Working document in view of the 3 DH-SYSC-I meeting
DH-SYSC-I(2017)010__EN
DH-SYSC-I(2017)010__EN
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7<br />
<strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I (2017)010<br />
- 3 contributions from <strong>in</strong>dividuals who were candidates for <strong>the</strong> post <strong>of</strong> judge at <strong>the</strong><br />
Court but were not elected follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> procedure conducted before <strong>the</strong><br />
Parliamentary Assembly <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council <strong>of</strong> Europe;<br />
- 3 contributions from former judges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court;<br />
- 4 contributions from judges <strong>of</strong> highest national courts without <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
category under which <strong>the</strong>y fall.<br />
14. As agreed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I, <strong>the</strong> Secretariat ensured <strong>the</strong> anonymity <strong>of</strong> this<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation as well as <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> any elements enabl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State<br />
or <strong>the</strong> persons concerned.<br />
15. At its second meet<strong>in</strong>g (19–21 October 2016), <strong>the</strong> Group held an exchange <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>view</strong>s with Mr Wojciech SAWICKI, Secretary General to <strong>the</strong> Parliamentary Assembly,<br />
accompanied by Mr Günter SCHIRMER, Head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Legal Affairs and Human Rights<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Secretariat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parliamentary Assembly. As <strong>in</strong>structed by <strong>the</strong><br />
Group, <strong>the</strong> Secretariat drafted a summary <strong>of</strong> this exchange <strong>of</strong> <strong>view</strong>s (doc. <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I<br />
(2016)008)), which was transmitted to <strong>the</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> Experts on <strong>the</strong> System <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
European Convention on Human Rights (<strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>) before its 2 nd meet<strong>in</strong>g (8–10<br />
November 2016).<br />
16. The Representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Registry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Court <strong>in</strong>formed <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I that <strong>the</strong><br />
Court’s Status Committee will meet <strong>in</strong> <strong>view</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> draft<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> its contribution to this<br />
work, on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> reference <strong>document</strong>s exam<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> Draft<strong>in</strong>g Group. This<br />
contribution will be submitted to <strong>the</strong> Court sitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> plenary session with a <strong>view</strong> to its<br />
transmission <strong>in</strong> due course to <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I before its 3 rd meet<strong>in</strong>g (27 February–1 st<br />
March 2017).<br />
17. At its second meet<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> Draft<strong>in</strong>g Group proceeded to <strong>the</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong><br />
questions addressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>document</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I(2016)007. It decided to br<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to <strong>the</strong> attention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong> <strong>the</strong> decisions appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Appendix III <strong>of</strong> its meet<strong>in</strong>g<br />
report (doc. <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I (2016)R2) so as to ga<strong>the</strong>r its approval or possible guidance.<br />
Towards <strong>the</strong> third meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I: <strong>in</strong>termediate guidance by <strong>the</strong> Plenary<br />
Committees<br />
18. Dur<strong>in</strong>g its 2 nd meet<strong>in</strong>g (8–10 November 2016), <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong><br />
elements identified by <strong>the</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I Group dur<strong>in</strong>g its 2 nd meet<strong>in</strong>g, pronounced itself<br />
on <strong>the</strong> four <strong>the</strong>mes identified (<strong>the</strong> selection procedure, <strong>the</strong> election process, conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
employment and work<strong>in</strong>g conditions at <strong>the</strong> Court and ad hoc judges) and gave guidance<br />
for <strong>the</strong> future work (see paragraphs 6 to 14 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g report (<strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>(2016)R2)).<br />
19. The <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong> <strong>in</strong>structed <strong>the</strong> Secretariat to prepare a revised version <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>document</strong> based on comments formulated dur<strong>in</strong>g its discussions and those from<br />
<strong>the</strong> 2 nd meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>DH</strong>-<strong>SYSC</strong>-I, as well as on all new contributions <strong>of</strong> experts, who were<br />
<strong>in</strong>vited to send <strong>the</strong>m by Wednesday 14 December 2016, and <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> actors concerned.