01.02.2017 Views

Neil McGill Gorsuch

Gorsuch-SCOTUS-Report

Gorsuch-SCOTUS-Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Judges Terrence O’Brien and <strong>Neil</strong> <strong>Gorsuch</strong> agreed it was regrettable that a police officer felt ‘a need to re-sort to physical<br />

force, handcuffs, and arrest’ to control the 67-pound boy, but said that ‘equally regrettable is the disrespectful, obdurate, and<br />

combative behavior of that nine-year-old child.’” [Salt Lake Tribune, 12/05/14]<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The Nine-Year-Old Had Been Sitting Quietly When The Officer Arrived. According to The Salt Lake Tribune,<br />

“When Albrand arrived, three school employees had gotten him under control and he was sitting calmly in a hallway. The<br />

principal, school psychologist and the boy’s grandmother were sitting on the other side of the hallway. The principal told<br />

Albrand she wanted to file theft charges, and the accounts of what happened next diverge. Albrand said she tried to talk<br />

with the boy but he didn’t reply. She placed her hands on his left hand and elbow to help him stand, she said, but he<br />

started twisting and grabbed her arm. Fearing he was trying to get her gun, Albrand said, she placed him in a twist lock<br />

and then put him in handcuffs. In a twist lock, an officer holds a suspect’s arm at his side with both hands and then twists<br />

the arm in a painful way to stop the person from fighting or resisting, court documents say.” [The Salt Lake Tribune,<br />

12/05/14]<br />

The Officer Claimed She Was Afraid The Nine-Year-Old Was trying To Grab Her Gun. According to The Salt<br />

Lake Tribune, “When Albrand arrived, three school employees had gotten him under control and he was sitting calmly in<br />

a hallway. The principal, school psychologist and the boy’s grandmother were sitting on the other side of the hallway. The<br />

principal told Albrand she wanted to file theft charges, and the accounts of what happened next diverge. Albrand said she<br />

tried to talk with the boy but he didn’t reply. She placed her hands on his left hand and elbow to help him stand, she said,<br />

but he started twisting and grabbed her arm. Fearing he was trying to get her gun, Albrand said, she placed him in a twist<br />

lock and then put him in handcuffs. In a twist lock, an officer holds a suspect’s arm at his side with both hands and then<br />

twists the arm in a painful way to stop the person from fighting or resisting, court documents say.” [The Salt Lake<br />

Tribune, 12/05/14]<br />

The Force Used On The Child May Have Caused A Fracture On His Colalrbone. According to The Salt Lake<br />

Tribune, “According to the 10th Circuit ruling, an X-ray showed a possible hairline fracture in the boy’s collarbone. The<br />

child’s grandparents, who are his legal guardians, say he suffers from post traumatic stress disorder because of the<br />

incident. They filed suit in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City against Albrand and Sandy, claiming that the officer used<br />

excessive force. […] The 10th Circuit ruling, written by O’Brien, said the key legal question was when Albrand used the<br />

twist lock. The judges agreed with Shelby that the officer used the hold after the boy grabbed her arm, and that its use in<br />

those circumstances did not constitute excessive force.” [The Salt Lake Tribune, 12/5/14]<br />

<strong>Gorsuch</strong> Opinion: “The Disrespectful, Obdurate, And Combative Behavior Of That Nine-Year-Old Child” Was<br />

“Equally Regrettable” To The Officer’s Actions. According to the Salt Lake Tribune, “After a 9-year-old boy stole an iPad<br />

from his Sandy elementary school in 2011, his principal wanted him charged with theft. A Sandy police officer called to the<br />

school ended up pushing the boy’s arm into a pain-ful twist lock before handcuffing him. The officer didn’t violate the boy’s<br />

constitutional rights, a three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously agreed in a Friday ruling. But<br />

they split on the philosophical issue of how young offenders should be treated, with Judge Carlos Lucero of Colorado<br />

decrying how intertwining criminal justice and school discipline is creating a ‘school-to-prison’ pipeline. ‘Focusing narrowly on<br />

the legal standards applicable in this case renders it too easy to overlook the obvi-ous question: Why are we arresting nineyear-old<br />

schoolchildren?’ Lucero wrote. Judges Terrence O’Brien and <strong>Neil</strong> <strong>Gorsuch</strong> agreed it was regrettable that a police<br />

officer felt ‘a need to re-sort to physical force, handcuffs, and arrest’ to control the 67-pound boy, but said that ‘equally<br />

regrettable is the disrespectful, obdurate, and combative behavior of that nine-year-old child.’” [Salt Lake Tribune, 12/05/14]<br />

Mentally Ill Inmates<br />

2008: <strong>Gorsuch</strong> Ruled Against The ACLU’s Effort To Certify Mentally Ill Inmates As A Class. According to the<br />

Gazette, “A federal appeals court dealt a setback Friday to the American Civil Liberties Union in its effort to force broad<br />

reforms to how El Paso County treats mentally ill jail inmates. A three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals<br />

in Denver upheld a lower court's ruling that denied the ACLU's motion to have mentally ill inmates treated as a class. […]<br />

Judge <strong>Neil</strong> <strong>Gorsuch</strong>, writing for the three-judge panel, upheld the federal District Court ruling that certifying the inmates as a<br />

class would be impossible because ‘there was no single policy or procedure to which all were subject.’ Creating orders to<br />

reform the jail based on only the plaintiffs’ widely varying complaints would require a ‘stratospheric level of abstraction,’<br />

<strong>Gorsuch</strong> wrote.” [Gazette, 9/03/08]<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!