31.07.2017 Views

Liverpool Law Aug 2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hackathon<br />

The Online Courts Hackathon<br />

The online Courts Hackathon organised by the Society for Computers<br />

and <strong>Law</strong> and Legal Geek represented a brilliant opportunity to bring<br />

the the innovation and creativity of the UK’s burgeoning tech sector<br />

to bear on one of the thorniest problems of our age for the Legal<br />

Profession. Moving towards delivering justice online presents a major<br />

opportunity and also a major challenge. How do we ensure that the<br />

interests of parties are maintained, that those who are not<br />

comfortable with technology do not feel disadvantaged, that those for<br />

whom English is a second or third language still get the help and<br />

guidance that they need, that parties feel that they are receiving<br />

Justice and the online equivalent of their “day in court” where their<br />

matter is listened to and given due consideration? Balance that with<br />

the aim of improving access to Justice, helping the 9 out of ten people<br />

who have a legal issue or problem but who never get anywhere near a<br />

lawyer or a court for fear of costs, complexity or even just time? A<br />

major issue but one with unlimited potential to deliver access to<br />

justice to those who really need it, and to make legal services<br />

accessible for all.<br />

So the challenge, or rather eight of them formulated by the organisers of<br />

this hackathon, were focused around develop a system to help deliver an<br />

online court that could help with any one or more of Form Filling,<br />

Order Drafting, Online Hearing, Argument building, Outcome<br />

Prediction, Negotiation and settlement, Dispute Classification and<br />

bundles for hearings. Teams were invited to enter and develop a concept<br />

and demonstration for potential systems, all against the clock.<br />

The venue was the University of <strong>Law</strong>, Moorgate, with over 200<br />

competitors forming thirty teams. At fairly short notice, the <strong>Law</strong> Society<br />

had formed a joint team with Wavelength <strong>Law</strong>, and arrived at the<br />

previously “Secret” venue with enough supplies to last the 24 hours of<br />

the hackathon and relieved to see that there was a Tesco Express next<br />

door that would no doubt be relied on heavily by all of the competitors<br />

during the coming endeavours. From 11am competitors began to<br />

assemble, with teams from Oxford & Cambridge University as well as<br />

entries from firms like Pinsent Masons who arrived with a large amount<br />

of specialist IT equipment, Linklaters, Kennedys who arrived with 3<br />

coders that they had flown in from India, and even Australian firm<br />

Gilbert & Tobin who had flown a team in specially from Sydney.<br />

After a briefing from President of the Society of Computers and <strong>Law</strong><br />

Rirchard Susskind, along with comments from the Chief Executive of<br />

Her Majesty’s Court Service, the basis of the 8 challenges were revealed<br />

for the first time. Crucially, while detailing the substance, it was made<br />

clear that teams should not feel limited by each individual challenge. So<br />

if your solution covered several areas of the challenges, such as<br />

delivering an online hearing system that also managed negotiations and<br />

producing bundles for the parties, this was not only permissible but<br />

positively encouraged. So the green flag was in effect waved at 1pm,<br />

with pizzas organised along with a breakfast at 8am before tools were to<br />

be downed at 9am when pitches would commence.<br />

Due to the volume of competitors it would impractical to have 30<br />

pitches in the main hall, so there was a first round with teams split into 3<br />

rooms of ten with their 4 minute pitches screened by judges to whittle it<br />

down to 3 teams from each room, and a final round of 9 teams pitching<br />

for 5 minutes in the main room where the Lord Chief Justice and the<br />

Chief Executive of HMCTS were in attendance.<br />

After some deliberations, the joint <strong>Law</strong> Society/Wavelength team<br />

developed a system put forward by Mark O’Grady, the sole coder on the<br />

team, that operated using the Amazon "Alexa" system, as well as via<br />

mobile App and website, allowing for verbal interaction around a<br />

housing disrepair issue, with a system that listened to the problem, noted<br />

the evidence, drafted a letter to a landlord, kept track of replies and next<br />

steps and made recommendations on going to the Housing<br />

Ombudsman, Court or finding a solicitor where it would recommend a<br />

range of specialists who could handle it for a fixed fee, and a bundle of<br />

evidence was then available to help the solicitor or support court<br />

proceedings. So we covered about 4 of the 8 areas within the challenge.<br />

Furthermore the system was built around helping the user, not<br />

necessarily directing them to Court if it wasn’t the most effective<br />

resolution for them. Indeed, if services could be provided but the matter<br />

kept out of Court while the user is satisfied and has received real<br />

practical help and support, everyone is a winner with the user departing<br />

happily and the Court’s resources being saved.<br />

<strong>Law</strong> Society Director of Legal and Regulatory Policy, Sophia Adams<br />

Bhatti was integral in putting a <strong>Law</strong> Society team together with<br />

Wavelength <strong>Law</strong> at very short notice. She presented both the first round<br />

pitch and the winning pitch excellently, proving to be a polished<br />

unflappable speaker who contributed to a presentation that talked about<br />

people and their problems and how our system could help them, which<br />

seemed to have a positive impact on the judging panel. We progressed<br />

through the first round even though an AV issue meant that the room<br />

could not hear our pre – recorded video of the interaction with Alexa<br />

that had been prepared. However the supportive comments from other<br />

competitors started to raise our hopes, and the final presentation was<br />

seamless, with everyone able to hear COLIN (abbreviation of “Court<br />

On Line”) and the interaction with “Steve”, our hypothetical client. It<br />

was still a surprise though to hear the final words that Wavelength and<br />

the <strong>Law</strong> Society were winners, with the award presented by Lord Chief<br />

Justice Thomas.<br />

Amongst the busy social media traffic afterwards, HMCTS tweeted<br />

about the victory, which was retweeted by Cabinet Secretary and Head<br />

of the Civil Service Sir Jeremy Heywood. Clearly eyes had been focused<br />

on the Hackathon. Now we have to ask if COLIN will become a reality?<br />

Peter Wright<br />

Digital<strong>Law</strong>UK<br />

Wavelength - The <strong>Law</strong> Society team

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!