SIGAR HIGH-RISK LIST
2017_High-Risk_List
2017_High-Risk_List
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>HIGH</strong>-<strong>RISK</strong> <strong>LIST</strong><br />
inconsistent use of daily rosters, lack of verification of numbers, unsupervised paper-based<br />
and manually submitted data systems, weak controls, and Afghan ministry failures to submit<br />
financial records to the U.S. military, among other difficulties. 93<br />
Additionally, a 2013 <strong>SIGAR</strong> audit examined $4.7 billion in planned and ongoing ANDSF<br />
construction projects. The report concluded that DOD was funding a program that is potentially<br />
building permanent facilities in excess of the ANDSF’s eventual needs, and it was<br />
doing so without knowledge of the facilities’ utilization or the Afghan government’s willingness<br />
or ability to sustain them. In order to reduce construction of new U.S.-funded facilities<br />
and save reconstruction funds, <strong>SIGAR</strong> recommended, among other things, that DOD<br />
develop a plan to reduce future excess capacity taking into consideration potential cuts<br />
to the number of ANDSF personnel, and identify the extent to which current U.S.-funded<br />
facilities were underutilized. 94<br />
Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (CSTC-A) stated at that time<br />
that it had several initiatives under way to identify areas of excess capacity and projects<br />
that could be descoped or cancelled. CSTC-A said these initiatives, coupled with routine<br />
reviews, reduced U.S. and coalition funding by over $432 million from January 2013 to<br />
August 2013. General Dunford, then-commander of International Security Assistance Force<br />
(ISAF), requested quarterly reviews to ensure ANDSF facility requirements remain valid<br />
and that construction is on track. 95<br />
Afghan Public-Sector Sustainability<br />
While security is a significant driver of costs, public-sector development in Afghanistan has<br />
also contributed to the country’s growing fiscal gap. Each new development project that<br />
the United States and other international donors fund increases the country’s operation and<br />
maintenance costs, adding pressure to Afghanistan’s operating budget. Indeed, Afghanistan<br />
has one of the lowest rates of domestic-revenue collection in the world, averaging 9% of<br />
GDP from 2006 through 2013, according to the IMF. 96 It slipped to 8.5% of GDP in 2014. 97<br />
On a positive note, the Afghan government is working with the IMF on macroeconomic<br />
policies and a structural-reform agenda, having recently agreed to a three-year, $45 million<br />
Extended Credit Facility (ECF) loan agreement with Afghanistan. The ECF, which follows<br />
the satisfactory conclusion of an informal Staff-Monitored Program, is to focus on institution<br />
building, fiscal and financial reforms, and combating corruption to lay the foundations<br />
for increased private-sector development. 98 Afghanistan’s poor record with its two previous<br />
ECF arrangements, the most recent of which expired in November 2014, caused program<br />
reviews to be suspended. The IMF said both previous ECFs fell short of their goals. 99 The<br />
newly approved ECF could give the National Unity Government additional options for managing<br />
its financial affairs during the current period of economic and fiscal stress.<br />
Energy-Sector Sustainability<br />
Afghanistan has one of the lowest rates of electrification in the world, with only an estimated<br />
25–33% of Afghans connected to the power grid. 100 Since 2002, USAID disbursed<br />
28<br />
SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL I AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION