the<br />
court reporter operates her stenographic machine seated on a kitchen chair.<br />
The hearing in this <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> case was held at the request of City Councilman Tony Brancatelli, whose ward includes the<br />
Slavic Village neighborhood—an area often referred to as the epicenter for the foreclosure crisis.<br />
invited us back.”<br />
violations. They also added new siding, new trim and landscaping, restoring some of the home’s previous grandeur. The <strong>Court</strong>’s<br />
ultimate goal of code compliance was reached.<br />
in hand.<br />
Beyond Evictions<br />
The <strong>Court</strong>’s problem-solving mission is priority in the civil<br />
cases that it hears. Eviction cases comprise the bulk of the<br />
<strong>Court</strong>’s civil docket. Ohio law requires that eviction cases—<br />
formally known as forcible entry and detainer actions—move<br />
quickly through the court system. To meet this requirement<br />
and still provide a complete hearing for related claims, the<br />
<strong>Court</strong> splits these cases into two causes of action—the<br />
dealing with money damages and counterclaims. First cause<br />
hearings provide magistrates with the opportunity to refer tenants<br />
to available social service programs. The <strong>Court</strong> has established<br />
processes to connect seniors and those with disabilities to the<br />
a tenant is elderly or disabled, he or she is able to refer the<br />
and for connection to other available resources. The <strong>Court</strong> also<br />
mediation services just beyond the doors of courtroom.<br />
11
fter a Slow Start, <strong>Housing</strong> Advocates<br />
Win the Day<br />
As the official launch of <strong>Cleveland</strong> Municipal <strong>Court</strong>’s special housing division approached, controversy<br />
persisted reguarding its role, and officials squabbled over budgets, staffing and everyday matters such<br />
as office space.<br />
Still, housing advocates had won the day: <strong>Cleveland</strong> would have its <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, the first in Ohio devoted<br />
to housing cases, both civil and criminal. The community started to believe that neglectful owners might be<br />
held responsible for allowing their properties to deteriorate. The <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> was a busy court<br />
from the beginning: despite Judge Katalinas’s prediction, in its first year, <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> saw<br />
6,452 eviction cases and 599 criminal code compliance cases. 28<br />
It was a rocky start, however. The first <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> judge was Joseph F. McManamon, already a Municipal<br />
<strong>Court</strong> judge. His first appearance on the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> bench was delayed for two days because the new<br />
<strong>Court</strong>’s budget and offices had not been approved. Finally, on April 4, 1980, McManamon heard his first<br />
case: a complaint against a City worker who parked his garbage hauling equipment on a Tremont street at<br />
night. It was also the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>’s first example of the <strong>Court</strong>’s enduring philosophy of solutions-based<br />
decisions: McManamon sentenced the worker to 10 days in jail and a $500 fine, but suspended the jail<br />
sentence and half of the fine on condition that he not park his equipment on neighborhood streets again.<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>’s growing pains continued, partly because the <strong>Court</strong> was underfunded. <strong>Cleveland</strong> City<br />
Council had slashed McManamon’s requested $93,000 budget to just $50,000, preventing him from<br />
13
hiring more than one <strong>Housing</strong> Specialist. The entire staff, including the<br />
in McManamon’s initial request. Those constraints alone kept <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong> from reaching optimal effectiveness.<br />
The new <strong>Court</strong>’s future was challenged again that November when Judge<br />
McManamon was elected to the <strong>Court</strong> of Common Pleas, creating a fastrevolving<br />
door of judges on the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> bench. McManamon<br />
was replaced by Judge Robert Malaga, who had just lost his own bid for<br />
re-election to Probate <strong>Court</strong>.<br />
Many did not see Judge Malaga as a <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> supporter; however,<br />
he did honor the <strong>Court</strong>’s problem-solving approach to justice. “Those<br />
be mitigated if the work is done,” wrote a <strong>Cleveland</strong> Press reporter in<br />
April 1981. The newspaper quoted Judge Malaga as frequently telling<br />
defendants, “I’d rather have you put the money into the house than give<br />
it to the court.” 29<br />
Judge Malaga served only one year, replaced by Judge Eddie Corrigan,<br />
Local Rules, giving it a set of procedures and guidelines that set it apart<br />
from Municipal <strong>Court</strong> as a whole. It was an important step because of the<br />
specialized nature of cases heard in <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>.<br />
Judge Gaines also took the <strong>Court</strong>’s problem-solving philosophy to a<br />
higher level, assigning <strong>Housing</strong> Specialists to connect property ownerdefendants,<br />
often elderly and poor, with available programs to help them<br />
repair and maintain their homes. Resources, however, were few. One<br />
of the most popular programs, <strong>Cleveland</strong> Action to Support <strong>Housing</strong><br />
(CASH), was available only to homeowners who were eligible for<br />
conventional bank loans. Interest rates at that time hovered above eleven<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>’s early supporters remained frustrated over what they saw<br />
They set out to recruit a judge who would continue the <strong>Court</strong>’s established<br />
mission. They found their candidate in William Corrigan—a lawyer,<br />
neighborhood activist and former teacher and guidance counselor at<br />
Glenville High School. Corrigan had never served as a judge, but in<br />
1989, at age sixty-two, he ran for the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> and defeated Carl<br />
Corrigan ushered in a decade of expansion for <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
including the creation of the <strong>Court</strong>’s Mediation Program, which still<br />
offers landlords and tenants the opportunity to settle their disputes without<br />
a hearing, free of charge.<br />
Judge Corrigan’s tenure also was brief. Clarence Gaines defeated<br />
Corrigan in the next election and began his term in January 1984—<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>’s fourth judge in four years. Judge Gaines was<br />
a competent jurist who continued to raise the professional standards of<br />
the <strong>Court</strong>, requesting a study to evaluate <strong>Court</strong> operations. The report<br />
found that despite the rapid turnover on the bench, the <strong>Court</strong> had met a<br />
primary mission—to resolve more housing cases than ever before, and at<br />
a faster rate. 30<br />
The <strong>Court</strong>’s community service program (below and at right),<br />
engages in projects in local neighborhoods that focus on quality<br />
of life issues.<br />
<strong>Court</strong> Community Services Assists <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> in Fighting Blight<br />
Toxic titles, absentee and unresponsive owners, as well<br />
as other complicated problems may delay resolution of some<br />
cases in <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>. Grass and weeds grow high, scrappers<br />
strip gutters and aluminum siding, vandals break windows,<br />
and litterers use the yard to dump trash. What was merely<br />
a vacant house—again— quickly becomes an eyesore,<br />
a burden on property values nearby and a danger<br />
to the neighborhood and its residents. As <strong>Housing</strong><br />
cases are pending, decay through its use of <strong>Court</strong>
Corporation Docket<br />
One of the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>’s ongoing challenges is compelling corporate defendants to appear in <strong>Court</strong>. Because the <strong>Court</strong> cannot<br />
issue an arrest warrant or impose jail time on a business entites, it had to act creatively, to cause those defendants to appear.<br />
the orders of reviewing courts. The <strong>Court</strong> considers this an evolving docket, since the existing laws for criminal procedure were<br />
not established with corporate defendants in mind. The end goal of this specialized docket, however, always remains the same:<br />
to require corporate defendants to appear in <strong>Court</strong> when criminal charges have been brought.<br />
After an initial failure to appear, a business entity is ordered to appear and service is sent out again the entity’s address of record,<br />
cause why it should not be held in contempt. If the entity yet again fails to appear at the show-cause hearing, the <strong>Court</strong><br />
imposes sanctions until the entity appears and enters a plea. This practice has been successful in encouraging corporate defendants<br />
to appear in <strong>Court</strong>.<br />
One corporate defendant, a multi-national bank, routinely failed to appear on Judge Pianka’s docket, but ultimately made an<br />
address in Europe! This company, and many others like it, now appear consistently when summoned to the Corporation Docket.<br />
Community Services (CCS). Judge Pianka utilizes CCS to remove<br />
nuisances at problem properties.<br />
In addition to ordering a property maintained, if a property<br />
can assign defendants to perform community service in lieu of<br />
trees. “We’re a real low-cost form of labor to go out and remedy<br />
those kinds of problems,” said Paul Klodor, Executive Director<br />
of <strong>Court</strong> Community Services. <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> referred 60<br />
defendants in 2014, and they completed a total of 4,505 hours<br />
of community service.<br />
Not all the properties CCS services are vacant. The<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> has directed crews to the homes of the elderly and<br />
disabled who are unable do the repairs, and cannot<br />
afford to hire someone. The work often draws the<br />
attention of neighbors pleased to see that the blight next door is<br />
being cleaned up. “It is a way for <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> to demonstrate<br />
to different communities that the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> is tuned<br />
in,” says Klodor.<br />
15
oactive <strong>Court</strong><br />
The 1990s ushered in a new era for <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> with the beginning of JudgeWilliam Corrigan’s<br />
tenure as <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Judge. Judge Corrigan understood the important role the <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
could play in improving the quality of life in the City of <strong>Cleveland</strong>. 31 His proactive stance helped shed the<br />
malaise that marked the pre-1990 efforts at enforcement of the City’s <strong>Housing</strong> Code, and began to shape the<br />
<strong>Court</strong>’s reputation and policy going forward.<br />
During Judge Corrigan’s tenure, <strong>Cleveland</strong> City Council increased the <strong>Court</strong>’s budget, as well as the number<br />
of <strong>Court</strong> personnel, perhaps in recognition of the increased role the <strong>Court</strong> was beginning to play with respect<br />
to issues of quality of life in the City of <strong>Cleveland</strong>. The significant amount of money that the <strong>Court</strong> generated<br />
on a steady basis likely also influenced Council’s willingness to increase funding for the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>:<br />
during Judge Corrigan’s first two years on the bench, the <strong>Court</strong> collected a total of $310,000. The increased<br />
staffing included additional <strong>Housing</strong> Specialists, bringing their number to seven.<br />
The <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> possessed a deep understanding of the need to provide assistance to those under its<br />
jurisdiction. As such, the <strong>Court</strong> shouldered a responsibility to prevent and punish unsafe business practices.<br />
Such practices made life more dangerous for those who resided within the City limits. For example, during<br />
the early 1990s, the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> found itself hearing cases involving heightened lead emissions that<br />
threatened surrounding neighborhoods, as well as opportunistic companies that dumped trash on City streets<br />
and vacant lots. The <strong>Court</strong> exercised its jurisdiction in cases in which it protected surrounding neighborhoods<br />
from the increased illegal dumping, 32 as well as an insufferable stench from a meat-processing operation. 33<br />
Residents of the City began to see that the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> was willing to flex its muscle to provide protection<br />
for the residents whose simple goal was to enjoy their homes.<br />
17
Receivership Halts Deterioration, Restores Stability<br />
The row house on West 112th Street was quickly turning into a<br />
nightmare: The owner had moved to California, leaving behind<br />
a roof that leaked badly. Eventually, rain and snow damaged a<br />
wall shared with neighbors. One of eight connected row houses,<br />
the property, if allowed to continue to deteriorate, could destroy<br />
other units. It would have a devastating effect on a block that<br />
had been spared the worst of the housing crisis.<br />
Neighbors turned for help to Cudell Improvement Inc., the local<br />
community development corporation. Cudell’s Executive Director,<br />
Anita R. Brindza, saw that the neighbors’ nightmare could be a<br />
dream receivership. “There are lots of reasons why community<br />
development corporations shy away from receiverships,” Brindza<br />
says. “A property might be too far gone for repairs; it might<br />
carry a too-large mortgage; it might have little resale value; the<br />
title could be tangled with liens; the housing market could be<br />
down enough to make a quick resale unlikely. But none of that<br />
would be a problem here. The brick row house could be repaired<br />
for less than its value. It didn’t carry a mortgage. Its location on<br />
a good street meant it could be resold quickly. And Cudell had<br />
enough money to pay for the renovation.”<br />
With Cudell’s help, the owners of the adjoining unit filed a<br />
receivership action in the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>. The <strong>Court</strong> appointed<br />
Cudell receiver of the property, and gave them the authority to<br />
contract for and supervise the necessary repair work.<br />
Contractors fixed the roof and the common wall and cut down a<br />
large pine tree in the front yard. After repairs were completed, the<br />
three-bedroom row house was sold to a neighbor for $113,000.<br />
Cudell was reimbursed for the cost of repairs and legal services,<br />
and received a small fee, as well, for serving as receiver. The<br />
original owner eventually contacted the <strong>Court</strong>, and received the<br />
nearly $22,000 profit from the sale.<br />
“It was nice to be able to help the people who complained,<br />
because otherwise they would have had to abandon the<br />
property,” Brindza says.<br />
In recognition of his commitment<br />
and efforts, <strong>Housing</strong> Advocates,<br />
Inc., a <strong>Cleveland</strong>-based nonprofit<br />
public interest law firm<br />
and fair housing agency, awarded<br />
Judge Corrigan the “<strong>Housing</strong><br />
Advocate of the Year” award, just<br />
prior to the expiration of his term<br />
as <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Judge.<br />
The early 1990s also saw one of<br />
the first uses of receivership as<br />
a nuisance abatement tool. The<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> Restoration Society<br />
filed one of the first actions of its<br />
kind against the owner of a property<br />
on South Boulevard, ultimately<br />
saving a showcase home.<br />
One of Judge Pianka’s early initiatives was the creation of the Selective<br />
Intervention Program, or “SIP,” in 1998. SIP is a criminal diversion<br />
program designed to guide owner-occupants who are first-time offenders<br />
through the process of making repairs and bringing their properties up<br />
to City code. Each defendant in SIP is assigned a <strong>Housing</strong> Specialist,<br />
who assists the defendant in drawing up a contract with the <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
promising to complete the necessary repairs within a specific period<br />
of time. The Specialist explores resources available to the owners, and<br />
reports to the <strong>Court</strong> on the owner’s progress. At the end of the contract<br />
period, if the defendant has completed the program, the criminal case is<br />
dismissed. In 2000, just two years after the program was created, more<br />
than 300 defendants were referred into the program, with the vast majority<br />
successfully completing the necessary repairs, and avoiding the stigma<br />
of a criminal record. To date, the <strong>Court</strong> has referred more than 3,000<br />
defendants to the SIP program.<br />
The <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> recognized that education plays a significant role<br />
in achieving compliance with the law. In 1998, the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>,<br />
In January 1996 Raymond L.<br />
Pianka took office as the sixth<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Judge.<br />
A former City Councilman, Judge Pianka became the longest-serving<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Judge, on the bench for nineteen of the <strong>Court</strong>’s first<br />
thirty-five years. His experience as a passionate advocate for the City of<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> and its residents enabled him to hit the ground running. From<br />
the outset, Judge Pianka focused the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>’s efforts on achieving<br />
compliance with the City’s codes, assisting those defendants who needed<br />
extra help, while pursuing and punishing those who attempted to elude the<br />
<strong>Court</strong>’s authority.<br />
18
collaborating with the Northeast Ohio Apartment Association, began<br />
offering quarterly presentations of “What Every Landlord Should Know.”<br />
Essentially a school for landlords, particularly those new to the business,<br />
this program provided information on landlords’ rights and responsibilities.<br />
“What Every Landlord Should Know” continues to this day, now with a<br />
counterpart program — “What Every Tenant Should Know” — presented<br />
to individuals about to enter the rental market as tenants. The <strong>Court</strong> has<br />
added an additional program, as well, “Get the Lead Out,” addressing the<br />
law and practical issues raised by lead present in residential properties.<br />
From the onset of Judge Pianka’s term, it was clear that while the <strong>Court</strong><br />
would work to empower landlords, tenants, and property owners to<br />
comply with the law, the <strong>Court</strong> would not coddle defendants who failed<br />
to appear and answer charges against them. The <strong>Court</strong> created a Warrant<br />
Capias Unit to locate recalcitrant defendants, and compel them to appear<br />
in <strong>Court</strong>. The <strong>Court</strong> hired retired police officers as part time, temporary<br />
employees, relying on their skills to locate and persuade defendants to<br />
present themselves in court, as ordered.<br />
At right, after and before, a condemned historic Franklin<br />
Boulevard home, renovated for owner occupancy, and<br />
becoming a neighborhood asset after years of neglect.<br />
Opposite page: Saving a magnificent century old Georgian<br />
Revival home (far left) on South Boulevard through creative<br />
use of receivership enabled financing to be obtained in<br />
the absence of an owner who could deliver clear title.<br />
The exterior of the landmark house today, middle, and<br />
the restored stair hall, bottom.<br />
Specializing in Getting the Job Done<br />
The <strong>Housing</strong> Specialist stands on the front porch and braces<br />
herself for what lies behind the front door. Judge Pianka has<br />
assigned her to assist a woman in her mid-sixties who lives in<br />
a modest house on the City’s northeast side. The City has filed<br />
both a civil suit and criminal charges against the woman, telling<br />
the <strong>Court</strong> that the home presents health and safety hazards.<br />
The woman greets the <strong>Housing</strong> Specialist at the door and<br />
reluctantly invites her in. Almost immediately, the woman begins<br />
to explain the stacks of newspapers, books, clothing, and other<br />
household items. “I’m going to go through all this ... I need these<br />
things …this stuff over here belonged to my husband…”<br />
The woman leads the Specialist further into the small, single<br />
family home she lives in alone. The walk is precarious, at times<br />
requiring the women to hold onto doorways while climbing on<br />
piles of items. The kitchen appliances are unusable, covered<br />
with boxes, papers, and other items stretching toward the<br />
ceiling. The basement is inaccessible, due to the clutter.<br />
The house smells of animal urine. It’s another day on the job<br />
for this vital group of <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> employees—the <strong>Housing</strong><br />
Specialists.<br />
The Specialists do some of their work in the court itself—<br />
testifying before the Judge, working with criminal defendants<br />
to locate resources to make repairs, explaining court procedure<br />
to landlords and tenants. Much of their work, however, is done<br />
“in the field,” at many of the thousands of properties before<br />
the <strong>Court</strong> each year. Specialists may even don ventilators,<br />
safety suits and gloves and pitch in to help work crews clean<br />
up property as part of court-ordered community service.<br />
Judge Pianka has chosen this Specialist specifically to work with<br />
this homeowner. The social work background and experience<br />
of this veteran court worker will be helpful in dealing with the<br />
woman’s hoarding issue. She will visit the property another halfdozen<br />
times, supervising, coaching, cajoling to get the property<br />
cleaned out. In this case, the hard work yields a good result—<br />
the homeowner gets rid of much of the clutter, cleans the<br />
basement, and sanitizes the property. On this first visit, though,<br />
there is still much to be done. “Okay,” announces the <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong> Specialist, “here’s what we’re going to do first…”<br />
19
ew Challenges Test the <strong>Court</strong><br />
Two decades after its creation, the <strong>Court</strong> already had become an essential component of the City. But a new<br />
decade for the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> brought new challenges. The <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> continued to adapt itself to meet<br />
these challenges with creative and effective solutions.<br />
At the beginning of the twenty-first century, vacant properties marred many of <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s once-vibrant<br />
neighborhoods. Estimates placed between 10,000 to as many as 25,000 vacant and abandoned properties<br />
in <strong>Cleveland</strong>. Following years of predatory lenders and often unscrupulous companies with no legitimate<br />
paperwork on properties, Cuyahoga County was also at the crossroads of another major obstacle: the<br />
foreclosure crisis, which hit <strong>Cleveland</strong> early and hard. By 2007, when the rest of the nation was just<br />
beginning to feel the effects of the housing bubble, foreclosures in Cuyahoga County surged past 14,000<br />
a year. Vandals destroyed vacant properties and stripped empty homes of plumbing, heating equipment,<br />
and recyclable materials. Homeowners whose properties were in foreclosure often were dismayed to learn<br />
that though they could not afford their homes, they were still the legal owners of the properties, and thus<br />
responsible for their upkeep.<br />
Responding to this challenge, the National Vacant Properties Campaign and Neighborhood Progress,<br />
Inc. published <strong>Cleveland</strong> at the Crossroads. This comprehensive report urged greater cooperation among<br />
city leaders, CDCs, and the private sector to identify vacant properties and develop an enforcement and<br />
development strategy. 35 Judge Pianka recognized the need to enforce the City Building and <strong>Housing</strong> Code,<br />
while simultaneously encouraging the partnership and creative solutions offered by the Crossroads report,<br />
in an essay he wrote for the Northeast Ohio Apartment Association. 35<br />
21
The often unscrupulous practice of property “flipping” exacerbated the<br />
foreclosure crisis in <strong>Cleveland</strong>. 37 In search of fast money, land speculators<br />
descended upon <strong>Cleveland</strong>, purchased condemned properties, and resold<br />
them at substantial markups—often without ever seeing the property, or<br />
making any improvements. These investors wanted to resell the houses<br />
quickly at a profit; compliance was not part of their plan. Mortgage<br />
companies—many out of state, and many willing to provide loans with<br />
little or no documentation—helped facilitate the scheme of property<br />
flippers. 38<br />
Notorious among these investors was Raymond Delacruz. According to an<br />
August 28, 2000 article in the Plain Dealer, “records show[ed] that Delacruz<br />
and his associates . . . bought and resold at least 50 properties, enjoying a<br />
return on their purchase investment of roughly 85 percent, while holding<br />
onto the properties an average of just four months each.” 39 In one example,<br />
Delacruz, through his associate, purchased a property on Kolar Avenue for<br />
just over $20,000. However, the deed Delacruz recorded, along with an<br />
accompanying affidavit, falsely stated the associate paid $75,000 for the<br />
property. 40 Seven months later, Delacruz sold the Kolar Avenue property<br />
for $87,000. 41 Delacruz was later cited for myriad housing violations at<br />
the property. When Delacruz failed to bring the property up to code, Judge<br />
Pianka sentenced him to thirty days of house arrest in the property, so that<br />
Delacruz could properly “focus [his] energies” on the property. 42 Delacruz<br />
subsequently was convicted of federal mortgage and real estate fraud for<br />
his operations throughout <strong>Cleveland</strong> and Columbus. 43<br />
The City had a difficult time enforcing local codes with respect<br />
to “property flipping” for various reasons. First, <strong>Cleveland</strong> has no law<br />
requiring home inspections at the point of sale. Second,although the<br />
City passed an “anti-flipping” ordinance in 2003, 44 the Ohio Supreme<br />
<strong>Court</strong> later held the ordinance was preempted under the Ohio Constitution<br />
by powers reserved to the State. 45 Third, though the City had previously<br />
passed a Certificate of Disclosure ordinance, prosecutors had rarely used it. 46<br />
That particular ordinance requires a seller of any one, two, three, or four-<br />
58<br />
The “Clean Hands” Docket<br />
“Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. You are here today<br />
because one or more parties to your case have outstanding<br />
criminal warrants and/or fines with the <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong>. Judge Pianka requires you to clear up these outstanding<br />
issues before allowing you to proceed in your eviction case.”<br />
This is the opening announcement to attendees of the <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong>’s Eviction-Warrant Docket. In 2008, Judge Pianka noticed<br />
he was signing entries granting writs of restitution for evictions,<br />
while signing judgment entries to issue warrants for the same<br />
parties on his criminal docket. There is a longstanding legal<br />
principle that “he who seeks equity must do equity, and that<br />
he must come into <strong>Court</strong> with clean hands.” Christman v.<br />
Christman (1960), 171 Ohio St. 152. The Eviction-Warrant<br />
Docket was created to further prevent this practice, as well<br />
as to clear up outstanding cases pending in the <strong>Court</strong>.<br />
22<br />
In one case, a corporate Landlord cleared up outstanding<br />
warrants and fines that were preventing it from moving<br />
forward on its eviction case, before the Eviction-Warrant Docket<br />
hearing; the <strong>Court</strong> therefore allowed it to proceed. However, the<br />
Tenant also appeared that day, and agreed to vacate the premises.<br />
The parties were able to reach an agreement through the<br />
<strong>Court</strong>’s Mediation Program. The <strong>Court</strong> considers this a win-winwin<br />
scenario: the Landlord received the remedy it sought; the<br />
Tenant’s goal of a “soft landing” was met; and the <strong>Court</strong> resolved<br />
its outstanding warrants and fines.<br />
Over 830 cases have been referred to the <strong>Court</strong>’s “Clean Hands”<br />
Docket since it began in 2008. As a result, hundreds of warrants<br />
and capiases have been cleared up and thousands of dollars in<br />
unpaid fines have been collected as a result of referral to this<br />
specialized docket.
unit dwelling to furnish a Certificate of Disclosure to the purchaser,<br />
outlining the condition of the property. A violation of the ordinance is<br />
a first degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail and a<br />
$1,000 fine for an individual, and $5,000 for a corporation. 47<br />
Frustrated with the number of vacant properties ravaged by the foreclosure<br />
crisis, Judge Pianka instituted tough measures against the properties’ new<br />
owners: the lenders and investors themselves. In response to business<br />
entities, including banks and other lenders, ignoring <strong>Court</strong> summons for<br />
code violations, Judge Pianka began holding hearings in the corporation’s<br />
absence, and converted these fines to cival judgment, upon which the<br />
clerk’s collection attorneys recorded liens in Cuyahoga County. By 2008,<br />
he had tried twelve companies in absentia, “leaving each unable to sell any<br />
properties in the area until it [paid] up.” 49 Judge Pianka also created the<br />
Eviction Warrant Docket, commonly known as the Clean Hands docket,<br />
preventing landlords with outstanding warrants and unpaid criminal fines<br />
from prosecuting eviction actions until the landlords appeared at and<br />
participated in their own criminal cases. The Judge’s tactics got attention:<br />
fewer property owners ignored the <strong>Court</strong>’s summonses.<br />
Toepfer provided the painted boards often are located near tidy, occupied<br />
homes, or near retail stores or other businesses, whose owners cannot<br />
escape the adjacent blight. As Judge Pianka remarked, “I think it’s making<br />
the most of a bad situation... It’s not a solution to the vacant, abandoned<br />
property crisis, but it’s one thing that can be done.” 51<br />
Throughout the 2000s, the <strong>Court</strong> also saw an increase in the number of<br />
nuisance abatement cases seeking the appointment of a receiver. These<br />
highly specialized, somewhat cumbersome cases, brought under Ohio<br />
Revised Code 3767.41, are limited to instances where a property owner<br />
has failed to remedy a nuisance property. The City, a neighbor within 500<br />
feet, a tenant, or local non-profit organization can bring the case, and have<br />
the <strong>Court</strong> appoint a receiver to make the necessary repairs to the premises<br />
to eliminate the nuisance.<br />
Judge Pianka also employed creative measures to address the City’s vacant<br />
properties. In partnership with community groups, Judge Pianka arranged<br />
with Chicago-based Chris Toepfer to paint the plywood boards, used to<br />
secure vacant houses, with scenes of people, window boxes and curtains.<br />
Toepfer’s technique, known as “artistic boarding,” attempts to make<br />
vacant properties more aesthetically attractive, and, more importantly, less<br />
likely to be targets of vandalism and other crimes. 50 The homes for which<br />
Staff confer in <strong>Court</strong>’s 13th floor Justice Center reception area,<br />
left, and in a courtroom as court is about to begin, right.
evitalization and Resilience<br />
As the first decade of the new millennium drew to a close, <strong>Cleveland</strong> residents looked at their community<br />
with optimism, blended with some harsh realities.<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> has continued to struggle with the results of the mortgage lending and foreclosure crises. As<br />
Judge Pianka told a reporter from Suites magazine in late 2009, “[i]f the [mortgage] crisis ended tomorrow,<br />
we’d be dealing with the fallout for another five to ten years.” 52 At that time, it was estimated that <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
had more than 10,000 vacant homes; since then, that number has risen to more than 15,000. 53 In 2009,<br />
economists and Washington, D.C. officially declared the recession 2007 “over”. But homeowners in<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> continued to feel the effects of stagnant wages and job losses, combined with increased prices for<br />
labor and materials to perform routine maintenance on their homes. As a result, many homeowners could<br />
not afford to maintain their homes in good condition, and structures deteriorated throughout the City.<br />
The increased number of criminal case since 2009 reflects both the decline in the condition of the housing<br />
stock and the City’s stepped-up enforcement efforts. Between 2009 and 2012, the City filed 26,852 criminal<br />
cases. 54 The Clerk of <strong>Court</strong>, in 2012 alone, collected more than $500,000 in fines and court costs levied by<br />
the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>.<br />
The <strong>Court</strong> also has seen an increased number of civil filings in recent years. On average, over 11,000<br />
civil cases are filed in the <strong>Housing</strong> Division. Most of these cases were eviction actions, the overwhelming<br />
majority for non-payment of rent. 55<br />
Still, there are signs of hope and increasing energy.<br />
25
A small portion of the civil cases filed were nuisance abatement actions,<br />
brought by neighborhood Community Development Corporations<br />
(CDCs). In these actions, CDCs sought an order from the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
to declare a property a public nuisance and appoint a receiver, when<br />
necessary, after interested parties failed to make the necessary repairs.<br />
The neighborhood groups’ efforts moved toward abating the nuisance<br />
posed by vacant, abandoned, and poorly maintained properties one at a<br />
time. Receivership can be a costly remedy, and not every neighborhood<br />
CDC has the available cash or credit to rehabilitate property for later<br />
sale. Still, for neighbors of the handful of properties about which these<br />
actions are filed each year, the effect is dramatic—sometimes demolition,<br />
but other times complete rehabilitation, with a subsequent sale to owneroccupants.<br />
Not only is the nuisance abated, but the City often acquires<br />
new residents as well. While the City itself has the legal authority to bring<br />
these actions, it has not yet embraced this legal strategy, and has not filed<br />
any receivership actions.<br />
The City of <strong>Cleveland</strong> has taken initiative on another front. In June 2009,<br />
the City published a report on its newly-formed Code Enforcement<br />
Partnership. 56 Beginning as a pilot project between the City and the<br />
Midwest <strong>Housing</strong> Partnership, the Code Enforcement Partnership<br />
formalized the relationship between the City and the CDCs.<br />
The Sylvia Apartments are a perfect example of collaborative<br />
neighborhood revitalization. The Sylvia was built on Franklin Boulevard<br />
in the 1920s – part of a stretch of once-grand homes on the City’s West<br />
Side. By the late 2000s, however, the Sylvia was owned by a company<br />
that permitted it to fall into serious disrepair. In November 2008, the<br />
owner of the company died. On the brink of the oncoming winter, the<br />
tenants faced utility terminations. When no one from the owner’s family<br />
or the company came forward to take responsibility for the building, the<br />
Detroit Shoreway Community Development Organization stepped in, and<br />
filed a receivership action in the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>. 57<br />
Through the action they filed, Detroit Shoreway negotiated and secured<br />
cooperation from the City, neighborhood groups and financiers to<br />
save the three-story, 18-unit brick structure from demolition. After a<br />
$3 million renovation, in May 2012, the Sylvia was re-opened in a ribboncutting<br />
ceremony. Among those present was Mayor Frank Jackson, who<br />
remarked that the Sylvia was now the “jewel” of Franklin Boulevard. 58<br />
Also in attendance was 82 year old Eleanor French, who had called the<br />
Sylvia her home for nearly 65 years. Forced to vacate in 2008, when the<br />
building was at its worst, Ms. French happily returned to the Sylvia to see<br />
the transformation. 59<br />
A local television station at the Sylvia ribbon-cutting interviewed<br />
Cuyahoga County Land Bank Chief Operating Officer Bill Whitney.<br />
Whitney commented on the difficulty of structuring complex development<br />
projects: “These projects aren’t easy.” He went on to note, “[t]he structuring<br />
of these kinds of development models is really what has propelled <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
and its neighborhood groups to the forefront of city redevelopment…<br />
26<br />
The goal of the partnership from the outset was to make use of the<br />
information the CDCs acquired about local neighborhoods in a<br />
streamlined and efficient manner. The CDCs maintain an inventory<br />
of abandoned properties, prioritize properties needing attention, and<br />
convey that information to a centralized complaint system in the City’s<br />
Department of Building and <strong>Housing</strong>. The complaint department then<br />
prioritizes the incoming complaints from all sources, to make the most<br />
efficient use of staff time.<br />
The Partnership is still developing, and the City likely has not yet felt its<br />
full effect. It does illustrate, however, the undeniable need for community<br />
involvement to address the issue of declining neighborhoods. In areas<br />
where the residents and CDCs are active, neighborhoods have steadily<br />
improved. But no one individual, group, or government entity can bear<br />
the burden on its own—it takes a combined, concerted effort to push back<br />
the forces of decay.<br />
It’s not just brick and mortar… It’s the heart of the neighborhood and<br />
all the people who live there.” 60<br />
And the heart of many of <strong>Cleveland</strong> neighborhoods continues to beat<br />
strongly:<br />
In the Larchmere neighborhood, the annual Larchmere PorchFest is a free,<br />
one day music festival that attracts thousands of people to hear musicians<br />
perform on the porches of beautiful, well-maintained homes. Since its
first year, 2008, this family-friendly event has grown to feature thirty<br />
musical groups performing at thirty different homes throughout the day. 61<br />
The Kinsman area has welcomed CornUcopia Place, a<br />
community facility featuring a harvest preparation station for local<br />
market gardeners, and a community kitchen, where cooking and nutrition<br />
demonstrations are held. The affiliated Bridgeport Café serves handcrafted<br />
soups and sandwiches, and sells fresh, locally-grown produce. 62<br />
In Hough, neighborhood resident and activist Mansfield Frazier proposed<br />
the creation of a vineyard on a lot once occupied by a dilapidated apartment<br />
building. The vineyard, Chateau Hough, released its first bottle of wine in<br />
2014, and received 2nd place at the Great Geauga County Fair. Since its<br />
inception, the project has expanded to include the creation of a bio-cellar,<br />
a passive solar greenhouse derived from the foundation remnant of an<br />
abandoned building. 63<br />
Stockyard-Clark-Fulton has witnessed the introduction of “mow goats”<br />
to the area, an innovative approach to clearing brush from vacant lots. A<br />
team of four goats came from a farm in Madison, Ohio, to <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s<br />
near West Side, to test the use of goats to clear lots to mow-able height. 64<br />
The <strong>Cleveland</strong> Flea—a pop-up neighborhood flea market – is “part<br />
urban treasure hunt, part culinary adventure, part maker center.” This<br />
monthly flea market offers locally made jewelry, art, crafts, clothing,<br />
and food, along with artist demonstrations in the St. Clair-Superior<br />
neighborhood. 65<br />
The Detroit Shoreway neighborhood celebrated the renovation of the<br />
historic Capitol Theater. Situated in the heart of the Gordon Square<br />
Arts District, the Capitol Theater is now locally owned and operated<br />
by <strong>Cleveland</strong> Cinemas. During its 2012-2013 season, the <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
Orchestra launched its “At Home” neighborhood residency program in<br />
Gordon Square, with performances at the Capitol Theater. 66<br />
In the Lee-Harvard, Miles, and Mt. Pleasant neighborhoods, concerned<br />
residents have worked alongside Empowering and Strengthening Ohio’s<br />
People (ESOP), and the Concerned Citizens of Mt. Pleasant to re-claim<br />
their community from the ravages of crime and foreclosures. Their efforts<br />
have included tips that led to the raid of a suspected drug house. 67 In 2011,<br />
the Concerned Citizens, along with ESOP, confronted two property owners<br />
who owned run-down properties in the Mt. Pleasant neighborhood: first at<br />
a community meeting, then at an<br />
unannounced visit to the owners’<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> Heights residence. 68<br />
Concerned Citizens and ESOP’s<br />
pressure led to the property<br />
owners paying their outstanding<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> fines. 69<br />
Old Brooklyn is proud of its<br />
green spaces, including the Ben<br />
Franklin Community Gardens,<br />
and the Treadway Creek Trail<br />
and Greenway, a 21-acre park<br />
that links the neighborhood to the Ohio and Erie National Heritage<br />
Canalway Towpath Trail. 70 It annually participates in River Sweep,<br />
touted as “Ohio’s largest done-in-a-day cleanup effort.” 71 and hosts many<br />
community street festivals and events, such as Pedal for Prizes, Old<br />
Brooklyn Wings & Things Cookoff, and Pop Up Pearl. 72<br />
In the West Park area, the Hooley on Kamm’s Corners is the neighborhood’s<br />
annual street festival. The festival features live entertainment, food, and<br />
Celtic music. 73 Neighborhood residents are also working to purchase<br />
the former St. Mark’s Episcopal Church from the Episcopal Diocese of<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong>. 74<br />
Along Waterloo Road in North Collinwood, anchor businesses such as the<br />
Beachland Ballroom and Tavern have helped transform that neighborhood<br />
into a haven for music, art, and entertainment. Every summer for over<br />
ten years, the neighborhood has also celebrated the Waterloo Arts<br />
Fest, a street-wide festival along the aptly-named Waterloo Arts and<br />
Entertainment District. 75<br />
A <strong>Housing</strong> Specialist confers with an attorney and client in court,<br />
far left. A Magistrate examines evidence during a hearing, middle<br />
left. <strong>Court</strong> Watch members attend a session of <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> to<br />
track a defendant’s sentence and to remind Prosecutors and the<br />
<strong>Court</strong> of the importance of the case to the community. Top, this<br />
page: A porch pillar in a historic district; one of many wellmaintained<br />
homes in <strong>Cleveland</strong> neighborhoods, too often<br />
overlooked by pundits; and a home owner paints his front porch.<br />
27
<strong>Cleveland</strong> Public Theater, left, has been<br />
a pivitol part of the public-private<br />
partnership that created the Gordon<br />
Square Arts District. A stome angel<br />
adorning the landmark St. Coleman<br />
Church. <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s places of worship<br />
help to stabilize neighborhoods.<br />
And Slavic Village, the neighborhood<br />
often referred to as the “epicenter of the<br />
foreclosure crisis,” takes pride in promoting<br />
healthy, active living. A participant in the<br />
Active Living by Design program of the<br />
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Slavic Village focuses on family<br />
health, from the Morgana Run Trail, a two-mile bicycling and walking<br />
path, that serves as the site of an annual Pierogi Dash 5K Run and<br />
Fun Walk, to the Velodrome, a 166-meter steel and wood Olympicstyle<br />
cycling track, installed on a patch of vacant land where a hospital<br />
once stood. 76<br />
The longevity of each of these ideas, of course, is unknown. But<br />
more important than their duration, these innovations represent the<br />
commitment of residents of <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s neighborhoods to the reinvention<br />
of <strong>Cleveland</strong> itself.<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong>’s neighborhoods are getting a hand from some larger partners, as<br />
well. For example, the Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation,<br />
known as the County Land Bank, is a non-profit organization that<br />
strategically assesses abandoned or otherwise distressed properties, and<br />
renovates or demolishes them. The Land Bank, which has accepted dozens<br />
of property donations from <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> defendants, puts properties<br />
into the hands of beneficial owners, returning them to productive use, and<br />
keeps them out of the hands of real estate speculators. The Land Bank’s<br />
work clears the way for new, positive ownership of the properties. Since its<br />
inception in 2009, the Land Bank has made a difference on dozens of streets<br />
throughout Cuyahoga County, helping neighbors in those communities take<br />
pride in their homes, businesses and surroundings again. The actions of the<br />
Land Bank and other large organizations within the City can supplement<br />
and complement the work of the smaller, grass roots organizations, to<br />
revitalize our City.<br />
Evolution of the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
1970’s<br />
1980’s 1990’s<br />
Late 1970s City officials, state legislators and<br />
community activists lobby for the creation of a<br />
court to handle housing issues on the <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
Municipal <strong>Court</strong> docket.<br />
1980 Governor James A. Rhodes allows bill to become<br />
law without his signature. The <strong>Court</strong> has five staff,<br />
including Judge Joseph F. McManamon, who was<br />
appointed by the legislature, and a <strong>Housing</strong> Specialist<br />
and a bailiff. Judge McManamon wins election to<br />
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas <strong>Court</strong> after serving<br />
10 months as <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Judge.<br />
1987 <strong>Cleveland</strong> State<br />
University Professor<br />
W. Dennis Keating<br />
prepares study: “An<br />
1996 Judge Raymond L. Pianka takes office as the sixth<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> judge.<br />
1996 The <strong>Court</strong> creates the Warrant/Capias Unit, which<br />
Evaluation of the tracks down criminal defendants who fail to appear in<br />
1981 Governor Rhodes appoints Judge Robert<br />
Malaga for a 1-year term. More than 920 code<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong>.”<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>. The <strong>Court</strong> establishes the Amicus Curiae volunteer<br />
program.<br />
. . . .<br />
enforcement<br />
. .<br />
cases<br />
.<br />
are filed<br />
.<br />
in the <strong>Court</strong>’s<br />
.<br />
first<br />
.<br />
full<br />
. . . . . . . . . .<br />
year of operation.<br />
1990 Judge William F. Corrigan takes office<br />
as the fifth <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> judge.<br />
28<br />
1979 The Ohio General<br />
Assembly passes legislation<br />
creating the <strong>Housing</strong> Division<br />
of <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
Municipal <strong>Court</strong>.<br />
1984 Judge Clarence Gaines<br />
takes office, becoming the<br />
fourth <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> judge<br />
in four years.<br />
1982 Judge Eddie Corrigan<br />
takes office as <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
judge. The <strong>Court</strong> creates its<br />
first set of Local Rules.<br />
1986 The Union Miles<br />
Development Corp. spearheads<br />
formation of the <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Receivership Project,<br />
comprised of neighborhood<br />
groups that want to use<br />
receivership as a tool to fight<br />
abandoned houses.<br />
1992 <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
establishes its Civil<br />
Mediation Program.<br />
1993 The City of <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
Department of Community<br />
Development publishes its<br />
Building & <strong>Housing</strong> Task<br />
Force Report, recommending<br />
an expansion of code<br />
enforcement efforts.<br />
1993 A historic South Boulevard home is condemned<br />
and slated for demolition. The <strong>Cleveland</strong> Restoration<br />
Society files a nuisance abatement case with <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong>, is appointed receiver, eventually restoring the<br />
grand old home.
2000’s<br />
2010’s<br />
2003 The <strong>Court</strong> begins publishing a series of newsletters, later<br />
expanded to include informational videos, on its web site.<br />
2005 The <strong>Court</strong> begins working with <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
Marshall School of Law students through<br />
CSU’s <strong>Housing</strong> Clinical Program.<br />
n Judge Pianka fines two South Carolina real<br />
estate companies more than $13 million for failing<br />
to fix derelict property.<br />
n <strong>Court</strong> marks its 30th anniversary.<br />
2007 The <strong>Court</strong> begins its Trials in Absentia<br />
n <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> sentences defendants to<br />
1997 Almost 4,000 foreclosure cases are<br />
docket. Judge Raymond L. Pianka is Community Control (formerly known as<br />
filed in Cuyahoga County, a rise from<br />
previous years.<br />
reelected without opposition.<br />
probation) to monitor cases and properties owned<br />
by defendants.<br />
2007 The <strong>Court</strong> begins sending letters<br />
.<br />
1997<br />
.<br />
The <strong>Court</strong><br />
.<br />
launches<br />
.<br />
the<br />
.<br />
Code<br />
. . .<br />
informing<br />
. .<br />
owners<br />
.<br />
of foreclosed<br />
.<br />
properties<br />
. . .<br />
n <strong>Housing</strong><br />
.<br />
<strong>Court</strong> creates<br />
.<br />
Mental<br />
.<br />
Health Project to<br />
Enforcers Program, now the Neighborhood<br />
about their maintenance obligations connect mental health consumers with resources,<br />
Advocates Program.<br />
and rights.<br />
improve compliance with court orders.<br />
1999 The <strong>Court</strong> publishes<br />
report, Beyond Broken<br />
Windows.<br />
1998 The <strong>Court</strong> begins the Selective<br />
Intervention Program, pairing firsttime<br />
offender owner-occupants<br />
with <strong>Housing</strong> Specialists to achieve<br />
compliance.<br />
2008 <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> Renewal Project sues<br />
Deutsche Bank and Wells Fargo Bank in <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong>. <strong>Court</strong> grants temporary restraining order to<br />
halt sales and ultimately orders properties brought up<br />
to code through repair or demolition.<br />
2008 The <strong>Court</strong> creates the Eviction Warrant Docket.<br />
2008 The <strong>Court</strong> begins accepting comprehensive<br />
plea agreements from volume owners in code<br />
violation cases.<br />
n <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> launches Neighborhood<br />
Advocates Program.<br />
n <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> subpoenas lienholders to appear<br />
in criminal cases to discuss solutions for problem<br />
properties.<br />
n All housing-related Small Claims cases are<br />
assigned to the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> for hearing by<br />
magistrates.<br />
2010 The Cuyahoga County Land Bank is<br />
established.<br />
29
The Work Continues<br />
Now in its fourth decade, the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
joins many of the entities at the forefront<br />
of the effort to ensure our City remains a<br />
community where families can live and<br />
grow, entrepreneurship thrives, and the<br />
health and well-being of residents is of<br />
paramount importance.<br />
The <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> is one of the<br />
busiest single-judge courts in Ohio. 77 The number of cases, though, tells<br />
only a small part of the story. Many of the more than 17,000 cases filed in<br />
the <strong>Court</strong> each year represent not only discrete legal problems for one or<br />
two individuals, but often are signs or symptoms of larger issues. These<br />
issues include homeowners in financial crisis, neglectful, absent owners<br />
of rental property, and tenants disrespectful of their responsibilities and<br />
neighbors.<br />
The <strong>Court</strong>, focusing on its holistic, problem-solving mission, invests<br />
time and effort into each of these cases, not only to resolve the legal<br />
issues before it, but to solve systemic problems. To fulfill its mission, the<br />
<strong>Court</strong> relies heavily upon its staff to provide innovative solutions to new<br />
challenges. Thanks to the support of <strong>Cleveland</strong> City Council, the <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong> has been able to increase its staff to meet its responsibilities.<br />
Groups interested in housing problems and solutions have recognized<br />
the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>’s commitment to innovation. Members of the<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> staff have frequently presented and shared their ideas and<br />
Across the city, a new<br />
generation is<br />
discovering the charm<br />
of <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s front<br />
porch neighborhoods<br />
and pedestrian<br />
scale, and bringing<br />
neglected homes back<br />
to life. <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
continues to work<br />
to preserve the<br />
quality of life for all<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong>ers as it<br />
enters a new decade.<br />
innovations at the National Vacant Properties Conference, Continuing<br />
Legal Education programs, and various community outreach efforts.<br />
Law and policy groups throughout the country, looking to address<br />
housing issues in their own communities, have frequently looked to<br />
the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> as a “national model” for housing courts. 78 “What<br />
is happening there is certainly at the forefront of initiatives seeking to<br />
impose liability upon the owners of substandard properties,” Frank<br />
S. Alexander, a professor at the Emory University School of Law, told<br />
The Plain Dealer in 2010. 79 <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> has come a long way since<br />
its first case in 1980. The creation of the <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
was the culmination of nearly four decades of community advocacy,<br />
problem-solving, and creative ideas by individuals dedicated to<br />
improving the lives of <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s residents.<br />
But the work of <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> is not done. The <strong>Court</strong><br />
continues to bringing new solutions to increasingly complicated problems,<br />
and remains dedicated to the spirit of problem-solving and innovation<br />
that promulgated the first calls for<br />
a <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> in <strong>Cleveland</strong>.<br />
In this way, the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> will<br />
continue to build on more than<br />
35 years of progress—solving<br />
problems and strengthening<br />
the community, house by<br />
house, block by block, and<br />
neighborhood by neighborhood.<br />
30
Notes<br />
The Early Years: The Emergence of an Idea<br />
n 1 William Dennis Keating &Norman Krumholz, CLEVELAND: A METROPOLITAN READER<br />
43 (Kent State University Press, ed. 1995). n 2 Id. n 3 348 U.S. 26, 36 (1954). n 4 Id. at 32-33.<br />
n 5 See Ray Dorsey, Councilmen Back Open-Type Garage for Parking in City, THE PLAIN DEALER,<br />
Apr. 5, 1950, at 2 (discussing attendance of <strong>Cleveland</strong> City Council members at the conference, and<br />
their favorable impressions of the Baltimore <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>). n 6 John G. Blair and Odell M. Smith,<br />
<strong>Cleveland</strong> Lags Far Behind Baltimore in <strong>Housing</strong>, Visitors Find, THE PLAIN DEALER, Apr. 16,<br />
1954, at 1A. n 7 Fix Up Slums, Says Editor to Owners, THE PLAIN DEALER, Apr. 30, 1950, at 6F.<br />
n 8 Baltimore Aide Views Rigid Codes as Key to City Fixup, THE PLAIN DEALER, Sept. 25, 1952,<br />
at 22. n 9 Bankers Prodded on Urban Tasks: St. James A.M.E. Pastor Asks Redevelopment Aid, THE<br />
PLAIN DEALER, June 13, 1953, at 8. n 10 Report Says <strong>Housing</strong> Code Important in Fight on Slums,<br />
THE PLAIN DEALER, July 19, 1953, at 3E. n 11 Eugene Segal, Full Time <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Called<br />
Need by Corrigan, THE PLAIN DEALER, Apr. 25, 1954, at 22B. n 12 Editorial, Too Much Wrist<br />
Slapping, THE PLAIN DEALER, Oct. 6, 1959, at 12. n 13 Urban League Backs Better <strong>Housing</strong> Push,<br />
THE PLAIN DEALER, Apr. 14, 1961, at 25. n 14 Donald Sabath, Praise of Two Landlords Brings on<br />
Heated Debate, THE PLAIN DEALER, Jan. 21, 1964, at 17. n 15 Pilot Rehabilitation Urged in Ward<br />
21, THE PLAIN DEALER, Feb. 1, 1965, at 16.<br />
Social and Political Change Bolsters the Call<br />
for a <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />
n 16 Clinic Sought to Aid Fight on Blight, THE PLAIN DEALER, Apr. 4, 1965, at 28A.<br />
n 17 Stokes Pledges War on Landlords, THE PLAIN DEALER, Sept. 9, 1965, at 67. n 18<br />
See OHIO REV. CODE §§ 5321.01-5321.19. n 19 Donald Sabath, City Is Losing Battle<br />
to Stem Urban Blight, THE PLAIN DEALER , Mar. 23, 1972, at 2B. n 20 William C.<br />
Barnard, <strong>Housing</strong> Fines Here Average Only $15, THE PLAIN DEALER, Dec. 23, 1966, at 1.<br />
n 21 Roldo Bartimole, City in <strong>Housing</strong> Crisis, PATH Study Concludes, THE PLAIN DEALER, Mar.<br />
14, 1967, at 1. n 22 Robert E. Miller, Bill Would Set Up <strong>Court</strong>s to Fight Slumlords, THE PLAIN<br />
DEALER, Feb. 15, 1979, at 26A. n 23 <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Is Proposed, WEST SIDE SUN (<strong>Cleveland</strong>),<br />
Feb. 8, 1979. n 24 See, e.g., Katherine L. Hatton, The Time for <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Is Now,<br />
THE PLAIN DEALER, Mar. 4, 1979, at 29; F. Ross Ellis, Letter to the Editor, <strong>Housing</strong> Judge Idea<br />
Backed, THE PLAIN DEALER, Mar. 23, 1979, at 22A; Councilmen Testify in Favor of <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong> Bill, THE PLAIN DEALER, Mar. 31, 1979, at 10E. n 25 See S.B. 35, 113th Gen. Assemb.<br />
(Ohio 1979), codified at OHIO REV. CODE § 1901.011. n 26 Special City <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Born as<br />
Rhodes Skips Veto, THE PLAIN DEALER, Jan. 1, 1980. n 27 Robert Jaquay, <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s <strong>Housing</strong><br />
<strong>Court</strong>: A Grassroots Victory 25 Years Ago Paved the Way for a Reliable, Much Needed Institution,<br />
SHELTERFORCE ONLINE (NAT’L HOUSING INST.), no. 141, 2005, available at http://nhi.org/<br />
online/issues/sf141.html.<br />
After a Slow Start, <strong>Housing</strong> Advocates Win the Day<br />
n 28 Id. n 29 Bob Schlesinger, Judge Malaga Nudges Delinquent Owners to Repair Their Run-<br />
Down Properties, THE CLEVELAND PRESS, Apr. 13, 1981. n 30 See W. Dennis Keating, Judicial<br />
Approaches to Urban <strong>Housing</strong> Problems: A Study of the <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, 19 THE URBAN<br />
LAWYER 345 (1987)<br />
Proactive <strong>Court</strong><br />
n 31 Angela D. Chatman, Judge Wants to Get <strong>Housing</strong> in Order, THE PLAIN DEALER, Feb. 15, 1992,<br />
at 31. n 32 Dave Davis, Contempt for Dumping: <strong>Cleveland</strong> Judges Drop Gavel on Illegal Junk, THE<br />
PLAIN DEALER, Mar. 4, 1992, at 1B. n 33 David Plata, Stadler Citation, Penalties Being Sought,<br />
THE PLAIN DEALER, May 12, 1994, at A1.<br />
New Challenges Test the <strong>Court</strong>...the 2000’s<br />
n 34 Mallach, Levy, Schilling, CLEVELAND AT THE CROSSROADS, 5 (2005).<br />
n 35 Mallach, Levy, Schilling, CLEVELAND AT THE CROSSROADS (2005). n 36<br />
Hon. Raymond L. Pianka, Abandoned Properties: Facing the Challenge, available at http://www.<br />
clevelandhousingcourt.org/hc_rd_b.html. n 37 Bob Paynter, From Ramshackle to Riches: A Boom in<br />
Houses of Cards, THE PLAIN DEALER, Aug. 28 2000, 1A. n 38 See Alex Kotlowitz, All Boarded<br />
Up, THE NEW YORK TIMES, Mar. 4, 2009, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/<br />
magazine/08Foreclosure-t. html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. n 39 Bob Paynter, From Ramshackle to<br />
Riches: A Boom in Houses of Cards, THE PLAIN DEALER, Aug. 28 2000, 1A. n 40 Id. n 41 Id. n 42<br />
Bob Paynter, Entrepreneur to Serve Time in Condemned Rental House, THE PLAIN DEALER, Aug.<br />
31, 2000, 1A. n 43 Local Real Estate Flipper Sentenced to Federal Prison, THE NEIGHBORHOOD<br />
NEWS (<strong>Cleveland</strong>), Jan. 25, 2006. n 44 C.C.O. § 659.02. n 45 Am. Fin. Serv. Ass’n v. <strong>Cleveland</strong>,<br />
112 Ohio St.3d 170, 2006-Ohio-6043, 858 N.E.2d 776. n 46 C.C.O. § 367.12. n 47 C.C.O. §§<br />
601.99(a), (c). n 48 Thomas Ott, <strong>Housing</strong> Judge Hammers the Banks, THE PLAIN DEALER,<br />
Mar. 15, 2006, at B3. n 49 Joe Milicia, Cities Fight Glut of Vacant Houses, THE ASSOCIATED<br />
PRESS, Feb. 2, 2008, http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2008Feb05/0,4675,<br />
ForeclosureCrisisAbandonedHomes,00.html. n 50 Sandra Livingston, Program Uses Decorative Boards<br />
to Try to Blend Vacant Homes into <strong>Cleveland</strong> Neighborhoods, THE PLAIN DEALER, Aug. 25, 2010.<br />
n 51 Id.<br />
Revitalization and Resilience<br />
n 52 Shawn Rech, Holding <strong>Court</strong> in a Crisis: <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Judge Raymond<br />
Pianka, SUITES MAGAZINE, Fall 2009, at 16-17. n 53 See Alex Kotlowitz, All Boarded Up, THE<br />
NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, Mar. 8, 2009, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/<br />
magazine/08Foreclosure-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (“The city estimates that 10,000 houses,<br />
or 1 in 13, are vacant. The county treasurer says it’s more likely 15,000.”); see also PBS News Hour,<br />
Raze the Roof <strong>Cleveland</strong> Levels Vacant Homes to Revive Neighborhoods, (original broadcast July 5,<br />
2011), available at http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/july-dec11/makingsense_07-05.html<br />
(“<strong>Cleveland</strong> alone host some 13,000 vacant homes, and the numbers keep piling up.”); 60 Minutes,<br />
There Goes the Neighborhood (original broadcast Dec. 18, 2011), available at http://www.cbsnews.<br />
com/8301-18560_162-57344513/there-goes-the-neighborhood/ (Cuyahoga County ripped down 1,000<br />
[vacant homes in 2011]. And they have 20,000 more to go.”). n 54 2009-2012 OHIO SUPREME<br />
COURT REPORTS FOR CLEVELAND MUNICIPAL COURT, HOUSING DIVISION (on file<br />
at <strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, and available upon request). n 55 2012 OHIO SUPREME COURT<br />
REPORTS FOR CLEVELAND MUNICIPAL COURT, HOUSING DIVISION (on file at <strong>Cleveland</strong><br />
<strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong>, and available upon request). n 56 Mark Frater, Colleen Gilson, Ronald J.H. O’Leary,<br />
CITY OF CLEVELAND CODE ENFORCEMENT PARTNERSHIP (2009), available at http://<br />
www.communityprogress.net/filebin/pdf/ CLE_CE_Partnership.pdf. n 57 Sylvia Gets a Makeover,<br />
CUYAHOGA LAND BANK (Apr. 16, 2012), http://blog.cuyahogalandbank.org/2012/04/sylviagets-a-makeover/.<br />
n 58 Ted Kortan, Ribbon-Cutting Caps Building Renovation in <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s Detroit<br />
Shoreway Neighborhood, NEWSNET5.COM (May 15, 2012), http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/<br />
news/local_news/cleveland_metro/Ribbon-cutting-caps-building-renovation-in-<strong>Cleveland</strong>s-Detroit-<br />
Shoreway- neighborhood. n 59 Ted Kortan, <strong>Cleveland</strong> Woman Returns to Her Home Since 1945<br />
After Renovation, NEWSNET5.COM (May 28, 2012), http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_<br />
news/cleveland_metro/<strong>Cleveland</strong>-woman-returns-to-her-home-since-1945-after-renovation n 60 Id.<br />
n 61 LARCHMERE PORCH FEST, http://larchmereporchfest.org/ (last visited May 15, 2013).<br />
n 62 CornUCopia Place, BURTON, BELL, CARR DEVELOPMENT, INC, http://www.<br />
bbcdevelopment.org/cornucopia-bbcd/ (last visited May 15, 2013); Welcome to Bridgeport Café,<br />
BRIDGEPORT CAFÉ CLEVELAND, http://www.bridgeportcafe.com/ (last visited May 15, 2013).<br />
n 63 VINEYARDS OF CHATEAU HOUGH, http://chateauhough.org/ (last visited May 15, 2013).<br />
n 64 Joe Pagonakis, Could Goats Replace Lawn Mowers in Maintaining <strong>Cleveland</strong> Inner City<br />
Vacant Lots?, NEWSNET5.COM (June 12, 2012), http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/money/consumer/<br />
troubleshooter/could-goats-replace-lawn-mowers-in-maintaining-cleveland-inner-city-vacant-lots.<br />
n 65 About, THE CLEVELAND FLEA, http://theclevelandflea.com/about/ (last visited May 15, 2013).<br />
n 66 See Clint O’Connor, Capitol Theater’s Unexpected Success Spurs Revival of <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s Gordon<br />
Square Arts District, THE PLAIN DEALER, Oct. 16, 2012, available at http://www.cleveland.com/<br />
moviebuff/index.ssf/2012/10/capitol_theatres_unexpected_su.html; see also Neighborhood Residencies<br />
“At Home”, THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA, http://www.clevelandorchestra.com/at-home.aspx<br />
(last visited May 9, 2013). n 67 Donna J. Miller, City Pledges to Help with Mt. Pleasant Cleanup, THE<br />
PLAIN DEALER, Oct. 5, 2010, at B2 n 68 Pat Galbincea, <strong>Cleveland</strong> Residents Confront Landlord, THE<br />
PLAIN DEALER, Aug. 11, 2011, at B6; Direct Action Against Slumlords Karla Shim and Evon Gocan,<br />
THE ESOP BLOG (Sept. 14, 2011), http://esopblog.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/direct-action-againstslumlords-karla-shim-and-<br />
evon-gocan/. n 69 See <strong>Cleveland</strong> v. Karla Shim, No. 2009 CRB 16953<br />
(Clev. Mun. Ct. 2011) (showing fine paid in full). n 70 See Ben Franklin Community Garden, OLD<br />
BROOKLYN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, http://www.oldbrooklyn.com/<br />
BFCG/ (last visited May 13, 2013).Treadway Creek Greenway Restoration and Trail Fact Sheet, OLD<br />
BROOKLYN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, http://www.oldbrooklyn.com/<br />
Treadway/treadway.html (last visited May 13, 2013). n 71 Events, OLD BROOKLYN COMMUNITY<br />
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, http://www.oldbrooklyn.com/specialevents.html (last visited May<br />
13, 2013). n 72 Id. n 73 The Hooley on Kamm’s Corners Offers Fun All Day, 13 KAMM’S CORNERS<br />
MAGAZINE, no. 2, 2013 at 8, available at http://www.kammscorners.com/Magazine/13Spring.pdf.<br />
n 74 A Place for the Arts in West Park?, 13 KAMM’S CORNERS MAGAZINE, no. 2, 2013 at 15,<br />
available at http://www.kammscorners.com/Magazine/13Spring.pdf. n 75 See Joe Crea, Waterloo<br />
Road Renaissance Underway in <strong>Cleveland</strong>’s Collinwood Neighborhood, THE PLAIN DEALER,<br />
Feb. 20, 2013, available at http://www.cleveland.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2013/02/waterloo_road_<br />
renaissance_unde.ht ml; see also Waterloo Arts Fest, ARTS COLLINWOOD, http://waterlooartsfest.<br />
com/new/ (last visited May 14, 2013). n 76 See Living Active, BROADWAY SLAVIC VILLAGE<br />
DEVELOPMENT, http://slavicvillage.org/livingactive/morganaruntrail (last visited May 14, 2013);<br />
see also Mission, Vision, and History – <strong>Cleveland</strong> Velodrome, FAST TRACK CYCLING, http://<br />
clevelandvelodrome.org/# (last visited May 14, 2013).<br />
The Work Continues<br />
n 77 See, e.g., SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, 2011 COURTS STATISTICAL REPORT 194, available<br />
at http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/publications/annrep/11OCS/2011OCS.pdf; SUPREME COURT<br />
OF OHIO, 2010 COURTS STATISTICAL REPORT 193, available at http://www.supremecourt.ohio.<br />
gov/Publications/annrep/10OCS/2010OCS.pdf. n 78 See, e.g. Heather K. Way, Michelle McCarthy,<br />
John Scott, BUILDING HOPE: TOOLS FOR TRANSFORMING ABANDONED AND BLIGHTED<br />
PROPERTIES INTO COMMUNITY ASSETS, A REPORT ON DALLAS, TEXAS 17 (Univ. of Texas<br />
School of Law, Cmty. Dev. Clinic 2007), available at https://www.utexas.edu/law/clinics/community/<br />
buildersofhope.pdf; see also Frannk C. Bracco, AN INCREMENTAL APPROACH TO IMPROVING<br />
CODE ENFORCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE IN CLAYTON COUNTY, GA (Clayton Archway<br />
Partnership 2010), available at http://archwaypartnership.uga.edu/wp- content/uploads/2010/03/codeenforcement_march2010.pdf.<br />
n 79 Sandra Livingston, Making Absentee Owners Pay: Judge Wants<br />
Them to Cover the Losses that Neighbors Sustain, THE PLAIN DEALER, Aug. 2, 2010, at A1.<br />
32
<strong>Cleveland</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Judges<br />
From Founding To Present<br />
Joseph F. McManamon<br />
April 1980-November 1980<br />
Robert S. Malaga<br />
November 1980-December 1982<br />
Eddie Corrigan<br />
January 1982-December 1984<br />
Clarence L. Gaines<br />
January 1984-December 1989<br />
William F. Corrigan<br />
January 1990-December 1995<br />
Raymond L. Pianka<br />
January 1996-Present
Adobe: Creative, marketing and document management solutions<br />
http://www.adobe.com/[9/28/2016 12:28:31 PM]