2 France 31 On this topic, see Y Bertoncini, ‘Le “Brexit” entre europhobie britannique et euroscepticismes continentaux’ [‘Brexit’ between British europhobia and continental euroscepticisms], Policy Paper 171, Institut Jacques Delors, Sep 2016. 32 D Debomy, L’UE malgré tout? Les opinions publiques européennes face aux crises (2005–2015) [The EU in spite of everything? European public opinion in times of crises (2005–2015)], Institut Jacques Delors, Études et Rapports 111, Jun 2016. 33 European Commission, ‘Public opinion in the European Union: first results’, wave EB85.2, Standard Eurobarometer 85, spring 2016, ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/ publicopinion/index.cfm/…/75902 (accessed 20 Jan 2017). 34 Y Bertoncini, ‘Europe: l’hymne à la peur’ [‘Europe: ode to fear’], Institut Jacques Delors, May 2014. 35 European Commission, ‘Public opinion in the European Union’.
171 References Bertoncini Y, ‘Europe: l’hymne à la peur’ [‘Europe: ode to fear’], Institut Jacques Delors, May 2014. Bertoncini Y, ‘Le “Brexit” entre europhobie britannique et euroscepticismes continentaux’ [‘Brexit’ between British europhobia and continental euroscepticisms], Policy Paper 171, Institut Jacques Delors, Sep 2016. Boudet A, ‘Sondage exclusif – les Français ne croient plus à l’état d’urgence après les attentats de Nice et Saint- Etinne du Rouvray [YouGov]’, Huffington Post, 5 Oct 2016, www.huffingtonpost.fr/2016/08/04/etat-urgence-securite-desfrancais-preoccupation-numero-chomage-sondage-exclusifyougov_n_11315414.html (accessed 19 Jan 2017). Chanvril F, ‘Baromètre de la confiance politique CEVIPOF – vagues 1 à 7: les cercles de la confiance (2009–2016)’, Centre de recherches politiques de Sciences Po, 17 Jan 2017, www.cevipof.com/fr/le-barometre-de-la-confiance-politiquedu-cevipof/tendances/confiances/ (accessed 20 Jan 2017). Counterpoint, ‘Shaping the vote? Populism and politics in the media: a view from Finland, France and the Netherlands’, discussion panel part of the project ‘Nurturing Populism? The impact of the media on the growth of populist right-wing parties in Netherlands, France and Finland’, 2014, http:// counterpoint.uk.com/shaping-the-vote-politics-and-populismin-the-media/ (accessed 18 Jan 2017). de Montigny A, ‘Selon Amnesty International, l’état d’urgence conduit à des abus contre des réfugiés’, Le Monde, 12 May 2016, www.lemonde.fr/societe/ article/2016/05/12/selon-amnesty-international-l-etat-d-
“ Mapping and responding to the r
First published in 2017 © Demos. S
Open access. Some rights reserved.
11 Foreword Nothing to Fear but Fea
13 FORES in Sweden, the Institute o
15 rising tide that cuts across tra
17 diversity), and political leader
19 trends in Austria, where the Fre
21 refugees of ‘bringing in all k
23 themselves embodying the fear of
25 ‘wrong-headed doctrine’, and
27 While the Central European case
29 Europe, but the politics of fear
31 of European identity - attachmen
33 Euroscepticism In every country,
35 Figure 2 Views of respondents in
37 Political trust We also asked ou
39 significantly less support in th
41 - internationally and intranatio
43 els/soc/OECD2014-Social-Expendit
45 25 R Wodak and S Boukala, ‘Eur
47 References ‘Denmark suspends q
49 European Commission, Standard Eu
1 Great Britain - ‘It’s who you
53 1 What we already know about Bre
55 compared with 59 per cent of tho
57 This leads the authors to conclu
59 think it is vital to let Europea
61 between areas hit hardest by aus
63 wealthy towns in the south of En
65 Similarly strong predictive powe
67 Anti-immigrant sentiment In addi
69 External and campaign factors Th
71 One caveat of this research is t
73 vote (and indeed on populism in
75 As part of this project, we comm
77 Table 1 Predicted probability of
79 neighbourhood levels of deprivat
81 Social networks Most important f
83 Table 3 Predicted probability of
85 Over recent decades the world ha
87 significance of demographic vari
89 ·· relative employment depriva
91 Variable Scale Explanatory or re
93 regardless of the possible impor
95 Table 6 Brexit model with socdif
97 Table 8 Brexit model with attitu
99 Table 10 Brexit model with attit
101 Table 12 Brexit model with atti
103 Table 14 Brexit model with atti
105 Table 16 Brexit model with pref
107 Notes 1 D Runciman, ‘A win fo
109 org/2016/07/brexit-vote-boosts-
111 29 Jun 2016, http://bruegel.org
113 53 R Stubager, ‘Education eff
115 71 Ashcroft, ‘How the United
117 84 Goodwin and Heath, ‘Brexit
3 Germany ·· Q5. Which of the fol
3 Germany a Angela Merkel b The Ger
3 Germany 6 T Lochocki, The Unstopp
3 Germany European Parliament, Stan
Contents Introduction 1 Migration,
4 Spain 1 Migration, economic crisi
4 Spain During the rapid economic e
4 Spain Figure 4 GDP (adjusted for
4 Spain Figure 8 Household expendit
4 Spain In short, high levels of mi
4 Spain of them also illiberal, wer
4 Spain Figure 9 The proportion of
4 Spain This Europeanism presents i
4 Spain Table 3 The views of respon
4 Spain The acceptance of globalisa
4 Spain Figure 13 The views of resp
4 Spain Increased acceptance of dif
4 Spain Table 7 The percentage of r
4 Spain Figure 15 Views of responde
4 Spain Table 9 The extent to which
4 Spain Table 10 Respondents’ vie
4 Spain are most inclined to vote f
4 Spain 3 Electoral and party polit
4 Spain The extreme right was disco
4 Spain towns, although none of the
4 Spain emphasising unity and the l
4 Spain cradles of successful natio
4 Spain of the population supportin
4 Spain Appendix 2: Results of the
4 Spain Total (%) Partido Popular (
4 Spain Total (%) Partido Popular (
4 Spain Total (%) Partido Popular (
4 Spain Total (%) Partido Popular (
4 Spain Total (%) Partido Popular (
4 Spain Total (%) Partido Popular (
4 Spain Notes 1 Jose Pablo Martíne
4 Spain Material deprivation covers
4 Spain 23 European Commission, Sta
4 Spain See Centro de Investigacion
4 Spain European Commission, ‘Pub
4 Spain INE, ‘Padrón municipal
4 Spain paper presented at the 12th
Contents Summary Introduction 1 Soc
5 Poland Introduction - what happen
5 Poland the Hungarian political sc
5 Poland the Law and Justice party,
5 Poland giving the winner an absol
5 Poland and to tire out the domest
5 Poland 1 Social cohesion and econ
5 Poland and an inflow of European
5 Poland The second factor is the p
5 Poland seems economic indicators
5 Poland occupational qualification
5 Poland Table 2 Respondents’ ans
5 Poland Table 3 Respondents’ vie
5 Poland Despite the generally posi
5 Poland not the Law and Justice pa
5 Poland or immigrants from Arab co
5 Poland Post-election developments
5 Poland 3 Social conservatism and
5 Poland women’s empowerment, LGB
5 Poland women’s access to legal
5 Poland commentators did not expec
5 Poland Conclusions - resilience a
5 Poland The rise of authoritarian
5 Poland Notes 1 YouGov surveyed ad
5 Poland Since then, the near absen
5 Poland 24 World Bank, ‘GINI ind
5 Poland European Union’, Standar
5 Poland migrants-asylum-poland-kac
5 Poland 67 In 1993 60 per cent sup
5 Poland 82 Fomina and Kucharczyk,
5 Poland Boguszewski R, ‘Nastroje
5 Poland Faiola A, ‘In Poland, a
5 Poland Kucharczyk J and Zbieranek
5 Poland Public Opinion Research, 2
6 Sweden - Sweden: the immigration
375 Introduction In Swedish migrati
377 migrants came mainly as family
379 Citizens from outside the EU ar
381 2018 elections. The Sweden Demo
383 Figure 3 The proportion of Swed
385 science: national identity is t
387 During the refugee crisis of 20
389 and immigrants even when suppos
391 2 Analysis and results The main
393 she suggested that the ‘migra
395 emphasised, this crisis came ac
397 directed towards Swedishness in
399 which leads voters to connect S
401 exclusively of people with a ci
403 Table 3 confirms the findings i
405 Summary and discussion During 2
407 rhetoric of the Christian Democ
409 6 Migrationsverket, ‘Asylsök
411 22 H Oscarsson and A Bergström
413 37 P Mouritsen and TV Olsen,
415 References ‘Historiskt högt
417 Jenkins R, Social Identity, Lon
419 Regeringskansliet, ‘Regeringe
7 Responding to the politics of fea
423 Introduction This project has i
425 In responding to the current fe
427 in facilitated discussion to es
429 2 Reconnect ‘political elites
431 background is also central to r
433 Boost the accountability of EU
435 3 Make the case for openness an
437 communities and country’s pla
439 1.8 million signatures, predomi
441 4 Counter post-truth narratives
443 organisation’ 30 - including
445 - whether through public policy
447 8 C Malmström, ‘Shaping glob
449 24 J Haidt, ‘The ethics of gl
451 References Arthur J and Kristj
453 European Ombudsman, ‘Ombudsma
Demos - License to Publish The work
This project is supported by The ca
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Magazine: Demos-Nothing-To-Fear-But-Fear-Itself