HIS 103 Week 4 Discussion The Global Trader (Ashford)

HIS 103 Week 4 Discussion The
Global Trader (Ashford)
BUY HERE⬊
https://www.homeworkmade.com/his-
103-week-4-discussion-the-globaltrader-ashford/
HIS 103 Week 4 Discussion The Global Trader (Ashford)
The Global Trader. 1 st Post Due by Day 3. You are a trader on the Silk Road. You can be Chinese,
Mongolian, Arabian, Byzantine, or Venetian. Your job is to gain access to spices, incense, glassware, and
other commodities the elite demand. Remember that trade in this age has followed the old contours of gift
exchange (items intended for elite consumption and redistribution in order to solidify political alliances).
What if you made these goods available to a broader audience? What if you took the profit made
transporting these goods and used it to leverage business growth against native and foreign competitors?
For you to succeed in this scheme, you must get eliminate of some of the middle men. Then, you must
secure alternative safe passages to the main caravan hubs in central Asia. Will you need naval power to
accomplish this bold and audacious plan? Consider your options wisely.
Present an update on the status of your plan to usurp the silk trade from a powerful and cutthroat
competitor. Use words with precision and skill as you present your step-by-step plan to gain control over
the silk trade. Present an overview that makes an explicit argument. This will serve as your thesis
statement. Then, in a systematic and logical fashion, lay out your bold and cunning strategy in your initial
post of at least 300 words. Consult the Week 4 Civilization Tour for additional resources.
Think about these issues as you draw up your proposal:
An adventure of this scale is costly. How do you propose to raise the money without incurring the
wrath
of your already heavily taxed subjects?
Do you plan to use military forces for this operation?
o Ifso,areyouaskingforspecializedeliteforcestoplaytheroleofmerchantsindisguise?
How do you propose to usurp trade from a rival empire that marks up the price of luxury goods
that arrive in your empire? They are the cause of your negative balance of trade, and the time has
come to bypass the middleman. Unfortunately, diplomacy has failed to reach a negotiated settlement
because the stakes are too high for each side to make concessions.
Do you seek out religious minorities within your rival’s domain and empower them in an effort to
politically or economically undermine your adversary? Is there a potential for backlash?
Do you seek to take advantage of social or economic divisions within your rival’s domain in an
effort to politically or economically undermine your adversary? How certain are you that
encouraging dissent will weaken, rather than strengthen, your rival’s hand?
Do you dispatch envoys to China in an effort to monopolize the export of goods such as silks,
spices, and exotic herbs? Who will you send?
Prior to completing your post, please review the following resources:
o Fassnacht, M., Fink, S., Jackson, R., and Warn, M. (2016). The anatomy of a discussion board.
Retrieved from https://www.criticalthinkingandreasoning.org/infographic
o Fassnacht, M., Fink, S., Jackson, R., and Warn, M. (2016). Critical thinking guide to skillful
reasoning. Retrieved from https://www.criticalthinkingandreasoning.org/evaluating-critical-

thinking
Your initial post should be a minimum of 300 words, due by Day 3. Remember that you are drawing
up a proposal. Be persuasive by supplying specific examples that are drawn from course materials,
sources produced by your own research, or sources included in the collaborative annotated
bibliography to support your position. Cite all sources according to APA style guidelines as outlined
in the Ashford Writing Center, using both in-text citations and providing full references at the
bottom of your post.
Guided Responses: Respond to two colleagues with cogent but succinct critiques of at least 150
words. Keep in mind that these people are potential competitors or allies! Do you wish to form an
alliance, or do you wish to offer false counsel to sabotage their plans?