Canada's National Firearms Association - NFA, National Firearms ...
Canada's National Firearms Association - NFA, National Firearms ...
Canada's National Firearms Association - NFA, National Firearms ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Legal<br />
Corner<br />
By Grayson Penney<br />
by Sean & Grayson Penney<br />
Legal Update<br />
& R. v. Manzer<br />
Canada’s <strong>National</strong> <strong>Firearms</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />
continues to pursue a very aggressive<br />
legal agenda aimed at protecting and<br />
preserving our rights as responsible<br />
firearms owners. In addition to one-onone<br />
legal advice, briefing papers and<br />
related aid we provide, at no charge,<br />
to members of Canada’s recreational<br />
firearms community (you don’t have to<br />
be a member!), we are actively engaged<br />
in three important legal challenges at the<br />
present moment.<br />
Mini-update:<br />
R. v. Cancade<br />
Issue of concern: Are individual parts of magazines<br />
considered to be prohibited weapons, as some<br />
government agencies have contended?<br />
Status: Heard by BC Court of Appeal, awaiting<br />
decision.<br />
Norinco Type 97A Reference Hearing –<br />
Issues of concern: May the RCMP arbitrarily<br />
reclassify and prohibit firearms on their own<br />
authority? Should the Type-97A be prohibited<br />
on the basis of the RCMP’s contention that it is<br />
“easily converted to fully automatic?” Who or<br />
what has the authority to establish when such<br />
a conversion meets an acceptable definition or<br />
standard of “easy conversion” given the highly<br />
subjective nature of the debate.<br />
Status: In process - hearing scheduled February<br />
2011. (Donations can be made on-line at www.nfa.<br />
ca or phone, toll free: 1-877-818-0393)<br />
R. v. Manzer<br />
Issue of concern: Manzer charged under CCC,<br />
s. 88 (1) Possession of Weapon for Dangerous<br />
Purpose.<br />
Was Manzer properly exercising his right to selfdefence<br />
and defence of property as laid out in<br />
the CCC? Is it reasonable for a citizen to confront<br />
potential criminals while armed?<br />
Status: Hearing scheduled in Burton, New<br />
Brunswick on June 28th & 29th. Please see below<br />
for more details.<br />
46 January - February www.nfa.ca<br />
Self Defence & the Case of<br />
Lawrence Manzer<br />
Meet Lawrence, “Laurie” Manzer. Laurie is a retired<br />
member of the Canadian Forces, a loving husband and<br />
doting father of four -- three boys and one girl. If his<br />
local police have their way, he’ll also be a convicted<br />
criminal very soon. Laurie is in legal hot water for<br />
doing what any reasonable person would do when<br />
confronted in the middle of the night by roving thugs,<br />
and a call for immediate help from a neighbour and<br />
friend. Laurie jumped out of bed and went to help.<br />
For his own protection, Laurie took an unloaded<br />
shotgun with him and some shells in case they were<br />
needed; fortunately, they weren’t. As a retired member<br />
of the Canadian Forces and a recreational shooter<br />
and hunter, Laurie understands how to use firearms<br />
responsibly. He was specifically trained to safely use<br />
firearms, even under the most adverse of conditions,<br />
and in high-stress environments. Confronting three<br />
unknown prowlers in the dark would certainly qualify<br />
in that respect.<br />
As it turned out, Laurie never even had to load<br />
his shotgun. Brian Fox, Fox’s son and Laurie were<br />
successful in apprehending the three miscreants in<br />
short order. The latter turned out to be a trio of area<br />
youths who were feeling the liquor they had been<br />
consuming that evening, and who were looking to see<br />
what trouble they could get into.<br />
No shots were fired in the apprehension of the vandals,<br />
and no injuries resulted from the actions of either<br />
Manzer or Fox. Local police arrived shortly thereafter<br />
to take the erstwhile prowlers into custody. But the<br />
vandals weren’t the ones in real trouble – instead,<br />
Laurie Manzer found himself facing charges relating<br />
to his carrying a firearm with him when he went to the<br />
aid of his neighbour.<br />
Without reservation, Canada’s <strong>National</strong> <strong>Firearms</strong><br />
<strong>Association</strong> firmly supports every Canadian’s legal<br />
right to self-defence.<br />
Laurie’s actions, that dark night last year, were wholly<br />
justified in our estimation. Laurie was correct in the<br />
assumptions he made, he took reasonable safety<br />
precautions that were in the best interests of the public<br />
good, and from our perspective, offered a wholly<br />
proportional level of force in relation to the perceived<br />
threat posed by the miscreants involved.<br />
Rather than being treated as a criminal, and being<br />
forced to defend himself against such outrageous<br />
charges, having his reputation damaged, and now<br />
facing potential financial ruin in order to pay for his<br />
legal defence -- Laurie Manzer should have been<br />
lauded by the police for his courageous actions in<br />
standing by his neighbours, and for assuming an active<br />
role in ending the wave of property crimes, thefts and<br />
vandalism that had been wracking his community.<br />
Lawrence Manzer while still on active duty with the<br />
Canadian Forces.<br />
Local police and the Crown attorney need only to have<br />
looked to Peel’s Principles of Policing for guidance in<br />
the Manzer case. As Peel wrote:<br />
“Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship<br />
with the public that gives reality to the historic<br />
tradition that the police are the public and the public<br />
are the police; the police being only members of the<br />
public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties<br />
which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests<br />
of community welfare and existence.”<br />
Laurie merely did what each of us not only has a<br />
right to do, but that which we have an obligation to<br />
do as responsible citizens. He accepted the awesome<br />
responsibility of protecting himself, his family and his<br />
property; while offering the same aid to his friend and<br />
neighbour Brian Fox.<br />
Despite past requests for police help, Manzer and<br />
Fox were left with few options in the face of the<br />
local police being unable or unwilling to take more<br />
proactive measures to end the mini-crime wave being<br />
perpetrated against the pair that night, and in the<br />
months preceding the incident in question. Left with<br />
no other option, Laurie accepted the risks inherent in<br />
facing the unknown so that he could protect his home<br />
and family.<br />
Unbelievably, Laurie is currently scheduled to appear<br />
at the Burton Courthouse this June 28th & 29th<br />
to answer the charges. His lawyer is already hard<br />
at work prepping for the trial, but his legal bills are<br />
accumulating quickly. Laurie is one of the good guys<br />
and he can certainly use our support. If you can<br />
afford to help this good citizen defend himself, and<br />
prevent a gross miscarriage of justice, please send<br />
your donations in trust to Laurie’s legal counsel made<br />
payable to:<br />
“Lawrence Manzer - In Trust of Blair McKay”<br />
c/o Mr. Blair McKay, Attorney-at-Law,<br />
291 Restigouche Road, Oromocto,<br />
New Brunswick, Canada E2V 2H2<br />
www.nfa.ca January - February 47