Clarksville- Main File

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FIGURE 6: Average Earnings Trends (adjusted in 2015 dollars), 2010-2015 Clarksville Montgomery County 10-county region $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: Emsi Dataset 2017.3 AVERAGE WEEKLY WAGE > $805–$871 > $723–$805 > $618–$721 > $566–$618 Christian Todd Logan Trigg Stewart Montgomery Robertson Cheatham Houston Tennessee: $912 Dickison U.S.: $1,031 14 COMPREHENSIVE LABOR ANALYSIS: CLARKSVILLE-MONTGOMERY COUNTY
POVERTY Poverty rates are one measure used to gauge the health of regional economies because it is expected that as the economy grows, so will employment and income growth. Using federal poverty guidelines, Figure 7 illustrates that poverty rates in the past five years have generally edged downward throughout the region. Poverty in the 10-county region stands at 16.5% while the City of Clarksville’s overall poverty rate is 17.4%. Montgomery County has one of the lowest rates in the region at 13.4%. Christian County has the highest at 20.3% and Cheatham County has the lowest at 10.6%. Poverty is especially hurtful to children as they can be greatly impacted by hazardous or unhealthy living conditions, poor nutrition, and other risk factors associated with poverty. These risk factors may impact physical or emotional development, which may further reduce the acquisition of skills required for a career and a steady income. Roughly one in four persons under the age of 18 in the 10-county region is living in poverty. The region’s childhood poverty rate was approximately 24% in 2015. Montgomery County’s childhood poverty rate was 18% the same year—far less than the surrounding region. Houston County’s childhood poverty rate was the highest, at nearly 30% (see Figure 8). FIGURE 7: Poverty Rates by Geographic Area (2010-2015) FIGURE 8: Childhood Poverty Rates by Geographic Area (2010-2015) 2010 2015 2010 2015 City of Clarksville City of Clarksville 17.4 24.8 10-county 10-county 16.5 23.9 Montgomery County Christian County Logan County Todd County Trigg County Cheatham County Dickson County Houston County Robertson County Stewart County Montgomery County 13.4 18.4 Christian County 20.3 28.9 Logan County 15.5 24.3 Todd County 19.3 28.1 15.1 Trigg County 26.5 Cheatham County 10.6 16.3 16.4 Dickson County 23.3 Houston County 19.5 29.9 Robertson County 12.3 18.4 15.5 Stewart County 25.2 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates Demographic Profile 15
Page 1 and 2: COMPREHENSIVE LABOR ANALYSIS Clarks
Page 3 and 4: 61 INDUSTRY CLUSTER AND SUPPLY CHAI
Page 5 and 6: INTRODUCTION Over the past five yea
Page 7 and 8: DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE The City of Cla
Page 9 and 10: The map below illustrates total mig
Page 11 and 12: TABLE 2: Generation Breakdown, 10-c
Page 13: INCOME Income is generally used as
Page 17 and 18: STAKEHOLDER THEMES In August and Se
Page 19 and 20: Below are the labor force figures p
Page 21 and 22: FIGURE 11: Labor Force Participatio
Page 23 and 24: COMMUTING PATTERNS Commuting patter
Page 25 and 26: TABLE 6: Where Residents from Montg
Page 27 and 28: sector. Figure 16 above shows resid
Page 29 and 30: public transportation, broadband av
Page 31 and 32: TABLE 7: Job Performance 2011 2016
Page 33 and 34: FIGURE 19: Montgomery County Indust
Page 35 and 36: TABLE 8: Number of Payrolled Busine
Page 37 and 38: TABLE 9: Occupation Groups with Mos
Page 39 and 40: REAL-TIME DATA KEY HIGHLIGHTS Suppl
Page 41 and 42: COMPENSATION KEY HIGHLIGHTS • Ave
Page 43 and 44: STAKEHOLDER THEMES • 50% of respo
Page 45 and 46: The May 2017 Soldier For Life Surve
Page 47 and 48: TABLE 12: MOC to SOC Crosswalk for
Page 49 and 50: MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS ANNUAL
Page 51 and 52: MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS ANNUAL
Page 53 and 54: • Military spouses most likely ma
Page 55 and 56: FIGURE 27: Higher Education Institu
Page 57 and 58: MEETING THE NEEDS OF INDUSTRY Some
Page 59 and 60: SOC CODE SOC DESCRIPTION 2016 JOBS
Page 61 and 62: INDUSTRY CLUSTER AND SUPPLY CHAIN A
Page 63 and 64: INDUSTRY CLUSTERS Industry clusters
Page 65 and 66:
SUPPLY CHAIN ANALYSIS Supply chain
Page 67 and 68:
TABLE 18: Purchases of Services by
Page 69 and 70:
PEER REGION ANALYSIS Clarksville is
Page 71 and 72:
TABLE 20: Duo Peer Regions, MSAs, M
Page 73 and 74:
TABLE 22: Individual Peer Regions,
Page 75 and 76:
RECOMMENDATIONS INCREASE COMMUNICAT
Page 77 and 78:
• Encourage engineering internshi
Page 79 and 80:
• Numerous golf courses in the ar
Page 81 and 82:
economic development professionals
Page 83 and 84:
APPENDIX II: INVESTMENT IN CLARKSVI
Page 85 and 86:
2) Is your firm in one of the follo
Page 87 and 88:
• Friendly people • Good Locati
Page 89 and 90:
• Seems like a good effort to rec
Page 91 and 92:
• some bad areas of congestion
Page 93 and 94:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Infantr
Page 95 and 96:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Logisti
Page 97 and 98:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Field A
Page 99 and 100:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Medical
Page 101 and 102:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Supply
Page 103 and 104:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Signal/
Page 105 and 106:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Militar
Page 107 and 108:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Electro
Page 109 and 110:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Armor I
Page 111 and 112:
MOC SOC CODE SOC TITLE JOBS Intelli
Page 113:
For more information please contact
show all

Clarksville- Main File

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?