01.04.2017 Views

Review of Domestic Sharing of Counterterrorism Information

Domestic_Sharing_Counterterrorism_Information_Report

Domestic_Sharing_Counterterrorism_Information_Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

facilitating counterterrorism information sharing between DOJ field and<br />

headquarters components regarding threats, litigation, criminal enforcement,<br />

intelligence, and training. Each USAO was required to complete an ATAC Plan<br />

that defined how each <strong>of</strong>fice implemented the ATAC Program, and each USAO<br />

is supposed to update its plan every 6 months. 26<br />

Beginning at a March 2010 ATAC training event and continuing<br />

thereafter at training events, the ATAC National Program Coordinator<br />

instructed the ATAC Coordinators to coordinate their efforts with other entities<br />

within their jurisdiction to reduce duplication as it pertained to convening the<br />

committee to share counterterrorism information. For example, the USAO may<br />

not need to maintain its own distribution list for sharing counterterrorism<br />

information if the fusion center provides the primary information sharing<br />

responsibilities for national security matters within the district. Nonetheless,<br />

the USAO must remain a full-time participant with the agencies leading<br />

counterterrorism information sharing efforts and be willing to certify that the<br />

USAO is actively engaged in information sharing. Similarly, if the JTTF in the<br />

USAO’s district conducts effective meetings and trainings that include the<br />

same law enforcement partners as the ATAC, then the USAO is not required to<br />

conduct duplicative ATAC meetings or trainings. However, the ATAC<br />

Coordinator should have a substantial role in developing the agenda,<br />

presenting information, and participating in the JTTF meeting or training.<br />

To assess the USAOs’ efforts to reduce the potential duplication between<br />

ATAC meetings and those <strong>of</strong> their partners, the DOJ OIG reviewed the 2006<br />

and the most recent version <strong>of</strong> the ATAC plans for the USAOs located within<br />

eight FBI field division jurisdictions. 27 The DOJ OIG found that half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

USAOs’ ATAC Plans had not been updated for nearly 10 years (from the initial<br />

submission in 2006 until the DOJ OIG requested them). As a result, the DOJ<br />

OIG was unable to determine the evolution <strong>of</strong> the ATACs and the USAOs’<br />

efforts to reduce the potentially unnecessary duplication <strong>of</strong> counterterrorism<br />

information sharing.<br />

26 The ATAC Plan sets forth required objectives that must be achieved in each district. These objectives<br />

include defining the duties and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the ATAC Coordinator and other USAO personnel who<br />

assist on counterterrorism matters, ensuring that the USAO has established a mechanism for effectively<br />

distributing time-sensitive information throughout the district, outlining collaboration between the ATAC<br />

Coordinator and DOJ’s National Security Division, and ensuring the USAO has a plan for convening the<br />

ATAC.<br />

27 We requested the most recent ATAC Plans for the USAOs located in the headquarter cities <strong>of</strong> the FBI<br />

field divisions we visited. The ATAC Plans for six <strong>of</strong> the USAOs were dated September 2015, one was<br />

dated April 2013, and one was not dated. We did not speak to the ATAC Coordinators about the plans<br />

because we were not informed <strong>of</strong> them until after our site visits.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!