13.12.2012 Views

The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity

The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity

The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lasers and a large enough sail, even a manned interstellar<br />

mission could be mounted on this basis. 96<br />

Recently, another variation on the space sail theme has<br />

been proposed: the magnetic sail, or magsail. One form<br />

<strong>of</strong> this would be a loop <strong>of</strong> superconducting wire reeled<br />

out from a spacecraft in which a current was made <strong>to</strong><br />

flow. Once started, the current would continue cycling<br />

around the loop indefinitely, because a superconduc<strong>to</strong>r<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers no resistance. <strong>The</strong> magnetic field generated by the<br />

current loop would interact with charged particles in the<br />

solar wind <strong>to</strong> impart momentum <strong>to</strong> the magsail and thus<br />

accelerate the spacecraft in the direction <strong>of</strong> the wind. At<br />

roughly the distance <strong>of</strong> Earth from the Sun, this would<br />

be sufficient over time for the magsail <strong>to</strong> reach speeds <strong>of</strong><br />

9, 320, 321<br />

several hundred km/s.<br />

Space Shuttle<br />

See article, pages 396–401.<br />

space-sickness<br />

See space motion sickness.<br />

space simula<strong>to</strong>r<br />

A device that simulates conditions in space and is used<br />

for testing equipment and training programs.<br />

space station<br />

A large orbiting structure in which humans can live and<br />

work for extended periods. <strong>The</strong> concept goes back at least<br />

as far as a tale called “<strong>The</strong> Brick Moon,” written by<br />

Edward Everett Hale just after the American Civil War.<br />

Konstantin Tsiolkovsky tackled the idea more technically<br />

in a 1895 science fiction s<strong>to</strong>ry and in 1903 expanded<br />

his description <strong>to</strong> include rotation for artificial gravity,<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> solar energy, and even a space greenhouse with<br />

a closed ecosystem. In 1923, Hermann Oberth coined<br />

the term “space station” <strong>to</strong> describe an orbiting outpost<br />

that would serve as the starting point for flights <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Moon and Mars. Five years later, Guido von Pirquet considered<br />

a system <strong>of</strong> three stations—one in a near orbit,<br />

one more distant, and a transit station in an intermediate<br />

elliptical orbit <strong>to</strong> link the other two—that he suggested<br />

might serve as refueling depots for deep space flights. <strong>The</strong><br />

notion <strong>of</strong> a rotating wheel-shaped station was introduced<br />

in 1929 by Herman Noordung in his Das Problem der<br />

Befahrung des Weltraums (<strong>The</strong> Problem <strong>of</strong> Space Flight).<br />

He called his 30-m-diameter station “Wohnrad” (Living<br />

Wheel) and suggested that it be placed in geostationary<br />

orbit.<br />

In the 1950s, Wernher von Braun worked with Collier’s<br />

magazine (see Collier’s Space Program) and Walt Disney<br />

Studios <strong>to</strong> produce articles and documentaries on spaceflight.<br />

In them, he described an updated version <strong>of</strong> Noor-<br />

space station 395<br />

dung’s wheel, enlarged <strong>to</strong> a diameter <strong>of</strong> 76 m and reached<br />

by reusable winged spacecraft. Von Braun saw the station<br />

as an Earth-observation post, a labora<strong>to</strong>ry, and a springboard<br />

for lunar and Mars excursions. Later in the same<br />

decade, the dream slowly began <strong>to</strong> turn in<strong>to</strong> reality. In<br />

1959, a NASA committee recommended that a space station<br />

be established before a trip <strong>to</strong> the Moon, and the<br />

House <strong>of</strong> Representatives Space Committee declared a<br />

space station a logical follow-on <strong>to</strong> the Mercury Project.<br />

As it transpired, the <strong>Apollo</strong> lunar program preempted the<br />

goal <strong>of</strong> building an American space station in the early<br />

1960s, although in 1969, the year <strong>Apollo</strong> 11 landed on<br />

the moon, NASA proposed a 100-person permanent<br />

space station <strong>to</strong> be completed by 1975. Known as Space<br />

Base, it was envisioned as a labora<strong>to</strong>ry for scientific and<br />

industrial experiments and as a home port for nuclearpowered<br />

tugs designed <strong>to</strong> carry people and supplies <strong>to</strong> an<br />

outpost on the Moon. NASA realized that the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

resupplying a space station using expendable rockets<br />

would quickly exceed the station’s construction cost. A<br />

reusable spacecraft—the Space Shuttle—was the obvious<br />

solution. <strong>The</strong> Shuttle would ferry up the people and the<br />

supplies needed for a long stay in space, and ferry back<br />

down people and the industrial products and experiment<br />

samples they made on the station. But economic and<br />

political priorities shifted during the <strong>Apollo</strong> era, and,<br />

despite <strong>Apollo</strong>’s success, NASA’s annual budgets suffered<br />

dramatic cuts beginning in the mid-1960s. Because <strong>of</strong><br />

this, plans for a permanent space station were deferred<br />

until after the Shuttle was flying.<br />

Meanwhile, the Soviets, having lost the race <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Moon, focused instead on setting up a permanent human<br />

presence in orbit. Throughout the 1970s they launched a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> small, pioneering Salyut space stations and then,<br />

in 1986, began assembly <strong>of</strong> the multi-module Mir.<br />

NASA deferred post-<strong>Apollo</strong> station efforts <strong>to</strong> the 1980s,<br />

with the notable exception <strong>of</strong> Skylab. When the last Skylab<br />

crew headed home in February 1974, NASA proposed<br />

sending a Shuttle <strong>to</strong> boost the station—a converted Saturn<br />

V third stage—<strong>to</strong> a higher orbit, and even refurbishing<br />

it for further use. However, delays <strong>to</strong> the Shuttle program<br />

combined with greater-than-expected solar activity (which<br />

expanded Earth’s atmosphere) hastened Skylab’s fall from<br />

orbit.<br />

In response <strong>to</strong> budgetary pressures and the magnitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> the task <strong>of</strong> building a large permanent space station,<br />

NASA began <strong>to</strong> explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> international<br />

cooperation. American and Soviet negotia<strong>to</strong>rs discussed<br />

joint Shuttle-Salyut missions as an outgrowth <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

manned American-Russian space effort, the <strong>Apollo</strong>-<br />

Soyuz Test Project in 1975. NASA <strong>of</strong>fered the Shuttle<br />

for carrying crews and cargo <strong>to</strong> and from Salyut and in<br />

(continued on page 401)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!