07.02.2018 Views

Pittwater Life August 2017 Issue

Local Election Countdown. DAs Process Overhauled. Gallop Poll. Taste of the Beaches.

Local Election Countdown. DAs Process Overhauled. Gallop Poll. Taste of the Beaches.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

travel costs that were for private<br />

purposes. The amendments will<br />

provide confidence in the tax<br />

system by ensuring tax deductions<br />

are better targeted.”<br />

Tightening of rental deductions<br />

2 – depreciation of plant<br />

and equipment: Also abolished<br />

but from budget night on 9<br />

May <strong>2017</strong> is the ability to claim<br />

deductions for the depreciation<br />

of previously used plant and<br />

equipment.<br />

Again, quoting from the<br />

exposure draft: “The intended<br />

effect of these amendments is<br />

that certain entities will only<br />

be able to deduct the decline in<br />

value of depreciating assets used<br />

in gaining or producing assessable<br />

income from residential<br />

premises if the asset is acquired<br />

new for that purpose. Broadly,<br />

the amendments ensure that<br />

entities cannot claim overstated<br />

deductions relating to their<br />

rental properties by ‘refreshing’<br />

the values of previously used<br />

depreciating assets used or installed<br />

ready for use in relation<br />

to those properties.”<br />

The reference above to ‘certain<br />

entities’ is that big business (specifically:<br />

companies, public offer<br />

superannuation funds and unit<br />

trusts with 300+ unitholders) will<br />

still be able to depreciate their<br />

plant and equipment and continue<br />

to claim for travel expenses.<br />

In both cases it appears it was<br />

the mums and dads who were<br />

‘rorting’ the system and who presumably<br />

will be happy enough<br />

to retain negative gearing in its<br />

general form despite the loss of<br />

deductibility of these two items.<br />

This is rubbish policy, as it runs<br />

contrary to fundamental principles<br />

of tax law and has its roots<br />

in populism. What we don’t know<br />

at this point is will the government<br />

stop here or is this the start<br />

of ‘a death by a thousand cuts’ to<br />

negative gearing?<br />

Retention of the 20k<br />

instant asset write-off: There’s<br />

nothing really new here, it<br />

obviously keeps testing well in<br />

focus groups and is back for<br />

another year at least. From the<br />

ATO website: “On 9 May <strong>2017</strong>,<br />

the Government announced an<br />

extension to the 2015-16 Budget<br />

measure providing an instant<br />

asset write-off provision for<br />

small business. Small businesses<br />

can immediately deduct the<br />

business portion of most assets<br />

if they cost less than $20,000<br />

and were purchased between<br />

7:30PM on 12 May 2015 and<br />

30 June 2018. This deduction<br />

can be used for each asset that<br />

costs less than $20,000, whether<br />

new or second-hand. You can<br />

claim the deduction through<br />

your tax return, in the year the<br />

asset was first used or installed<br />

ready for use.”<br />

The franking credit debacle:<br />

You may have caught the headlines<br />

about the reduction in<br />

company taxes – currently 27.5%<br />

(down from 30%) for businesses<br />

turning over less than $10 million<br />

in 2016/17. The government<br />

is aiming for a 25% company tax<br />

rate across the board; however,<br />

this has not been legislated yet.<br />

I’ve written about this before.<br />

The thing with small business<br />

is that most earnings are usually<br />

taken out as wages or as<br />

dividends and therefore taxed<br />

at marginal personal rates, not<br />

corporate rates. What people<br />

are realising about these tax<br />

cuts is that if you paid tax at<br />

30% but only obtain dividend<br />

imputation at 27.5%, there is<br />

a net 2.5% give back to the<br />

government of unused franking<br />

credits. In other words, not really<br />

a tax cut at all. The problem<br />

is starting to be anticipated up<br />

the chain, as bigger turnover<br />

companies see the potential<br />

for this franking credit wastage<br />

and shareholders such as large<br />

superannuation funds start lobbying<br />

the government.<br />

If you are in business and use<br />

a corporate entity presumably<br />

your accountant will be the one<br />

grappling with this problem. Be<br />

thankful it’s them and not you.<br />

Business <strong>Life</strong><br />

Brian Hrnjak B Bus CPA (FPS) is a Director of GHR Accounting<br />

Group Pty Ltd, Certified Practising Accountants. Offices at:<br />

Suite 12, Ground Floor, 20 Bungan Street Mona Vale NSW 2103<br />

and Shop 8, 9 – 15 Central Ave Manly NSW 2095,<br />

Telephone: 02 9979-4300, Webs: www.ghr.com.au and<br />

www.altre.com.au Email: brian@ghr.com.au<br />

These comments are of a general nature only and are not<br />

intended as a substitute for professional advice.<br />

The Local Voice Since 1991<br />

AUGUST <strong>2017</strong> 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!