14.02.2017 Views

Working document in view of the 3 DH-SYSC-I meeting

DH-SYSC-I(2017)010__EN

DH-SYSC-I(2017)010__EN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I (2017)010<br />

Judge to <strong>the</strong> Court on <strong>the</strong> occasion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Second activity report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Advisory Panel<br />

which became public on 24 June 2016 (doc. Advisory Panel(2016)1).<br />

10. After completion <strong>of</strong> its work, <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I <strong>in</strong>structed <strong>the</strong> Secretariat to prepare<br />

a new work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>document</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>view</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2 nd meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group, <strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong><br />

aforementioned guidel<strong>in</strong>es drawn up by <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong> and endorsed by <strong>the</strong> CD<strong>DH</strong>. The<br />

Group agreed that all <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes and sub<strong>the</strong>mes covered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>document</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<br />

<strong>SYSC</strong>-I(2016)003 should be addressed tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>the</strong> elements raised dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g. The Secretariat should ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a degree <strong>of</strong> latitude with regard to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>document</strong> <strong>in</strong> so far as all <strong>the</strong> questions are <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sically l<strong>in</strong>ked.<br />

11. For <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> prepar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>document</strong> that would be presented at <strong>the</strong><br />

next meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Group (19–21 October), <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I set a procedure and a<br />

calendar. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I considered that it could also be useful to obta<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> various op<strong>in</strong>ions and experiences, positive or negative,<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> national processes <strong>of</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> candidates for <strong>the</strong> post <strong>of</strong> judge at<br />

<strong>the</strong> Court and <strong>of</strong> election <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court. It was noted that without at least<br />

try<strong>in</strong>g to ascerta<strong>in</strong> to which extent <strong>the</strong> factors pre-identified <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CD<strong>DH</strong> report on <strong>the</strong><br />

longer-term future <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Convention, that seem to discourage potential<br />

candidates for <strong>the</strong> post <strong>of</strong> judge at <strong>the</strong> Court, correspond to reality, <strong>the</strong> Group would<br />

simply stick to hypo<strong>the</strong>ses. While not<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> difficulty <strong>of</strong> this exercise, <strong>the</strong> Draft<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Group <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong> request for <strong>in</strong>formation should be made by national experts <strong>in</strong><br />

accordance with <strong>the</strong> appropriate methods chosen by each expert. The modalities<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> request for <strong>in</strong>formation and its submission were laid down <strong>in</strong> Appendix III<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first meet<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

12. Before <strong>the</strong> 2 nd meet<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>formation was received from some member States on<br />

<strong>the</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Guidel<strong>in</strong>es on <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> candidates at national level,<br />

<strong>the</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> service as a judge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court and possible relevant national practices<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judges <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest national courts, as well as from <strong>the</strong><br />

Representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Registry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court on certa<strong>in</strong> questions raised dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first <strong>DH</strong>-<br />

<strong>SYSC</strong>-I meet<strong>in</strong>g (see <strong>document</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I(2016)005).<br />

13. Regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> call for op<strong>in</strong>ions and experiences concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> national processes<br />

<strong>of</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> candidates for <strong>the</strong> post <strong>of</strong> judge at <strong>the</strong> Court and <strong>of</strong> election <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

judges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court, elements were received directly from <strong>in</strong>dividuals or transmitted to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Secretariat by national experts. The follow<strong>in</strong>g contributions appear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>document</strong><br />

<strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I(2016)006 Restricted:<br />

- 4 contributions from <strong>in</strong>dividuals whose pr<strong>of</strong>ile corresponds to <strong>the</strong> post <strong>of</strong> judge at<br />

<strong>the</strong> European Court <strong>of</strong> Human Rights but do not wish to be candidates, more<br />

particularly with regard to <strong>the</strong> factors that might discourage <strong>the</strong>m;<br />

- 4 contributions from <strong>in</strong>dividuals who were candidates for <strong>the</strong> post <strong>of</strong> judge at <strong>the</strong><br />

Court but were not reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> national selection procedure;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!