The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity
The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity
The Complete Book of Spaceflight: From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
lasers and a large enough sail, even a manned interstellar<br />
mission could be mounted on this basis. 96<br />
Recently, another variation on the space sail theme has<br />
been proposed: the magnetic sail, or magsail. One form<br />
<strong>of</strong> this would be a loop <strong>of</strong> superconducting wire reeled<br />
out from a spacecraft in which a current was made <strong>to</strong><br />
flow. Once started, the current would continue cycling<br />
around the loop indefinitely, because a superconduc<strong>to</strong>r<br />
<strong>of</strong>fers no resistance. <strong>The</strong> magnetic field generated by the<br />
current loop would interact with charged particles in the<br />
solar wind <strong>to</strong> impart momentum <strong>to</strong> the magsail and thus<br />
accelerate the spacecraft in the direction <strong>of</strong> the wind. At<br />
roughly the distance <strong>of</strong> Earth from the Sun, this would<br />
be sufficient over time for the magsail <strong>to</strong> reach speeds <strong>of</strong><br />
9, 320, 321<br />
several hundred km/s.<br />
Space Shuttle<br />
See article, pages 396–401.<br />
space-sickness<br />
See space motion sickness.<br />
space simula<strong>to</strong>r<br />
A device that simulates conditions in space and is used<br />
for testing equipment and training programs.<br />
space station<br />
A large orbiting structure in which humans can live and<br />
work for extended periods. <strong>The</strong> concept goes back at least<br />
as far as a tale called “<strong>The</strong> Brick Moon,” written by<br />
Edward Everett Hale just after the American Civil War.<br />
Konstantin Tsiolkovsky tackled the idea more technically<br />
in a 1895 science fiction s<strong>to</strong>ry and in 1903 expanded<br />
his description <strong>to</strong> include rotation for artificial gravity,<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> solar energy, and even a space greenhouse with<br />
a closed ecosystem. In 1923, Hermann Oberth coined<br />
the term “space station” <strong>to</strong> describe an orbiting outpost<br />
that would serve as the starting point for flights <strong>to</strong> the<br />
Moon and Mars. Five years later, Guido von Pirquet considered<br />
a system <strong>of</strong> three stations—one in a near orbit,<br />
one more distant, and a transit station in an intermediate<br />
elliptical orbit <strong>to</strong> link the other two—that he suggested<br />
might serve as refueling depots for deep space flights. <strong>The</strong><br />
notion <strong>of</strong> a rotating wheel-shaped station was introduced<br />
in 1929 by Herman Noordung in his Das Problem der<br />
Befahrung des Weltraums (<strong>The</strong> Problem <strong>of</strong> Space Flight).<br />
He called his 30-m-diameter station “Wohnrad” (Living<br />
Wheel) and suggested that it be placed in geostationary<br />
orbit.<br />
In the 1950s, Wernher von Braun worked with Collier’s<br />
magazine (see Collier’s Space Program) and Walt Disney<br />
Studios <strong>to</strong> produce articles and documentaries on spaceflight.<br />
In them, he described an updated version <strong>of</strong> Noor-<br />
space station 395<br />
dung’s wheel, enlarged <strong>to</strong> a diameter <strong>of</strong> 76 m and reached<br />
by reusable winged spacecraft. Von Braun saw the station<br />
as an Earth-observation post, a labora<strong>to</strong>ry, and a springboard<br />
for lunar and Mars excursions. Later in the same<br />
decade, the dream slowly began <strong>to</strong> turn in<strong>to</strong> reality. In<br />
1959, a NASA committee recommended that a space station<br />
be established before a trip <strong>to</strong> the Moon, and the<br />
House <strong>of</strong> Representatives Space Committee declared a<br />
space station a logical follow-on <strong>to</strong> the Mercury Project.<br />
As it transpired, the <strong>Apollo</strong> lunar program preempted the<br />
goal <strong>of</strong> building an American space station in the early<br />
1960s, although in 1969, the year <strong>Apollo</strong> 11 landed on<br />
the moon, NASA proposed a 100-person permanent<br />
space station <strong>to</strong> be completed by 1975. Known as Space<br />
Base, it was envisioned as a labora<strong>to</strong>ry for scientific and<br />
industrial experiments and as a home port for nuclearpowered<br />
tugs designed <strong>to</strong> carry people and supplies <strong>to</strong> an<br />
outpost on the Moon. NASA realized that the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
resupplying a space station using expendable rockets<br />
would quickly exceed the station’s construction cost. A<br />
reusable spacecraft—the Space Shuttle—was the obvious<br />
solution. <strong>The</strong> Shuttle would ferry up the people and the<br />
supplies needed for a long stay in space, and ferry back<br />
down people and the industrial products and experiment<br />
samples they made on the station. But economic and<br />
political priorities shifted during the <strong>Apollo</strong> era, and,<br />
despite <strong>Apollo</strong>’s success, NASA’s annual budgets suffered<br />
dramatic cuts beginning in the mid-1960s. Because <strong>of</strong><br />
this, plans for a permanent space station were deferred<br />
until after the Shuttle was flying.<br />
Meanwhile, the Soviets, having lost the race <strong>to</strong> the<br />
Moon, focused instead on setting up a permanent human<br />
presence in orbit. Throughout the 1970s they launched a<br />
series <strong>of</strong> small, pioneering Salyut space stations and then,<br />
in 1986, began assembly <strong>of</strong> the multi-module Mir.<br />
NASA deferred post-<strong>Apollo</strong> station efforts <strong>to</strong> the 1980s,<br />
with the notable exception <strong>of</strong> Skylab. When the last Skylab<br />
crew headed home in February 1974, NASA proposed<br />
sending a Shuttle <strong>to</strong> boost the station—a converted Saturn<br />
V third stage—<strong>to</strong> a higher orbit, and even refurbishing<br />
it for further use. However, delays <strong>to</strong> the Shuttle program<br />
combined with greater-than-expected solar activity (which<br />
expanded Earth’s atmosphere) hastened Skylab’s fall from<br />
orbit.<br />
In response <strong>to</strong> budgetary pressures and the magnitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> the task <strong>of</strong> building a large permanent space station,<br />
NASA began <strong>to</strong> explore the possibility <strong>of</strong> international<br />
cooperation. American and Soviet negotia<strong>to</strong>rs discussed<br />
joint Shuttle-Salyut missions as an outgrowth <strong>of</strong> the first<br />
manned American-Russian space effort, the <strong>Apollo</strong>-<br />
Soyuz Test Project in 1975. NASA <strong>of</strong>fered the Shuttle<br />
for carrying crews and cargo <strong>to</strong> and from Salyut and in<br />
(continued on page 401)