11.12.2012 Views

lcc liberal arts studies / 2010 volume iii - LCC International University

lcc liberal arts studies / 2010 volume iii - LCC International University

lcc liberal arts studies / 2010 volume iii - LCC International University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28<br />

MICHELE HERSHBERGER / A NEED FOR ORDER AND DIVERSITY: HOMOGENEITY AND PARTICULARITY<br />

The book of Jonah provides an interesting take on the tension of<br />

homogeneity and particularity. Seen by some scholars as an allegorical sermon<br />

directed at the returnees from Babylon, (Limburg, 1988, pp. 138-151) Jonah could<br />

represent the majority of Jews who didn't want God to bless every family on earth<br />

through them. God sent Jonah to Nineveh to bring a message of judgment for their<br />

wickedness. As the capital of Assyria, Nineveh symbolized the worst enemy. Jonah<br />

instead fled to Tarshish via the sea, in an attempt to escape his calling. The pagan<br />

sailors showed more compassion than Jonah did for Nineveh, hesitating to sacrifice<br />

Jonah's life, even though their own lives were in peril. But eventually they did throw<br />

Jonah out of the boat, only to be swallowed by a big fish, a possible metaphor for the<br />

Babylonian exile. The fish spat him out at Nineveh with a second chance to do the<br />

mission he was called to do. Surprisingly, Nineveh repented, God granted them<br />

v<br />

mercy—and Jonah was upset. Unlike God, he didn't show chesed and for that God<br />

punished him. Jonah, like the returnees from Babylon, had a second chance to<br />

understand his chosen status in a different way and be a “priest” connecting others<br />

to God, but unfortunately, he failed. As the story ends, Jonah is more upset about a<br />

bush than about the potential death of a city and God has a revealing rhetorical<br />

question, “And should I not be concerned about Nineveh, that great city, in which<br />

there are more than a hundred and twenty thousand persons who do not know their<br />

right hand from their left and also many animals?” (Jonah 4:11, NRSV)<br />

But what if Ezra and Jonah were right? What if they had been chosen<br />

because they were God's favorites? What if the monarchy was God's ultimate will<br />

and altogether needed? The Old Testament narrative contains evidence for both<br />

sides of the argument. One way to resolve the dilemma is to look at the life of Jesus<br />

for the best understanding of God's original intention. Did Jesus strive to renew a<br />

culturally homogenous people? Was he ethnocentric?<br />

The gospels contain stories of Jesus reaching beyond the Jewish ethnic<br />

people group. In John 4, he spoke with a Samaritan woman and she became the<br />

first evangelist as she ran to tell the good news to her village. And while Samaritans<br />

were a different group than the larger category of Gentiles and Jesus reaching out<br />

to the Samaritan woman perhaps represented a restoration of united Israel rather<br />

than an outreach to Gentiles in general, her conversion is significant, as<br />

Samaritans were hated by the Jews (Sloyan, 1988, pp. 52-55). The inclusion of the<br />

Samaritans was the beginning of the breaking apart of ethnocentrism that was<br />

common to many Jews of Jesus' day. In Luke 7, Jesus healed the slave of a Roman<br />

centurion. The centurion asked Jesus not to come into his house because he<br />

believed himself unworthy to have Jesus enter. He also stated his belief that Jesus<br />

could heal the slave by merely speaking the word from where he stood. Jesus<br />

<strong>LCC</strong> / LIBERAL ARTS STUDIES / <strong>2010</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!