16.03.2017 Views

SIGAR HIGH-RISK LIST

2017_High-Risk_List

2017_High-Risk_List

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>HIGH</strong>-<strong>RISK</strong> <strong>LIST</strong><br />

inconsistent use of daily rosters, lack of verification of numbers, unsupervised paper-based<br />

and manually submitted data systems, weak controls, and Afghan ministry failures to submit<br />

financial records to the U.S. military, among other difficulties. 93<br />

Additionally, a 2013 <strong>SIGAR</strong> audit examined $4.7 billion in planned and ongoing ANDSF<br />

construction projects. The report concluded that DOD was funding a program that is potentially<br />

building permanent facilities in excess of the ANDSF’s eventual needs, and it was<br />

doing so without knowledge of the facilities’ utilization or the Afghan government’s willingness<br />

or ability to sustain them. In order to reduce construction of new U.S.-funded facilities<br />

and save reconstruction funds, <strong>SIGAR</strong> recommended, among other things, that DOD<br />

develop a plan to reduce future excess capacity taking into consideration potential cuts<br />

to the number of ANDSF personnel, and identify the extent to which current U.S.-funded<br />

facilities were underutilized. 94<br />

Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (CSTC-A) stated at that time<br />

that it had several initiatives under way to identify areas of excess capacity and projects<br />

that could be descoped or cancelled. CSTC-A said these initiatives, coupled with routine<br />

reviews, reduced U.S. and coalition funding by over $432 million from January 2013 to<br />

August 2013. General Dunford, then-commander of International Security Assistance Force<br />

(ISAF), requested quarterly reviews to ensure ANDSF facility requirements remain valid<br />

and that construction is on track. 95<br />

Afghan Public-Sector Sustainability<br />

While security is a significant driver of costs, public-sector development in Afghanistan has<br />

also contributed to the country’s growing fiscal gap. Each new development project that<br />

the United States and other international donors fund increases the country’s operation and<br />

maintenance costs, adding pressure to Afghanistan’s operating budget. Indeed, Afghanistan<br />

has one of the lowest rates of domestic-revenue collection in the world, averaging 9% of<br />

GDP from 2006 through 2013, according to the IMF. 96 It slipped to 8.5% of GDP in 2014. 97<br />

On a positive note, the Afghan government is working with the IMF on macroeconomic<br />

policies and a structural-reform agenda, having recently agreed to a three-year, $45 million<br />

Extended Credit Facility (ECF) loan agreement with Afghanistan. The ECF, which follows<br />

the satisfactory conclusion of an informal Staff-Monitored Program, is to focus on institution<br />

building, fiscal and financial reforms, and combating corruption to lay the foundations<br />

for increased private-sector development. 98 Afghanistan’s poor record with its two previous<br />

ECF arrangements, the most recent of which expired in November 2014, caused program<br />

reviews to be suspended. The IMF said both previous ECFs fell short of their goals. 99 The<br />

newly approved ECF could give the National Unity Government additional options for managing<br />

its financial affairs during the current period of economic and fiscal stress.<br />

Energy-Sector Sustainability<br />

Afghanistan has one of the lowest rates of electrification in the world, with only an estimated<br />

25–33% of Afghans connected to the power grid. 100 Since 2002, USAID disbursed<br />

28<br />

SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL I AFGHANISTAN RECONSTRUCTION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!