2 months ago

Writ Petition (PIL) No.126 of 2014


Writ Petition (PIL) No.126 of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No.126 of 2014 Mohd. Salim Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ……. Petitioner … Respondents Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Standing Counsel, for the Union of India. Mr. N.P. Shah, Standing Counsel, for the State of Uttarakhand. Dated: March 20, 2017 Coram: Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma , J. Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. Per: Hon. Rajiv Sharma, J. Vide judgment dated 5.12.2016, this Court had issued the following mandatory directions to the respondents: - “1. Respondent nos. 3 to 7 are directed to evict the respondent nos. 8 & 9 from the Government land within a period of twelve weeks from today. 2. The respondent no.11 i.e. Central Government is directed to take final decision on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the State of Uttar Pradesh and the State of Uttarakhand, regarding the division of assets/properties on 02.02.2016, within a period of three months from today. 3. The Central Government is also directed to constitute a Ganga Management Board, under Section 80 of the Act, and make it functional within a period of three months. The Central Government shall also induct State

Proposal:Route 126 Rail Crossing Separation - Boston Metropolitan ...
April 2012 (issue 126) - The Sussex Archaeological Society
126 MatheMatics teacher | Vol. 104, No. 2 • september ... - EDC430-03
june, 2013 # 126 Revista Digital miNatura 1 -
20 l mix l 126
26 l mix l 126
P-126-05 CanadasCapital_E - National Capital Commission
2014-05-14 TomTomTrafficIndex2013annualAme-mi
2013–2014 to Museum Services
Sustainability Reporting Journey 2014.Jul 14
CCPOA's Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandate - California ...
Petitioners' Petition for Writ of Mandate Filed on - California Courts ...